Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Pyotr Kurzin | Geopolitics" channel.

hahahaha keep dreaming sunshine
15
@barracuda7018 i bet you think Biden's on top of his game and is sharp eh
12
amazing how Zelensy demands every town is defended with no retreat because ofits strategic importance, then when UA does retreat sudden;y it is of no importance. How did UA's massive counteroffensive go by the way? you know, the one where Zaluzhny was given everything he wanted - and more.
2
NATO & EU will drop UA like a bad habit as soon as it no longer serves their purpose. Biden wants it to continue to Nov 2024 as 2 failed wars on his watch would be political suicide. EU countries are changing leaders at elections to ones who will no longer support Americas war, it will never join NATO or the EU due to corruption and it will never be able to pay the $$ billions to join. All the cret!n Zelensky had to do is read Kissingers quote and pay attention to the last 6 words
1
@rickybobby6527 the USA fought farmers with AK47's and sandals - and still lost. 20 years, 4 Presidents, $3 trillion, $ billions in equ left behind to replace the Taliban with . . drumroll please . . . the Taliban. you can say the same when the USA fought Vietnam and Iraq. when was the last time the USA fought an oponent of equal size? they always fight small nations on the other side of the globe who cannot defend themselves - AND STILL LOSE. this is an artillery war and UA is being supplied with all of the wests so called wonder weapons. USA kannot defeat goat herders with weapins designed in 1947. actually - tell me the last time the USA won a war - was it Grenada in 1983?
1
@JNosewicz7569 hahaha try looking at history of how the USA treats wrld leaders that they formerly befriended and supported - Manual Noriega - jail, Ngo Ding Diem - dead, Saddam hussein - dead, Muammar Gaddafi - dead, Osama bin laden - dead. the cr3tin on this video says the wests support is resolute - what has Trump said - he will no longer support UA if elected
1
@terjeoseberg990 2019 RU sent NATO & the USA a draft for security framework for Europe to avoid conflict - ignored by both. Stoltenberg is on video saying they received it. Oleksii Arestovych former muitary officer & aid to UA President is on video saying "the price for UA to join NATO is to provoke a war with RU that leads to RU defeat." Arestovych is also on video saying RU were extremely generous with concessions including withdrawel of all troops fro UA - for neutrality. Boris Johnson (UK) flew to UA and told Zelensky not to sign peace agreement. 2019 US Military commissioned the Rand Corporation to conduct surveys on how to antagonise & provoke RU who the US Army acknowledged were trying to avoid conflict. This is Americas war, a continuation of their FOREVER WARS all so US congress become $$ millionaires from kickbacks from US weapons manufacturers. Blinken & Loyd Austin - the war is good for the US economy creating jobs - & no US troops are dying. Look at Raytheons stock prices increase over the past 2 years. RU has repeatedly stated they are open for peace talks - all shot down by the USA. Had Boris Johnson not flown to UA and told Zelensky not to sigh peace - this would have ended in April 2022. Had the USA / NATO agreed to the new security framework for EU - it never would have happened. Had the USA not lied re NATO expansion it never would have happened. What did the USA do when the USSR were t put missiles in Cuba? the US illegally blockaded shipping in international waters and depth charged Soviet submarines to drive them to the surface & almost started WW3. Why does the USA have over 900 military bases around the world - encircling their so called enemies? USA has to find enemies all around the globe to justify their $$ billion annual military budget
1
@joemann2178 it is all UA has
1
@AkenValle mostly underground
1
@terjeoseberg990 in its 75 year existence NATO, the supposed guarantors of peace and stability are responsible for instigating over 100 military actions or wars around the globe - so much for it being a defensive alliance. the USA / West want to overthrow Putin so the west can rape RU of its oil, gas and mineral wealth. the west had been doing that from the break up of the USSR in 1991 until 2002 when Putin put an end to it. the EU has no minerals or resources, they must rely n their colonial rule as enslavers of other countries to obtain that countries wealth for their own use
1
@terjeoseberg990 literally 9 out of 10 people in EU & USA want the UA war to end with negotiated settlement. What do the democratically elected leaders of the so called democratic leaders of the USA & EU do? they ignore the people that they were elected to represent. why? Corrupt EU & US leaders making way too much money in kickbacks from US weapons manufacturers - Assange pointed that out
1
@joemann2178 well the USA & EU thought their illegal sanctions would collapse the RU economy in a few months & cause Putin to be overthrown. the west has failed on every front. the USA have wanted to get rid of Putin ever since 2002 when he ended the wests rape of RU's resources since 1991
1
@IamRemoWilliams hahaha keep watching CNN dkhd. RU's economy is 4th in the world and above all developed nationa according to the IMF. How is the US & EU economy looking? US netional debt reached $35 trillion yet?
1
@GolemRising RU surffering 10-1 losses ha good one, you need to stop watching CNN where Zelensky, who has lied from day 1 reports UA losses as RU and western media reorts it as fact with zero checks. You probably believe RU is using pre WW2 shovels as was reported in the WSJ. Mediazona a pro UA web site lists RU losses at 58K, meanwhile 2023 General Zaluzhny stated UA needed ANOTHER 500,000 troops. Zelensky reports UA losses at 30K so he and his g00ns can steal the wages of the dead soldiers along with ot having to pay the families compensation.
1
@Whatsthedealsquirter hahaha you believe the lies and BS on this garbge channel while ignring the realities of the battlefield
1
@Whatsthedealsquirter amazing how the majority of UA successes are always "reported by UA" and mostly with ZERO confrmation from anyone else
1
@Whatsthedealsquirter or UA and their death list would hunt me down and kill me for having a different oponion to them eh. Just as UA has, with full support of the USA, children on that kill list because they want peace. I see you are too chknsht to post your name (unlike me) so more like youare the one who knows they will be ridiculed
1
@Whatsthedealsquirter you should try watching this video - you might learn something "west admits Ukraines growing manpower crisis + the evolution of Russia's FAB-3000 bomb"
1
impact RU's black sea fleet - you mean how they hit a landing craft in dry dock?
