Comments by "" (@TentaclePentacle) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. Well there goes that whole theory of gays having a gaydar.
    77
  2. That's just sick, i can't condone cannibalism.
    50
  3. Melissa gets it. It takes someone who lives in a authoritarian regime to get it. It truly takes an immigrant who choose to adopt western culture to defend the virtues of western culture.
    47
  4. I agree with mostly everything except that social safety net should be provided by churches. As an atheist I don't' want to join a church. That's the problem with libertarians, they want the safety net to be some kind of charity predicated on some one else's good will.
    47
  5. Pamela Anderson in barbed wire.
    29
  6. Boring, plagiarist, not an original thought in her brain. That about sums it up.
    24
  7. +John May There is only one explanation she is not a rational thinker. Cara is mired in dogma, and are part of extreme left. Exactly the kind of left that Rubin is against. Her beliefs that a woman should be able to accuse anyone of rape, and they should be automatically believed even after an investigation found no evidence of rape would make your head spin.
    21
  8. Trump is not hilter, but if trump don't get elected and this resentment keeps building, the regressive keep having their way. The next candidate 8 years down the road may very well be hilter.
    17
  9. but we have to remember kanye have a huge ego, if the left keeps on attacking him, he will fight back. I'm just going to get the popcorn ready.
    16
  10. I advocate for stoicism and none emotion, but I teared up at end. This is the hill that all liberals should die on. If you are not willing to die on this hill don't call yourself a liberal.
    16
  11. So Cara thinks one should look at evidence and base our judgment on that? Well how about looking at the evidence that mattress girl wasn't raped? But nooooo, according to Cara we should automatically believe mattress girl because she is a woman. Evidence based skepticism indeed.
    16
  12. The guy is a hypocrite. He wants greece to leave the EU and yet, he is in UK right now, during the brexit vote he was out there telling people to vote remain. What he said about how greece got into trouble was correct. It was those loans. But no one force the greek people to take those loans. The greeks did it themselves, because they wanted excessive socialism. He is blaming the people who gave him candy which made him fat and diabetic.
    13
  13. +Caalamus yeah he was alot more optimistic in the beginning, and now you can see the tiredness in his eyes.
    12
  14. +Rannos22 You have no idea how true that is. She is clueless when it comes to science, and she calls herself a science communicator.
    11
  15. shush, the transformer is talking. Autobots can always transform and rollout, and transform back if they want.
    11
  16. DarKool81 you can't hide behind enlightenment and reason, enlightenment and reason speak for itself.
    11
  17. Dave Rubin was also on the young turks, but we don't hold that against him anymore.
    11
  18. oh this guy is right on, on the immigration issue. Take note you self hating white liberals. It takes an immigrant like this guy to see the truth of what's going on. I agree with him 100% on his analysis and I'm an immigrant myself.
    11
  19. Great interview, but why is it so short?
    10
  20. the fat kid isn't at fault for eating all those candy. its always the candy store's fault.
    10
  21. Rubin just interviewed a real life transformer. Stop being so robotphobic.
    8
  22. Keep looking Liana might not be venomous as most feminists, but she is definitely not the unicorn you seek.
    8
  23. Williams is as fake as they come. She is two faced not far from black face
    8
  24. +BuFFoTheArtClown This is exactly why I have been calling pakman a regressive. But I still have hope for him, he at least can be reasoned with.
    8
  25. no borders is a librarian plank. Government controls borders, if you have no government, no borders. Those are the core libertarian views. He is right on on fronts.
    7
  26. he is a simpleton that loves boobs. Me, on the other hand, is a complicated man, I like legs and boobs.
    7
  27. He is not a socialist he is a communist. He is a hypocrite at that. He tells UK to remain in EU while telling greece to leave EU. He also forgot to mention its his fault that greece needed a second bailout because he refuse to implement any austerity measures, forcing greece to take a second bailout. He is just a hypocrite communist. He wants UK to remain in EU thus giving EU more money, and he wants greece to take those money and run.
    7
  28. "we know that black people are being killed by police" well we all know white people are being killed by police why ain't you talking about that? There is an issue of police excessive force, but it isn't a race issue. But we can never talk about the police use of excessive force problem, until you drop the ridicules race issue. You are just distracting from the real problem at hand by race baiting.
    7
  29. So I'm guessing its the regressive islam apologist cenk that is accusing rubin's show to be entirely for muslim hate.
    6
  30. +Redlock Well atleast Cara could of check over TF's calculations. And what independent body was she talking about? We still have no idea. Her lack of scientific knowledge is one thing. What I can't stand is her stands on the mattress girl rape case. In one of the TYT video she was arguing against cenk, when cenk is having his rare logical moments. When cenk suggests that once a rape case had already been adjudicated, we should say the guy is innocence and not hold the rape accusation over his head anymore. But her stands is that we should automatically believe mattress girls because a rape accusation should be automatically believed even after its been adjudicated, we still can't say the guy is innocent, we should still believe that mattress girl was raped. If this kind of thinking is what she meant by having a scientific mind and applying skepticism to her thinking, then she have no credibility.
    6
  31. There are consequence to speech? What kind of consequence are we talking about? Firing? No platforming? This is an important point that needs to be clarified.
    6
  32. This is the most frustrating thing for a liberal like me. I don't like to agree with those people on the far right, but their logic is undeniable. While liberals (those regressives) have stopped using logic.
    6
  33. do you even hear yourself? you believe in having borders, but open borders? we have a border but its open anyone can just walk through. Oh the irony or stupidity.
    6
  34. nothing wrong with liking boobs just don't mention boobs in front of a woman? how puritanical of you.
    6
  35. +Grant Mitchell Treat the greeks like kids, that sounds about right.
    6
  36. +Jacob Furness Why should Bill Gates pay for my health care you ask? Here is a simple answer Bill Gates have so much money paying a little bit towards the health care of those who can't afford it is not going to inconvenience him. If Bill Gates doesn't want to pay for the health care of the peasants. Well the peasants will eventually get fed up and say fuck it, and string Bill Gates up in the public square, when they start communism. Paying for the wealthfare of the poor is to prevent the poor from rising up and killing the rich. Because there is a lot more poor than rich.
    6
  37. It wasn't a debate, it's a cat fight.
    6
  38. Sell me on Hillary, and yet this women keeps talking about her personal relationship with Hillary. How does that sell me on Hillary?
    5
  39. +Kayman Fani yes atheism is the none belief in god, it has nothing to do with charity. Its not a religion. There are atheists who will do charity, but it have nothing to do with their atheism.
    5
  40. Candy Vegetables and darkness This is exactly why the liberal media don't show those images, because they are islamiphobic images.
    5
  41. a science communicator who thinks you can just pull carbon out of thin air. science communicator or magic communicator?
    5
  42. ah no, i watch her videos. She doesn't engage, she use to debate people on stream until she gets her ass handed to her. So she doesn't really engage, she just preaches.
    5
  43. a post modernist.
    5
  44. his wife married a man, not a decepticon.
    5
  45. The problem is its life destroying, they will not lock you up. They will fine you, and they will go to your job and require your employer to fire you because according to this new law, your employer is responsible for what you say. When you refuse to pay the fine, they will take it by force. Only when you are too poor to pay, and you continue to offend, then they will finally lock you up. Its death by a thousand cuts.
    5
  46. +Jesper G You are correct on your assumption, if you watch the stuff she dose on TYT its the same vapidness.
    5
  47. Well there are people who are voting for trump because they want the country to burn. Only by burning down everything, you can start a new again.
    5
  48. He also wants a "tough luck" system. He doesn't care about those laborers, he just wants it cheap, You can't compete against millions of others, well tough luck. There is always charity you can beg for.
    5
  49. Morality doesn't need religion to define for you what is good and what is bad. Only a psychopath needs morality to be spelled out for you. Atheists derived their morality from social contracts and the golden rule. That is the only morality an atheist needs so he doesn't just go around killing people for their own enjoyment. Just because this guy brought into one psychopath's explaination of atheism doesn't mean he is correct.
    5
  50. +William Boyle It's not it's a new cryptocurrency. It's like Monopoly the board game said ok bitcoin user. Today we are going to give every bitcoin owner the same amount of monopoly money. From now on you can use this monopoly. So now please use this monopoly money rather than bitcoin.
    5
  51. +dude3sasha hmmm so he thinks UK is making a surplus for EU, so that's why he wants UK to stay? Why would anyone from the UK wants to stay if they are ones making surplus and supporting all the other countries with deficits? He sounds like the kind of asshole who wants those people giving him the money to keep giving him money, because he is benefiting from it.
    5
  52. he is blaming the candy store that made him fat from eating all those candies. Germany gave greece all those loans, while the greeks ate it up greedily, and even asked for seconds, refused to stop, even when they got diabetes.
    5
  53. +EnhancedNightmare If its just the lack of scientific knowledge sure, that's no reason to dislike her. However there is a reason to dislike her if she completely abandons critical thinking, and go full authoritarian zealot, when it comes the issue of rape accusations. Her views on rape accusations is that women should be able to accuse a man of rape, and people, authorities should believe that woman no matter what. Even after an investigation had found no evidence of rape, we should still believe the rape happened. That is a stance that free thinking liberals can not countenance.
    5
  54. +Kayman Fani What motives churches you ask? Its not the free market. What motives churches are religion, they want to indoctrinate / bribe people into their religion, that's what motives churches.
    4
  55. +Kayman Fani The market is based on greed and profit, there are no profit in charity. I don't want my safety net to be based on charity. The market would not provide charity.
    4
  56. oh this guy is awesome. and you can't touch him cause he is more oppressed than your raving sjws.
    4
  57. +Mastikator She did one of those features on some guy claims that his technology is going to solve the global warming problem, by pulling carbon right out of the air. They can use that carbon to make plastic. When real scientist like thunderf00t came and did a rough calculation of the energy involved to make that happen, and showed that its not even remotely viable as a solution to global warming. She shuts down the calculations, saying its just some calculation, and still maintain that its a viable solution. This is the kind of science that she believes in. hoaxes and pipe dreams. Science communicator indeed.
    4
  58. I did hear that robot out. This decepticon basically said if you don't like your transformation you can always change back. That deserves a downvote for its deceptiveness.
    4
  59. What do you have against megatron? You robotphobe!
    4
  60. wow christina hit it out of the parks, what's happening on college campus these days are akin to the student struggle sessions of communist china. I showed that yale video to my dad, he was triggered. He was a teacher in china back in the cultural revolution, and went through the student struggles. He said it reminded him of what the students did to him back then. He was surrounded and beaten often, now there was no beating in the yale video, but that's how the beating always starts. Students demands the teacher apologizes and self flagellate themselves, it slowly crescendos into a beating.
    4
  61. I think she is on something. She sound high as hell.
    4
  62. Trump university 😂
    4
  63. sorry once seen, can not unseen.
    4
  64. +pizaz1001 Well that's because its hard to disprove what Tommy had said about the Rotherham rape cases, and all of what's happening in Europe. The Rotherham rape case is especially well documented. While you can easily disprove of what that black woman had said, with real stats. And that black woman did come off as racist and some what frighting with quotes like this "In any transition, some people have to be scapegoated some people have to be sacrificed"(not actual quote, but something to this effect). Tommy had said nothing controversial in this interview, hence the difference between like and dislike ratio.
    4
  65. holy fucking shit listen to that dumb blonde goes "people are PC and its a good thing" Those two morons are arguing for self censorship.
    4
  66. The earliest I can think of is red Sonia but then again I'm no film history buff.
    4
  67. Glenn Beck thinks russians care about starwars? hahhahahahh
    4
  68. +Zed Dez This is how they always take over, through the good will of people who were sleeping and looking the other way.
    4
  69. everytime I hear people advocate for bitcoins, I always get this scummy feeling, that I'm being conned.
    4
  70. Sorry to break it to you but microsoft and windows is still this dominant thing. It's just that after the government scared them with the anti monopoly law, microsoft have been laying low.
    4
  71. +PeterK1984 Right unsub from TF because he made some errors and assumptions, but loves cara even when she knows nothing about science. That's how much difference a pretty face makes.
    4
  72. +PeterK1984 could it be that she deletes those negative comments? occam's razor
    4
  73. +Jacob Furness Its in his interest to keep society stable. If the poor had enough they will string him up. if you don't take care of the poor communism will rise.
    4
  74. +Ryan McKinney look at private prisons and see how well that turned out.
    4
  75. +Chríss M no you fight bad ideas with good ideas. You criticize islam, you mock islam. You don't import millions of muslims into your countries to spread islam. Its not a far fetch idea to say stop importing muslims. Those muslims that are already in the country so be it, nothing can be done about that, except to mock their bad ideas, and to assimilate them. How do you think Christianity get to their enlightenment stage. Christianity got mocked so much in society it became socially unacceptable to hold backwards Christianity views anymore. That is why Christians are not out on the streets stoning gays. We should do the same thing with islam.
    4
  76. The major problem with those sjws, is that they honestly have no problems with thought policing. In fact the main weapon sjws have to achieve their aim is with thought policing.
    4
  77. All ancaps says you have to rely on charity. It's nothing new, its just another way of saying "tough luck, go on the street and beg".
    3
  78. +arad7613 I think she was saying that the invasion wasn't justified. I think she was against the war, but once we are there, we should stay. We broke it we should put it back together, and hence nation build.
    3
  79. +Yann G Well she grow up in a communist country, and communist were dogmatically for gender equality.
    3
  80. +FrankDaTank1218 A 15 year old is not still sucking nutrients from the women, while a fetus is continuing sucking genetic material from the body. A fetus is no different than tumor in that regard. When that collection of cells stop sucking the life out of a women, until then women gets to have the right to kill that collection of cells.
    3
  81. +alphamoonman Look I do understand how you feel. I'm just giving you some bitter medicine. You don't believe in the mormon religion and yet you go to the mormon church. because mormons are friendly. You think that friendliness is someone comforting, while I think that friendliness is faked, ingenuine. Ask yourself this, if the mormon church stop talking about god and were just a simple social center where people come to party, would you be happier?
    3
  82. +Senad Elezovic You have more freedom of movement without harness, you don't have to spend time putting on harness and taking it off everytime you go up there. Hence more efficient, but not safer.
    3
  83. +Senad Elezovic its efficient for a window washer to go up on 70's floor and not wear a harness. Well I'm glad there are regulations saying you must wear a harness.
    3
  84. +Senad Elezovic again I don't want my safety net to be reliant on charity. I don't want to rely on the good will of others. i don't want to hold my hat out and beg.
    3
  85. let the witch hunts begin, no good can come of this, especially when those DNA face reconstruction technique is a complete farce.
    3
  86. +Sean Thomson again you try to pass off an economic philosophy as liberalism. Not everything is about trade, not everything is about economics. Those people that forced King or prince John to sign the Magna Carta are liberals. They could be considered one of the classical liberals, It is about citizen rights, nothing to do with economics.
    3
  87. a postmodern interpretation of accomplishment indeed.
    3
  88. Well when this deception is trying to tell trans people its ok to transition, if you don't like you can always change back, even when you cut off your penis. That's so irresponsible and dangerous.
    3
  89. i'm going to call him a decepticon, not on his voice, but on his deceptiveness of trying to convince people that you can change back even after you cut off your penis. Plus he is a post modernist, which raises all kinds of bullshit alarms.
    3
  90. well those sjws have redefined what term of harm. Now words can harm you, your hurt feelings is a harm. So if your feelings are hurt, the one who hurt your feelings have just committed a hate crime.
    3
  91. This diversity quota is a deal breaker for me, everything else she stands for sounds reasonable, but when she wants a diversity quota, that's a deal breaker. Don't vote for her.
    3
  92. I think that's what he and the rest of the regressive sjws would like. sending those that they don't agree with to reeducation camps.
    3
  93. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo Really I'm reading the same comments as you, I have not seen anyone who made any claims that refutes what tommy has said in this video. Can you give me an example what people is saying that is wrong?
    3
  94. what did you expect, he is in radio.
    3
  95. +Reverend Reko having an organism growing inside of you, leeching nutrients from you while providing no benefit to you. that is a parasitic relationship. The simple fact that the fetus is present within the host is an act of aggression towards the host. Just because this is the way humans procreate, doesn't change the nature of that relationship or that a fetus (a human) is leeching off the host.
    3
  96. +spracketskooch Calling a fetus is too callous? That's an emotional response. The technical interaction between a fetus and the mother is a parasitic relationship. That's just the way it is. I do realize I'm divorcing the concept of procreation from sex. But sex doesn't necessarily have to lead to procreation. Procreation is the act of the uterus hosting an embryo. If you were to say "but the women had sex by choice so she should face the consequences". The argument is sex doesn't always lead to pregnancy. There is only a chance of pregnancy when you have sex. It's like if you know a street is dangerous, chances are if you walk down that street at night you would get robbed and murdered or raped. But if someone did choose to walk down that street knowing the dangers, and if someone did come up to that person to attack them, would that person lose the right to self defense? It's the fetus that attacks the host, just like its the criminal that attacks the person walking down that street. As for the degree of threat posed by the fetus. A pregnancy doesn't have to be life threatening that is true. But a pregnancy have the chance of becoming life threatening. A pregnancy is also 100% of the time damaging to the health of the mother. So some are damaging your health constantly, would you not have the right to remove that threat to your health? That is the basis of self defense, it is to remove a threat to your person by the least amount of force possible. By least amount of force means if it's possible to have an abortion and still keep the fetus alive, we should do that. But if it's not possible, then the rights of the host to self defense takes precedence over the fetus.
