General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Acid Joke
British Landeur
comments

Comments by "Acid Joke" (@PWMoze) on "British Landeur" channel.

I find Charles allowing Windsor Castle to be used as a make shift mosque enfuriating. He is supposed to be 'defender of the faith' now we're all left wondering which faith? What a shambles...
958
I'm starting to wonder if a national enquiry is what we actually need. Would it lead to arrests? Would it lead to prosecutions and would they in turn lead to substantial sentences? Would those guilty of corruption in the councils, the police and the Labour Party actually be properly exposed and punished? Would it be prompt? Would it be carried out without fear or favour? In light of the Hillsborough enquiry, the Chillcott enquiry, the COVID enquiry, the Post Office scandal, the contaminated blood scandal, the Jay enquiries, somehow I doubt it....
82
And yet, yesterday our Prime Minister described what you have just so eloquently said as, 'spreading far right poison'. He also implied that discussing it was 'jumping on a far right bandwagon' and threatening 'The Rule of law' (he shouted that bit).
36
Excellent work! Keep it up.
33
It seems astonishing that no one is officially challenging TR's treatment by the British authorities. Regardless of one's views of his politics (and I have supported him since 2016) this Orwellian misuse of the law to persecute, intimidate and endanger him is a national scandal. Are there no campaigning lawyers prepared to call this out or do they only want to protect the rights of people from elsewhere?
23
Excellent use of research to both prove a hypothesis and spotlight a compromised public servant. Our system is quite clearly full of them. It makes me wonder what we should do to bring guys like this to account. Letters to the Law Society? A public petition? Complain to your local MP? It all seem quite pointless. Identitfying the guilty ones is a start I suppose. The other side of this coin would be senior police officers who prefer to investigate non crime hate incidents rather than catch criminals, like the guy in charge of Essex police, Ben Julian Harrington for example. More of these please.
20
Excellent content. The video interviews at the end are particularly persuasive. I'm glad I have discovered your channel.
19
Excellent analysis as usual. I hope you're right and Starmer's days are numbered but I can foresee things being absolutely awful before he jumps or finally gets the push. One has to wonder why we have had such a terrible run of utterly inept PMs.
14
Not just a fudge but a cheap fudge. If it were me I would consult Maggie Oliver and follow her advice; a statutory enquiry with the power to force witnesses to appear, to give statements under oath and with the authority to further prosecutions of the complicit and the guilty, preferably promptly.
12
@BritishLandeur Couldn't agree more. Would you want Rachel Reeves or Shabana Mahmood deciding anyone's fate?
11
Additional info for the ever-growing arsenal of evidence against this govt. Well researched and well presented. Thankyou for your excellent content.
10
If this is a trend I would be very interested in any other car camping channels that have got into 'nonsense extremism'. Perhaps you could provide links? Sounds good.
9
@BritishLandeur And now we discover Gordon Brown was implicated in 2008 and of course Starmer himself back in 2012. A catalogue a corruption and failure ending up with Labour Party favourites Andy Burnham, Sadiq Khan, Yvette Cooper and Jess Phillips. Ed Balls was on GMB this morning doing his best to dismiss the need for a national enquiry...I wonder why?
9
Excellent points. The problem is: our government has no intention of acting in the way you suggest, our civil service has every intention of countering effective policies to stop illegal immigration and the large body of left wing lawyers is committed to countering any attempt to prosecute or remove people from the UK. Incidentally, when he was a QC, our current Prime Minister specialised in protecting terrorists from extradition and having restrictions placed upon their movements. He also defended murderers of women and children and people on death row in the Caribbean. He was not a man who sought to protect victims against criminals so it is hard to imagine him being trully committed to 'smashing the gangs' let alone stopping illegal immigration.
7
Farage could have distanced himself from TR without having to slag him off. The fact that he did reinforces the idea that he doesn't support him for personal reasons rather than because of any ideological differences. TR is a hero to most Reform voters and Farage should at least be able acknowledge that his stance on r.gangs etc has been pivotal in bringing it to the British public's attention.
7
Sadly this is not a new phenomena. Throughout the sixties and the seventies Che Guevara posters adorned the walls of every left wing student's bedsitter, a murderer who thought nothing of employing torture, assasination or political violence against non-combatants but was loved by young lefties because the iconic poster made him look like a rock star. Before that the left loved Mao, Stalin, Trotsky and Lenin, all of whom were genocidal psychopaths.