1
@geofflepper3207 last i saw this is a land war all UA can do is shell civilians and try to destroy te Kerch bridge all for p!ssweak PR stunts. wasting precious missiles on a non military target so websites like this can crow about it. General Zaluzhny "we need ANOTHER" 500,000 troops. Zaluzhny was given everything he asked for - and more, by the west for UAs counter offensive, what a dismal failure that was
1
@JNosewicz7569 NATO doesn't have a brain in their collective heads and does everything the USA tells them. What does the USA do to other world leaders that they no longer need after they have served their purpose - Manual Noriega - jail, Ngo Dinh Diem - dead, Muammar Gaddafi - dead, Osama bin Laden - dead, Saddam Hussean - dead. do you even know of Kissingers quote about the USA that ends - to be a friend is fatal
1
@kraadnargis3294 you should try watching "Ukrainian Offensive nears 2 month mark: little left to replace heavy losses" on the New Atlas where Brian uses western media to hilite their very own lies
1
@gordonho3828 hahaha keep watching CNN. Now only had NATO built up, trained, funded & supplied weapons to UA from 2014 by NATO to NATO standards (as admitted by Angela Merkal where she stated Minsk 2 ceasefire was a sham), but Zaluzhny was given everythinghe wanted - tanks, etc, and still the counteroffensive that was supposed to reach the sea of Azob=v went nowhere
1
@EvanMichael-mj5tf Bakhmut - they left 1 road open for troops to vacate but Zelensky was dum enough to eep sending his troops there. Ask anyone with military knowledge, clearly of which you have ZERO - why go to the enemy when they come to you. Zelensky lost massive amounts of troops in Backmut, then UA lost Avdiivka which UA & NATO fortified from 2014. you want to talk about pathtic - took the USA 20 years and $3 trillion dollars to replace the Taliban with . drumroll please . . . . the Taliban. USA & west cannt defeat farmers with AK47's and sandals - take your pick out of Vietnam, Afghanisan and Iraq for starters
1
@rickybobby6527 3 goals 1/ demilitarize UA - not only are they demilitarizing UA but also all of NTO. 2/ denazify UA - most AZOV Nzi have been killed apart from those who refuse to go to the front lines or remain in political positions 3/ secure the safety of the Donbas where Poroshenko & Zelensky murdered over 14,000 from 2014-2022 - almost completed. their goals are almost completed. Its the USA who says RU wants to take over all of UA blah blah, just like Blinken saying how they planned to take Kiev in 3 days - RU withdrew from Kiev in good faith of UA signing the peace agreement in April 2022, had Boris Johnson not flown to UA and told Zeensky not to sign peace, this would have ended then. Had the USA / NATO agreed to RU's security agreement for EU in 2021 - this never would have happened, had Poroshenko & Zelensky not murdered 14,000 people in the Donbas - it never would have happeneed. so you kep watching CNN cr3t!n as you know nothing
1
@rickybobby6527 how are all of those USA / NATO wonder weapons going? you know - the ones that would make RU so scared they would run away. Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, Leopard, the indestructable Chalanger & Abrams tanks - all duds, how are the US HIMAIRS, Patriots and all of the western wonder missiles? looks like the USA and NATO should go back to fighting farmers with AK47's and sandals (take your pick out of Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq for starters), remember how the USA took 20 years, 4 Presidents $3 trillion to replace the Taliban with . . . . drumroll please . . . . the Taliban
1
@rickybobby6527 you probably believe Biden is mentally sharp and on top of his game too!
1
@rickybobby6527 you probably believe Biden is mentally sharp and on top of his game too!
1
@rickybobby6527 maybe the USA should try invading Cuba again, after it has been on sanctions for over 60 years you may have better luck this time
1
@rickybobby6527 USA & NATO weaponised, funded, built up & trained UA military where it was the 2nd largest military out of NATO countries and the largest military in EU - & it's losing even though it is supported by 32 countries and provided with the wests modern weapons - proof of how useless NATO are
1
@rickybobby6527 USA & NATO weaponised, funded, built up & trained UA military where it was the 2nd largest military out of NATO countries and the largest military in EU - & it's losing even though it is supported by 32 countries and provided with the wests modern weapons - proof of how useless NATO are
1
@rickybobby6527 USA fights against countries with no air force, no navy, no tanks, little to no artillery, no air defence systems, carpet bombs a country from 30,000 feet before sending in the tanks and troops - AND STILL LOSES
1
@rickybobby6527 hahaha even the US media states the USA haven't won a war since WW2 - and then the Soviets won the war in Europe and Japan had 80 % of their forces fighting in China.
1
@rickybobby6527 you should try reading "anatomy of failure why the USA loses every war it starts" for starters. amazing how the USA is always too p!ssweak to go to war themselves, they need to drag other cuntries with them
1
@rickybobby6527 what was it - 20 years, 4 Presidents, $3 trillion, $ billions left behind in a shameless and embarrasing withdrawal when fighting goat herders with AK47's?
1
@terjeoseberg990 hahaha look at mediazona web site there you'll see RU has 58K losses, meanwhile UA General Zaluzhny stated UA needed ANOTHER 500,000 troops. What were RU's goals? demilitarize UA - you do that through attrition and they are also demilitarizing NATO, denazify UA - the psycho Azov many are dead, secure the safety of the RU seakers in the Donbas. Point out any quote where RU said they wanted to take over UA. that is a US quote as is Blinkens 3 days.
1