Comments by "Valkyrie Z" (@Valkyri3Z) on "Temple a symbol of Mahatma Gandhi's pursuit for truth u0026 path for Ram Rajya: PM Narendra Modi" video.

  1. Temple of SHAME , temple of greed , temple of blood and violence. This temple is not a Ram Temple , its a SHame Temple. And how SHAMELESS you have to be to destroy a place of worship and build another place of worship there.
    4
  2.  @akshaydhamsania8324  Read the court verdict you fool. NO TEMPLE WAS DESTROYED. Court clearly said Mosque was destroyed. HAHA Only ignorant uneducated idiots like you will go to this temple. Proved again this is a temple of shame.
    2
  3.  @narendrarao2465  Read the court verdict you illiterate. No temple was destroyed ..court said the mosque was destroyed ILLEGALLY. LOL This temple is actually for illiterate fools like you.
    2
  4.  Jay Dev  TEMPLE OF SHAME HAI RAM TEMPLE. 😂😂 We are talking Babri Mosque .
    2
  5.  vipkoli  Tu KHUD PADLE gadha -- "The ruins of an ancient religious structure under an existing building do not always indicate that it was demolished by unfriendly powers" COURT CLEARLY SAID NO EVIDENCE TEMPLE WAS DESTROYED. COURT CLEARLY SAID "MOSQUE WAS DESTROYED" LOOOL
    2
  6.  vipkoli  "Demolition of the Babri Masjid and the 1949 desecration of the Babri Masjid was in violation of law" 🤣🤣 English padna aata hai ???
    2
  7.  @akshaydhamsania8324  Who is stopping you to claim Mecca and Madina ? 🤣🤣🤣 LOL you were converted to Hinduism after Aryans came to India. HAHAHA
    2
  8.  @alexturkey276  THank you. You are proving my point. Temple of shame and violence and hate.
    1
  9.  vipkoli  "Do not always indicate" MEANS it is not a proof that it was destroyed. THAT MEANS NO PROOF OF BJP STORY THAT Babar destroyed anything. Supreme court DID NOT SAY there was a temple , they said it was Non Islamic structure.
    1
  10.  @akshaydhamsania8324  SC verdict says no temple was destroyed and there is no proof that it was even a temple. It was a Non Islamic structure. LOOL However SC verdict clearly said Mosque was desecrated and destroyed illegally.
    1
  11.  vipkoli  READ the verdict if you understand English. Did Supreme Court ever say it was a Ram Temple before mosque ??? NO. SC never said Guru Nanak went to Ram Mandir , they said he went to Ayodhya. Nihangs did their puja in the mosque.
    1
  12.  vipkoli  Did the Supreme Court say the temple was destroyed to build a mosque ?? NO. There is NO PROOF. Did the Supreme Court said mosque was destroyed ?? YES.
    1
  13.  vipkoli  There is no later part. Court NEVER said there was a Ram Temple. It said a 'Non Islamic structure'. Stop spinning fairytale. And Court ALSO said there was no proof that it was destroyed to build the mosque. If you dig under your own house you can find someone else's house build 500 years ago..LOOL Its not magic , its fact. Use your brain.
    1
  14.  vipkoli  Abbe gandu , Nihang ne masjid mein puja kiya , court verdict dekh le bhakt. HAHAHA Aur Ayodhya jaane ka yeh matlab nahi usi jagah pe jana..Ayodhya mein kya koi madir nahi hai ? Gau mutra kam peeya kar..dimaag thik hoga tera..HAHAHAHAHA
    1
  15.  vipkoli  are BIMARU bhakt chup kar.🤣
    1