Comments by "marvin martin" (@marvinmartinsYT) on "LADbible TV" channel.

  1. Sorry. He’s an idiot. No other way to put it. I’ve had conversations with him and he is in full denial.
    133
  2.  @tbrown3356  Btw yes both you and boot head in video ignore science. NASA? Neil Tyson. Hawkins. Brian Cox. All scientists with many years spent on these topics. All proven earth to be a ball. Excepted world wide as accurate on every level. Confirmed by other fields non related. Yet you say they are full of it? That’s ignoring science. The actual people doing the science and their outcomes of years of doing exactly what you’re asking here. Well actually your telling what you think it is. You have no idea what your talking about. It seems I’ve been through this before. Exact same rhetoric with the exact same mistake. I’ll go see if that was you.
    4
  3.  @tbrown3356  Lmao. I have two degrees. One in engineering, the other in materials sciences.
    4
  4.  @tbrown3356  Ok. Sunrise. I can’t manipulate either the sun or the horizon or earth. What I can do is change my height, view point and distance. There’s a very easy thing you can try for this. If on the east coast near a beach. Watch the sunrise while standing. Sit down and watch it rise again. You are the variable. Well your height is. Seeing the sun rise twice on the same day. Can’t happen on flat. This can be taken further with a drone at its highest altitude, watch the sun rise. Lower the drone watch it again and so on right down to the ground. Drone is the variable. You getting how this works yet? Now give me an example from your point of view. Can you give me an example of variables that prove flat? Science. Yeah you’ve no clue.
    4
  5. Girl Power Fuck off and grow up!
    3
  6. UnknownFury 7 This thread filled with nut cases pretty quick lol.
    3
  7. This guy, the FE. Hasn’t realised, like most FE. That flat earth is dying. I’ve been keeping watch on numbers. Numbers of views. Numbers of likes. Numbers of comments and the likes those comments get. All are on a slow downward trend. On all platforms. Even here.
    3
  8. JCS You aren’t questioning anything! A question requires an answer. When given the answer you ignore it or dismiss it. That isn’t questioning at all.
    3
  9.  @tbrown3356  Here’s curve though. Plainly visible https://youtu.be/HeURyLNUe1Y.
    3
  10.  @tbrown3356  So now we’re back to you. Where’s your test/experiment that shows flat? Like you said we can’t manipulate the horizon. Your turn.
    3
  11.  @garyryan7852WR  Yeah no problem. Earth is round. Gravity exists. The sun is fucking huge and a long way away. Antarctica gets 24 hour sunlight. We’ve been to the moon and stared at earth. Space X launches up to 6 rockets to space each month. Crew dragon is at the ISS right now. The ISS can viewed with a telescope. Flights from Australia to Africa fly over nothing but ocean. The sun travels in a straight line. Sunset can be viewed multiple times on the same day. The entire planet sees a full moon on the same night. Antarctica is a continent a little bigger than Australia. Where you can see sigma octantis as the southern pole star. That can’t be seen from the north. Polaris can’t be seen from Australia. Plus 2,000 years of observation, tests and experiment have proven earth to be a ball. In a solar system, within a galaxy, that’s part of the universe. Just for starters off the top of my head. I can give you way, way more if you like.
    3
  12.  @tbrown3356  2,000 years of observation, experiments and tests. Not to mention maths. He ignores it all. On a daily. He will even tell you so.
    3
  13.  @tbrown3356  Not set. Rise. There should be nothing blocking the sun once I can see it. It’s travelling at 1000 mph towards me. How can sitting down block the view of sun rise?
    3
  14.  @tbrown3356  I’d love to hear your thoughts on covid.
    3
  15.  @tbrown3356  What variables would you like to see? On what topic? Which branch of independent variables do you want? Have you one specific in mind? Your question/statement is very vague. Expand it. I can give you three simple, easy to do and very cheap tests you can do yourself that proves earth is a ball. It requires some maths though, are you comfortable with maths? Will you do any tests yourself to show us here variables you’re after?
