Comments by "Ragnarok" (@mastermariner490) on "Russia Has “Upper Hand” In Donbas l Kyiv Accuses Putin Of “Genocide” l Chechen Leader Warns Poland" video.

A day without being troll for Prigozhin is a day wasted -you
6
Untill Ukraine recives MLRS and HIMARS
5
@pinyaposka9671 They have run out of missiles,you dont see to many iskanders fired anymore?And kalibr are fired from submarines now,not cruisers or frigates. Even the russian themselves say they will struggle producing more if this goes on for much longer. And Russias missiles have 40-50% failure rate
4
Once MLRS and HIMARS gets to Ukraine its a fair fight again
3
@pinyaposka9671 They dont need large numbers if used right MLRS and HIMARS are precision guided munitions,and can take out artillery and valuable targets from a longer distance. Something Russia have the advantage of now with unguided rocket artillery,ballistic missiles and cruise missiles fired from the black sea.
3
@pinyaposka9671 Most russian artillery is upgraded soviet era,just like Ukraines,nothing new there And no tanks are immune to atgms from sideshots,the thing is without infantry support or air support,that is NATOs doctrine,you are sitting ducks
3
15000 war crimes in OSCE reports says otherwise Nice try though troll See you in the war tribunal in Hague
2
@justdude2775 GMLRS are precion guided muntion,Einstein,with accuracy Russians can dream off with their 60s technology guidance You also have the ground launced small diameter bomb You also have with anti tank submunition And Himars are gps guided,tell that to your intertial guided ballistic missiles
2
@pinyaposka9671 Yes thats true,but when US and NATO upgrades they upgrade to the modern battlefield,Russia however using old inertial guidance from the 1960-70s ,you wont get you far with that regards to accuracy on todays battlefield And yes we dont know,Russia have the edge now because they managed to get their artillery and reserves into Donbas before Ukraine,but we will see once the Ukrainians starts their offensive. They do still need long range missiles like MLRS
2
@mgtvnews6890 Yes we hear it all the time in the news about destroyed western equipment,oh wait,thats russian propaganda news and misinformation. TASS,russian news agency,said that Zelensky ran away when Russia invaded too,and said Moskva was missing in a storm after a fire lol Get a grip of reality Einstein
1
Whataboutism is a Cold War propaganda tactic the Soviet Union started using in the 1940s to deflect unwanted criticisms and accusations. Instead of addressing concerns or answering uncomfortable questions, Soviet leaders started replying with "What about……." and then mentioning unfavorable events in the U.S. and other parts of the Western world.
1
@omarwilliams6729 Nobody can prove anything except russian misinformation propaganda,strange The same propaganda that claimed Zelensky ran away from Kiyv when the invasion started and said that a fire was the reason why Moskva sank in the black sea. Stay brainwashed with your peanut brain
1
@pinyaposka9671 Yes inertial guidance,lol that what missiles used in the 1940s to hit targets in London fired from V2 rockets Try modern NATO missiles with GPS/INS and datalink and midcourse updates and you will understand why
1
@pinyaposka9671 Kalibr missile,Inertial guidance plus terminal Active radar homing, By satellites, DSMAC Iskander uses both,but the older versions uses only inertial guidance Rocket artillery,all inertial unguided Ukaine opened up a kalibr and iskander missile in the beginning of the war,they found technology from the 1960s used inside
1
@olympia5758 No they swapped it with tocha u and bastion from old stocks or borrowed from Belarus
1
@justdude2775 No they dont,you live in fantasy land. Kinzhal is a new missile,because Russia had to adapt to a more modern battlefield,so its only natural it uses Inertial guidance with Glonass backup for more accuray. Problem is however Russia doesnt have that many Kinzhal or zirkon missiles,majority are old upgraded soviet era missiles with 1960s guidance. The newer missiles are for defence of Russia,not a special operation in Ukraine. NATO doesnt use its newest weapons either unless they have to,and also the reason why you dont see zircon used in Ukraine,still being tested and t14 armata tanks. But NATO uses GPS/INS on all their missiles,its a nato requirement and standard,so NATO is lightyears ahead of Russia when it comes to accuracy. And many missiles also have loitering capability,datalinks and midcourse updates,something Russia dont have.
1