Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "Peace in Ukraine Summit: 13 countries reject endorsing Ukraine's territory | DW News" video.

@bonnie7898 you need to read the USA Rand Corp article where the US Army asked them for ways to antagonise & provoke war with RU who they (USA) knew were trying to avoid conflict Oleksii Arestovych - former military officer & aid to UA President is on video saying the price for UA to join NATO is to provoke war with RU that leads to RU's defeat. Arestovych is also on video saying RU were extremely generous with concessions - all for UA neutrality. Of course the USA then sent Boris Johnson to UA to tell Zelensky not to sign peace. So you need to review who are the ones who wanted this war
3
@bonnie7898 my god if you keep believing that you have brought ign0rance and styupidity to a whole new level
2
@bonnie7898 point out Yugoslavia on a map for me will you as I cannot find it. Best ask the USA & NATO who I can't find it yes
2
point out Yugoslavia on a map will you? i cannot find it - wonder why? ask the USA & NATO. RU gave the USA / NATO a draft treaty for security in EU in 2019 - ignored by the USA & NATO (Stoltenberg is on video saying they received it).. read the 2019 RAND Corp article where the US Armyasked them for ways to antagonise & provoke war with RU who the USA acknowledged were trying to avoid conflict. Boris Johnson flew to UA and told Zelensky not to sign peace, had he not done that it would have ended in April 2022. USA says it is up to UA to seek peace yet every time RU or China promote peace talks the USA torpedoes them. So ask yourself who are the warmongers (part of the USA's FOREVER WARS).
1
@edvsilas8281 yep, the USA illegally blockaded shipping in international waters and depth charged Soviet submarines to drive them to the surface. Reports that US had nukes in the air before Kennedy recalled the planes. USA were going to use nukes in Vietnam. 2002 USA withdrew from the ABN treaty and immediately installed milliles with nuclear capabilities in Poland and Romania - aimed at Moscow. 2019 USA withdrew from the INF treaty. Jan 2022 Blinken stated the US would install nukes in UA, only the quantity of missiles would be open to discussion with RU. RU has signed the "no nukes first" agreement - the USA has not. the only fair comparison would be for RU to install nukes in Canada where the missiles are just minutes from Washington.
1
@jesusaguilar4585 and you keep parroting USA / western lies. "do you know who the biggest propagators of disinformation in the history of the world are? the United States Government" - US Senator Rand Paul
1
@bonnie7898 USA prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian to keep the war going as 2 failed wars on Bidens watch would be olitical suicide along with the USA wanting access to the $$ trillions on minerals in UA. USA's aim was for RU regime change so the west could rape RU of its oil, gas and mineral wealth something they had been doing from 1991-2002 when Putin put an end to it. 2019 EU politicians showing maps of RU broken apart into republics all for EU's access. THAT is why the USA / NATO started this war
1
Ukraine ended being a sovereign state immediately after the USA's violent and illegal coup in 2014 to overthrow the democratically elected President. All decisions are made by the USA. do you have any idea of global politics?
1
for 75 years NATO, the supposed guarantors of peace and security are responsible for starting over 100 wars or military conflicts around the world - so much for a defensive alliance!
1
@bonnie7898 for 75 years NATO, the supposed guarantors of peace and security are responsible for starting over 100 wars or military conflicts around the world - so much for a defensive alliance!
1
@bonnie7898 exactly - thanks to the USA & NATO
1
@bonnie7898 more like you don't understand it. Next read Jacques Bauds article "the Military Situation in the Ukraine" & before you so how Jacques Bauds a Putin puppet - he is a former Colonel in the Swiss army, UN Peacekeeper & NATO officer
1
@bonnie7898 you obviously refused to read the part where NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia. Like all in the west, you like to apply rules and international law only when it suits you. What are your thoughts on hos Clinton, Bush & Obama invaded 9 countries in 23 years and killed 11 million? Or how the USA has dropped on average 40 bombs a day, every day for the past 20 years, or how the USA are responsible for starting over 80% of the wars they have been involved in since the end of WW2 (& that the USA has not been at war for 16 years since 1776)
1
@bonnie7898 Ooh a diploma in information management - you must be so proud. Is that one of those useless diplomas that carry zero weight in the real world? You know what they say about information - its only as good as what you are told and if you are told garbage, you will believe garbage. "Do you know who are the biggest propagators of disinformation in the history of the world are? the United Stated Government" - US Senator Rand Paul. So you keep readoing US lies and bllsht, i know you believe it
1
@bonnie7898 You should try reading the UN articles that state NATOs bombing was illegal. And the USA are part of NATO, i see you like to cherry pick things when it suits you. NATO doesn't have a brain in their colective heads, the USA tells them what to do, just as the USA gets them to join them in their many illegal and forever wars so they can use the guise of "its a global concern" - NATO is a defensive alliance and is agaimst their charter to attack nations - or did you miss that when doing your masters degree in useless studies? In its 75 year existence NATO - the supposed defenders of peace and security are responsible for instigating over 100 military actions or wars.
1
@bonnie7898 you spent what - 5years going to Uni to learn to read - I wouldn't be bragging about that if i were you. you are obviously incapable of doing a search on the UNs web site andothers. IF you made an effort you will see that Yugoslavia was attacked by NATO, the Security Council did NOT sanction the use of force. Just as the UN stated the USA had no legal right to invade Iraq (which the USA lied about in looking for non existent WMD's when it was to kill Saddam Hussein as he was trying to trade Iraqi oil in a currency other than USD) and that was the same reason the USA destroyed Libya because Gaddafi was trying to create an African gold backed currency to sell Libyan oil. Putin is the next in line for the USA to get rid of because he (and China) are the big players in dedollarisation - thats why the USA say they will go to war with China. Who has China invaded? Taiwan, as is recognised by EVERY country is part of China. And as for your comment of "you have heard of Baud" inreality that means you know nothing of what he has written or said - so you know NOTHING. Amnesty International stated NATOs bombing violated international law & the bombing hastened killing, so try reading an article not printed in the USA. you need to look at all of the countries ilegally bombed by the USA, all of the Governments illegally overthrown by the USA, World leaders murdered by the CIA - you can start with African leaders and work your way from there
1
@bonnie7898 The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) conducted a bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) from 24 March 1999 to 9 June 1999. During and since that period, the Prosecutor has received numerous requests that she investigate allegations that senior political and military figures from NATO countries committed serious violations of international humanitarian law during the campaign, and that she prepares indictments pursuant to Article 18(1) & (4) of the Statute. Criticism of the NATO bombing campaign has included allegations of varying weight: a) that, as the resort to force was illegal, all NATO actions were illegal, and b) that the NATO forces deliberately attacked civilian infrastructure targets (and that such attacks were unlawful), deliberately or recklessly attacked the civilian population, and deliberately or recklessly caused excessive civilian casualties in disregard of the rule of proportionality by trying to fight a "zero casualty" war for their own side. Allegations concerning the "zero casualty" war involve suggestions that, for example, NATO aircraft operated at heights which enabled them to avoid attack by Yugoslav defences and, consequently, made it impossible for them to properly distinguish between military or civilian objects on the ground. Certain allegations went so far as to accuse NATO of crimes against humanity and genocide. NATO attacking civilians - something the USA / UK started doing in WW2 when they carpet bombed cities in Germany, US firebombed Tokyo knowing the majority of housing is wooden & would lead to massive civilian casualties, 2 atomic bombs in civilians, US used chemical weapons in Vietnam on civilians, USA used napalm on civilians / villages, the USA in every war attacks civilians
1
it means they didn't care because they knew they weren't invited
1