    3
  16. Chris Parrot Yep you’re an imbecile.
    3
  17.  @tbrown3356  Here Dependent and independent variables are variables in mathematical modeling, statistical modeling and experimental sciences. Dependent variables receive this name because, in an experiment, their values are studied under the supposition or hypothesis that they depend, by some law or rule, on the values of other variables. Independent variables, in turn, are not seen as depending on any other variable in the scope of the experiment in question; thus, even if the existing dependency is invertible, the nomenclature is kept if the inverse dependency is not the object of study in the experiment. In this sense, some common independent variables are time, space, density, mass, fluid flow rate, and previous values of some observed value of interest to predict future values. Of the two, it is always the dependent variable whose variation is being studied, by altering inputs, also known as regressors in a statistical context.
    3
  18. Nunya Business 201 did not predict covid. The prediction was made decades ago. It is inevitable. This isn’t the first and won’t be the last. This has been known for a long time
    3
  19.  @tbrown3356  I already know variables. That’s why I’ve asked for yours. For flat earth. Go
    3
  20.  @tbrown3356  He does deny science. He will tell you as much. And is proud of it like you.
    3
  21.  @tbrown3356  Where’s your variables for flat earth? Not conceding that easy are you?
    3
  22.  @tbrown3356  By the way. If a variable is in play that proves flat earth. I’d like to see it?
    3
  23. Chris Parrot The only conspiracy involved with covid is the Chinese government lied.
    3
  24.  @tbrown3356  No there isn’t. It shows curve though. The point of the experiment. I’m done with you. You have zero grasp on any of this. Unless you show me yours to prove flat. We are going in circles.
    2
  25. Chad Walker you’re a psychologist I take it?
    2
  26.  @tbrown3356  👋🏽
    2
  27.  @tbrown3356  Oh by the way. I can manipulate the horizon by height. You’ve missed that through this. Two variables.
    2
  28.  @tbrown3356  Yes height causes the horizon to move. Either towards you or away. I’m not manipulating the curve. It’s there. I can’t mov it. But I can move the horizon by moving up in height. The horizon moves further away. You get that right? Dependent variable and independent variable. That’s what you asked for. I gave you both. Now your turn. You seem to think you know how this all works. Go.
    2
  29.  @tbrown3356  Your covid thoughts aren’t related to this convo. I’m curious in nature. It’s a big issue. But doesn’t matter if you don’t want that.
    2
  30. I’ll give him props for doing this video. But why do part two? He’s already made it known to the world he denies science. Is a dumb flat earther.
    2
  31. Actually he sort of does. He has all the nonsensical npc lines all FE say and spout as fact. On the flat earth topic, from a flat earther point of view he’s spot on.
    2
  32. Not me. Waste of time and money. I’d rather go.
    2
  33.  @tbrown3356  Nope. Not even close to thinking earth is flat bit isn’t. I have seen curve I’ve been south of the equator all my life. Along with three trips to Antarctica for work. And I watch rockets go to space on a regular. No earth is not flat. No science to prove earth is a sphere. What rubbish that is. That’s ignoring science on a grand scale. But yeah you don’t do that at all? Can you maths? At all?
    2
  34.  @satanael9260  Definitely not you. Your post fizzled.
    2
  35. There is no evidence of earth being flat. There is literally mountains of evidence showing earth as a ball
    2
  36. Stop it.
    2
  37. fresh75 Fuck you too buddy
    2
  38. Wrong.
    2
  39. Na. He can’t. He was very subdued and over confident after the first question. The question was rather dumb. Made him feel he was right.
    2
  40.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Oh shit bro. You just broke his brain with that equation
    2
  41. @Yusuf Best How many flat earth theories (which aren’t actually a theory. They don’t qualify as one. A hypothesis at best) would you like me to give you? There is an edge. One idea. There is unlimited ground outside the dome. We are in one part of a big object that has many flat surfaces. It’s flat with a dome thats just outside of the ice wall. There are many.
    2
  42. T Brown Yep. We all do. Except a very very tiny group of comatose people
    2
  43.  @tbrown3356  now. Let’s see your independent and dependent variables. Go. Last chance to show us you actually know what you’re talking about. Give me an example or experiment. I know you won’t. You can’t. But you could try.
    2
  44. 팬케이크 The entire flat earth idea comes down to “it looks flat”. That’s the entire argument
    2
  45. M13 Nope he has it all entirely wrong.
    2
  46.  @JulioLopez-uk9qe  “If it’s flat, why hasn’t anyone fallen off”. Pretty reasonable question while being a bit of a troll. Yeah I’d agree there. “The questioner has assumed his own claim”. Not true. There are a multitude of flat earth proponents that say there is an edge. The questions aren’t very technical I’d agree but to those folks that just come across this topic without any prior knowledge of it. These questions are fair. Not to mention they are basic questions. If you’re smart you ignore the troll aspect and just answer.
