Comments by "David Houseman" (@davidhouseman4328) on "Explained: The $800m of weapons the US is sending Ukraine" video.

  1. Russia defensively will be much harder, I think Crimea won't be possible and eastern Donbass unlikely.
    2
  2. That's nuclear war.
    2
  3. It doesn't look like Ukraine could be overwhelmed at moment, Russian success would see a larger part of Ukraine carved off rather that total Ukrainian defeat.
    2
  4. Russia pulled back from the north and all the troops there, so at very least they can get to those. But by essentially surrounded you mean not surrounded.
    1
  5. Bigger kit like artillery also needs training so a big dump isn't actually that useful.
    1
  6. The club that Ukraine wasn't part of?
    1
  7. Russia needs all the weapons in can get to fight this war.
    1
  8. Why would struggling against Ukraine make you think attacking NATO would be a good idea?
    1
  9. That would mean attacking a NATO?
    1
  10. That just shows what media your watching there is a whole array of support coming from various NATO members.
    1
  11. Perfectly, Russia are the ones that invaded.
    1
  12.  @АлексейИванов-ъ4х1н  That is an attack on NATO. An frankly about the most provocative thing you could get.
    1
  13.  @drudru5992  You'd have to be subsidising oil (or more importantly gas) for the rest of the world?
    1
  14.  @drudru5992  OPEC could act, the likes of the US and Canada can't produce it cheap enough and so it would need to be subsidised.
    1
  15. Kosovo?
    1
  16. Russia wanted Biden's polls boosted?
    1
  17. Mines cover remote triggered as well as proximity devises.
    1
  18. So the Russian economy colapses but it doesn't effect Ukraine?
    1
  19.  @nerdnec  nope, but I know Russia isn't the only source of fuel. And frankly the Europe is already considering sanctioning oil. It'll cost but is doable. It's gas that would really hurt.
    1
  20.  @JCJW101  we can't know for certain of course but there were only a few available simple lack of sorties possible limits what they could have done.
    1
  21. Lots of countries are, and have been all through the conflict.
    1
  22.  @joelopez198  You know your I much larger country? And for reference Slovakia has already sent an S300 system and Czechia T-72 tanks.
    1
  23. Ukraine didn't chose to be invaded, why are they dumb?
    1
  24. As far as I'm aware there isn't a problem with food in general but getting it to besieged places.
    1
  25. I agree with giving them MIGs but it would only have made a small difference.
    1
  26. Russia aren't finished yet, fuelling Ukraine doesn't change that.
    1
  27.  @karlharrison2449  You know Russia pulled back in the North? And Donbasss isn't surrounded.
    1
  28. Very different to Syria, this is an invasion not a civil war, and the scale of support is much greater.
    1
  29. The US defence budget is hundreds of Billions a year, how is 800 Million surprising?
    1
  30. Simply that isn't known, that's Russian bull.
    1
  31. There is a constant flow of gear a into Ukraine.
    1
  32.  @karlharrison2449  the Ukrainian army isn't surrounded and and even if part of it was the rest can still attack from the outside.
    1
  33. This isn't to do with oil?
    1