Comments by "Patchwurk" (@patchwurk6652) on "‘Sack Tap’: Steven Crowder Staffers Quit Following WILD Meeting" video.

  1. 7
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @johnlennon6790  "That is not "judging" someone. You're changing the scope to fit your argument. " Okay. How? "Calling someone a "dick" or female dog epithet is not "judging someone"." It's literally an insult in regards to their character, so yes it fucking is a JUDGEMENT you paint-huffing little cockgoblin. "Letting a stranger in your car is an act of judgment" No it isn't, and are you going to explain any of these blanket assertions you're making instead? "Even judgment of guilt or innocence might be revealed through careful, thorough inquiry, like a trial in a court setting, and that still isn't "judging someone", that's judging whether or not they did something." IT LITERALLY FUCKING IS YOU STUPID TROG! "We're talking about judging someone, their entire person, who they are, which requires a lot of knowledge that we generally don't have about anyone except those closest to us. " Wow, the literal existence of Nazis and bigots proves you wrong, what a shock. "Nobody is doing that in here except for you losers that have judged Steven to have deserved this based on a carefully selected moment of hidden video." Wow, sounding a little JUDGY there! XD "I just don't like the dude. I don't have to. I don't wish him bad experiences though, nor any of you." No one cares. "Hidden video is excellent for whether or not someone did something, or said something - it's not enough to "judge someone", such as you all have." If it's "not enough", then how are we doing it? Ohhhhhh, you're just being a holier-than-thou pretentious assnugget. Silly me, I thought I was talking to someone with a point, not a pearl-clutching little Biiiiiiiiiiiitch! In case it slipped you're mind, EVERYTHING in this comment is me judging you.
    1