    2
  47.  @dsodragon8152  Yes I get that. You’re missing the point. If earth “is actually” flat. We already have these things working. Everything is working. What would change? We already are going about our business as usual on a flat earth. What would change? Zero.
    1
  48.  Imani Alexander  I don’t believe the blm movement.
    1
  49. MrDusant He wouldn’t go on CNN. Far to scared of being shown to be the idiot he is
    1
  50. MrDusant Bye. There is no debate. That was settled over 2,000 years ago.
    1
  51. MrDusant Omg. The Greeks made statues of men holding the globe 2000 years ago ffs
    1
  52. MrDusant Debate is over based on pure science. Greeks knew way back it is round. You say only a few hundred years. That’s demonstrate-ably Wrong. Statues holding a globe from 2,000 years ago.
    1
  53. Marcus Nazis don’t exist though. Gone
    1
  54. dontae hamlett He is right though. Flat earth is stupid
    1
  55. FPS Dovah Lol. With up to 6 launches per month.
    1
  56. Jared Lopez They are the same thing here. What do you mean ?
    1
  57. Axiom Ape One of them designed a clock app. Demonstrate-ably Wrong though
    1
  58. Mr Anonymous You know nothing snow
    1
  59. Dakota Stein YouTube isn’t s encoring flat earth.
    1
  60. Mr Anonymous Lol. He’s a complete scam artist. If you really think he’s the guy. Your intellect is seriously lacking.
    1
  61. Hals Stop being a pussy ffs.
    1
  62. marco leal And the point is what exactly?
    1
  63. J.c kanon Keep notice! Of numbers. But I am interested in the numbers lol
    1
  64. Patrick M. Absolutely
    1
  65. T Brown Omg. No it’s completely the opposite
    1
  66. jdp 90five Composites are a few or many photos compiled together to give a bigger picture. You can do the same thing with a camera. Still real though.
    1
  67. T Brown Omg. Can’t even get a quote right. No wonder you think earth is flat.
    1
  68. T Brown I feel movement every day. I drive, I walk, I ride. What you’re referring to is the spin/rotation. Yeah we can’t feel that as we’re on earth.
    1
  69. T Brown Well you just showed you have zero clue. Cheers.
    1
  70. Frosticular Nug Those idiots proved earth spins at 15 degrees an hour. And simply ignored it. As they do with every bit of evidence
    1
  71. Frosticular Nug Have. They did. Then made some bs excuses. The aether
    1
  72. Chipwitch But we don’t actually know. Bullshit. Sorry. We categorically know earth is a sphere.
    1
  73. Chipwitch Yes they most certainly have multiple times by verifiable repeatable experiments done over a 2,000 year time frame by millions of people.
    1
  74. Daniel T You missed the point there entirely lol.
    1
  75. Avoid Programing44 That’s been done many times. He loses just by ignoring
    1
  76. Dirixio They are exactly the same
    1
  77. Avoid Programing44 Why would you expect that? He won’t leave his safe space
    1
  78. midoriguiles7 Nope
    1
  79.  @captainjackpugh6050  tries to.
    1
  80.  @garyryan7852WR  O my. Water finds its level. Level definition. Perpendicular to the centre of earth. How does water “know” (?) how to run down hill. Gravity. How could any building be plum. We use level as a starting point.
    1
  81.  @rcook2608  Bahahahahah. You do realise that if earth were flat you could travel in a straight line from any location on earth and land on Antarctica? That doesn’t happen though and there’s zero documentation of anyone doing it. Yet there are literally millions that haven’t landed there travelling in a straight line. Pole circumnavigation has been done. Multiple times. There’s even a sail boat race around Antarctica.
    1
  82.  @bronxx2633  Well you missed the first post point.
    1
  83. @Yusuf Best Omg. Can you be any more wrong? No. Is the answer. You are just completely wrong.
    1
  84. @Yusuf Best No dome no edge. Mmm you’re not a flat earther. You are a globe denier. A numpty.
    1
  85. @Yusuf Best Even if an explanation explains everything correctly, it’s not proof. No. It’s evidence you twit. Then gets verified by other non related sources. Which is proof.