7
@BritishLandeur Suggested topics for group discussions: 'how to avoid excessive clutch wear and excessive immigration'. 'How to make savings on fuel and foreign aid budgets.' 'Staying awake at the wheel or staying a woke at the wheel, which is more important?'
6
@BritishLandeur There are two separate groups at work here; those individuals who are deeply and unaccountably motivated by their religious beliefs (I would include Mayor Sadiq Khan in this group) and those who have been indoctrinated or captured by 'the woke mind virus', in which I would put many senior police officers, civil servants and judges. You could probably find significant members of both groups in The Home Office or the BBC for example.
5
@BritishLandeur I would attend that meeting! You could discuss 'The Strange Death Of Europe' while, at the same time, planning the best routes to avoid witnessing it!
5
Another excellent piece of analysis. When we still had Liz I used to wonder to what extent the royals were told what to say in public so that they didn't betray their real motives or objectives. Clearly with Charles he's been waiting for his chance to change the script for ages and now we get to find out how he really feels. And what a surprise! He's revealing that the Royal family is just another British institution that no longer serves the interests of British people any more, if indeed it ever did! Add it to the ever-growing list!
5
@BritishLandeur It would be very ironic indeed if it was the ECHR that ended up protecting Tommy's rights. Obviously I'm not holding my breath in the meantime. By the way, I don't necessarily see TR as on 'the right' given that the primary target of his attentions (wink wink) are just about as intolerant, undemocratic and authoritarian as you can get.
5
The various muppets on the Jeremy Vine show discussed this subject without once acknowledging why it may actually be a problem. They seemed to be at a loss to identify why it was necessary to bring in changes to the law. Of course, in reality, they knew the truth, they just found it too uncomfortable to discuss it frankly. It's interesting that the independent MP who defended the practise was from Batley. We all know why that town has been in the news recently.
5
We used to give 'have-a-go heroes' praise and public acclaim. Now we accuse them of racism and threaten them with prosecution .
5
This is insane. We need a British version of Trump as soon as possible.
5
@markb1487 That's kind of what I was thinking.The establishment tend to protect each other, especially when they're all in the same political party. They also protect the system by taking years before any legal action is taken, usually when the guilty have retired or moved on. Look at the Post Office scandal: everyone knows what went wrong, who was a victim and who was to blame and yet still, over twenty years later, it has not been resolved.
4
I am horrified, after the forced departure of Ben Habib, Lowe was my man. Where does this leave those of us who saw Lowe as a necessary stabilising influence on Farage? He was the only reason why we could be reletively sure democratisation within the party would happen. What are we supposed to do now the Reform party HQ has again revealed itself as petty, underhand and corrupt?
4
If a picture of a man looking like that appeared in a book, depicting a fictional evil character intent on violence, it would be called an unacceptable racist stereotype and the book would instantly be withdrawn. Reality is now much more politically incorrect than fiction.
3
@BritishLandeur it reminded me of something I may have seen in an Enid Blyton children's book I read as a small child. Obviously those kind of books are no longer available in the UK nowadays. Perhaps if they were, people would learn to recognize an existential threat when they saw one.
3
I noticed Ch4 have a two part documentary on the fake grooming scandal on tonight. Absolutely nothing on the thousands of genuine cases, just a massive promotion of the one false one. I wonder why? Will they mention how TR eventually exposed her lies and came out in support of the falsely accused guy? I doubt it.
3
@BritishLandeur I don't know why but Youtube keep immediately deleting my replies. I was trying to say that I agree with you and that the situation you describe was also the case in the seventies, with the Bader-Meinhof Gang in Germany and the Brigado Rossi in Italy as two examples. Ridiculously unrealistic and unachievable demands lead to extremely violent tactics, all the while being romanticised by foolish young left wingers. It is very worrying when people start justifying and celebrating extremism. No one benefits from the actions of fanatics.
3
This is a really interesting topic. Having British values does not make you British that much is clear and you are right, British values are probably most easily defined by what they are not rather than what they are? You know when you see it.
3
@BritishLandeur I'm finding it impossible to continue this discussion in the comments, Youtube keep instantly deleting my replies no matter how carefully I phrase my observations. Someone doesn't want this topic to be discussed.
3
Thankyou for an excellent and thorough breakdown, so much more insightful and informative than the clips shown on the MSM.
3
By the time we get to next General Election they will have established their own party to represent their own concerns. It may be in disguise; like the Green Party or The Workers' Party or it may be confident enough to reveal what it really is. Either way there is no chance of people like Jess Phillips winning their seats again.
3
@BritishLandeur Agreed. You can just hear them muttering under their breath behind each other's back "Come the glorious day brother, you'll be first up against the wall!"