    3
  97. Well to be fair Barbarella weren't very actiony. Neither was the character in 10,000 bc
    3
  98. +tripp so the leftists are discriminatory towards dumb black people. Good to know.
    3
  99. he have made the book free with a promote code on his website.
    3
  100. open borders remember, we don't need to know english just walk across those borders that are opened.
    3
  101. +Deer Sakamoto everyone thinks cheap labor is a good thing, except when you are the cheap labor.
    3
  102. These days the more I hear the left talk the more right I become. I can't stand the left anymore, but then Dave allow the right to speak, an offer up their sober views. After listening to this guy's idea, it was enjoyable, it makes me think, but after all he said, he just reminded me why I'm on the left. There is a problem with this guy's view. Charity is the safety net? But according to his world view, everyone should act on their own self interest. So if everyone is acting on self interest why should I donate to charity, how dose donating to charity help me? This whole charity being the safety net is a net full of holes, it will not catch everyone that falls. History remembers, before deposit insurance banks would fail, and people would lose their money. Some bank manage could run off with all the money and the depositors would lose. Some one spreads a rumor that this bank is going under, people would line up at the teller and demand their money, there would be a massive withdraw, and even if the bank was healthy a mere rumor of it being unhealthy would cause the bank to fail. Those cases have happened in the past. Those are the reasons why deposit insurance was introduced.
    3
  103. Holy shit this women is a nazi. "In any transition, some people have to be scapegoated some people have to be sacrificed" What? How is that different from the nazis scapegoating jews? Rubin I'm down voting this video not because you brought her on, she should be interviewed to find out her views. I'm down voting because you didn't push back against this rhetoric. This is how those regressive thinks, and these kind of thinking leads to purges. Communists use that tactic, nazis use that tactic, they see their cause as righteous, and thus in pursue of that cause its ok to commit any atrocities.
    3
  104. this guy gives off a scummy feel. If he is the spokesman for cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency is doomed.
    3
  105. so bitcoin cash will win because it has a conman for a spoke person. sounds about right.
    3
  106. bitcoin cash is not just an altcoin, it is actually stealing from bitcoin in terms of it's value and brand name.
    3
  107. hypnotic because he is talking out of both side of his ass like a good post modernist.
    3
  108. +PeterK1984 She never said anything stupid on science because she never say anything scientific. Just look at her none science commentary and you will see the stupid.
    3
  109. +EnhancedNightmare Well there we go, the only reason you like her is because of her face. She has no skills, no talent, but she has a nice face.
    3
  110. +Patrick King we know what trump wants, he wants to build a wall, he wants to ban muslim immigration. We know where trump stands, unless you are saying trump is so smart he have some kind of other ulterior motives that we don't know about. What stands have trump shifted? does he no longer want to built a wall? Is all of sudden trump wanted to have massive muslim immigration? Trump says he is oppose to the iraq, war, but if you wan't to interrupt his bubbling interviews as something else, well that;s you project your own feelings over his words. Trump is not that smart to play the double talk like most politicians do. And yes trump's whole platform is everything is negotiable, it comes from his business background. But what ever you might think about trump, you can't deny that he is a nationalist, a protectionist. He wants to protect americans and negotiations wants america to gain the most favorable position. With Hillary you don't know what's true.
    3
  111. +Alex Kosh Sam's support of Hillary can be summed up in this sentence. "I think she understands and will do the right thing, even though her speeches don't show it." That is dangerous. At least with trump we know where he stands, and we know he is an idiot. An idiot can not do much damage in office because of all the checks and balances we have in the government. But a smart person like Hillary can do alot of damage covertly, and that's more dangerous than trump.
    3
  112. +Scumbag Atheist well like you said with Trump, he is not going to do anything. So with trump people will be less fucked. Nothing can fuck you less than something.
    3
  113. +Scumbag Atheist If trump becomes a president and he is not gonna do shit, that's perfect. Hillary is going to do shit, and its shit that we don't want. Hillary is going to move the country towards globalisation, move the political process more towards the banks, and move the society more towards sjws. If trump doesn't do shit, and all his function is to stop Hillary from doing those things. That would be the perfect presidency.
    3
  114. +radthecliff yeah you see, you hope he is exaggerating, because you don't want to believe how bad things have gotten, its is a form of denial. When things get so bad you close your eyes, and hope it would go away, but that's not how reality works.
    3
  115. +Qwerty Qwertz it is no different. There are people who are constantly unhappy with their face, they get tons of plastic surgery and butcher their face to the point of absurdity. There are people who want to cut off their arms because they want to be disabled. There are people who want boobs so big that they are the size of a basketball. It is no different.
    2
  116. +MunkeyChips the problem is the school system are full of those sjw teachers. They are the ones teaching our kids this none sense.
    2
  117. +Brandon S. no he just made a video dissing her.
    2
  118. +Brandon S. cenk ogre did a piece on Hirsi, where he demonized her. and call her a fake.
    2
  119. +Dean Cutler It's not self defeating when you make tons of money in the mean time.
    2
  120. people will always cut corners, especially in easily established business. All one has to do is screw over bunch of people by the time the market had caught up to it, he'll just close down the business change the name and start all over again. There are tons of factories in China that produce substandard products. When their name gets widely known, they'll just change the name of their company and start all over again.
    2
  121. +mytmouse57 funny you keep saying how others are ignorant. Have you ever read the quran? I have. You don't want to live in an islamic culture but some how those culture of oppressing women, the culture of draconian laws, the culture of barbarism suits others just fine doesn't it? How hypercritical an unprincipled can you get? The west learned from islamic cultures? which part? the head chopping or the hand chopping? What have islam contributed to the world? Name them. Woopiedo Pakistan elected a women as the head of state, they also shot a girl for trying to go to school. And we are talking about western cultures, and yet you think it centers around the US. Other western countries have women head of states just because the US never had one doesn't mean anything. Again you have no first hand experience, I do, many others do, ex muslims do. They will tell you how horrible a shit hole the islamic word is. i don't need to broaden my vision because I have seen with my own eyes. You need to open your eyes and broaden your vision.
    2
  122. +mytmouse57 80% of muslims believe in some from of sharia law. That stats says it all.
    2
  123. +Realthx its the regressive pearl clutches.
    2
  124. +FrankDaTank1218 Yes the argument is its her body, and that tumor is feeding off her body. I don't care if that tumor is alive, that tumor was created by her, and she have a right to end that tumor if she choses. "thou shall not kill"? god kills all the time. sorry I don't' believe in your god and you don't get to force you god onto me. If you want a theocracy go live in a muslim world. A breastfeeding child is just like a leech, but with a breastfeeding child the mother can push that leech away from the breast and prevent feeding. With a fetus you have to cut it out if the women choses. A women creates life a women can end it, as long as its attached to her. Just like go kills all the time. The goal has never shifted, if something is feeding off of you, you can stop that feeding.
    2
  125. +FrankDaTank1218 The goal post haven't change, the goal post is always that, Its inside the body feeding off the body, hence the host body gets to decide what to do with this tumor. A tumor feeds off the body just like a fetus. The women creates that life, the women can end it. There is a reason why the religious is so against abortion. Its because they think god created life and not the women, so only god can end a life. But that's not scientifically provable. Science says women created life through her own genetic materials, so a women can end it, as long as that life is feeding off the women.
    2
  126. +Bitter Cactus Her story is fishy, the KGB was disbanded in 1991, and she was born in 1990 so she was kidnapped by the KGB at the age of 1?
    2
  127. Something about her story doesn't add up. This women was born in 1990. The soviet union fell in 1991, the same year the KGB was disbanded. So she lived in a communist regime in for a total of 1 year. And some how the KGB kidnapped her when she was 1?
    2
  128. +Senad Elezovic begging is for someone who doesn't have power, while voting is for someone who has power.
    2
  129. +Senad Elezovic A safety net is suppose to be safe, its not suppose to force you to beg for charity.
    2
  130. +ausraider let trump get elected now or face hilter in the next election cycle.
    2
  131. +RavenC1357 Yeah if you put in effort into it, as in try or try harder. You can do it. This is call the human experience. Some people have to try harder than others. Life isn't' fair not everyone is born equal. There is an old saying "the stupid bird flew first". Its because the stupid bird try harder and flew before the smart ones.
    2
  132. Ravinian its completely unreliable and utter none sense, soon you will have a witch hunter of people pointing fingers. And if you happen to look like those composites, well your life is ruined.
    2
  133. +Erez Why are we talking about jacklyn glenn? She has nothing to do with this video.
    2
  134. +DJRAKKK If those are the only 2 choices america has then america is fucked. Cara is vapid, and knows no science, while Trump is a loud mouth blow hard who knows no science. I would pick Trump since none of them knows any science, might as well get some entertainment out of it.
    2
  135. +Sean Thomson The magna carta is about individual rights, its about what a king may, or may not do to a subject. The regressive left believes in group rights not individual rights. The regressive left is perfectly happy to use the state to crush individual rights. So no the regressive left don't support the magna carta. And you are correct about western culture and philosophy, at least what can be considered the modern west is based on liberalism. On the difference between what separates a libertarian and a classical liberal. I have already told you, libertarians have a disdain for government, while liberals love government, they want to improve it. Hence the transition from monarchy to a democracy. A libertarian would like to opt out of government, they believe taxation is theft, while a liberal does not. A libertarian believes you are born with certain rights. A liberal position is that your rights are given to you by a government. That is why they forced king John to sign the magna carta, guaranteeing those rights. I have watched Sargon's debate with libertarians on the issue of rights, Sargon intuitively understands this, but he couldn't quiet spell it out, to put it in those words. That's why Sargon have so much trouble distinguishing himself with librarians. I believe that inability to think of rights as given to you by the government is a relic and hold back from a religious backgrounds for most of the western liberals. Most of those early liberals are christians after all. They think of rights as something god given, but in reality rights are given to you by the state, or society at large.
    2
  136. +Sean Thomson did you just use an economic philosophy to describe liberalism? Liberalism is philosophy about how to govern, how a society should function. Sure economics is part of governance, part of society, but its not the only thing. This is the problem I have with you libertarians. You have blinders on, all you see is the free market, the holy market. The market is not the end all and be all of society. Liberals understand that, libertarians don't.
    2
  137. +Sean Thomson classical just means original, before all the progressivism seep into it. There is a lot overlap between libertarianism vs liberalism. But one fundamental difference is that libertarians have a disdain for government while the original liberals seek to create a new government out of the old monarchy, so liberals actual like government.
    2
  138. +firstatheist that just means you don't watch her materials.
    2
  139. +godwings101 trump is a loud mouth buffoon, he says what ever comes to his mind. But he haven't blatantly lied, Hillary has time and time again. And hillary have no excuses of being an idiot to hide behind.
    2
  140. +godwings101 more than hillary who has been proven to lie time and time again. Lie and cheat.
    2
  141. +godwings101 at least trump is against it, while hillary says she is against it but then do everything in her power to pass it. That kind of shameless lie is the hall mark if hillary. So who can you trust, trump the idiot or hillary the conniving witch.
    2
  142. +godwings101 by that logic trump could have other people, people more qualified to run the country. So all that rhetoric about how trump don't know what he is doing goes all out the window. At the end of the day Hillary still can't be trust, and trump have vowed to stop TPP. That's something Hillary refuse to do.
    2
  143. +KingOfTheCairns All those former Christians got daddy issues and then turn atheist to spite their family. Those stories are not original at all.
    2
  144. +Thatcher Nap She seems flippant because she thinks she won't change her mind. But there are some who have changed their mind and killed themself because they just can't go back anymore. There is a lot of word play, I can choose to live like a dog if I want. That means nothing. When you cut off your penis, that's a huge change you just can't undo.
    2
  145. so basically a decepticon.
    2
  146. its a decepticon.
    2
  147. +Mithridate You are still getting confused on what she said. She is for psychiatry (the use of drugs) but singles out the medical doctors that over prescribe drugs. But in general she is ok with psychiatry. She said she is all for the drugs. Oh and yes I did misheard her she doesn't seem to have a problem with psychologists. But my point still stands, she is all for drug interventions. She advocates for surgery over talking, that is the dangerous. Here is an example of her being deceptive. "There is something really important for straight people to understand, no one has regret." And then in the very next sentence "the number of people that have regret is miniscule" Is the number of people who have regret miniscule? Or no one have regret? There is a contradiction right there. "B if they have regret they can change back." - That is a lie you can not change back. "change back you can't grow, a penis, well so what" She thinks having a penis is no big deal, well I'm going to tell you right now a penis is the most important organ to a man. As for abandoning her family. A man does not abandon one's family That is a societal expectation for a man. But she doesn't want to be a man anymore. I guess she can't handle the responsibility of being a man. She did abandon her family, by not wanting to be a man. The family didn't abandon her, because you can't expect any wife to stay with someone when they decided to be a different person. It's his choice to stop being a man so he abandoned his family.
    2
  148. +Bea Smith you just gave a US definition of hate crime. In canada a hate crime is when you violates one of the human right codes. When you discriminate against one of the declared protected class of people you are committing a hate crime. Just this year, a comedian, made fun of some disable kid in one of his show. And he was brought up on hate crime charges by the human rights court, and was fined. So making fun of the disable is considered a hate crime in canada, because the disabled is considered a protected class in canada. So by adding trans and their gender expressions into that protected class. Not using their pronouns, or if you make fun of them is also going to be considered a hate crime.
    2
  149. Great talk, but your sound quality is atrocious.
    2
  150. Pakman is the king of click bait there are numerous examples in Pakman's titles where he doesn't even follow his own rules on truthfulness when it comes to titles. But Pakman's own rules on making titles are ethically questionable. Pakman will pick what's technically true, but word it in a misleading way to cause sensations. That's highly unethical, and that is the definition of click bait (a title that is designed with hints of deception to cause sensations).
    2
  151. Buy but but trump university 😂
    2
  152. I considered the unborn baby a person. I also consider that person to be an aggressive person in active attack against the mother. That unborn person is sucking nutrients from the mother, causing the mother pain and discomfort. Risking the mother's life during the birth process. So yes that unborn child is a person, but the mother have the right to self defence against that person.
    2
  153. +AristedesLoL because he is the type of personality that can never admit he did something wrong.
    2
  154. Dave has become a real shill lately. The Florida sun must have fried his brain.
    2
  155. +Shankopotamizz google Rotherham rape, that'll get you started. What he said about the Rotherham case is true.
    2
  156. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo yeah he cares about what happens to Europe, because he lives in Europe, so he talks about what happens in Europe. So what. Why does he have to take on the whole world and try to fix the muslims religion. All he is trying to fix is the european attitude towards that religion. There is nothing wrong with that.
    2
  157. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo do know you know how tiresome it is if one is to qualify every single sentence? when people say muslim must we add the word not all? For fuck sakes context matters. One don't have to make every day speak into a law document where every thing is defined to the last letter. 
    2
  158. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo Well in Rotherham the report states about 1400 white girls were made victims, so no muslim women. And no muslim are being decapitated in UK. Context matters, he is talking about within UK, not all over the muslim world.
    2
  159. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo what claims do you think he exaggerated? Everything he has said is well documented, especially the one about the rotherham rapes.
    2
  160. Woman vs a soyboy who has the advantage?
    2
  161. +LiberaLib do you know what trump said about barring muslims from entering the US? The quote is "until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on" Trump's reaction is a childish one brought on by the regressive left that refuse to analyses or even talk about the muslim problem. Trump is echoing a sentiment in the general population that our leaders refuse to talk about or even figure out what is going on. That is the issue here, when the left and its leaders refuse to address this issue, and shy away from it. You will get sentiments like this.
    2
  162. +Samuel Underwood That is why you are biased. Your goal is to stop abortions, it's not to answer the simple question of who takes precedence. The host or the fetus? An objective person has to make a choice between the host or the fetus. But have already come down on the side of the fetus. To me a fetus is the aggressor, it's a parasite, while the mother is a host that has an organism invading her. Even if that organism is a human life, its a human life that's being aggressive towards the host.
    2
  163. well for the self defense argument, a fetus is considered a life. It's a life that's attacking the host, so the host can defend against it via abortion. For late term abortions, every effort has to be made to keep that fetus alive. But you can even make an argument that for late term abortions the self defense argument doesn't apply more because you have waited for so long, you essentially already consented to have this parasite living inside of you. For the self defense argument, when you found out you are pregnant, you have the choice to abort or consent right there and then. You don't get to make that choice later, unless it's in the event of health complications.
