Comments by "Orbital_Inclination" (@Orbital_Inclination) on "The weapon that destroyed the Royal Navy's first aerial target since 1991" video.

  1. The days of us being the best are long gone, but we still manage well at times
    3
  2. The main gun isn't designed for anti-air fire at that range, and it wasn't in range of CIWS either
    3
  3. That issue was solved years ago. Your information is a long time out of date.
    2
  4.  @jayspik6498  Diamond is still awaiting her PIP fix for the propulsion system, but a workaround has been in place for years anyway. Type 45s have been fully capable for years, since the propulsion system problem was identified and new procedures put in place. The PIP upgrade removes the need for those procedures, reducing burden on the crew.
    2
  5. And yet the actual cost of a drone strike would be far worse, both for the ship it hits and the wider economy as a whole.
    2
  6. You're ignoring the bigger picture. If that £500 drone hits a cargo ship, it causes millions in damage to global trade as companies reroute their vessels. That drives up costs, which are passed onto the general public, so it costs us all more.
    1
  7.  @GarmondPhil  that depends on the engagement range
    1