Comments by "Valkyrie Z" (@Valkyri3Z) on "South Korea, UP government to build park in Ayodhya, says envoy Shin Bongkil" video.

  1. Everyone is playing cheap politics over misinterpreted history. The Korean story mentions 'Ayutha' as a place. Even if we accept it to be Ayodhya of India , we need to know the current day Ayodhya used to be called Saaket in ALL historical record. It was never Ayodhya. Right from the time of Hindu kings this place was called Saaket . Therefore its silly to twist facts. But Korea and India wants to play populist politics so everyone is fine I guess. LOL
    2
  2.  Nitin Shekhar  Who traveled to Ram's time to claim that Ram was born in Ayodhya ? Who traveled to Babar's time to claim Ram temple was destroyed?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Are you seriously THAT dumb ?
    2
  3.  Nitin Shekhar  No my dear. Even a simple Wikipedia search will tell you the FACTS. 🤣🤣 This is why the entire Ram janmabhoomi movement was a hoax.
    1
  4.  Nitin Shekhar  First you made a super dumb statement without even caring to read the Wikipedia and now you repeat your dumb question. If you know how to read Wikipedia you will know the source of the fact because ALL is mentioned in that page.
    1
  5.  @palashpalash1717  I repeat in ALL official Hindu king records the place is known as Saaket. "Saketa" is the older name for the city, attested in Sanskrit, Jain, Sanskrit, Buddhist, Greek and Chinese sources. According to Vaman Shivram Apte, the word "Saketa" is derived from the Sanskrit words Saha (with) and Aketen (houses or buildings). The Adi Purana states that Ayodhya is called Saketa "because of its magnificent buildings which had significant banners as their arms". According to Hans T. Bakker, the word may be derived from the roots sa and ketu ("with banner"); the variant name saketu is attested in the Vishnu Purana.
    1