    2
  164. Oh what was the pirate movie she was in where she is the pirate captain?
    2
  165. Milo is a tool for the intolerant right? Well Michael Ian Black is a tool for the intolerant left.
    2
  166. you need to learn some history. there were head tax in the us for immigrants in the 19th century. People have to pay to get into u.s. Welfare isn't the issue, if you have a wealthy society, and open borders, people will come, and if massive of the poor comes then your society won't be so wealthy.
    2
  167. the history of having a border and its open? You don't need to study history to understand irony.
    2
  168. libertarians believe in no borders. And look at what no borders have done to sweden.
    2
  169. Oh for fuck sakes Liana, this is why I say some times you have blinders on. The reason why there are all those white slim attractive women running around in the dessert is because those are brides. They are immortal Joe's brides who are trying to escape him. Immortal joe is attracted to those women, that's why he is keeping them in his harem. It makes perfect sense. But feminists just don't see the simplest explanations. Everything have to be a greater societal issue.
    2
  170. Naive and gynocentric for a feminist that's considered to be on the good scale.
    2
  171. +Andrew Brekus Same concept, a country is the extension of a home for a group of people. Because this migrant who comes to the country will displace a fellow citizen who is already in this country.
    2
  172. +Andrew Brekus how many homeless people do you have in your home? You are literally killing them by not letting them into your home.
    2
  173. +Deer Sakamoto oh yes sweat shops are good. You can treat a person as shitty as you want, as long as you feed them. Great moral principle isn't it.
    2
  174. +Bob Jenkins you can always try to find a charity to help you. so begging is always an option in a libertarian paradise.
    2
  175. +evenflow919 so the safety net is build on expects? and hopes? Not much safety in that. There is a reason why in the past charities have always been run by churches. Its a way for the churches to preach their religion to you. Nothing is for free, when you accept help from churches, the church expect your soul in return.
    2
  176. +Liam Smith She is a regressive, she likes the tactics of nazis and the communist who uses purges. Her words "In any transition, any time you are trying to transform an organization....is someone going to be scapegoated is someone going to be sacrificed? yeah."; She is for purges, and for scapegoats.
    2
  177. most likely he didn't do his research and doesn't know what that site is all about.
    2
  178. +John H De Sade was a sadist, a psychopath, and clinically insane. Just because he wrote some crap about atheism it doesn't mean he represented atheism. De Sade is wrong, and Klavan based his opinion of atheism on one insane man's rambling. Well he is someone who believes in a fairy tale book written by insane men in the dessert. So I guess Klavan have a history of listening to insane men.
    2
  179. +Diverting Tales The golden rule is not subjective. The golden rule is very simple. If you don't like getting hit on the head, then you don't go around hitting others on the head.
    2
  180. exactly, it's scummy as hell
    2
  181. That's why it's so scummy, it's very dishonest using the same name to confuse people. Ver even try to imply in this interview that rubin's bitcoins are somehow bitcoin cash.
    2
  182. +Srs Acct I'm going to give every bitcoin holder an equal amount in monopoly money. So from now one everyone come and use my monopoly money. Sure you still have your old bitcoin wallet, but who cares about that, my monopoly money is where it's at. if people stop using bitcoin then the value of bitcoin drops. When people started to use my monopoly money, my monopoly money's value increases. That's how bitcoin cash is stealing value from bitcoin. if it's just a 1 to 1 transfeer of value then its' not a big deal, but the problem is its' not 1 to 1. People like Ver stands to gain a lot during that transfer.
    2
  183. +William Boyle what's the point of giving every bitcoin user the same amount of bitcoin cash? Where did all those bitcoin cash come from? I'm not talking about the tech behind cryptocurrency, I'm talking about the scummy business practice of bitcoin cash.
    2
  184. whenever anyone tries to sell me in the virtues of bitcoin, I always get a scummy feeling coming off of them.
    2
  185. +TiagoTiago scummy and liars trying to appropriate a name that doesn't belong to you. Especially that name is associated with a highly traded item, that's worth billions.
    2
  186. +William Boyle If Roger Ver is bitcoin jesus, that just shows how scummy this whole cryptocurrency is.
    2
  187. give it a couple of years until someone forks BCH, then you will be crying over all the money you lost.
    2
  188. +Carlos Correia That's just it, you are not buying a piece of equipment. You are buying money. bitcoin have value because it's been heavily traded and because it has built up a user base. If you take away the bitcoin user base, the value of bitcoin drops. So if all the user base from bitcoin switch to bitcash, the value of bitcoin drops while the value of bitcash rises. It wouldn't be so much of a problem if the value drops and rises 1 to 1. The problem is it doesn't. Say bitcoin is trading at 10k per coin at the time of the fork. When the fork happens, logically bitcash should be worth 0. When more user switch from bitcoin to bitcash the value of bitcoin drops while bitcash rises. but that rise of bitcash and the fall of bitcoin is not in a 1 to 1 ratio or even uniformed. People like Ver here makes tons of money from the rise of bitcash, and those that don't pay close attention to the fall of bitcoin will lose most of their value.
    2
  189. I'm sorry Dave this is where you lose me, The force awaken wasn't a bad movie, but it wasn't a good movie either. Its unoriginal, bad character development. It shits all over canon. I think you are too into the reverse wookie to see the flaws in this movie.
    2
  190. oh this guy is great. One of the best explainers of how a civil society should function. Dan reminds me why I'm still a liberal. Even though I hate all of those sjw, the regressive and I support trump.
    2
  191. lol this guy is so dignified that he is staying at a mansion in UK, while telling brits to vote remain at the same time shouting for greece to leave. So dignified indeed.
    2
  192. +Dionys84 He had 1 job when he was in office, and that was to cut cost. He refused to do it, thus forcing greece to take another bailout loan. He dug the hole deeper for greeks, and that's why he is hiding out in UK right now, telling brits to vote remain, while telling greece to leave. He is a hypocrite.
    2
  193. +Petra Maier Well Hitler is a leftist by today's standard, but back then he is considered right because he was fighting an even bigger leftist, which are the communists.
    2
  194. +Petra Maier Well this is how Hitler comes to power. The left makes a mess of things, and someone like Hitler comes in. It is going to be scary.
    2
  195. +Ewan Robertson its the other way around, marxism is a subset of communism. Karl Marx is a communist, so to be a marxist you are a communist.
    2
  196. If this guy had any sense, he would of imposed austerity, cut greek government spending when he got into office. That way they wouldn't have needed a second bailout. Instead he refuse to cut costs because he is a communist, he still wanted all those social programs, that forced the greek government into a situation where they needed a second bailout.
    2
  197. +Matt James (Aviation) Its guilt by association, she says she doesn't like to use this guilty by association tactic, but she is using it none the less. Just because she sees the neo nazis supporting PEGIDA, so anything they touch must be bad. She will keep talking about how islam is the problem, but she will not do anything about it because doing something about it means joining movements like PEGIDA.
    2
  198. The reason really has been taken over the sjws, the organizers are sjws. The people attending might not be sjws, and are perfectly rational atheists, but the organizers are definitely sjws, just look at their website.
    2
  199. +EnhancedNightmare Well that's another example of her character, and her world view. Her thinking doesn't involve evidence, she has no critical thinking skills. its really surprising that she is in the science field. But then she is in the science field because of her face, not her brain.
    2
  200. +John May "Vegans absolutely have the moral high ground over meat eaters." That's a ridicules argument, following that logic, not eating would be the highest moral ground one can obtain. Then everyone should just starve themselves to death.
    2
  201. +Sea Knight The whole point of rational selfishness is to rationalize. What rationale is behind giving to charities? You have to make a rational claim because you are the one who wants to say rational selfishness is a virtue. I would say that those people who are currently giving to charities are not being rationally selfish. They are being unselfish. As for charities thanking the donors, well that is a second hand thank you, if you want to be rational, why would you want to buy a second hand thank you if you can buy a first hand thank you? To be rational selfish, I would have to make the calculations is the risk of my own life worth saving this person that I don't know. The answer is always no in a rational way. The emotion of empathy overwrites rationality, that is why people who risk their lives are not being rationally selfish. They are being unselfish.
    2
  202. +Sea Knight I know what rational selfishness means. Sure there might be some that think it feels good when they have plenty and give some away. But most don't feel good to give out their hard earned money. It would make me feel good when I give a few dollars to some homeless guy and having him thank me profusely than giving to an organized charity, which I will never get any thanks. Also, a rational selfish person would not risk their lives to save a stranger. The risk/reward is just not worth it.
    2
  203. There is an inconsistency within objectivist / libertarian thought. Objectivists want to make rational selfishness into a virtue, and yet they keep saying if there are no welfare programs private charities would take over. Well if everyone is rationally selfish, why would there be any private charities?
    2
  204. +playandrepeat she has no idea when it comes to the topic of science, she is just a good communicator of pseudoscience.
    2
  205. +Scumbag Atheist to vote for a third party at this point is to allow hillary be president. Hillary is can not be allowed to be president. Vote for trump hope that he does nothing to prevent Hillary from achieving her goals.
    2
  206. the lolbertarins are becoming dumber and dumber.
    2
  207. This is the core of the issue. Ideals don't matter to those people, the outcome the ends is what those people are interested in. They don't care about the truth, they think they are justified in lying because they think their end goal is noble. That's the problem with those sjws.
    1
  208. +Vanessa P its so sad you are trying to ignore reality. There is a reason they call it a mental disorder.
    1
  209. +Vanessa P keep ignoring reality. Artificial, man made. Its a fake vagina, its a hole drilled into the body to make it look like a vagina. Reality is reality, stop getting triggered by it. I'm debating someone who is detached from reality.
    1
  210. +Vanessa P simple truth. You want to cloud the issue and ignore simple truth. can those artificial vagina produce lubricant yes or not?
    1
  211. +Vanessa P simple reality you are willing to ignore. you think simple = untrue or something. simple truth is just unequivocal and undisputable.
    1
  212. +Vanessa P ... and then back to simply biology, so simple that a junior high schooler understands. There is no such thing as my version of reality, there is only reality. And again I have to repeat myself. I don't care about anyone's sex until its time to have sex with them. The thing with transgenders is that they care intensely about how other people perceive them.
    1
  213. +Vanessa P does it lubricate, does it menstruate, does it produce eggs, those are all realities you want to ignore.
    1
  214. +Vanessa P Aaaand we're back to ignoring reality.
    1
  215. +Vanessa P hahah the plumping works? really does it manstrate? Can it produce eggs? Does it lubricate? Real good at it indeed.
    1
  216. +Trans ExFeminist Autism I have already explained. I don't care about your sex unless its time for sex.
    1
  217. +Vanessa P realistic vagina? haha. Does that doctor attach nerve endings to the vagina as well? We all know the answer to that don't we. And "Bad questions to ask a transsexual"? If there are such things are a taboo topic with transgenders than that just hows how fragile their psych is.
    1
  218. +Vanessa P Why am I making it my concern, again that was a response to a previous comment on how beautiful she looks as a women. So when it comes to the question of sexual attractiveness, genitals are the primary concern. Furthermore, there is no amount of surgery that can make a penis into a realistic looking vagina.
    1
  219. +Vanessa P Why am I making the genitals my concern? Because I don't care about your gender, i don't care about your sex, unless its time for me to have sex with you. This is the reality for 99% of the men.
    1
  220. +Vanessa P Simple biology my dear, Blair might look like a beautiful woman on the surface. But when she takes off her pants people would not think that anymore. That is the bearing it has on everyone. When men look at Blair they think "she is so beautiful I want to have sex with her", when she takes off her pants all that thought goes away. That's the reality. Are you trigger by reality? I don't care what she wants to label her self as or what others want to label her. But you can't get away from this simple reality.
    1
  221. +Vanessa P That was a response to a previous comment and it was self explanatory. Are you triggered by simple biology?
    1
  222. +Vanessa P what do you think is in her pants? what's between your legs determine your sex. You can't get away from reality.
    1
  223. +Ron Charles except when she takes down her pants
    1
  224. +Derin G not sure what that means, "better than nothing" As if there is narrative to be had and we must grasp at straws at anything to fit that narrative. Science doesn't work that way. When a study says no conclusions can be made, then no conclusions can be made.
    1
  225. +Derin G you are talking about the study on MRI brain scans of male and females. Well those scans do show a difference, where different areas light up for male and female brains. Well those differences are chemical, and neurological, not biological. The brain structures are still the same for both male and female. Its just certain areas of male brains are enlarged and certain areas of female brains are enlarged. And those size differences are still with in the norm of averages. Even that study disclaims that no conclusion can be made on the issue.
    1
  226. +Derin G well then we agree. Which brings us back to my original point. Transgenderism is not biological.
    1
  227. +Derin G sure, its perfectly reasonable that could cause unhappiness. such causes are once again mental, not physical nor biological.
    1
  228. +Derin G specifically the ones with chromosomal abnormality.
    1
  229. +Derin G what does indirectly mean? Is it because they know their conditions in know it created an unhappiness mentally? That's call indirectly.
    1
  230. +Derin G well completely unfounded. chromosomes does not cause unhappiness.
    1
  231. +Derin G it isn't a coincidence? what does that mean? You are trying to imply that it is a partial cause, which is completely unfounded.
    1
  232. +Derin G sight, I thought this would be obvious and does not require stating, but apparently not. Just because you can find a few intersex people who are also transgender, it doesn't mean intersex causes transgender. Correlations does not equal causation.
    1
  233. +Derin G what does that have to do with transgender? or hermaphrodites for that matter?
    1
  234. +Derin G I'm not the one who is being triggered right now. People with intersex conditions tend to be trans, that's a ridicules statement. Because trans means you are not intersexed. trans means you are from one gender, and then transformed into another gender. Intersex means exactly that both sex. Completely different concepts that exclude each other. A Hermaphrodite by definition means both sexes, and thus that person have the option of choosing both genders, so they are not coming from 1 gender to another. Hermaphrodites is about extra sex organs. You would not know the difference if you had male or female chromosomes without the sex organs. Again all of that is still biological.
    1
  235. +Derin G the misinformation that transgender have anything to do with genetics, there have been 0 studies to even suggest that's the case. If its genetics that means its passed down from generation to generation. Which is a ridiculous idea, it would be very noticeable if that's the case. A certain family line would produce alot of trans. But that's not the case. Cancer have no connection to gender dysphoria and neither does being a hermaphrodite. You think hermaphrodite have something to do with sex, and transgender have something to do with sex which is a wrong conclusion. Hermaphrodite have something to do with sex as a biological organ, transgender have nothing to do with sex. Transgender as the name suggests is about gender. There might be Hermaphrodite who have gender confusion and thus develop trans symptoms. That's the mental component of being trans. There is some thing you can say about the hormonal causes, because of the extra genitals that can create an hormonal imbalance. Again the hormonal angle is no where conclusive yet.
    1
  236. +Derin G the genetic thing is ridiculous misinformation. How ever there are something in regards to hormonal anomalies, but that's never been substantiated or even explored enough to come to any conclusions. In any case if it is indeed hormonal, then its definitely not biological. Hormonal means chemical reactions in the brain, that's neurological. A hermaphrodite can develope trans symptoms and thus become trans, just like any other human. That's a red herring that means nothing. Just like a cancer patient can also be trans.
    1
  237. +Derin G stop confusing the terms. An hermaphrodite is not trans, because an hermaphrodite doesn't have to have body/gender dysphoria. Now an hermaphrodite can develop dysphoria symptoms. When that happens, then you can call an hermaphrodite a trans. They are completely different conditions.
    1
  238. +Derin G there can be what? if its a biological issue like extra genitals then its not a trans issue. You are talking about a totally different set of problems like a hermaphrodite. People often want to confuse and conflate the two different problems.
    1
  239. +Julian Walker well transgender is not a biological issue. There is nothing wrong with the trans's body biologically. It functions just like any other body. It is a neurological issue in side the trans's brain that's causing the unhappiness.
    1
  240. Well studies have shown trans people are not satisfied with SRS. The suicide rate and dysphoria rate remains the same amount trans after SRS. But on the other side of that coin, SRS is not a brain transplant. If you can take the brain of a trans and put it into a different body I wonder what the result would be. The medical/psychological problems the trans issue is far from settled.
    1
  241. Who here would be upset if she did exactly what she said?
    1
  242. Abortion is the intentional taking of human life, but that intentional taking of life is in the act of self defense.
    1
  243. "In my system this is where we draw the line. If you fail you die. Tough luck" Great endorsement to a system. I can't wait to get on the tough luck system.
    1
  244. If these are the kind of students yale is graduating then why is anyone still looking to hire anyone who has a yale degree?
