Comments by "" (@rogerwilco5918) on "9/11: Conspiracy theories still surround the September 11 attacks - BBC News" video.

  1. What couldn't science explain??
    16
  2.  @dunexapa1016  no consideration for heat and the strength of steel? Kinda strange.
    3
  3.  @wrotedog  what?????? Could you try again in English?
    3
  4. 😂 "scientific analysis"
    2
  5.  @coolk3dat754  no, nobody "witnessed" it. See how you people see or hear what you want? Perhaps there's a pattern here...
    2
  6.  @dunexapa1016  oh, BTW, det chord isn't remote or wireless, but let's be real, I wouldn't expect you to know the first thing about what you're trying to talk about.
    2
  7.  @dunexapa1016  They would also have tio be invisible.. installed by an army of invisible ninjas or something.. using invisible wires and det chord .
    2
  8.  @dunexapa1016  for that theory to be plausible, we need magic explosives that don't go "boom".
    2
  9. They knew it was going to collapse hours before it did. Did you think that was supposed to be evidence of something?
    1
  10. Explosives that don't go "boom"? What "swab tests"? The beams were cut during the rescue/recovery. Sure, it was wired and nobody noticed 😂
    1
  11. Sources?
    1
  12.  @devourthepower007  😂 there's also a very convincing "documentary" on bigfoot.. it's on YouTube, so you know it's real.
    1
  13.  @devourthepower007  😂 and what's the "evidence"? Magic explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  14.  @devourthepower007  what a surprise, no actual evidence.. Why don't you people just come here and go "bahhhh bahhhh"?
    1
  15. Paranoia isn't evidence
    1
  16. Because there is absolutely no evidence that would suggest that.
    1
  17.  @evobase  Just so we're clear, you've got absolutely no form of evidence, and you're completely empty handed?
    1
  18.  @evobase  yeah? When did that happen?
    1
  19.  @evobase  and who told you that nonsense?
    1
  20.  @evobase  Wow! You're gonna be famous!!! What did you debunk??
    1
  21.  @evobase  where do you think you did that? I've noticed that when you idiots say "critical thinking" you mean you're literally making shit up.
    1
  22.  @evobase  I've literally been asking you to do the opposite. I've noticed people like you like to pretend you have all the answers.. right up until someone asks you a question.. then quit predictably, you have nothing.. you can almost set you watch by it.
    1
  23.  @evobase  just so we're clear, you're still completely empty handed, and you never actually "debunked" anything?
    1
  24.  @benjaminhenderson7059  they knew it was going to collapse hours before it did.. Is that supposed to be evidence of something?
    1
  25. Uh, destroyed??
    1
  26. Who said fuel "melted" anything?
    1
  27. And?
    1
  28. Where was that "proved"?
    1
  29. Yeah? Is there any actual actual evidence of your version of the truth?
    1
  30.  @DeverHB  I didn't ask why wtc7 collapsed, I asked if the other building had massive structural damage. So, the fire was put out, unlike wtc7. Again, you're trying to use ignorance as evidence.
    1
  31.  @DeverHB  I was asking because you're trying to compare 2 completely different scenarios. And you're saying it didn't have massive structural damage from part on one if the tallest buildings in the world fall on it, and they actually fought the fire and put it out. A few more than subtle differences, wouldn't you say? How about the construction of the buildings? Were they similar?
    1
  32.  @DeverHB  and did it have massive structural damage from another building falling on it?
    1
  33.  @DeverHB  I didn't ask what the report said about the fuel, I asked if it had the equivalent of 4 passenger jets worth of fuel. So, they did actually fight the fire though, huh?
    1
  34.  @DeverHB  it's appears that you're trying to use ignorance as evidence.. "I can't comprehend something, so it must be fake". Did "one meridian plaza" have 40,000 gallons of diesel fuel stored in multiple tanks? Did they even try to fight the fire, unlike wtc7? Did it have massive structural damage from a chunk of one one the worlds tallest buildings fall on it? Did the fire suppression systems work, unlike wtc7? Was it built with the same kind of structure?
    1
  35.  @dunexapa1016  😂 who told you that nonsense? And please explain your magical explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  36.  @dunexapa1016  and explosives that don't go "boom"?
    1
  37.  @DeverHB  how is it relevant how long it took them?
    1
  38.  @coolk3dat754  sorry, I've seen the videos.. no explosions.. however I did see the video of the fireman talking about secondary explosions, but if you knew your ass from a hole in the ground you would know that's not the same.
    1
  39.  @coolk3dat754  a controlled demolition has a signature daisy chain of explosions.
    1
  40.  @coolk3dat754  daisy chain is a term we use in the military when explosives are linked together, again I wouldn't expect you to understand that either.. ever play with explosives? I have.
    1
  41.  @coolk3dat754  😂 common sense would dictate that with the complete absence of the signature chain of explosions, controlled demolition is impossible.
    1
  42.  @DeverHB  they knew it was going to collapse because firefighters have seen a fire or 2, and it was left to burn unchecked for hours because it had already been evacuated.
    1
  43.  @coolk3dat754  you're presenting nonsense. You want to pretend people heard something they didn't.
    1
  44.  @jordancostello3385  try again in English
    1
  45.  @proteg3881  sources on you "3/5%" nonsense? That sounds made up to me.
    1
  46.  @Lee-wg7en  what???
    1
  47.  @RS54321  there's a huge difference between "questioning things" and making s*** up.
    1
  48.  @RS54321  I guess that all depends on what silly ideas you have rattling around in your little nutcase head.
    1
  49. @firestream93  the firefighters were talking about secondary explosions which should be expected there. Entirely different than the signature daisy chain explosions of a controlled demolition
    1
  50. What are you seeing that normal people can't see?
    1
  51. Sources?
    1
  52. It's a conspiracy theory when you have absolutely no evidence.
    1
  53. Sources? Wasn't he telling stories to kids when it happened?
    1
  54. "millions"?? Sources??
    1