3
@BritishLandeur Thanks for the reply.
3
We absolutely do not have free speech in the UK, we have confined speech which is why we have such a long tradition of English political philosophers trying to define the parameters and justifications for free speech. Half the reason why British non-conformists went to settle in America was to escape the legal restrictions upon their rights of speech, association and religious expression..
3
Excellent content, balanced and informative. Can't see remigration happening without a huge social shift that somehow by-passes the civil service, all the left wing human rights lawyers, the MSM, and all the myriad left wing activists determined to undermine the UK. But it's a nice idea.
3
Happy Christmas and all the best for the coming year. I'm really glad I came across your channel, I have high hopes for you in the future. Keep it up mate!
3
@inquisitive.lurker i was talking generally not specifically about Daniel Perry's case. However I don't condemn him either.
3
In the UK the progressive, globalist left is so enbedded in the civil service and all the other government institutions, that a Trump like figure would need an extraordinary mandate to sweep them away and all the legal impediments they would no doubt create to block radical change. We have such a man in Rupert Lowe (bringing back Ben Habib wouldn't be a bad idea either) but he would have to secure such a massive parliamentary majority to be effective I'm not sure if that's likely. Maybe Trump will inspire our country and it will wake up a populist, nationalist movement? Stranger things have happened.
2
@BritishLandeur The scandal is no longer just the poor girls and the hateful things that were done to them, it is also the institutional corruption and complicity. Clearly our institutions have been corrupted and have not been working for English people's best interests for some time. It is hardly surprising when Westminster Council are allowed to openly discriminate against white job applicants and state that they will favour applicants from the 'the global majority'.
2
Not sure how much we can trust Farage at this point. I suspect he will slowly move closer to the liberal middle ground, to attract one nation conservative voters and MPs, rather than trying to drag the Overton Window further over to the right.
2
@BritishLandeur I watched, half falling asleep for the first 40 minutes and then with my jaw dropping for the rest. I thought Zelensky was quite rude. He obviously has become used to being able to talk big without much pushback when in these situations, he is probably tolerated if not encourged usually? The body language wasn't good, nor were the interruptions and the sullen muttering. I thought J.D.Vance had stepped up (quite understandably) to check the disrespect, back up the boss and defend the US. Whatever you may think of Trump (he acted a bit like he was back on 'The Apprentice') the whole exchange illustrated how inflexible and unrealistic Zelensky's expectations are. Trump probably thinks this will justify keeping Zelensky out of the diplomacy loop when deciding upon the terms of the peace deal, after all Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill didn't consult the leaders of the nations they decided the fates of when they were carving up Europe after WW2....
2
@BritishLandeur I couldn't agree more.
2
People who were never slaves demanding reparations from people who never owned slaves? It sounds like a scam doesn't it? It would take a right plonker to fall for that one...We're being represented by David Lamy? Oh dear, we're f***ed!
2
You absolutely hit the nail on the head! I have various well-informed friends who remind me that Reform, for better or worse, are our best bet. But when I hear Anderson, Tice and Farage refuse to support Tommy, I can't help but have reservations. Why is he a distraction? Why does he not have the right to join the party of his choice? Would they back me if I was being persecuted by the state for having the same opinions or if I got a ridiculously long sentence for protesting about Southport? If Douglas Murray, Jordan Peterson and Elon Musk can square this circle why can't they? It makes me doubt their integrity, ideologically and worry that there is a certain amount of class division at work here.
2
@BritishLandeur Farage vs Charles at the next election? I'd love to see that! But imagine all the wrong 'uns who'd be falling over each other to contribute to Charles' campaign funds.
2
@BritishLandeur Sadly I think you may be right.
2
@BritishLandeur I see your point. When leftists' political aspirations are extreme or unrealistic they often resort to extremist methods, like the Bader Meinhof gang or Brigado Rossi did in the seventies. If the UK or any Western European country were to experience a national populist government in the near future, one that firmly pushes back against the liberal, globalist agenda, you can pretty much guarantee that there would be this kind of reactionary backlash.
2
@BritishLandeur English children are currently taught in schools not to think of any other ethnicities as posing any kind of threat to them. In fact they are encouraged to think of others as perhaps even slightly more virtuous and valuable than themselves. This is how we do the old multiculturalism lie in UK education. Most kids aren't daft, they share their playgrounds with certain groups and know which ones are not to be trusted. They hear the stories of the grooming gangs, the Jihadis, the non crime hate sppech laws and the the trans ideologists and usually draw their own conclusions amongst themselves. But their teachers are simply not allowed to acknowledge the reality of the situation, despite the increasing evidence that they should. They are under great pressure to not admit the truth but to present a ridiculous idealistic misrepresentation of reality..