    1
  245. +mytmouse57 Would you like to live in pakistan? Do you know what kind of a shit hole pakistan is? Why are more people from pakistan wanting to immigrate to the west than the other way around? You don't believe the majority of the world are shit holes that's because you have never been there. I have have, I traveled I have seen. I doubt you have, or else you wouldn't make that ridicules statement. Islam is a horrible religion not only because those people that practice it. Its a horrible religion because its doctrines its text are horrible. With its horrible text as a basis, the people who practices it in a horrible way. That's is the fundamentals if islam. You are in the camp that thinks the west is responsible for all the world's ills. Here is a few examples that run contradictory to that notion. China is a horrible place in the past, because of communism. Now Hong Kong is a better place because it was a British colony, it practices western values, and its more prosperous because of it. Now the rest of china have become better because the chinese government have abandoned communism and embraced western values. The same goes for the middle east, most of that place is a shit hole. There are a few gems that shiny in the region relatively. Israel practices western values, and it is prosperous. Dubai is prosperous, because it some what embraces western values, because it needs to do business with the west. When ever western civilization touches something, the people in that region become more prosperous. You would know that if you traveled. I can say for certain that you haven't traveled because you hold those ignorant views.
    1
  246. +mytmouse57 again you argue from a position of ignorance. Name one prosperous islamic society. Go right ahead name one. There are tons of people wanted to immigrate to the west, very few wants to go the other way. That say says it all. I wanted to immigrate to the west, because my own country was a shit hole, and I did immigrate. You have no idea what you are talking about until you go love in a third world country. Yes parts of the US are poor, but compare to the poor people in third world countries, they would be living like kings. You have no idea what poor is until you see the poor in the third world. You first world privilege and ignorance is disgusting to an immigrant like me. You have no idea how good you have it. I have first hand experience, you have nothing but your white guilt.
    1
  247. +mytmouse57 you don't want to worry about who's culture is better, that's your first world privilege. I know western culture is better, because I immigrated to this culture, i wanted to live in this culture, i wasn't born into it. I have compare it other cultures and it is clearly better. You speak out of ignorance, while I speak out of a simple comparison. Islam is a horrible culture and barbaric religion. All the ex muslims say this, and only the ex muslims have a right to say it. You are not part of islam you can't say it, and the current muslims will not say it. Only those who have left the religion knows how horrible it is.
    1
  248. +mytmouse57 even the gentlest version of sharia is still horrible. There is lawful, and there is chopping off body parts and using stoning as punishment. The problem is not with fundamentalism. The problem is with the fundamentals of islam. Islam is fundamentally violent, its a religion designed to conquer and to rule. I'm not a westerner, and i feel western culture is superior to other cultures especially islam. My ex muslim friend have a saying, he immigrated to the western world to get away from the barbarism of his culture to get away from his own people, and now they are following him to the western world. He is horrified. He jokes about how he needed westerners to protect him from his own people, because if he ever fell into the hands of his own people he would be dead.
    1
  249. +mytmouse57 sharia is not broad, its not open ended. Its a set of rules that every muslims have to live by. Its a code of law that covers everything from stealing to adultery. As with every law, there are punishments for breaking said law. Now there might be different interpretations of sharia. There are very draconian interpretations that says cut off the hands of thief. And there are softer interpretations that says you can only cut off the hands of thieves if they don't repent or under some conditions. But the bottom line is there are still provisions to cut off hands. The same laws that deal with rape, adultery, gays, apostates. There are harsh interpretations and there are soft interpretations. But even with the softest, the kindest interpretations possible, it is still an horrible barbaric law, there are still hand cutting, stoning and head chopping for minor offenses. 80% of muslims believe they should live by those laws, that is the problem.
    1
  250. +DirkAndDestroy Well I do know something about communists, I actually did live in a communist regime. And communists are way better at gender equality than the west ever was. So her whole claim of gender discrimination in a communist regime is kind of out there.
    1
  251. +DirkAndDestroy Then what is she talking about when she said she lived in a communist regime?
    1
  252. +FrankDaTank1218 You as a women made that baby, and you as a women can unmake that baby. Simple enough logic for you?
    1
  253. +FrankDaTank1218 Holy shit you are a moron, you can't argue your positions logically, so now you want to pull out quotes and citations. What quotes and citations do you have? All you have quoted is "thou shall not kill". Well fuck you and your bible. Learn some reading comprehension. I'm am willing to call it murder. I'm saying its justified murder just like self defense. Pregnancy is not fatal, getting hit in the face is not fatal either, but if some some one repeatedly hit me in the face and the only thing I can do to stop him is to kill him then its justified. Pregnancy is not just inconvenience, it have an adverse effect on health. Pregnancy carry the risk of death for the mother. That's enough justification to terminate if the mother chooses. I know you like to reduce a women to nothing but a walking child incubator. But women are people they have the right to choose to not give birth. Women's right supersedes that right of an fetus.
    1
  254. "Until a child can be independent, it is an infant still 100% relying on the resources, and nourishment of others." Yes relying on others. not necessary the mother. And that fetus once born is not sucking the life right out of the mother and causing a detriment to the mother's health. You want to claim that killing a child in the womb is homicide, go right ahead. I'm saying a women gets the right to commit that homicide in this circumstances. The ethical logical justification is that its self defense. The child is having an adverse effect on the mother's health, the mother gets the right to terminate. Ending a life in self defense is ethical, especially when the women created that life. That life is not yours or society to protect, its the women's own creation, the women gets to decide its fate.
    1
  255. +Matt Giles If a child is born, kicking and screaming, that means it no long needs to be attached to the mother to live, its no longer sucking nutrients from the mother, then it gets to have rights given to the child by society. The whole point of abortion is, what happens when the rights of the mother came into conflict with the rights of the child. Well if the child is sucking life from the mother, then the rights of the mother takes precedent. Because the mother is the one who is creating that life and sustaining that life. If a child is 1 year old, then no the mother don't get to kill it because the two rights are not in conflict.
    1
  256. +FrankDaTank1218 If you don't back your argument with religion you have no argument. You only argument seems to be "thou shall not kill". Well I already told you, killing is acceptable under certain circumstances. The creator of a life can end a life if that life is sucking nutrientes off the creator. If a fetus can survive outside of the body, then it deserves rights, the mother can cut it out and the fetus can still survive, then it gets rights. Its that simple. If it can't survive outside of the mother, then it doesn't get any rights. Rights are given to you by society, and the rights of the mother supersedes the rights of a parasite.
    1
  257. +FrankDaTank1218 I'm sorry Christi Winters, I'm sorry you don't understand sarcasm. And yes i do support the right of a creator of life to end that life. As long as that life is still attach to the creator. Your god have killed billions, what gives him the right to kill. Because he is the creator in your eye. Well a women is the creator of a fetus, a women have the right to end it.
    1
  258. +FrankDaTank1218 so you are now for abortion? Good job me, finally you have seen the light. Praise jebus.
    1
  259. +Lucky One so every time you masterubate you just killed millions. you genocidal maniac!
    1
  260. +FrankDaTank1218 God created life is a lie. Women created life is a scientific fact. I have had way too much fun at the expense of the mentally challenged.
    1
  261. +FrankDaTank1218 try to shift the goal post. Its her genetic material that made the fetus up. We are not talking about DNA we are talking about genetic material, and what made that material.
    1
  262. genetically not her body? what? Its the body that produced the fetus, its genetically not her body?
    1
  263. I'm all for gun ownership, but this objection to a gun registry is just illogical. America will never be like Australia, the 2nd amendment will ensure the gun registry will not be used to confiscate guns.
    1
  264. So basically new math is to count all your fingers and toes, when you run out of those you draw dots on the board🤦
    1
  265. +Tightmanhole perhaps, and I was told that the riot police in Belarus was called the KDB. Maybe that got lost in the translation.
    1
  266. +Casual T so its the belarus kgb not the soviet kgb that kidnapped her? Well that makes sense.
    1
  267. +JACK HQ Look the whole thing of we only help people via charity is not reliable. No matter how inefficient government programs are, it helps more people than charities. It has a wider reach than private charities, and its more reliable. The question becomes how much help does the government actually need to offer. That depends on how wealthy the government is. If you country is poor then obvious the government can't help as much. But if you are in a wealthy country then the government can do more to help. To help, it doesn't mean give people free stuff. To help means don't let people starve to death, don't let people die when its preventable. That's the pro life approach.
    1
  268. +JACK HQ scrutiny by the press without actual force backing it up is meaningless especially the press isn't trust worthy. Online media is no different.
    1
  269. +JACK HQ scrutiny by the press? you trust the main stream press? hahahahahahha
    1
  270. +TheIcecreamtaco Voluntary charity is never reliable because it's voluntary.
    1
  271. +Jarl Nieminen well charity is a self imposed tax, you could put it that way.
    1
  272. +Jarl Nieminen Well charity is not a tax, is voluntary. The whole thing of a tax is that its involuntary. There needs to be a safety net, and that net can not be based on voluntary actions of a few. If its based on voluntary only then the net will have too many holes to be effective.
    1
  273. +alphamoonman So you go to the moron church to not feel lonely. I feel for you, maybe you should look to get some real friends who you don't have to be fake around. You have to social need to feel that you belong. You have just make the case for religion being the opiate of the masses.
    1
  274. +Jarl Nieminen Again I don't see the problem, the greedy will not help, and the tax makes sure the greedy have no choice by to contribute. While those willing to help, well they should be glad to pay the tax.
    1
  275. +Jarl Nieminen If they are willing to help then they should be glad to pay the tax.
    1
  276. +Senad Elezovic With a dictatorial government you beg, with a democracy you vote, you exercise your power over the government. Its is the politicians that begs you for the votes.
    1
  277. +Senad Elezovic The difference is when you beg they can refuse to help. With the government, it has an obligation to help, with the government you are not asking/begging you are demanding your rights which the government can not say no to.
    1
  278. +Senad Elezovic When some one come to you, they are seeking to help you. That's not begging. But when you go to someone asking for help, that's call begging. It doesn't matter if they are offering help or not, you are the one going over there to ask for it.
    1
  279. +Senad Elezovic There are people who give charity, and there are people who receive charity, going to a church asking for charity is call begging.
    1
  280. +Senad Elezovic Going to a charity is begging. Paying into an insurance you say? What do you think unemployment insurance is?
    1
  281. +Senad Elezovic Yes you trade safety for efficiency, that's why the social safety net is better than begging on the streets.
    1
  282. +Johnny On the Spot Yes i'm a sadist, I'm not an anarchist. Larry Elder is a statist.
    1
  283. +Ekitchi Hoshi the safety net is not there for you to feel better, the safety net is there for when you fall.
    1
  284. +Senad Elezovic yes its call having a safety net. Its not called go begging on the streets if you fall.
    1
  285. +RavenC1357 Adults that get ADHD because they didn't get corrected by their parents when they were kids. Those adults that have the symptoms of forgetting a thought mid sentence. Maybe they have a short turn memory deficit, or maybe they just have low IQ. I know adults who have that short term memory problem, but they never act hyper, that's because they are adults. This whole hyperactivity disorder thing is not real, its just kids having too much testosterone, that's why its usually boys that get diagnosed with ADHD.
    1
  286. +RavenC1357 One of the huge disservice they did was put in the word "disorder" to ADHD. Its not a disorder, its just kids acting out. and parents who don't correct it when they were kids, they would rather drug the kids. What this so call "disorder" is just kids being active, and wanting to play. The older generations deal with these kids with a slap in the face, and they quiet down quickly. But now a days we just drug them.
    1
  287. If you have ADHD that means you are not trying. The whole stick of ADHD is that the kid don't try to listen and settle down.
    1
  288. Why is MundaneMatt in black face here? That's racist!
    1
  289. This just goes to show most of those youtube gaming channels actually sucks at playing games.
    1
  290. On the issue of leaks all she have to say is "There doesn't seem to be any thing that's troubling" Really seriously? If those emails are true and its not troubling to you? This women have 0 credibility and is as crooked as Hillary. She clearly have no moral center if she thinks those revelations are nothing serious.
    1
  291. I'm glad you are doing this definition of the terms. Most people keeps yelling those terms socialist, left wing, right wing, conservatives, republicans, liberals, libertarians, communist, marxist, naizs, fascists. No one knows what any of those terms mean anymore, they just identifies as one group and sees the others as enemies.
    1
  292. Steve Davies is correct on that immigrants depress the wages of poor people. It is the poor that suffers when you have mass immigration, and it lowers the standard of living over all.
    1
  293. +JennStiltskin I don't think Watson claims to be science communicator.
    1
  294. +Mastikator yes a science communicator who have never heard of trees.
    1
  295. +Eric21ND move to somalia don't come back take everything you own with you, see if the US government can still tax you or not. genius.
    1
  296. +Eric21ND not if you don't come back genius. leave don't come back.
    1
  297. +Sean Thomson Again you are cherry picking on economics again. Economics is not the whole part of liberalism. if you want to go by wiki's definition of classical liberalism. Here is what it says. "Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedoms found in economic liberalism which is also called free market capitalism." I don't see much difference from what I described to you. You want to focus on the economic part of that definition. There is a reason why its only at the end economics is brought up, because its not the most important part. The most important part is civil liberty and political freedom and a respect for democracy under the rule of law. What you and evangelical is trying to do is muddy the waters between libertarians and classical liberals, you are trying to say that libertarians are the classical liberals. Which is utter nonesense. I have already explain the difference between libertarians and classical liberals. But if you want to change the definition of libertarians, well then you are gonna have to convince libertarians to stop hating government.
    1
  298. +Sean Thomson Classical liberals focus on rights, and there are other philosophies that can also focus on rights. So... what? How does that dispute the definition of classical liberals? You keep providing articles on economics, economics is a very small part of liberalism. Economics wasn't even a concern when liberalism started. It feels like we are talking over each other. You ask for a definition of classical liberals I gave you one. But you don't accept it and you pull out some economic theory, to debunk my definition. Does not compute.
    1
  299. +Sean Thomson Again I don't accept your definition, classic just means original values, on citizen rights. Using your locke example, a classical liberal are interested in right to life, right to liberty, and right to property. Life being the first concert, then liberty and property last. Not everything is about economics, you have to way too narrow focus on economics. Liberalism's main focus is not on economics, but on rights.
    1
  300. +Sean Thomson wait what? classical economics. So to be call a classical liberal one must endorse classical economic? Well classical economics means trading with gold, no banks, no stock market, no paper money, no investments, no insurance, no interest. Blood hell to be a classical liberal we must all want to go live in the 16th century.
    1
  301. +Nightbob yeah yeah, tax is theft, you don't want to pay taxes, you don't want to be part of a society. Well leave.
    1
  302. +Sean Thomson I don't think Locke is against a progressive tax system. And Locke's idea of right to life, right to liberty and right to one's own property just means the government can't come and kill you for no reason. The government can't come and lock you up for no reason, and the government can't come and take your property for no reason. He wasn't talking about taxes. Now lets go back to the time of magna carta, even back then the barons who forced king John to sign the magna carta pay a lot more in taxes than the peasants. Back then only the land owners pay taxes, your average serfs don't even pay taxes. You can say that's a progressive tax system when poor's tax rates were 0. The progressive tax system was done for practical reasons, you can't ask the poor to pay when they have no money. If you ask the poor to pay the same rate as the rich they were starve to death, and that's the government depriving the poor's right to life. Another reason for the progressive tax system and for having wealthfare is that so the poor don't revolt. You can see it as protection money to the poor, there will always be more poor than rich, if you don't pay them, they are going to want communism. Or you can see it as the government's way of giving every citizen their right to life. Now the regressives they might say they respect the magna carta the same way they say they are for free speech. Its just lip service, in action don't don't respect the magna carta, they are perfectly happy to take away a man's freedom for saying the wrong things, or take their property in the form of a fine for saying the wrong things. You got feminists who says we should do away with the concept of innocent until proven guilty in rape cases, take away the right to a trial. That's against the spirit of magna carta and the very letter of it. Applying a progressive tax system is not the same as applying an asymmetrical economics to different groups. When you are in a group that the progressive deem, for example you are black, you can't not be unblacked, when you are white, you can not be unwhite. When you are rich you can be poor, so when you become poor, you pay less. When you are poor, you can also be rich, when you are rich you pay more. Its taxes according to means. Its not like the system saying oh you are a aristocrat, we are going to tax aristocrats at this rate, and you are a peasant, we tax peasants at this rate. Having more money or less money doesn't make you belong to a group. As for libertarian. I don't really know what libertarianism means. I can only go by what those people who claim to be libertarians tell me what they believe. What I describe of libertarians are what I see. No one can tell me definitively what a true libertarian is. But the libertarians that I know are not classical liberals in the sense that liberals want government, they want to improve it. While those people don't seem to want any form of government, or at the very least grudgingly accepts a very small government.
    1
  303. well the classical liberals are the ones that dismantled the monarchy, separate church from state. Started the industrial revolution. That kind of classical liberals, the beginning of liberalism.
    1
  304. +max larsen Those small states can also be tyrannical. There could be a dictator running a town, and there is nothing you can do about it.
