Comments by "David Houseman" (@davidhouseman4328) on "Ukraine needs vehicles alongside Western tanks for success - expert" video.

  1.  @lacdirk  Challenger was only a political point. Uniquely British vehicles aren't generally worth the logistical issues for the small numbers. Some warriors wouldn't be bad just we can do more bang for buck.
    3
  2.  @jacobschnberg5382  Your just showing your ignorance
    1
  3. You did hear that. This isn't a good interview. The idea shipping Abrams is the issue is also bunk.
    1
  4.  @john_in_phoenix  it wouldn't really be depending on others, tanks aren't needing for defending the UK, they're needed for defending our allies. Supplying a different mix to allies defence is perfectly respectable.
    1
  5.  @john_in_phoenix  not sure your point? Britain was made safe with fighters not tanks in 1940. Not sure how you can see an equivalent to Crimea with Britain.
    1
  6. Existing tank crews are traveling to other countries for training, the tanks are being supplied with spares as well as logistical support. The missing point isn't so much the support side, it's the fact these tanks are still weeks or months away from actually fighting.
    1
  7. No chance of it being over by then, either way.
    1
  8. The air domain is very hostile (to both sides). Frankly the A-10 works because it's supported by the rest of the USAF.
    1
  9.  @damianousley8833  Total dross, Germany are still building Leopard 2's
    1
  10.  @damianousley8833  As I said total dross dross. For example a recent contract for Hungary specifically had 12 existing Leo2's and 44 brand new tanks.
    1
  11. ​ @damianousley8833  44 neugefertigten Kampfpanzern Leopard 2
    1