Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "Feminist Lawyer Calls Dave Sexist as Vaccine Mandate Debate Gets Heated | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

@Libertarian Sasquatch ... Notice how she says one should NOT have the right to refuse vaccination, as it can harm another person. Of course, a "woman's right to choose" should be up to 8 mo. 31 days, but that does NOT hurt another person. Regardless of what side one falls on abortion, she is a hypocrite and bowing to authoritarian rule. To think... she calls herself a lawyer and out to protect peoples rights!
8
@sthubbins4038 ... @RoseLawliet ... I think what Dave and others, like myself, are saying is that if we say it is OK to say you DON'T have freedom of choice for Covid, where and when does that line stop? If we mandate vax today, then it will be easier to mandate other health related items going forward. "Hey, you are 105 lbs over-weight for your age group, you cannot buy french fries at a restaurant". Sooner or later, that gets moved to 75 lbs over-weight... then 50 lbs. As soon as we cross that line, it WILL be pushed farther down the road, when 105 lbs becomes the "normal" standard for mandating morality on others. This is an EXCEEDINGLY dangerous road we are on here and far too many people, not saying this about either of YOU, but we are that frog in the pot of water, with the temperature ever increasing to a boil!
5
@Sandpiper ... [desperately seeks to give red-heart for comment... cannot find button]
3
@mchrysogelos7623 ... Regressives are ALL about word games! So long as the rest of us "try" to play by the rules they have set down, we will forever lose the battle and ultimately the war. Dave is well aware of this, so when she claimed sexist, was just water off a ducks back :)
3
@sthubbins4038 .. Slippery slope is no fallacy! Remember, it was "10 days to 2 weeks to slow the spread". THEN... government thought it a good idea to shut down businesses to "slow the spread". Fast forward to now and we have the president MANDATING vaccines to protect the vaccinated.We have entire cities that are being forced to check your papers in order to enter the establishment. We have Australia who has build and will continue to build "quarantine camps" to protect the rest of us. At what point do you not see that living in fear is now a way for power hungry politicians to govern our lives? . If you want to wear a mask... fine. If someone wants to wear 2 masks and get vaccinated twice a week... fine. If another wants to lock themselves away or live in a hamster ball to feel "safe"... so be it! Life IS about weighing risk vs. reward and freedom. The problem with your analogy is that we keep moving that line farther and farther and once we have gone too far for EVERYONE, it is far too late to do anything about it. Your line may be right here at mandates, but those on the more extreme will push that line even farther, because you gave into the current line. . There is NO END IN SIGHT for this. The vax is as accessible and cheap as it can be, yet about 40% of the population is not vaccinated. This is about power and control... nothing more! If it were NOT and were actually about being safe, then Biden admin would not be asking FB to remove "Covid misinformation" according to the ONE AND ONLY GOD of all things Covid related.... CDC. Let the information come to light, let it be debated, let people be HEARD and discuss this as was what America was founded upon.
2
@ericsw03 ... You are getting to the central point for many :) As soon as we "demand" responsibility for governing another's decisions in life, we have lost the very thing that makes life worth living!
2
I keep saying it... but DAMN I am sure glad we got rid of that authoritarian tyrant Trump admin forcing his agenda upon the American people! EDIT: I love how she argues that .."You have the right to do what you want with your OWN body, but when what you choose to do can be dangerous to others, then we are in a whole different area..." Of course, when it comes to an abortion to end the life of a tiny human, THAT is not considered a choice that hurts another! Remember, this is coming from a lawyer who argued that YES... her client knew she was sleeping with a married Tiger Woods, but she should have the right to compensation because here client thought she was the ONLY one who Tiger was cheating his wife on at the time. She is SOO wickedly wretched! . Dave CRUSHED her!
1
@mo1240 ... Yes... they are called "tribal" :)
1
@ricardocontador1539 ... I am not sure, but I think he is. For Dave, it is a matter of principle, as he considers it personal health issue and none of anyone's business... I agree :)
1