    1
  305. +max larsen So you think a big state is inefficient, you would like to have alot of smaller states. So basically you want to go back to the time of city state nations. One thing you should consider if you have alot of states everywhere there will be tons of overlap in terms of services, and administrations, that's way more inefficient than a bigger coordinated state.
    1
  306. +max larsen a town has a mayor, a mayor represents a government a state. So the community you speak of eventually becomes a state if it gets large enough.
    1
  307. a community of one is an individual, a community of 100 becomes a state.
    1
  308. AndroidDoctorr They don't have to come and vote in an online poll, its not like ISIS is siting beside them and watching them vote.
    1
  309. Regulate the hell of them libertarians with their but but but muh private corporation will be the doom of us all.
    1
  310. +godwings101 You think you can, the fact that you don't even have 1 example in mind suggests you are falling for all the bullshit narrative the media spins.
    1
  311. That's what I have been saying for a year now. i would rather have a buffoon in office than a manipulative master mind who don't have our best interest at heart.
    1
  312. If you think of abortion as a self defense against a hostile life that's doing harm to the mother then you don't need to draw this arbitrary line on when life begins.
    1
  313. what are you going to do, a decepticon will always lie to you. Especially a post modernist decepticon who have an aversion to psychology.
    1
  314. That is a decepticon sitting in that chair not an autobot.
    1
  315. +Valerie Pisklak sounds like Soundwave to me.
    1
  316. its the voice of a decepticon.
    1
  317. +Shazy Donut I read all those stats came from self reporting surveys. Show me an FBI crime stat, hell just show me 1 trans on the news that were beaten because he was trans. At least the BLM can put a face on the news saying see the cops killed that black man. Show me some of those, you don't have any?
    1
  318. Transformers, more than meets the eye. men in disguise. Transformers...
    1
  319. +Thomas Saba I don't disagree with Rubin bringing her on the show. I disagree with the guess on what she said. That's why there is a downvote. Its rating how good the video is. If there is clear bullshit being spewed in the interview, and no one challenge that bullshit. It gets a downvote.
    1
  320. the dislikes are unwarranted? This decepticon is trying to deceive people into saying if you don't like your transformation, you can always change back, even when you cut off your penis. Only a decepticon can lie so well.
    1
  321. robots in disguise.
    1
  322. +Ozelot According to you hormones changes brain. So lets change Deirdre McCloskey's brain by pumping him full of male hormones and bam we have a full male.
    1
  323. +Ozelot You just found a cure for AIS and transgenderism. The nobel prize is in the mail.
    1
  324. +Ozelot Keep denying science you moron. but apparently you found a cure of transgenderism. Just give them hormones, and their brain will change. Holy shit you deserve a nobel prize.
    1
  325. +Ozelot you ridicules moron, AIS doesn't affect the brain at all. A simple google search can prove you are a moron. You think hormones can give people different brains. If that's the case then all you need to do to cure trans people is to give them hormones. Give Deirdre McCloskey tons of androgen and bam, his brain would change to a man. Problem solved. Moron!
    1
  326. +ProperJimmy I mentioned looks because he keeps going on about how men with AIS look like women and so society treat them as women. I just pointed it out if he thinks, just because some men look like women then they are women. Then By his definition of gender, it is solely based on looks.
    1
  327. +Ozelot You claim gender is based on looks, you said they look like a women so society treat them as women. If its based on looks then its a fashion statement. Stop denying science a simple google search will prove you wrong. "Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is when a person who is genetically male (who has one X and one Y chromosome) is resistant to male hormones (called androgens). As a result, the person has some or all of the physical traits of a woman, but the genetic makeup of a man." Which part of genetically male did you not comprehend?
    1
  328. +Ozelot You need to learn reading comprehension. I never said you claim that trans have a different brain. I said the trans community claim they have a different brain in the wrong body. What you claim is that gender expression, or gender is nothing but a fashion statement solely based on looks. You ask me to explain the existence of AIS women, well I'm telling you there is no such thing as AIS women. there is only AIS men, who might look like a women.
    1
  329. +Ozelot That's your own projection. If those men with AIS want to dress like a women, and pretend to be women. That's them pretending. If they pretend well people around them will not know the difference. If society treat them like women, its because they pretend to be women. You are without logic. The whole argument is that trans people have a different brain then their physical body. But what you are saying is even if those men were born men, but because they have a immunial disease all of sudden they will become women and trans? Well that completely destroyed the wrong brain theory. All you have presented is that if you dress like a women you are a women. That's call a fashion statement.
    1
  330. +Ozelot No you said society view them as women, "view" as in look. And I didn't say they dress that way, I said society doesn't treat them as women, unless they dress like women. You are the one who is treating those men as women, that's why you are projecting and saying society treat them as women. Society doesn't treat them like women, only you do. Men with AIS are not women. That is science.
    1
  331. +Ozelot What? Your cognitive disguise is cause your brain to bleed. I always maintained its the chromosome that make you man or woman. You keep wanting to bring looks into it. That's why you try to bring up Androgen insensitivity syndrome. If you want to bring in look, then looks is a fashion statement.
    1
  332. +Ozelot There you go again, gender is a fashion statement for you. They do look like women, that's the symptom of the disease. As for society treating those men like women, do those men present themselves as women? That's your own subjective bias speaking. If those men dress like men I doubt society would treat them like women. And this whole treating them like a women, what does that even mean? Men and women have the same rights in our society under the law.
    1
  333. +Ozelot See you got that right, they look like a women, the key word is look. Because their body killed male hormones, so they look like a women. They are still a man, they just look like a women. its all about looks. To you gender is nothing but a fashion expression. To the people who cares about science, we care about chromosomes, not fashion statements.
    1
  334. +Ozelot I can explain androgen insensitivity perfectly. Its a disease, its an error. Its a disease where a man, still a man who have xy chromosomes that reject male hormones (chromosomes are not hormones). Its like some people who have an immune system that kills their own blood cells.
    1
  335. +Szaam When someone peddles such nonesense as "you can change back, even if you cut off your penis". That person don't deserve any politeness. That person is deceiving everyone, hence a decepticon. That person is also a post modernist. All post modernists are decepticons in nature, the fact he have the voice of a decepticon is just the ironically cherry on top.
    1
  336. this guy is so reasonable that he thinks its ok if you cut off your penis, you can still change back if you don't like your transition. Its a postmodern definition of reasonable.
    1
  337. Holy fuck look at that robot talk about "if you have reget you can change back" Change back like grow a penis back? Then that robot laughs about how you don't need a penis. This is exactly the kind of thing a robot would say.
    1
  338. +Mithridate She is saying if you cut off your penis its no big deal, she make it seem like not a big decision to make. That's call unreasonable. That's encourage trans people to toward surgery. As for the psychiatry part, yes she is not against psychiatry (the use of drugs). She is against psychology (the use of therapy). Those are different concepts. She wants trans people to cut off their penis and take hormonal drugs. But she doesn't want trans people to talk to counsellors and seek none invasive drug and surgical treatments. As for the reaction of her family. I don't blame the wife. The wife married a man, and if he doesn't want to be a man anymore, can you blame the wife for leaving?
    1
  339. +Mithridate Well if you agree with me that cutting off the penis and still being reversible is unreasonable, then how can you still say that this trans is among the reasonable ones? As for the golden rule? I don't want people to encourage me to cut off my penis, so I will not encourage others to cut off their penis. Is that not the essence of the golden rule? This decepticon is against psychology, which means she is against therapy in treating transgenderism. And she is in favor of drugs, surgery and cutting off penis. I don't see the "not all" that she was trying to raise. Her stands is clear, she is pro surgery, pro drugs and anti analysis anti counseling. This makes her very dangerous to other trans. Her rhetoric and stands will encourage other trans to cut off their penis, and cutting it off is irreversible. That is why I said she is not reasonable, but you seem to disagree and think she is among the reasonable ones.
    1
  340. +Mithridate You did not claim that cutting off penis is reversible, but this decepticon did. All you did was claim that this decepticon is one of the more reasonable ones. I apply the golden rule quite simply. If I don't want something done to me, then its not something that i want done to others. I don't want my penis cut off, so I don't want to encourage others to cut off their penis. Finally, no, go back and watch that video again. She said she is not against psychiatry, as in giving drugs to people. She is against psychology, psychology is therapists talking to people trying to work out their problems with talking. This decepticon is against that. This decepticon is against talking, but want to give trans patients drugs. That is why this decepticon is dangerous, and not reasonable.
    1
  341. +Mithridate Again if you think cutting off penis is reversible as "one of the more reasonable" then what does that say about the other trans? And please learn what the golden rule is. If I don't want my own penis cut off, then I wouldn't wish it on other people. That's the foundation of secular morality. There needs to be more gender dysphoria research done with out politics getting in the way of real science. This "reasonable trans" is also against psychology, a field of science that can actually help trans people. So I don't see this person being reasonable, I see this decepticon as really dangerous.
    1
  342. +Mithridate if you have been around trans for years, and this decepticon is the most reasonable one you can find? Wow what does that say about the trans. And yes I like my dick I don't want it cut off. By applying the golden rule, I don't want other people to cut it off needlessly either. I have morals, I don't want people to suffer for a political narrative.
    1
  343. I heard this deception lie to people's faces and tell them that cutting off a penis is no big deal, you can always change back if you want. Sorry I'm going to judge this deception base on it's deceptiveness.
    1
  344. So dishonest, the so call private police still have to answer to the government police. Ancaps would like you to believe that there would be no problems when those private police don't have to answer to a higher power. Don Corleone approves of such a society.
    1
  345. +Bea Smith In a civil court you are responsible to bring the suit, you have to hire a lawyer, you have to collect and present all the evidence. In a human rights commission, they are the investigators. The commission acts as the police, some one complain to the commission, the commission do all the investigations, they will sue on behave of the complainer. And the format of the sue is not in any court room, the decider of the suit is another body call the human rights tribunal, which works closely with the human rights commission. Its very incenstrous. There is a case in Canada where the a reporter named Ezra Levant. Who made the statement saying the human rights commision is crazy. And he was sue again by the human rights commissions. The complainer was one of the human rights commission's prosecutor. But the case was not that Ezra Levant said something mean about the prosecutor, the case brought forward was that Ezra Levant say that the commission was crazy. So in essence the commission was suing Levant, but they just put the complainer as one of their prosecutors. http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/ezra-levant-crazy-prosecutions
    1
  346. +Bea Smith It is not a civil law when the government themselves can be the complainer who brings the suit. The human rights commission doesn't fall under the normal channels of a civil law suit. is that understandable for you?
    1
  347. +Bea Smith I was wrong about who gets the so call damages portion of the fine. The human rights commission gets the court costs. I stand corrected on that. But that doesn't change the natural of the human rights commision. It isn't a civil court, it doesn't follow any of the civil court procedures. Nuisance laws suits in a civil court will be thrown out, but not in the human rights commision. it is a quasi extra judicial entity. It doesn't even hold its hearings in a court room, and yet it have the weight of law behind it.
    1
  348. +Bea Smith the human rights court doesn't deal with civil claims. The fine imposed doesn't go to the kid that was made fun of, it goes to the government. Its not one party suing the other, its the government going after you. A violation of the human rights code is considered a hate crime. The comedian was charged with a hate speech, that was the official charge. Bill c16 adds gender expression as part of the protected class. Ofcouse something has change, it means you can no longer make fun of gender expressions. If that comedian made fun of some trans kid, then the human rights court can fine him also under bill c16.
    1
  349. +Bea Smith it was classified as hate speech for making fun of that kid. hate speech is a form of hate crime.
    1
  350. +Regless0000 Yes that comedian was fined 42k plus court costs for making fun of some disable kid. The US might protect against none violent hate speech, but Canada doesn't, that's why its very dangerous to add in extra protected class into the canadian law.
    1
  351. +Bea Smith Bill c16 triggered the debate, but its not bill c16 by itself as the problem. Bill c16 is only a few lines, that seems innocuous. The problem is within the human rights code which bill c16 amends. The requirement for employers to police what their employees say, the giving of offense to a protected class is a hate crime (which translates to the use of preferred pronouns). The problem part is in the human rights code. Furthermore, Peters is a psychologist, he would know more about gender expressions than you a nobody.
    1
  352. +Bea Smith The only reason why UofT came down on Peterson is because the new law requires employers be responsible for what their employee says. So it has something to do with the law. Just watch the Peterson debate, they explain the law adds gender identity and expression as a protected class to the human rights code. If your gender identity/expression is that for people to call you Ze, then that's gender pronouns. If you violated that expression it is considered a hate crime.
    1
  353. +Bea Smith Not using a gender neutral pronouns are considered a hate crime, and you can certainly be arrested for a hate crime.
    1
  354. +Bea Smith They would if you don't show up to their human rights court.
    1
  355. +Bea Smith Oh that's so much better, they'll just take all your stuff away. When I say they will lock you up, I don't mean a jail sentence, but they will bring you to the police station and hold you for a day or half a day. Its like if you have alot of parking tickets stacked up, and you get stop, they will bring you in. They won't put in in a real jail, they'll just take everything you own away and make you homeless. I would rather be in jail, at least you get fed and housed.
    1
  356. @Joe Almeida science never claim to have all the answers, science gives itself room to be wrong. The church doesn't. The church can't even admit when they are wrong.
    1
  357. The church is for science until science challenged doctrine. It's funny how the bishop mentioned the church's support for Copernicus and neglected to mention the church's persecution of Galileo and the burning of Giordano Bruno.
    1
  358. andy le Compare to the other sources who are you gonna trust. TYT? Gawker?
    1
  359. is she high?
    1
  360. Bob Lyon actually old people do things slowly because they can't move as fast.
    1
  361. OMGCHEA! I don't know what kind of documentary you been watching. But 20min docs? Were they made by highschoolers?
    1
  362. OMGCHEA! larry king had hour long interviews and most of his interview at the very least ran around 30mins.
    1
  363. OMGCHEA! that's still only 20mins, its super short.
    1
  364. The best he can come up with is trump university lol
    1
  365. The whole abortion issue and the whole argument of when does life begging? Is it a person or not? Those are all moot questions. All you have to ask yourself is does a person have the right to force itself on another person. Sucking off nutrients, causing pain, put that other person at risk? This is what pregnancy is. Its one life leeching off another in order to grow. Now you have to ask yourself does a person have the right to defend itself against another person literally sucking the life out of them?
    1
  366. +Reverend Reko oh he bans all negative comments on his channel. That's why you don't see any negative comments. You might see a few that he didn't get to ban right away, but eventually if a negative comment gets too much traction he will ban it. And he doxx people, he is going to claim its not doxx, he just reveals names. But that's just playing symatics. He have asked someone else to go dig up a kid's name, and when that guy find the kid's name along with the address he gave the name to Tracy and doxx the kid's address. But tracy will claim he had nothing to do with the doxx all he wanted was the kid's name. That's like a mob boss saying I never ordered this guy to be killed, all I wanted was someone else to teach this kid a lesson.
    1
  367. pschopaths will do that to you.
    1
  368. narcism with a hint of psychopathic personality.
    1
  369. The problem with this guy's world view is that, there are alot more poor people than rich people. And poor people have pointy pitch forks. When you push the poor far enough they will use those pitch forks.
    1
  370. BLM was a hate group, but now it has turned into a terrorist movement.
    1
  371. Glenn Beck "The perfect storm everything is going to fall apart. Now let me tell you the good part" Awkward long pause. Then shifts topic. We are doomed, there is no good part.
    1
  372. Holy fuck this guy is a drugged out moron, who knows nothing about current events. He still has his head stuck in the 40s.
    1
  373. +RisingTied72 again define stealing. I don't think you know what that means.
    1
  374. you want an argument? Tax is not theft. Simple common sense. You don't even know what the definition of theft is.
    1
  375. taxation is not theft you morons.
    1
  376. +cn012891pat because some of them watch him on ora.tv
    1
  377. Joey Joe Joe Jnr. Shabadoo People might disagree with Tommy on a personal level, and they disagree with his past association of EDL. But no one can refute what he has said on the interview. While it is so easy to dispute what Areva Martin has said. And every one can clearly see that Areva Martin is a racist, who is willing to sacrifice innocence in the purpose of her systemic change. That is the difference between the two interview, and hence the like/dislike differences.
    1
  378. Dave Green That is the great difficulty in trying to address the Islam problem. You will always attract those unwanted elements. But we can't just simply throw up our hands and pretend there isn't an problem simply because it might incite certain unwanted elements society. That's exactly the reason why the rapes in sweden are not dealt with, and the rapes in rotherham are covered up.
    1
  379. Dave Green You don't get to control or choose who follows you, he is not the king of anything. If his followers are truly racist he has no control over who follows him. And once he found out there something wrong with the group he created, well he left it. That's the only control anyone have, is control of one self. From what I have seen so far, all those labels of racist and bigot that's on his head is nothing but more of the same mud that the regressive sling at pretty much anyone. As for Pegida every they have said about what's going to happen to Europe have came true. I'm sure those anti immigration groups do attract alot of racists, because racists are also against immigration. But we have to look to what the leaders of a group is saying and judge based on that, rather than judge a group based on some nameless low level follower.
