Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Neil deGrasse Tyson Has an Insane New Rule About How He's Introduced" video.

  1. Neil has passed into the same dark void as Sam Harris... both are dead to me.
    511
  2.  @wwiiinplastic4712  .. That's not fair. I was subd to Sam's channel for a number of years, as I enjoyed his sparring with my boy JBP. I looked past his SERIOUS case of TDS, as I was not there for politics and I can handle people who have disagreements with me politically. However, after his initial "Trump vs. Bin Laden / Hitler" F'ing idiocy, I had enough. Gave him another try when the wrote that "eating my words syllable by syllable" retraction on Twitter... but then, he did it again. We have since seen him over and over expose his illness. . NDT was great for a lot of years, though I dd not follow him in any way, I would often tune in, when he was on podcast or something. The moment he said ..."assigned female / male at birth"... DONE!
    7
  3.  @msimon6808  ... I am not equipped (knowledgeable enough) to argue his scientific qualifications, nor have I claimed him to be superior to anyone else. He had lots of cool knowledge that I enjoyed listening to, when he would make appearances on podcasts and such. . That has all changed, as he has sold his soul to the WOKE cult and the Devil actually has an out!
    1
  4.  @Glum1964  ... Sam was, and still is a great thinker, regardless if I agree with him or not. My issue is that, like all who acquire TDS, when the subject of Trump comes up, they are suddenly get paralyzed mind syndrome and utterly incapable of rational thinking altogether. Just watch how ALL reason, accountability and objective critical thought is immediately vanquished from the thought pattern of ANYONE who is afflicted with this most debilitating of ALL mental illnesses. . Screw a cure for Alzheimer's... cure TDS to save the world from the evil they would RATHER bring forth, rather than see Trump as POTUS once again.
    1
  5. ​ @michaelbarker6460  ... Since this comment is not "@" anyone, I am going to figure it is to me, so will address it. It is a fair question you ask, because 100% of the people who have ever existed on this earth , does indeed have a bias. Yes. if someone says something that is true, it is and will forever be true, so to condemn both Sam and Neil as I have, is not a valid excuse to dismiss them entirely. My concern is the very obvious corruption that has forced Sam, to abandon the core values I had heard him speak about multiple times... free speech and NDT to abandon biology, to appease the WOKE cult. . Sam recognizes that free speech is a most core value, as we cannot debate things, if someone with the ability to control the dissemination of information, has deemed someone as NOT WORTHY of free speech. Both Sam and the overwhelming number of social media and big tech platforms have done precisely that . Twitter DELETED a sitting POTUS account (Trump), due to the internal decisions they made, to "decide" that he is not worthy of free speech. They had determined that since they do not like what he said about "A", he is therefore unworthy to be heard to speak about "B". Several of the mainstream legacy news media (Maddow on MSNBC spoke of this directly) opted NOT to carry Trumps weekly, I think it was, talks with reporters, saying... [paraphrasing] .."if Trump says something of importance, we will carry the press conference". Well, talk about the GD'd frigging arrogance for MSNBC to be the SOLE arbiter of the worthiness that the world should or should not hear, what a sitting POTUS has to say! This is the epitome of hubris, yet this is totally common place and accepted practice of the vast majority of platforms. . Gotten a bit off track, but only to show that some bias are carried to the extreme and they have the ability to KEEP people from hearing them. In the case of Sam and NDT, I have chosen to personally no longer follow anything they have to say, because the corruption of absolutely core principles have been abandoned. I have no power to stop them from sharing that information, nor would I do so had I the means. Neither are wrong about the truth they tell, but since Sam cares about free speech, until it is Trump and NDT only cares about biology, when it no longer is politically expedient to do so... I will have nothing to do with either. . A bit long winded, as well as sidetracked, but I think that answers your question. If not, do chime back in, as I am always willing to have a good faith discussion with anyone about anything 😸
    1