    1
  86. @Yusuf Best Compasses. You can’t use one made in the northern hemisphere in the Southern Hemisphere. And visa a versa. Did you know this? A compass doesn’t need to be flat. There are round ones.
    1
  87. @Yusuf Best Yes you are. You ignore 2,000 years of it. Constantly.
    1
  88. jdp 90five Here’s some of moons around the planets https://youtu.be/S1VyHui6zTM Need more? There are literally thousands of them right here on YouTube
    1
  89. @Yusuf Best Theory has some fact backing it. Flat earth does not. It does not qualify as a theory. Next
    1
  90.  @rcook2608  Nope. That’d be a hypothesis. Not a theory.
    1
  91.  @dsodragon8152  Actually it would not change a thing if earth was flat. We’d all carry on as we are.
    1
  92.  @demetriusroy  Wrong.
    1
  93.  @dsodragon8152  If earth is flat. (I know it isn’t.) We already have these things working. So no. It wouldn’t change a thing.
    1
  94.  @demetriusroy  You are so wrong. Byrd is not and was not considered crazy. You need to go read. You’ve been fed bullshit about the man. He never claimed flat earth. He didn’t find some land that no one else has found. He went to Antarctica and explored it. More so than any one had before him.
    1
  95. Ed Fuchs No
    1
  96. Bingo.
    1
  97.  @tbrown3356  Scientific models. Are absolutely science. If they weren’t, you wouldn’t be able to type on a computer.
    1
  98.  @tbrown3356  The northern hemisphere is the portion of earth north of the equator.
    1
  99.  @tbrown3356  We can’t see the same constellations from Australia! At all. Sigma octantis. Southern pole star. Cannot be seen from New York. Polaris can’t be seen from Sydney. These are absolute fact.
    1
  100.  @tbrown3356  They are mathematical models. Maths is the base of science.
    1
  101.  @tbrown3356  I waited. Now what?
    1
  102.  @Miike.R  Omg. You are so wrong.
    1
  103.  @tbrown3356  How far away is the horizon. That depends the height of the observation point. As I’ve told you. I can manipulate the horizon by gaining altitude.
    1
  104.  @tbrown3356  Your model? Claims the horizon is earths curve. No. It does not. The horizon is just the horizon. Curve in not implied or suggested.
    1
  105.  @tbrown3356  Your entire model is abstract. We have a model. Where’s yours?
    1
  106. The sun is only 39 miles wide. It is only 3,000 miles high. It’s light doesn’t travel as far as you think. It only lights half of earth.
    1
  107. jdp 90five Here’s a comparison of photos from the 60’s and now https://youtu.be/Z2zpKuBV07c
    1
  108. @Yusuf Best Fucking ghosts? Omg.
    1
  109.  @_61514  Actually he didn’t say that. Looks flat.
    1
  110. jdp 90five Some from a telescope https://youtu.be/fj-P031VlbU
    1
  111.  @tbrown3356  black swan. Bahahahahah bahahahahah bahahahahah. Omg.
    1
  112.  @tbrown3356  Nervous. Omg. That’s grasping at straws. I’m actually laughing at that one.
    1
  113. jdp 90five Here’s footage https://youtu.be/uF14sGoymW0
    1
  114. jdp 90five Here’s one of each planet https://youtu.be/paoB-LxWGhI
    1
  115.  @JulioLopez-uk9qe  it’s the same question. You could’ve answered with a troll yourself if you thought it’s not serious. Like, maybe they have fallen off, how would we hear about that? Gravity is not assumed. It is an effect. One we notice on a daily.
    1
  116.  @JulioLopez-uk9qe  Well yeah. Of course. Falling off doesn’t necessarily mean down. Just off.
    1
  117.  @Veaug  How can our atmosphere exist best to a vacuum with no barrier. I think you mean “next”. Space doesn’t suck like your Home Depot vacuum cleaner.
    1
  118.  @sisi-pr5hq  They can’t conceptualise. That’s the problem.
    1
  119. MrDusant Scientist would run rings around dubay. While dubay ignored every word a scientist said. That’s not a debate.
    1
  120.  @christianlovely1500  You do know of course that a compass from the north won’t work properly in the south right? Guess not.
    1
  121.  @christianlovely1500  You are by far the dumbest person in these threads.