1
@BritishLandeur English children are currently taught in schools not to think of other ethnicities as posing any kind of threat to them. In fact they are encouraged to think of others as perhaps even slightly more virtuous and valuable than themselves. This is how we do the old multiculturalism trick in UK education. Most kids aren't daft, they share their playgrounds with certain groups and know which ones are not to be trusted. They hear the stories of the grooming gangs, the Jihadis, the non crime hate sppech laws and the the trans ideologists and usually draw their own conclusions amongst themselves. But their teachers are simply not allowed to acknowledge the reality of the situation, despite the increasing evidence that they should. They are under great pressure to not admit the truth but to present a ridiculous idealistic misrepresentation of reality.This may be why this murderer's school and Head Teaacher were unable to sufficiently flag up what a threat he was. I bet his classmates knew though.
1
English children are currently taught in schools not to think of other ethnicities as posing any kind of threat to them. In fact they are encouraged to think of others as perhaps even slightly more virtuous and valuable than themselves. This is how we do the old multiculturalism trick in UK education. Most kids aren't daft, they share their playgrounds with certain groups and know which ones are not to be trusted. They hear the stories of the grooming gangs, the Jihadis, the non crime hate sppech laws and the the trans ideologists and usually draw their own conclusions amongst themselves. But their teachers are simply not allowed to acknowledge the reality of the situation, despite the increasing evidence that they should. They are under great pressure to not admit the truth but to present a ridiculous idealistic misrepresentation of reality.This may be why this murderer's school and Head Teaacher were unable to sufficiently flag up what a threat he was. I bet his classmates knew though.
1
The amount of Trump derangement syndrome in the UK MSM today was amazing! The descriptions of madness, meglomania and dictatorship flowed and predictions of doom and destruction were everywhere. Some even suggested that Trump is secretly planning to 'pass the Presidency to his son' in four years time to avoid relinquishing power! Like a tyrant king or dictator! They just hate him, even the so called 'Conservatives'. They are frightened of his American exceptionalism because they think we in the West should be constantly apologetic and humble, for our past transgressions or as atonement for our many successes. They can't stand his ambition because they are all much more comfortable discussing the managed and 'inevitable' decline of our economy, society, culture. They resent his popularity and constantly try to belittle his supporters, calling them deranged or at least misinformed. They fear his self confidence because they are full of doubts and uncertainty. Trump seems to imply that politics can be inspirational and they find that terrifying. 'What if all our politicians started to offer simple solutions to all those problems that are too difficult for our liberal elites to even discus, let alone solve? What if our politicians started actually delivering on those promises instead of betraying the people who voted for them? What if our politicians had a destinct and inspiring vision for our future? It would be a kind of revolution and we can't have that! Not in Britain! When he said he plans to take back the Panama Canal (a strategically sound objective) you could almost hear them wincing and squirming in their seats. When he said he intends to re-name the Gulf of Mexico 'the Gulf of America' I imagine some of the BBC journalists probably needed counselling for anxiety in the nearest safe space. Imagine their discomfort at his deliberately hurty words, They must have been asking how he could be such a bully towards those who were hired for reasons of Diversity not merit? How could he not want equity but just want prosperity? How could he want to remove those who have entered their country illegally over the last four years? What a brute! How dare he want a better deal for Americans and not those who are not? How dare he be so biased towards the majority and not prioritise all the poor, oppressed minorities? They must be in such a state of existential discomfort at the BBC. What our political pundits utterly fail to understand is that he is simply doing exactly what Americans have demanded of him. To fight for them and no one else. To 'go to bat for them' and in doing so, present a tough and confident attitude towards the rest of the World. To threaten to squash their many enemies and out compete their ubiquitous rivals. To cut the crap and act like the leader of the free world should; like a strong man, a tough male role model, a patriarch, a leader. Under such cicumstances the BBC are almost obliged to hate him, same with Ch4, ITV, Sky News, they simply can't understand him and never will. What they also fail to comprehend is how much we need such a leader in this country. Someone to fight for our cause instead of siding with those who would hollow us out, undermine us and erase us. Good luck to the Donald I say and let's all hope we get someone similar in the UK some day.
