Comments by "David Houseman" (@davidhouseman4328) on "Warrior: What Next For The Army's Infantry Fighting Vehicle?" video.

  1. It isn't, by role it more covered by Boxer. Ajax isn't for most for troops.
    5
  2. They aren't getting rid of MBTs.
    5
  3. It isn't getting rid of armour in general, just dropping down to Ajax, Boxer and Challenger. What it should mean is we actually get things updated and bought rather than discussed but we'll have to see.
    2
  4. He did, that is what they are calling the upgraded Challenger 2.
    2
  5.  @olivergoodridgeify  I agree with you on that, I don't like to see these asset gaps. I want to see things properly costed. A program without delays and well costed is a cost saving program, just I will take something retired early to keep a program going til it's finished.
    1
  6. This is a review that's come with increased spending.
    1
  7.  @studentaviator3756  Ajax doesn't have the troop space, it is no longer ASCOD. Even Ares which does carry some troops only carries 4 and it drops the 40mm.
    1