Comments by "Nikita Kipriyanov" (@nikitakipriyanov7260) on "Midwest Safety" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4.  @v_x6329  Who retroactively fucked the life up? That was her own decision to drive after drinking. Very bad and irresponsible, indeed. She knew she's forbidden to do so by the law. She vowed to abide the law, when she received her license. She decided to drive anyway, breaking her vow to the society. Now she's facing consequences, and if these consequences include ruining her life — it's a conseqence of her own bad decision making, not someone other's evil action. The only case when she's innocent is if someone forced her to drive under the influence, so she did it out of the fear for her life, whatever. This is very unplausible, given that there was no one else in the car who might have been forcing her to drive, so I'd rather eliminate this variant by Occam's razor. Every day, about 37 people in the United States die in drunk-driving crashes — that's one person every 39 minutes. In 2022, 13,524 people died in alcohol-impaired driving traffic deaths. These deaths were all preventable. That's exactly what the cops did — they proactively prevented her from killing herself or/an somebody totally innocent or damaging property — if not this time, then in the future. Instead of being a killer (which must be a very tough carry), she's only a DUI. That is not called runing a life, it's saving lives, and she must be all thankful to these people for saving her from much, much worse consequences. Or, does anyone think, once someone was DUI, then caught, and then let go, they would never do it again? Serously? The statistics say otherwise...
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1