    1
  380. Dave Green Again I have not seen any of those so call evidence of hatred. And if you are basing those hatred on what his followers done or believe. Well that is guilt by association. Tommy can't control all of his followers. This guilt by association thing is a trait exhibited by the regressive left. Just like Rubin said, he will be called a racist and bigot because he interviewed Tommy. Just as you are calling Tommy a racist and a bigot for supposedly what his followers believe.
    1
  381. +Dave Green Well I have only heard stories of Tommy's suppose racism and bigotry. A year ago I might of believe it. But now I'm taking all labels of racism and bigotry with a grain of salt. I have no idea what Tommy has done in the past, but from this interview, with everything he has said. He told the truth, and he doesn't seem racist or bigoted in any way.
    1
  382. +Airehcaz well if its call being disenfranchised. Those people who are support trump knows no politician really represents them, and none of the candidates really are looking out for their interest. They have no stake in the political process, so why not burn the whole political process down by electing trump. Trump is their wrecking ball.
    1
  383. +ninjamixer well dave have to learn those people are the ones he's against.
    1
  384. If you doubt the need for food and drug safety inspectors, then just go to china. They sell power mild laced with rock dust that makes people blind. They sell drugs that killed kids. That last major case was 20,000 kids died because one drug company sold expired drugs to hospitals. The last time I was there for a months I got food poisoned 3 times at 3 different restaurants. Another well know case was that a jerky company put DDT into the jerky making process just so their jerkys would last longer. No one will die right away from eating those jerkies, but it causes cancer and long term exposure will kill you. So yes people do poison your food to make a quick buck.
    1
  385. We already tried objectivism in the 19 century and it didn't work, it leads to massive wealth inequality which gave rise to communism.
    1
  386. This whole thing of private charity taking care of things is nothing but wishful thinking. All those rich leftists that kept saying tax me more, they never send an extra penny to the IRS. What makes you think they will step up and give to charity? That's the nature of humans. If there isn't a requirement for people to give, they will not. Sure there will be exceptions of generous people who will give, but those exceptions are not the rule, and they can not sustain a safety net.
    1
  387. +Jeremy Morton If the left actually spoke out about the problem or even acknowledge it. Then you wouldn't get stupid backlash sentiments like ban all muslims.
    1
  388. +Arbiter X how could you tell which arab girl is hot when they are wrapped in a bag? its like kinder surprise, you never know what you are going to get, until you open the package.
    1
  389. +dcpack yeah i do admit it's a life, i'm bypassing all of that when does life begin argument and go right to the crux of it all. Does a woman have the right to choose not to procreate, does a woman have the right to self defense against a fetus?
    1
  390. +Platypus Paws It doesn't matter if the chance of death is rare, the fact there is a chance of death means, pregnancy is not healthy for the mother. And I do agree this is pointless if you can't read or understand simple statements. I have continually said a fetus is a human who acts like a parasite during its fetal stage. but that fetus should have all the human rights, with human rights, comes human responsibility. The fetus is acting aggressively towards the mother in its fetal stage. That's what gives the mother the right to self defense against this human, just like a woman can have the right to self defense against any other human.
    1
  391. +Platypus Paws A fetus leeches nutrients from the mother, A fetus actively harms the health of the mother. A fetus hinders the mother. The mother has a chance of death from any childbirth. Many mothers have died giving birth. Those are undeniable facts. I'm not a woman, I have not aborted anyone. I'm a logical thinker who can reason rather than use emotions or religion.
    1
  392. +Platypus Paws your adoption solution doesn't remove the threat. As I have said before the threat is pregnancy, while the fetus is inside the mother, it's causing harm to the mother. That's what gives the mother a moral basis for self defense against the fetus. Adoption means the mother still have to carry the fetus for 8months, and then give birth. For 8 months the mother is constantly being assaulted by the fetus.
    1
  393. +Platypus Paws Self responsibility doesn't negate human rights. Just because you were irresponsible and you wander into a gang infested area. A gang member jumps out and tries to rob you. You were irresponsible you wandered into his territory, does that mean you don't have the right to self defense against that gang member? The whole moral basis for self defense is to use minimum force required to remove the threat. The threat is the pregnancy, the fetus inside the mother. The only way, the minimum force required to remove that threat is to kill the fetus and remove it from the mother. If there is a way to remove the fetus without killing it. Then all efforts should be made to do that. Unforturenantly there isn't a way to do that with our current medical technology.
    1
  394. +Reverend Reko You are arguing semantics. You want to place this artificial restriction on parasites not being the same species and not being part of reproduction. Why should that artificial restriction exist? A fetus acts exactly the same way as any parasite, why shouldn't it have that label just because it's the same species as the host? But if you don't like the word parasite, fine we don't have to use it. My argument doesn't even rest on that word. My argument is that pregnancy is harmful to the mother, the fetus is actively being aggressive in its fetal stage towards the mother. Cause the mother harm, and possibly loss of life. So the mother should have the right to self defense against this fetus, just as a woman have the right to self defense against any human who is actively harming her.
    1
  395. +Platypus Paws Yes, a woman should not be prevented from exercising her right to self defense against her own offsprings. Are you saying a woman shouldn't have the right of self defense against her own child? You don't choose to get pregnant, you choose to have sex, and getting pregnant happens by chance. By chance, a child starts to live inside the mother and is harming the mother by its mere existence. With this harm, the mother have the right to self defense against that harm and against that child. And I didn't understand your last question, could you please rephrase?
    1
  396. +Platypus Paws That sentence makes no sense. Self defense is a right, one can choose to exercise that right or not. In the case of my mother she didn't choose to exercise her right of self defense. The point is my mother should have the right to use her right of self defense or not. It's completely her choice.
    1
  397. +Platypus Paws Yes abortion is killing a human being. But its killing a human being in an act of self defense. If you kill a child after birth, that's not self defense anymore. A child after birth can not harm the mother, while a child inside the mother is actively harming the mother.
    1
  398. +Reverend Reko Parasite something that lives in a host that prevents no benefit only harm. Sounds like a fetus to me. Maybe you should go and relearn biology again.
    1
  399. if the technology exists to abort a pregnancy and keep the fetus in a gestation tank, i would say we should do that. But since such technology is not possible right now. The choice of the women should take president over a parasitic life form, whether that parasite is human or alien.
    1
  400. +Stalewind Farto1078 The planet is not alive the women is. If an alien implanted itself into the woman, does she not have a right to take that alien out?
    1
  401. but the viable unborn is acting like a parasitic life form harming the health of the host body. So the host body should have the choice of self defense against this parasite.
    1
  402. definition of an ideologue.
    1
  403. +Akon Fenty at least you can admit you are an ideologue.
    1
  404. +Akon Fenty in other words, you are an ideologue, who don't care about reason.
    1
  405. if you believe in self defense then you should agree anyone should have the choice to take out a parasitic life form growing inside of you.
    1
  406. +Jae Eph the fetus is not innnocent when it's actively trying to harm the host.
    1
  407. +Jae Eph I drank some well water and got a tapeworm, does that mean I don't have the right to remove it?
    1
  408. +Jae Eph a mother is a host to the fetus.
    1
  409. it's not sophistry, the relationship between a fetus and the mother is parasitical.
    1
  410. abortion is self defense against a parasitic life form. a woman should have the right to choose self defense. If a parasitic life form ever lived inside a man I would say that man should have the right to self defense against that parasite.
    1
  411. +nonam namrson an organism living inside a host, causing harm to the host and offering no benefit. That's what a fetus is.
    1
  412. baby not so innocent when it is acting like a parasite harming the health of the host.
    1
  413. +PcSpud There might be a hormonal substitutive that could be developed for such a case, but that's for the field of psychiatry to discover.
    1
  414. there might be chemical changes in women if she were to give birth, and an abortion skips that change. That might cause some mental problems, but that's a choice the woman makes.
    1
  415. ofcouse that decision to give up all rights to the child is subject to the same conditions as abortion. You have to make a decision at the point that you found out you have a kid. The father doesn't get to change his mind later.
    1
  416. As for the father, it's impossible to give the father a say in the process because the father isn't attached to the fetus. As for child support and all that, if the father gives up the right to the fetus, he shouldn't pay child support.
    1
  417. think of abortion as self defense against a parasitic life from growing inside of you. Self defense means you should use the least amount of force to stop a threat to you. So in the future if it's possible to have an abortion and still keep the fetus alive. We should do that instead.
    1
  418. +Stephen Darrenkamp a fetus is not innocent when it's aggressively trying to harm the mother in the womb. If you want to say a fetus is a human that have all the rights of a human, then it must accept all the responsibility of a human. That human is committing an act of aggression against the mother, without the mother's permission. The mother has the right to self defense against such a human.
    1
  419. +Reverend Reko something that grows inside of you, takes nutrients from you, gives nothing back to you, that's called a parasite. It doesn't matter if it's part of procreation, it's still parasitical.
    1
  420. you have no argument against why a fetus isn't a parasite. It acts like a parasite in every way. Refusing to listen to an argument is the sign of an ideologue.
    1
  421. are you for self defense? abortion is self defense against a parasitic life form growing inside of you.
    1
  422. A sharing economy is great, I can't wait for the day where I can rent underwear and share my dirty socks with someone else.
    1
  423. Last time I check treason is still a crime on the books
    1
  424. Red Sonja is the oldest movie I can think of off the top of my head. Can anyone think of something older than that?
    1
  425. Red sonja
    1
  426. lol so the russians cared so much they intentionally gave starwars bad reviews and tanked the box offices?
    1
  427. DeSantis is an establishment shill. He is part of the uni party. He uses deep fakes to attack his political opponent, DeSantis is untrust worthy.
    1
  428. I am slapping myself as i say this, Dinesh D'souza is sounding better than those progressive.
    1
  429. The lolbertarians are a joke, they have brought into all of the sjw progressive talking points.
    1
  430. +ChernobylPizza Well the OHRC is dangerous, we both agree on that. B c16 will make OHRC which is an ontario law federal. That's the danger, country wide in adopting this federally. OHRC should be abolished not adopted country wide.
    1
  431. Well there are those true believers , who truly believe what they are doing are good. But in the case of the guards, i doubt anyone who truly believe what they are doing is good, not after all the suffering they have seen. What's the point of torturing those prisoners why not just shoot them in the head. The guards wanted to torture them because their soul do extend all the way to hell.
    1
  432. +blasphemytard yeah that's where we have a problem isn't it. libertarians acting like communists.
    1
  433. +vishvak11 illegals don't get welfare, no illegals came for welfare. Are you seriously think that the undocumented are getting a single cent from the government? Can you just walk into a government office and say "I have no ID, but give me money please" and the government would just give them some cash?
    1
  434. +Bazuuka Joe holy shit you moron, without borders those 30 to 50 percent wouldn't even need to over stay their visa, because there would be no visas. Even according ot your ridicules number, open borders is 70 to 50 percent of the problem. But lets just ignore that big 70% number right?
    1
  435. lol oh right keep talking like a regressive focus on the 30 to 50 percent over blown that number, but lets just ignore the 70 to 50 percent of illegals that have nothing to do with visas. I have no idea that libertarian are the regressives have so much in common.
    1
  436. +Bazuuka Joe those people who overstay their visa are a minority. At least in the u.s. and even not in the u.s. a strong immigration enforcement agency can catch those that over stay their visa and deport them. A strong border is coupled with strong enforces.
    1
  437. +Bazuuka Joe are you dense or something? We don't want to stop people entering legally, because its legal, we allow them to come, because we have control.
    1
  438. +Bazuuka Joe america don't have a strong border now dose it? Hence problem not solved. But lately the illegal immigrants have stop coming because there are less jobs in america. Like you I said you can either have strong borders, or you can turn your country into a third world shit hole, those are the two ways you can stop people from coming.
    1
  439. +vishvak11 yes that's the point, better country. People from worst countries will always want to come to a better country. regardless of welfare. So we need to have a strong border to control those people from coming, we can pick and choose to let in those that have the skill, and keep out the rest. But the libertarians wants an open border, and wants to blame the illegal immigration problem on welfare, which is bullshit.
    1
  440. +Bazuuka Joe it doesn't matter which country we are talking about. you close the border, problem solved. the issue isn't welfare, the issue is open borders, and libertarians wants to push this open border agenda. Even with out welfare immigrants will still come if you have a higher standard of living. Unless you want to trash your country's economy back into a third world shit hole, immigrants will always want to come regardless of welfare. You need to have a border and close them so you can control that flow of people.
    1
  441. +vishvak11 no immigrant is coming to the u.s for welfare. If immigrant wanted welfare they go to sweden. Those that come to the u.s. wants to work. The u.s. don't have much of a welfare, and illegals don't get welfare. The issue isn't welfare, the issue is open borders.
    1
  442. +Bazuuka Joe so you are in the camp that thinks mexicans are coming over the border for all the unemployment insurances rather that wanting work?
    1
  443. libertarian want open borders, and open borders is bad. simple enough for you?
    1
  444. +BamBoJam how many countries do they need to cross to reach sweden? Might as well be 0. Its call the schengen zone. You can get on a bus from turkey and get to sweden. But yes sweden is giving out free handouts to everyone, and that's the reason why people are going there. But mexicans who goes to the U.S. don't get free handouts, they go over there to work. If sweden didn't handout free stuff, people would still go over there to work.
    1
  445. +Mathew Walke If there were no welfare they would still come. Example mexico and the u.s. The u.s. didn't give any of them welfare and yet millions still came to the u.s. looking for jobs. When you have weak borders and if your economy is strong the people in the third world will always come regardless of welfare.
    1
  446. exactly libertarians want open borders. Sweden had open borders and look where that's gotten them.
    1
  447. +Canadian Libertarian neighbours defending each other out of the goodness of their hearts? You obviously have never seen neighbours having a turf war with each other over the most trivial shit.
    1
  448. +Canadian Libertarian Do you have some kind of reading comprehension problem? i was addressing the guy who said Ayn Rand is not a libertarian because she doesn't believe in anarchism. So I take it that you don't think libertarianism = anarchism as fab006 seems to think?
    1
  449. +fab006 you seem to equate libertarianism with anarchism. You don't even seem to know what you want. If you want anarchy then there would be no laws, no borders to speak of, and might rules, the strong lives the weak dies.
    1
  450. +fab006 So Ayn Rand is not libertarian anymore? You just declared the first scotsmen to not be a scotsman. So borders are good, but keeping people from crossing those borders are bad? What's the point of having a border if you don't keep people from crossing it? Just the rest of the libertarians as dumb as you?
    1
  451. +Canadian Libertarian you can't always defend your own borders, that's ridicules. You can't have every farmer out there with a gun defending their own little piece of land.
    1
  452. +Charlie Bronson that guy rubin had one from the ayn rand foundation wouldn't like borders. Libertarianism carried to its logical conclusion means no government and no government means no one to control the borders.
    1
  453. There isn't much left for me on the left, and yet I can't bring myself to identify as on the right. If the right would stop talking about religion, stop denying climate change and stop worship the free market (notice I said worship, the free market is desirable but don't worship it.) then I would happily call my self a right winger.
    1
  454. No vaping is for millennial hipsters who can't truly commit to smoking. If you are going to smoke and do damage to your body do it right. Commit to it.
    1
  455. +Biceps Nikes well in a post apocalyptic world, if you are fat, you get eaten.
    1
  456. someone get rand paul a table that doesn't shake.
    1
  457. Fix gary johnson with advisers? lol why not just elect the advisers then?
    1
  458. This guy wants a "tough luck" system and open borders. That's just perfect, open the gates, let the poor people of our country the most vulnerable compete with the rest of the third world country's labor, and when they fail tell them tough luck, go beg for charity. This guy is the reason why communism is on the rise. When you make people fight for scraps and tell them tough luck. That's when they revolt and hang people like him.
    1
  459. +Andrew Brekus A none citizen does not have rights. Rights are granted by the state, and the state is control by the citizens. That's the whole concept of democratic nationhood. A state is empowered by its citizens to protect them. yes your neighbor's son might displace your job, because you are in direct competition with your neighbor's son. You are not in direct competition with everyone else in the world. If you want to be in direct competition with the lowest common denominator in the world, then you would not do so well. A first world country would be a third world country. You would adopt the wages and the labor practices of the third world.
    1
  460. +Robert Gallagher and those donations to charities have tax write offs. That's another government regulations. Without those regulations you will see a very quick drop in those numbers. And even in your 358 billion number which I question, most is going to some foundations or religious causes. I don't want the safety net to be run by religion.
