Comments by "naas699" (@naas699) on "The REAL Reason the West Will NEVER Give Ukraine Long Range Missiles" video.

  1. Zelensky hopes long range strikes inside RU will do something stupid & attack a NATO country, they Zelensky will demand NATO invokes article 5 just as he did when Zelensky killed those two farmers in Poland. Article 5 does not guarantee boots on ground, each country is free to provide aid as they see fit - it may mean boots, it may mean providing military or financial aid. In other words what NATO has been providing Ukraine from 2014 where they have been weaponised, funded, built up and trained by NATO to NATO standards where it was the 2nd largest military out of NATO countries and the argest in Europe. RU will no doubt arm Syria, African nations, Houthis etc and have them attack US or UK bases around the world
    2
  2. Lockheed Martin CFO stated they received a $10 billion order for UA and another $10 billion to replace what has been sent. Liz Cheneys net worth $7 million in 2017, $44 million in 2021 - who says Americas forever wars don't pay? Assange pointed that out, thats why they wanted him to rot in jail
    1
  3. the west do not care about UA as they have said repeatedly - fighting RU to the last Ukrainian, it is about trying to inflict pain onto RU Prior to 2014 UA was neutral it traded with the west, it traded with RU. It had full control of the Donbas and a semi autonomous Crimea within its borders. Then in 2014 the USA overthrew the democratically elected President and installed a client regime of their choosing that was openly hostile to Russia, militarising and NATOising Ukraine, creating a national security threat right on Russia's borders. As the Rand Corporation's 2019 article "Extending Russia" where they list the so called advantages of providing lethal military aid to Ukraine which would lead to military equipment losses and casualties of RU troops that would cause controversy in RU as did the Soviet - Afghanistan conflict.
    1
  4. Memorandum of Conversation Date: Friday, February 9, 1990 Time: 1:00PM - 3.00PM Place: Kremlin Participants: Secretary Baker (James Baker US Secretary of State) President Gorbachev (Mikhail Gorbachev - Soviet President) Eduard Shevardnadze (Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs) Memcon from 2/9/90 United Stated Department Washington DC 20520 Meeting w/USSR President Gorbachev and FM Shevardnadze Moscow, USSR We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East. If we maintain a presence in Germany that is a part of NATO,  there would be no expansion of NATO's jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east. At the end of the day, if it is acceptable to everyone, we could have a discussion in a two plus four concept That might achieve this type of outcome.  Maybe there is a better way to deal with the external consequences of German unification. And if there is I am not aware of it. We don't have German agreement but we have mentioned it to Genscher and he said he wants to think about it. Dumas liked it and now I have mentioned it to you Source: US National Security Archive
    1