Comments by "David Houseman" (@davidhouseman4328) on "Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief explains how Kyiv can defeat Russia" video.

  1. No, they weren't, we sent 14?
    6
  2. Yep
    4
  3. The west can continue to supply indefinitely, it is still fully in a peacetime economy. Its not ability in question, it's will.
    4
  4. There's no after the war, we are learning from them now. That said, lessons have to be taken with a pinch of salt as we would fight quiet differently.
    1
  5. The point is the line is deep with mines backed by artillery so you can't manoeuvre?
    1
  6.  @generalstack6540  Though a jet is much more influential than a tank ,10 certainly wouldn't. But then America hasn't said it will send any, it's the Dutch and Danish, there retiring fleet could provide 50. And the whole point of looking to the F16 specifically is there are lots around to build up to a credible force.
    1
  7. @zallyzally2698  I didn't say they would, nor did i see everyone saying Russians would be swept away by Leopards. But keep laughing at your failure of comprehension.
    1
  8. Why would anything suggest they would just give up? At most they would look to negotiate a peace.
    1
  9. @robertkubrick3738  that how wars end. Maybe Putin doesn't care young Russian dieing but he should at least care about his oligarchs being able to enjoy there money instead of spending it on a war.
    1
  10. It may be the wrong word to use be essentially a brand but you can supplement GPS with local signals.
    1
  11. I give two fucks.
    1
  12. No it wouldn't. It would be a slight set back to the west, but given the west is much richer, more populous and hasn't even fought, no ones dictating anything.
    1