    1
  122.  @jpalmer2785  I need a citation on 50 moons fitting inside earth. It has always been 5. You could fit 50 moons between earth and the moon. All the planets in our solar system including the moons, will fit between earth and the moon.
    1
  123.  @jpalmer2785  Citation required! They have said 5. If you can show where they have said 50.
    1
  124.  @jpalmer2785  Btw I’m not angry. If you claim they say 50. Show me.
    1
  125.  @jpalmer2785  Citation required. You yourself have said “examine the data”. Show me it so I may examine it.
    1
  126.  @jpalmer2785  Citi on required. Can you link it? I’ve always heard 5. Never 50. I’ve had a bit of a look. Can’t find what you’re saying anywhere
    1
  127.  @jpalmer2785  No. That’s not a citation. Need a link.
    1
  128. jdp 90five How many do you require to change your mind?
    1
  129. Toughen up lady. If this give you a headache, you need some self reflection going on.
    1
  130.  @tbrown3356  Wrong. Horizontal lines don’t converge. Nor do vertical lines. Sorry wrong again.
    1
  131.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Actually you don’t need a great distance. Only a few miles will show curve. The horizon for example.
    1
  132.  @tbrown3356  Yes please do try some comprehension Vertical parallel lines do not converge. Nor do horizontal ones. Can you understand this?
    1
  133.  @tbrown3356  Btw. You’re talking “point of view”. Why not just say point of view? Is it because you think perspective has a different meaning?
    1
  134.  @tbrown3356  No. That’s called point of view! From where you are looking to a point in the distance. Point of view. Or a two D image of a three D scene. Which one? POV or 2D?
    1
  135.  @tbrown3356  Dude I’ve been at this topic for over ten years. Point of view doesn’t work the way you claim. Parallel lines on the ground will seem to converge. Vertical ones don’t. Can you explain why they don’t. ? If you can’t, you’ve no idea what optics are. How it works and shouldn’t be trying to school anyone. Here’s another question. What happens to those lines with more height?
    1
  136.  @tbrown3356  Yes I read it. I also looked at the links. Can you explain why vertical parallel lines don’t converge? If not if have no business trying to school anyone on optics.
    1
  137.  @tbrown3356  No vertical lines converging in any of those images.
    1
  138.  @tbrown3356  can you show me your variables? Simple question. You like them it seems. Where are they?
    1
  139. jdp 90five All of them.
    1
  140.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  This coming from a guy that thinks “the live” is a documentary.
    1
  141.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  Firmament ended with Noah’s flood. Read the bible. Clearly says so.
    1
  142.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  Omy
    1
  143. Leo Self That’s way to reasonable of a question for flatwits.
    1
  144.  @satanael9260  Missed that point also ?
    1
  145.  @Babbyfacee  Are awoke? Fucking what?
    1
  146.  @freeman5231  He’s not a flat earther. He’s a globe denier. Big difference. He actually has no idea of earths shape. He is dumber than a flat earther.
    1
  147. God couple
    1
  148. Diviance Flat earth is totally inaccurate on every point they make
    1
  149. Wrong.
    1
  150. Chris Parkhurst Their “science” isn’t science. When they try actual science they fail on a few levels.
    1
  151.  @Miike.R  You’re referencing Bill Nye? Omg.
    1
  152.  @tbrown3356  The sun leaves your limited visual angle. Bahahahahah. No. How can that work at sunrise?
    1
  153.  @tbrown3356  we don’t know the actual size f the sun. More hysterical laughter from the crowd. You do know what maths is right? That distance can be measured quite easily. ?
    1
  154.  @tbrown3356  The sun arrives in your visual angle. How can I see two sunrise in one day if it comes into view while coming towards me?
    1
  155.  @tbrown3356  Second law of thermodynamics. Lmfao. You have zero clue what that is.
    1
  156.  @tbrown3356  The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time, and is constant if and only if all processes are reversible. Isolated systems spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium, the state with maximum entropy. The total entropy of a system and its surroundings can remain constant in ideal cases where the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium, or is undergoing a reversible process. In all processes that occur, including spontaneous processes, the total entropy of the system and its surroundings increases and the process is irreversible in the thermodynamic sense. The increase in entropy accounts for the irreversibility of natural processes, and the asymmetry between future and past. Historically, the second law was an empirical finding that was accepted as an axiom of thermodynamic theory. Statistical mechanics, classical or quantum, explains the microscopic origin of the law.