1
@BritishLandeur The scandal is no longer just the poor girls and the hateful things that were done to them, it is also the institutional corruption and complicity. Clearly our institutions have been corrupted and have not been working for English people's best interests for some time. It is hardly surprising when Westminster Council are allowed to openly discriminate against white job applicants and state that they will favour applicants from the 'the global majority'. It's almost as though somebody wants our country to be undermined and in decline...?
1
@BritishLandeur I see your point. When leftists' political aspirations are extreme or unrealistic they often resort to extremist methods, like the Bader Meinhof gang or Brigado Rossi did in the seventies. All of whom were spoilt, entitled, middle class kids from good homes. If the UK or any Western European country were to experience a national populist government in the near future, one that firmly pushes back against the liberal, globalist agenda, you can pretty much guarantee that there would be this kind of reactionary backlash.
1
When I was young, back in Thatcher's Britain, we all suspected that the legal system was corrupt because it so obviously served the interests of 'the Tory establishment'. As ordinary British people we all called for a 'fairer' system that wouldn't automatically work against our interests. How ironic that, now the anti-establishment guys have become the establishment, they choose to use the British legal system to serve the interests of everybody but the British people. What's worse, it turns out they've been doing it for ages, not only in the legal profession but also in the civil service, academia, local government, the church, the NHS, through the police and the legacy media, all with the complicity of a series of 'conservative' governments. It seems the British public are even more poorly served by this generation of ideologically driven activist professionals, who hold this destructive, 'progressive' ideology, than those they replaced. And now, of course these people are all firmly in the driving seat! Is it any surprise that we all find ourselves screaming out for a Trump/J.D.Vance figure to come and 'drain the UK swamp'? It is long overdue, but i wonder how much longer the long-suffering British public will be prepared to wait?
1
@BritishLandeur I see your point. When leftists' political aspirations are extreme or unrealistic they often resort to extremist methods, like the Bader Meinhof gang or Brigado Rossi did in the seventies. If the UK or any Western European country were to experience a national populist government in the near future, one that firmly pushes back against the liberal, globalist agenda, you can pretty much guarantee that there would be this kind of reactionary backlash.
1
@BritishLandeur To tell the truth I welcome the scandals now, all the more justification to drain the Westminster swamp
1
@BritishLandeur Absolutely. I even heard a guy on the MSM yesterday trying to excuse cousin marriage because Queen Victoria had married her cousin Albert! As though that provides justification! You only have to look at the various Habsburg emperors to see how badly that played out. Meanwhile Jeremy Corbyn and the four independent muslim MPs are planning to create a new 'cousin marriage party' in Parliament. Brilliant.
1
@BritishLandeur I keep trying to reply to your comment but Youtube keep deleting my comments immediately. Let's just say the fact that Queen Victoria married her cousin can hardly be used to justify the practise of consanguinity.
1
Great analysis. J.D.Vance was brilliant and I hope he goes on succeed Trump in 2029. Predictably his speech was largely dismissed or deliberately mischaracterised by our mainstream commentators, like Emily Maitliss and Rory Stewart. Personally I hope his views remain 'unacceptable' and that he keeps presenting them in the same calm, coherent manner. Clearly Europe is currently a shambles, which makes it all the more sad that, despite Brexit, the UK is too.
1
Absolutely excellent documentary. It is interesting that the BBC, Ch4 or ITV have never felt it necessary to do this kind of balanced and objective coverage of TR's story. I remember first seeing him on a Nicky Campbell debate show in which the panelists repeatedly silenced him by accusing him of being a racist. Needless to say no one bothered to defending his right to have an opinion let alone his right to speak. It was as though they had invited him on the show just to insult, dismiss and belittle him. His interview with Piers Morgan on GMB seemed to serve a similar purpose. Broadcasters want to distance themselves from him without even trying to understand what his message actually is. TR is one of the most significant figures in UK politics at the moment as well as definitely being the most courageous. Compare him to the so-called 'champion of women's rights', Jess Phillips, and her cowardly avoidance of facing up to the grooming gang scandal. History and hindsight will prove TR's activism justified, that he was deliberately and illegally targetted by the authorities and that he is worthy of much more acclaim than he is currently afforded in the UK.
1
@BritishLandeur We often hear that asylum seekers can't be sent back to their country of origin because they would be subject to persecution. It rarely occurs to people that there might be a perfectly reasonable reason why.
1
@BritishLandeur The loss of Ben Habib is bad news for Reform and it is a shame that Brexit is still dividing people, even the Brexiteers. The issues surrounding the party's democratic structure will also continue to be a concern until Farage allows it to be sorted out. I find Tice unconvincing too, however I find myself increasingly impressed by Rupert Lowe.
1