Comments by "Serenity" (@SerenityM54L2SAM5L5N1) on "'I quit after being subjected to cyberbullying': Rashmi Samant | Oxford racism | English News" video.

@vl8584 Maybe because Western nations generally are the most safe, prosperous and least racist countries in the world. Using an outlier case and a story that we don't know whether is true as evidence of the contrary won't work.
4
How do you know that Oxford has done anything wrong? How do you know that racism was the cause of her resignation without knowing any of the details? We know how often people wrongly accuse treatment, appointments and scenarios of racism even though it isn't true. So why believe this girl all of a sudden, is it because she's Indian?
4
Why do people always draw the race card? Probably because it works, even though it rarely is true. Adding to this cultural attitude should be discouraged.
4
Roshan Rajaraman The West has its flaws (that I constantly criticize), but it's way more secure, safe and developed compared with the rest of the world. Especially Africa, Asia and South America. Censorship in media? What do you mean? The media is angled and propagandist at times, but I don't know what you mean. It's way more controlled and censored in the many dictatorial countries out there. Telling the truth and sticking to the facts isn't a superiority complex, at least not on my part. It may sound derogatory if you can't handle it though, I can see that
1
@Raksanta Sakthivel That's factually true and has been confirmed by studies, censuses and based on their societal models. Yes, they're extremely non-racist. Have you fallen and been deceived by the made-up non-empirically supported BLM narrative or what?
1
@nid-jk2vx On the basis that they're tolerant through their legislation, migration policy, and cultural attitudes..? And on the basis that there's scientific censuses and data that points towards the West being the least racist place. It's just a fact than any objective observer knows. Racism isn't a thing, systematically or colloquially, in these countries. Assuming that a case of racism, discrimination or corruption occurred in the more undeveloped countries where such cases is frequent, is more understandable. But when the countries that barely see such cases are accused of the same, of course people will be skeptic. Why should we believe something with merits and proof? You realize how dangerous that is yes?
1