    1
  157. Derek Reynolds Can you prove either of them are a shill?
    1
  158. Bill Demich lol. Where? Haven’t seen any science from any flat earthy
    1
  159. sp4rt4ner13 Done. Still a ball.
    1
  160. Canary Tiger The whole idea of flat earth is stupid.
    1
  161. Anthony Cadena Btw. Old copies in original text say sphere or ball. Ancient Greeks carved statues of men holding a globe 2500 years ago. A globe earth
    1
  162. Anthony Cadena Nope. On Isaiah 40:22. A ball is a circle! In fact, a perfect circle.
    1
  163. Anthony Cadena If you can’t see metaphors in there 🤷🏼‍♂️
    1
  164. Anthony Cadena Your link. OMG ! Gullible be thy name.
    1
  165. Anthony Cadena Well you just proved my point. The foundations of earth is 100% a metaphor.
    1
  166. Anthony Cadena Construction is my life blood. Been at it for 40 years. I’ve forgotten more than you’d ever know. As for the “foundation”. In the bible. It’s a metaphor. Like a great deal in the bible.
    1
  167. Anthony Cadena No it is not ! Not even close. As I said just on punctuation it is a mess!
    1
  168. Anthony Cadena Oh. Btw. The KJV is by far the worst version ever translated into English. Just on punctuation it is horrible
    1
  169. Anthony Cadena None of that says “earth is a flat plain”. Not even close. And when you look up the original text it translates to sphere. Please do yourself a favour and read some actual writing on the subject.
    1
  170. azaz 2020 This is not true. There are channels here that have gone from flat to ball.
    1
  171. Wint James Sorry. No it doesn’t.
    1
  172. JCS Wrong again! Please read something on these theories. Btw flat earth is not a theory. At best it’s a hypothesis and worst it’s just a very bad idea. There is nothing in common between flat earth and geocentric. Flat earth sun is supposed to do circles above us. Geocentric sun orbits earth. Geocentric has Antarctica as a land mass a little bigger than Australia. Flat earth has Antarctica as a ring. Both are demonstrate-ably Wrong.
    1
  173. JCS You don’t even cling to the geocentric model. Which says everything orbits earth. Earth is a ball and space is real. No mention of a dome or flat.
    1
  174.  @tbrown3356  No subject change? I’m on flat earth what are you on? Sun rise is caused by curve. It is the only thing that can block the sun from my vision. You are a dill.
    1
  175.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Agreed.
    1
  176. Taylor Sukoshi Where?
    1
  177. Dept FakeX Yeah ok buddy.
    1
  178.  @tbrown3356  So no rhetoric about that link hey. Plainly shows curve. Want more? I can link you to live footage of that bridge.
    1
  179.  @tbrown3356  Yes you are. Your claim. Variables dependent and independent. Are false if they are evidence of round. I’ve just given you two. Where’s yours? Or are you saying you can’t science? I’ve even shown you curve. Still refusing to acknowledge science. Yes you are flaming science is bunk. It’s your entire reason for being here. Earth is a round ball. Proven by millions of people over 2,000 years. With observation, experiments and maths. If you have proof of flat. Show it. So far all you done here is bang on about variables which I’ve shown you.
    1
  180. Dept FakeX Except it doesn’t though
    1
  181. Kashmirknight Well it’s not flat so everything you typed is pointless
    1
  182. Kazzy Kaioken They lost some data tapes. That’s all. Not all of them. Not most of them. Not even a lot of them. Some. Do you have any idea what was on them ? Numbers. That’s it.
    1
  183. Kazzy Kaioken Lost what? All the footage. The astronauts. What did they lose? Oh you mean a few data tapes.
    1
  184.  @garyryan7852WR  I’ll wait.
    1
  185.  @garyryan7852WR  Yours.
    1
  186. @Yusuf Best How do you know earth is a planet. Omg. If you have to ask that. It’s well beyond your mental capacity to understand just about everything.
    1
  187.  @MaxLeGrand33  What on earth is a flight agency. Come on man. You know where people go to book flights. Like a travel agency. Flight booking agency.
    1
  188. @Yusuf Best You don’t have a question! A question requires an answer. When you’re given that answer you ignore it.
    1
  189. Idk. Obama took flat arth as a real debate.
    1