    1
  461. I love boobs, and I hate communism, but if communist will allow boobs to be everywhere, I'll vote for communists.
    1
  462. +Brendan Coulter There seem to be some confusion between a principle a foundation of morality to actual morality. Its a common misunderstanding with religious people who like to have their morality written down for them so they don't think about how those moralities came about. The golden rule is the foundation for a secular morality, its not the end all and be all of morality. Moralities like don't lie, don't kill, don't cheat. They can be derived from the golden rule, they can exist without religion. You can follow the logic behind those moralities and it ends with the golden rule. Example why don't we kill? Because the golden rule, that's the secular answer. The christian answer would be because of the 10 commandments. What ever Stalin did, or what moralities he violated, the same could of and have happened to religious people. Its not a problem with the golden rule that produced Stalin. And that last line in my previous comment was an unfair attack on my part. I apologize for that.
    1
  463. +Brendan Coulter ofcouse those car salesmen don't like being lied to. But they expect it and accept it, every car salesmen when buying a car themselves knows the other guy is lying to them. They accept it. You are arguing for those that cheat the rules. There will always be people who cheat the golden rule, just like there are christian that don't follow the 10 commandments. That means nothing. It doesn't mean that the golden rule is subjective. "There is literally nothing objective about the golden rule in and of its self." That statement just doesn't make sense. You are gonna have to define what objective means to you. Objective as anyone would understand it is that its a set of rules that is well defined, and are not open to interpretation. If you don't like being lied to, don't lie to others. If you don't like being cheated, don't cheat others. Its very objective, there is nothing subjective about it. The golden rules is "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." How is Stalin following those rules in any kind of scale? Stalin lives in luxury while his people live in poverty. We can objectively say, Stalin is not following the golden rule. Yes a man can be brutally honest, and in return he should expect others to be brutally honest with him. if he can dish it out but can't take it, then he is not following the golden rule. The golden rule stands on its own, its not flexible at all. I have no idea where you are getting this flexibility from. Perhaps from your own inability to follow the golden rule?
    1
  464. +Brendan Coulter Those car sales men as you put it, They do follow the golden rule, they think its ok to misrepresent used cars to their customers, and in term they expect other used car sales men to cheat them as well. They are following the golden rule. Stalin is not following the golden rule. Just like there are christians that don't follow the 10 commandments. Even with in communism, some animals are more equal to others. That's not following the golden rule. There is objective morality and that is the golden rule. Stalin just doesn't believe in the golden rule.
    1
  465. +John H. But De Sade is mentally insane, he goes in and out of sanitariums all his life. He have been diagnosed as clinically insane.
    1
  466. +Brendan Coulter So you don't think that you should follow the same rule as everyone else. That's what the golden rule is, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. So if you want to live in a society you don't want to follow that rule. You go around robbing others, and then in turn others can come and rob you. You kill others, and someone comes along and kills you. Do you like being killed? Its in your own interest to make a rule that says don't go around killing people. That's the basis of morality, you have your first rule, thou shall not kill. You don't need religion to come up with that rule.
    1
  467. +Brendan Coulter Religion didn't invent the golden rule. The golden rule was invented by society, and social interactions of humans.
    1
  468. why is it that anyone who advocates for bitcoin all seems like scummy crooks. After finishing listening to this guy I need a shower.
    1
  469. +Juan Lespins I don't care which coin is better technically. I care about the scams, and those that are trying to misrepresent to make money like Roger Ver.
    1
  470. +Daly Close There are two different prices and two different coins. Anyone trying to tell you it's the same thing is trying to scam you. Bitcoin was first it is called bitcoin, it is still called bitcoin. Anyone tell you that bitcoin cash is now bitcoin is trying to scam you.
    1
  471. +Daly Close except bitcoin is trading at 11k right now, while bitcoin cash is only trading at 1k. So all those people saying bitcoin cash is bitcoin, and bitcoin don't exist is lying and trying to scam you out of all that money.
    1
  472. anyone trying to claim bcash is bitcoin is a conman. How much is bitcoin worth right now and how much is bcash worth right now. The fact that the two coins have different prices tells you those people who claim they are the same is trying to scam you.
    1
  473. +Pelotero moron, the value of x is backing y. If the value of x falls, then y falls as well. So x affects y. Basic logic is not your strong suit isn't it?
    1
  474. +Pelotero fine I said backed, it makes no difference, it is still backed and it's the main driving force behind the value of the currency, In this context backed and affects are the same.
    1
  475. +Pelotero Where did I say back or did you not know how to read dumbass?
    1
  476. +Pelotero coming from a moron who doesn't even know GDP affects the value of a currency.
    1
  477. +Pelotero and when it crashes a lot of people are going to lose their money, that's your scam. Ofcouse you are ok with scams, you are a moron scum bag.
    1
  478. +Pelotero trade your USD for the scam of bitcoin dumbass.
    1
  479. +Pelotero anyone who uses the word bro unironically is an idiot.
    1
  480. +Pelotero hahahah moron what bank would allow you to have a mortage without equity?
    1
  481. +Pelotero the fact that you have an equation means it's not 1 to 1. Do you even know basic math?
    1
  482. +Pelotero yeah the fact that you have equity mean it's not 1 to 1. Do you know what 1 to 1 means? mortgage = value that's 1 to 1 moron.
    1
  483. +Pelotero go back to highschool kid.
    1
  484. +Pelotero You sound like an Idiot, I never said it's the only cause, but it's the main cause. My mortgage is not 1 to 1 you moron, my house is worth way more than my mortgage. You say you work in the business sector? Doing what? Cleaning floors?
    1
  485. +Profetu Rulz Exactly all country have gold on reseve to support their currency.
    1
  486. +Profetu Rulz backed doesn't mean 1:1. My mortgage is backed by my house, that doesn't mean it's 1:1. By backed I mean you have assets that can offset a debt. the US have gold stored as an asset.
    1
  487. +Pelotero good idea, tell your employer what you think drives currency value, and let them laugh at you. If your job has anything to do with trading currency, they will fire you. Currency is used to buy goods and services. GDP is that goods are services for a country. If you GDP number goes up that means the USD you have can buy more goods and services. So the value of USD goes up. If the GDP number goes down, that means fewer goods and services, so the USD you have will buy less goods and services, thus value goes down. Simple demand and supply stuff. Exports comes into the picture when you want to compare the value of USD against another currency. Basic stuff that you don't even understand.
    1
  488. +Pelotero The reason why I called it the myth of gold is because we don't know how much gold the US has. It's more accurate to say it is backed by assets. And the gold US has is part of that asset. Burn your degree if you even have one, it's worthless if you don't even understand the current USD valued is influenced by how much the US exports and the GDP of US.
    1
  489. +Pelotero Petrol dollars, lol why do you think the middle east accepts USD and not any other money? It's because the US has a stable currency, and it's backed by the US government that's supposedly having the biggest gold reserve in the world. You don't use currency to redeem gold, but the fact that the US has gold reserves meand they can sell it if the currency is ever to tank. That's why it's backed by the myth of gold, no actual gold is exchanged for USD, but the fact the US government has it means they have assets. Bitcoin has nothing, no promises, no backing no assets, no products. It's trading on air.
    1
  490. +Pelotero 1. USD is still backed by gold, even if it's the myth of gold. There is a reason why Rand Paul keep harping on the FED to show people there are still gold in fort knox. 2. Good produced, and then exported drives demand for said currency. It's simple stuff. If you don't understand this, then you should tear up that worthless degree of yours.
    1
  491. +Pelotero GDP is a measure of how much a country produces. GDP and exports are one factor in determining the value of a currency, another factor is how much of that currency exists. The UK pound is worth more because there is less of it. The demand for a currency is determined by the export levels of a country, if a country is exporting more goods, then there is more demand for that currency to buy said goods. That's like basic highschool economics here. If you don't understand basic highschool stuff, then you should really stop talking. What bitcoin cash is doing to bitcoin is exactly why cryptocurrency will not work.
    1
  492. +Pelotero Ofcouse a country's GDP affects the value of its currency. You need to learn basic economics. GDP is how much a country produces in terms of value. Some of that value is consumed by the citizens of that country, and any extra value can be traded to other countries. If you produce a lot of value and traded to other countries, then your currency is more in demand because other countries want to buy your goods. The problem with bitcoin is being highlighted on this bitcoin, bitcoin cash debacle. Anyone can come along and fork the coin, thus devaluing the coin, and create a bunch of empty coins for themselves. Without a regulation force on the bitcion market, market manipulation is rampant that is why bitcoin are so violitile.
    1
  493. +Pelotero The US government still has the largest gold and silver reserve. So yes it is supposed to be backed by the gold standard. The USD is also backed by the US GDP, if the US economy shrinks, the USD will drop in value. Sure other governments like greece have broken their promise, that's why their currency isn't worth anything. The value of the USD is based on the supposedly gold reserves, the economy, and how stable the government is. The reason why bitcoin is so volatile is there are no stable force backing it.
    1
  494. +Pelotero USD is supposedly backed up by gold stored by the US government. And the promise of a government backed currency has value. Government promises still have value even if you don't trust the government.
    1
  495. +Profetu Rulz ofcouse if you build something there is always a chance of failure. The alternative to build nothing, have everything in chaos.
    1
  496. +Profetu Rulz That's the whole problem there is no mechanism to stop any of that. It's a place of chaos, full of scams and scummy people.
    1
  497. +Profetu Rulz Except when I stole the name bitcoin and try to confuse people into thinking my new currency is still the old one. That's why it's scummy.
    1
  498. +Profetu Rulz It's scummy because you are trading in something that has no value, other than an imagined value. This war between bitcoin core, and bitcoin cash is proof of that scummyness. Bitcoin cash basically just used the bitcoin name and stole value from bitcoin core.
    1
  499. because he is a conman.
    1
  500. +William Boyle this fork of bitcoin is stealing. Or atleast an attempt to steal the value of bitcoin. It's like Monopoly the board game said ok bitcoin user. Today we are going to give every bitcoin owner the same amount of monopoly money as you have in bitcoins. From now on you can use this monopoly money. So now please use this monopoly money rather than bitcoin. So all of sudden all bitcoin owners got free monopoly money. Where does the value of that monopoly money comes from?
    1
  501. +M. S. Oh yes let's just build a market for all the criminals to congregate that will surely reduce crime. Even the conman Roger Ver in this video is saying how easy it is to hire a hit man with bitcoin.
    1
  502. +M. S. money smuggling is amazing, isn't it?
    1
  503. +M. S. There is no value only a bubble, the so call value comes from chinese money smuglers.
    1
  504. The drama isn't stupid, bitcoin cash is trying to destroy the bitcoin core's value because as long as bitcoin core have value, bitcoin cash never will. This whole thing all comes down to the fork in the block chain. What bitcoin cash did was to create a new cryptocurrency, and they gave everyone who already owned bitcoin core the same amount of bitcoin cash for free. This free coin they gave out have no value, the only way for it to have value is to kill bitcoin core, so the value of bitcoin core can be transferred into bitcoin cash.
    1
  505. +Phillip X I care about the scam factor. BCH could of start out at 0 just like BTC did. It didn't because it was greedy, it wanted to scam people. It gave out free coins to themselves. That's a huge scam.
    1
  506. +xZeroTheGreat Yes I'm a proud statist, because I don't like scams. You are the definition of a scam artist.
    1
  507. +Phillip X It's a scam because of the free coins, to line your own pockets. It's a scam because you pretend to be bitcoin. I don't care if BTC isn't peer too peer, BTC can become a paper money for all I care it's still called BTC. You don't get to take that name, the only reason why you want that name is because you want it for your scam.
    1
  508. +Phillip X how many times must I repeat? I don't give a fuck about white papers or the technology behind it. I care that it's a scam. A fork is a copy of the code copy means it's not the original. Stop trying to scam people.
    1
  509. +Phillip X You can call BCH the new advanced crypto or whatever, but its not bitcoin, that name is already been taken, use a different name. But I don't even care about the name, it's the free coins that I care about. It's pure greed. There wasn't a need to give people free coin. BCH should have started like BTC make it on its own merit, but now it is forever tainted with the stink of a scam.
    1
  510. +Phillip X Again I keep telling you I don't care about the technologies behind it. I'm happy to grant you that BCH is better and more advanced than BTC. That's not the issue here. The issue is the scummy way BCH is operating, it's a scam to give themselves more money. BCH should start at 0, not give free money those people who have been hoarding BTC.
    1
  511. +xZeroTheGreat I don't have problem with cryptocurrency only scam artists like you.
    1
  512. +Phillip X No you are trying to steal BTC value and line your own pockets. Stop calling yourself bitcoin, that's the scummiest part. Call yourself something else, and don't steal value give yourself free coins, then no one would have a problem with you.
    1
  513. +Phillip X I don't have a problem with BCH if it started from 0, if it didn't give people free coins, like every other crypto. Scums want free money that's why they gave people holding BTC free coins to line their own wallets.
    1
  514. +Josiah Romoser technologies can be upgraded, but this isn't an upgrade. You still have your old bitcoin which is priced at 11k right now, and now you have a batch of no bcash coins priced at 1k. You are double dipping, the people behind bcash have created extra coins out of nothing.
    1
  515. +Josiah Romoser I don't care about the technology behind the two coins. BCH can copy BTC all they want, they can copy the crypto structure, the code, everything. But they have to start at 0, with no transactional history, and not give those people who are already early in the game free coins. That's market manipulation at it's scummiest.
    1
  516. +TiagoTiago is it a split or just a clone? There is a huge difference. People who are pushing for bitcoin cash are not honest about this. Is bitcoin cash just giving everyone who owns bitcoin the same amount of bitcoin cash? A split means you take value from the old and split into the new. Value is transferred. A clone is that you get a bunch of new coins that have no value. Which one is it?
    1
  517. +William Boyle You are either stupid, can't comprehend how the value is transfeered, or you are trying to con people.
    1
  518. +Srs Acct To say that the bitcoin pre aug no longer exists is simply a lie. The proof is simple just look at rubin's pined comments he have two links for donations now, one for bitcoin, and another for bitcoin cash. So stop lying. This is why cryptocurrency is so shady, too many people are either lying or ignorant.
    1
  519. +William Boyle The trick is, if I started off Bitcoin Cash Extreme (BCE) with no built in users of bitcoin cash, or bitcoin, My BCE is worthless, until it gets traded up by natural means. But by forking, I stoled a bunch of user base from bitcoin and bitcoin cash. I can trade my BCE a lot higher in the exchanges. It's a con to pump the value of my BCE up, while deflating the value of bitcoin and bitcoin cash. That's the problem here.
    1
  520. +William Boyle The fork is a con. Its stolen value from bitcoin. If I say, that's it, on the start of 2018. I will create a new cryptocurrency call Bitcoin Cash Extreme Anyone who owns bitcoin cash right now will get the same amount of Bitcoin Cash Extreme (BCE) in their wallets. Some come and use my cryptocurrency instead of this outdated bitcoin and bitcoin cash. That is a con, its a con to steal brand name and actual value of a cryptocurrency.
    1
  521. just shutup and give him your money, that's what this con man wants. He is not fit to answer complicated questions like that.
    1
  522. this guy is a con man.
    1
  523. you shouldn't trust anyone who went to prison for selling explosives and running cons.
    1
  524. +TiagoTiago If bitcoin cash didn't copy all the transactional history, given people free bcash, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. The act of copying all the history of bitcoin and given people free bcash then lie and claim bcash is bitcoin. That's just too scummy.
    1
  525. I get a scummy vibe off this guy. I feel like he is trying to con me. And I don't even own any cryptocurrency, from what i gather bitcoin cash is a different cryptocurrency from bitcoin. He is actually trying to cause a brand confusing by pushing bitcoin cash.
    1
  526. a soft fork would not work either, it would just be too confusing, essentially you have two coins competing with each other. bitcoin cash would work if everyone agrees to shutdown bitcoin, but no one would, that's the problem.
    1
  527. worst than a ponzi.
    1
  528. that is currently the problem with cryptocurrency. someone comes along introduce a new coin, and the previous one gets pushed out. Loses all of its value. People lose money, while the opportunists make money.
    1
  529. this guy is a criminal, he went to jail for coning people and selling explosives. he is coning people right now.
    1
  530. this is what happens when you put your trust in con men.
    1
  531. +Official Bitcoin see this is why no one trusts cryptocurrency. It is because conman like you keep lying trying to pump up it's exchange value.
    1
  532. +William Boyle It's artificially creating a user base for bitcoin cash, that pump it's valued up. It's like if i cloned youtube, the whole algorithm the whole userbase and their passwords. And named it Youtube Plus, and started telling people youtube plus is the true youtube, and on my true youtube, I don't censor people. Vidme would love to do that, but they would get sue to the ground, but in the world of cryptocurrency there are no rules.
    1
  533. +William Boyle I don't own any crypto, that's why I can stay objective on this whole bitcoin, bitcoin cash thing. The value of cryptocurrency comes from it's trading and it's user base. That is why bitcoin cash is shady in stealing users from bitcoin.
    1
  534. that is why no one can ever trust cryptocurrency. It's spokesperson are con men.
    1
  535. +Zlipster Royals when people lose their life savings after the bubble bursts, that's when those people will start to cry for government control of bitcoin.
    1
  536. +Michael Felton He is being red pilled. He sees how scummy the crypto market is. This whole bcash fork is just one example of it. People are trading on air, while the market manipulators profit and the little guys lose their shirts.
    1
  537. +akc7100 That's why it is a bubble. All those extra value came from speculation and heavy trading.
    1
  538. +Joaquin Pirotto Yes, the price of bitcash might rise back to the level of bitcoin. But during that time trading happens, there will be tons of people losing out on that value. That's what people forget about trading Price goes up and down, but people lose when price goes up and down. It's not just the prices that changes, it's actual money that changes hands.
    1
  539. +Joaquin Pirotto ok so right now bitcoin is trading at what? 10k per coin. If everyone stops using bitcoin, then that 10k value becomes 0. That's how you lose value. If people switch from using bitcoin to bitcoin cash, the value of bitcoin cash goes up, while the value of bitcoin goes down. Now do you see how value is lost and gained?
    1
  540. +Joaquin Pirotto that is the problem if it eventually defaults to 1 currency. That means one currency has to die, all the value that currency accumulated over all those years are lost, or be stolen by the other. That is why I call it value tempering.
    1
  541. +Joaquin Pirotto bitcoin cash stole the name of bitcoin, and its userbase. Thus taking away bitcoin's value while pumping up it's own value. That's how bitcoin cash is tampering with bitcoin.
    1
  542. +Joaquin Pirotto no one can tamper with it? Bitcoin cash is tampering with it right now. It is stealing value from bitcoin and transferring it to bitcoin cash.
    1
  543. this whole fiasco and the war between bitcoin cash, and bitcoin core just goes to show you, without government regulations, everything is up in the air. Bitcoin cash, can steal value from bitcoin core just like that.
    1
  544. he is a con man. I needed a shower after listening to him.
    1
  545. it's like a pyramid scheme, you don't have to understand how the pyramid works, just give me your money.
    1
  546. +M. S. crypto is falling apart right now in front of your eyes. It has become a marketplace for scam artists and manipulators. I wasn't against crypto before this bcash fork, now I am against crypto. Enjoy your scum pool.
    1
  547. +aaronsdavis I don't have any cryptocurrency. I refuse to get into that scummy pool. That's how I can remain objective. Bitcoin cash is scummy, it sets a very bad precedent. There are already other forks because of bcash. There are bitcoin gold, bitcoin diamond. etc. All sorts of forks are coming out, the whole house of cards will come crashing down soon, and someone will lose tons of money while others make out like bandits.
    1
  548. +aaronsdavis the scummy behavior is the bitcash forking. It stole the name of bitcoin and created a brand confusion. Bitcoin cash is not bitcoin. You have conmen like Roger Ver here telling people it's the same thing. That's scummy. Bitcoin cash also steals value from bitcoin by brand confusion and forking that copied its user base. Bitcoin cash is trying to ride on the coattails of bitcoin to increase its value. All of those practices are considered market manipulation if the cryptocurrency market were regulated like the stock market. None of those practices were be allowed.
    1
  549. +DowskiVision MagicalOracle you don't need to understand the technology to see the scummy side of it. The market manipulations, the predatory pump, and dump behavior. Gorden Gekko would love cryptocurrency.
    1
  550. +M. S. There you have it. You just admitted people lost money when bitcoin cash stole the brand of bitcoin and stole its value. That's why people are pissed because bitcoin cash is controlled by the big players, and they are screwing over the little guys. This just goes to show cryptocurrency is unworkable without regulations to prevent this kind of scummy behavior.
    1
  551. when people say it's impossible for anyone to stop bitcoin, they are lying to you. All a government has to do is shutdown the exchange companies of bitcoin. No exchange companies, bitcoin cannot be exchanged for money, bitcoin dies.
    1
  552. I know he sounds so different, I mean he kind of looked fat, but that's to be expected as someone gets old. But the voice how does someone change their voice that much?
    1
  553. daily wire the gate keepers of conservative world. Steven Crowder is right about them.
    1
  554. +Mario Pendic You dishonest moron. The UN report ranks the place of sweden in 2030. You are saying that article is an opinion piece, and yet you what is that reddit post? Its some moron's opinion. Go to the UN report and see where they place sweden in 2030.
    1
  555. +Mario Pendic hahaha you linked a reddit source. While I gave you an article that have the actual link to the UN report.
    1
  556. +Mario Pendic I don't care if its alt right or ctrl left. Is it not true that the UN project sweden to become a third world country in 2030? There is a link to the UN report. I don't care what they say the reason for this drop is, but sweden is going to be a third world country.
    1
  557. +Mario Pendic UN projections. http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.454/sweden-to-become-a-third-world-country-by-2030-according-to-un.html
    1
  558. +Mario Pendic Sweden is projected to be come a third world country in about 13 years. I wouldn't call that functioning well.
    1
  559. something is wrong with the audio, there is a lot of noise.
    1
  560. The universities should have their endowment seized and use to pay off the student loans the left is always harping about
    1
  561. +bow man I don't want dave to bach cenk, I want dave to bash his ideas. But i'm free to bash cenk and make fun of his fat ass. I'm not a public figure or trying to present a good face here.
    1
  562. So much emotion and not a single rational thought in the brains of those disruptors.
    1
  563. Augs lives matter?
    1
  564. Much respects Rubin, glad you have the courage to do the interview. The regressive tactic of no platforming is very corrosive. We need people like you to stand up to this cancer.
    1
  565. This dude is a transformer, a decepticon to be precise.
    1
  566. I wish there were an intellectual alternative to trump, but since we don't have that. I'm gonna have to settle for trump.
    1
  567. +Theodore Pellegrin because these days most libertarians are anarchist. Are most of them are just as crazy an illogical as the regressives.
    1
  568. +Aanthanur DC did he want greece to leave or stay? We know what his position is. he wants to have his cake and eat it too. Talking out of both side of his ass is his specialty.
    1
  569. +Aanthanur DC have you not watch the video? What do you think he was talking about? Did he want greece to take the bailout, or not take the bailout? What is the consequence of not taking the bailout?
    1
  570. +Aanthanur DC you want at source he wants greece to leave? have you not watch the video? He said it right here on rubin's show.
    1
  571. +ultru France is not doing that well either. France's economy is stronger than greece that's why they can borrow longer. If a homeless guy gets a loan that he can't repay its obvious its the homeless guy's fault. The lender took a risk, and he should lose his money. But it's still the fault of the homeless guy for being greedy and wanting such a large loan.
    1
  572. +Aanthanur DC government spending fell in the previous government. When his party got into power, they got in because they promised to stop the austerities and they did. They started paying out retirement funds, hired more government workers. just look at this chart http://www.tradingeconomics.com/greece/government-spending Yannis came into power at jan 2015. The first thing he did when he came into the office was to start spending again. It dropped down again when the ran out of money, but in july of 2015 at the height of his power, the spending rises again. That is why they needed that other bailout.
    1
  573. +Aanthanur DC Evidence that they start spending again? Ain't you dense. The greeks had a referendum, they voted no to austerity.
    1
  574. +Aanthanur DC Greece did cut spending before he came to power, Greece was on its way to a long road of digging themselves out. He and his party came to power, and started spending again. That's when greece ran into trouble again. Greece didn't need the second loan until he came to power and started government spending again.
    1
  575. +Aanthanur DC no one is willing to loan someone who is going bankrupt and refuse to cut cost. its just not good business. If someone give greece who have a negative credit rating any kind of loan is charity. That's free money, if you factor in the opportunity cost and risk. He refuse to cut cost, that's why greece needed a second loan. The debt was restructured in such a way if greece cut cost, they would be solvent. Sure the economy would shrink there would be high employment. There will be alot of pain, but they wouldn't have needed a second loan. He didn't cut cost, so they needed a second loan. This crazy communist is talking out of both side of his ass. That's why he calls himself erratic because he knows his position is all over the place.
    1
  576. +Aanthanur DC he wants aid, that's call free money. Aid=free, loan=not free. Is that not simple enough for your pee brain to understand? So he is an erratic Marxist? hahah ok fine I stand corrected from now on I'll call him a crazy communists then.
    1
  577. +Aanthanur DC If Yannis is talking about how greece should receive what is equivalent of the marshal aid program then he is asking for free money, And are we still seriously denying he is a communist at this point? He is a self proclaimed marxist. Marxists are a subset of communists.
    1
  578. +Botond Szilagyi lol he and noam chomsky two communists talking about how the rest of the world should give them free money. That's just such a cliche. Sorry there are no free lunches.
    1
  579. +Rob Bob the Corn Cob To leave the euro is to leave the EU, greece will not be able to stay in the EU after it's left the euro. The reason being is if greece leaves the euro, it will have to default on great many debts, and taxes and tariffs would have to be implemented on greece from the EU. Thus effectively making greece not part of EU.
    1
  580. +Botond Szilagyi "Restructure" the debt, what does that mean? Be specific. Greece had already "restructured"the debt, and that restructuring took the form of defaulting on 50% of the debt. So what he wants to default on another 50% of the debt? Is that his plan? Greece didn't need that second bailout only if he followed the plan of the first bailout, by cutting costs. He didn't want to cut cost, because at that time cutting costs in greece was very unpopular. He was voted into office to stop the cost cutting and to open up government spending again. He is blame for not cutting cost, and spending more money he didn't have, and thus forcing the greek government into a position where they needed a second bailout, or default. Defaulting would mean to leave the EU, leave the Euro. His prime minister didn't want to leave the EU, so they took the second bailout. He is to blame not forcing greece into this choice of either take more money, or grexit.
    1
  581. +Rikishade1 Yes the bailout was a shitty deal. So what, greece got themselves into that situation of having to accept a shitty deal. Did he mention greece ran a deficit for over 40 years? Did he mention greece faked their books to get into EU? Did he mention greece loved those borrow those money, and knew full well they can't pay for it. Did he not call his own party leader a traitor for accepting the final bailout deal inorder to stay in EU? Are you talking out your ass or is he talking out of his ass? He said its a wrong decision to take the final deal. But the alternative to not taking the final deal was to leave EU. Did he want greece to leave the EU or not? He wants greece to not leave EU and he wants greece to not take the bailout loans. So how does that work? He wants EU to give greece free money, is that his plan?
    1
  582. +Ewan Robertson he is a self proclaimed marxist, that makes him a communist.
    1
  583. This guy took the brits to remain in EU while telling greeks to leave. This guy refuse to implement any austerity measure and cut cost while he was in power forcing greece to take a second bailout. This guy is trying to down play the responsibility of greeks themselves for taking those loans, running a deficit for over 40 years. its all because he is a communist and he believes in those social programs.
    1
  584. +antonis ch Greece imposed austerity, that was the government before him. But the austerity prove to be too unpopular, so the greeks elected the communists, enter Varoufakis. He turn back time and started up spending again to gain popular support. He is spending money that he doesn't have, and thus making greece needing another bailout. Its his doing that greece needed that second bailout. And ofcourse the austerity measure shrink the economy, that's call austerity. Its needed, because they have no more money to spend. If greece wants to spend more money, well they are going have to borrow more money. Varoufakis never asked for the second bailout, that is true he never "ask" for it. But he force it, he made it necessary. If he cut the spending then they wouldn't have need the second bailout. The greek government was solvent until he came into office and started spending again.
    1
  585. +Bombsquad85 if you stop taking all those cheap loans then it would work. Just because you have access to tons of candy, it doesn't mean you have to eat it.
    1
  586. +asaenvolk I think its a bit of both, she thinks PEGIDA is guilty for associating with the neo nazis, and the far right, and she is also implying that they are neo nazis for associating with the neo nazis.
    1
  587. +EnhancedNightmare yeah that's too much conspiracy theory going on. its one thing to accuse her of not know anything about science and for having a ridicules position. But we enter conspiracy territory when we accuse her of being dishonest and lying to herself.
    1
  588. +EnhancedNightmare Well we shall see, but as an evidenced based thinker, she will need to prove herself with evidence, not just her pretty smile.
    1
  589. +John May The answer is no I have no obligation to reduce suffering of animals. Humans are a higher lifeforms thus humans can do what ever they want with a lower lifeform. Its call the natural order of things. By your logic carnivals are immoral by nature.  When one talks about morality the only rule that can apply is the golden rule. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This so call the cruelty of natural selection is all in the eye of the beholder. Animals have no such concept as cruelty or brutality. Therefore, using the golden rule, cruelty or brutality can not be applied when it comes to animals. Especially when it comes to the food chain.
    1
  590. +John May I can deem animal life above plant life, but that's my values. I am not arrogant enough to hold my values over others, and pretend that I have the moral high ground over others. By the same token that I deem animal life over plants, I deem human life above animal life. Hence we have the food chain, herbivorous eat plants, because they are above plants. And humans eat animals because we are above animals. That's nature, and I am not arrogant enough to say that nature is immoral.
    1
  591. +John May are you the moral arbiter of what gets to live and what gets to die? Plants are alive too what gives you the right to value animal life above plants? This is the problem with you people trying to claim moral high ground. You have no authority to dictate what's moral and what's not.
    1
  592. +John May It is ridicules to claim moral superiority over diet choices. Vegans are not the arbitrators of what's moral. You can argue by eating plants, you are destroying plant life and causing suffering of plants. Then you get to this what's conscious and what's not. Who are you to say that plants are lower lifeforms than animals and thus its ok for you to eat them? Oragisms consume each other, that's life, who are vegans that they get to decide what life is above another? The arrogance of vegans is what makes people sick.
    1
  593. That dog is just like the rest of the normies slept through all the talk.
    1
  594. had dave gotten more orange in florida?
    1
  595. Oh come on Biden is actually having fun now that he isn't running.
    1
  596. such a politician's answer and this guy is not even running for anything. You don't have to call people slow or lazy? lol What he means is that you don't have to call people racist. He is so scared to use that word.
    1
  597. +Abnormal Wrench in other works a typical old school politician.
    1
  598. This halloween I'm dressing up as a male feminist.
    1
  599. +Sea Knight There is no true altruistic act, that is true, anyone who does anything always has a reason, whether it be self gratification of material gain. To to have a society sole sees self gratification and material gain as the ultimate virtue. That would be disastrous when the virtuous thing is to not risk your life. There would be no heroes, no self sacrifice for the good of the other.
    1
  600. I'm a big trump supporter, but Frum is actually right in this case about trump. He is pretty much right on most issues except one thing. The clintons did the same thing trump did. They accepted foreign help. The clintons had to return some campaign donations made by the Chinese government. The clintons knew the money came from the chinese government, but they took it anyway, only when it was revealed to the public that the money came from China, they had no choice but to return it.
    1
  601. +Orcbanger Or you can say that because of this issue it shows Cara is not that rational, and can not be taken seriously when she is talking about science. All she can do is repeat marking information that someone else has written down for her, rather have an critical understand of the material presented to her.
    1
  602. Sam just doesn't understand that Hillary might be smart, but she is too smart. Not to say that too smart is a bad thing, Hillary is too smart and her intentions are unknown and devious. So I would rather have a buffoon in office who is incapable of hatching devious plots working against the interest of the people, as oppose to a smart Hillary who is very capable of hatching those plots. Plus Hillary panders to the regressive left, so if she is in office nothing will change and the regressive left will be emboldened. Only when trump gets in office the pendulum can be swing to the right so hard that it will bounce back to the center eventually. The current trajectory is a swing to the extreme left, only trump can change the momentum of the pendulum.
    1
  603. +Heiner Privat you can get fined for jay walking. The point is some times nothing is better than something worst.
    1
  604. +SynMonger really having nothing in your wallet is worst than having a ticket for a fine?
    1
  605. yes he is a buffoon, but at this point a buffon is better than hillary. Hillary will take this country down a wrong direction, while a buffoon won't accomplish much.
    1
  606. Trump is not going to burn down the country. He is too dumb to do that. Trump however will change the momentum and the trajectory of the country away from sjws, away from globalisation, and away from wall street. How much can trump accomplish, probably nothing, but its still better than Hillary. Hillary will step on the gas for all those issues, while trump might tap on the breaks.
    1
  607. Can Big tech be stopped? Yes, but we need all libertarians to get out of the way.
    1
  608. show us the dog Rubin, and did you put the camera on the dog?
    1
  609. no, more downvotes means more views. In terms of the youtube algorithm that does the promotions downvotes counts as much as up votes. is about the activities on a video.
    1
  610. Yes the PC police is getting very unbearable, but the bigger question is, is Rubin wearing a bra?
    1
  611. The gay wedding cake situation is very simple. When you are a baker, and you an already made cake in the display case. You have to sell it to who ever that wants it. But when someone demands that you put words on a cake that you disagree with, you can refuse to do that. That's call customization, you are not obliged to customize anything for anyone.
    1