Youtube comments of (@NinjaKittyBonks).

  1. 2300
  2. 1200
  3. 1000
  4. 1000
  5. 968
  6. 697
  7. 613
  8. 578
  9. 511
  10. 500
  11. 499
  12. 465
  13. 462
  14. 441
  15. 440
  16. 434
  17. 396
  18. 386
  19. 381
  20. 376
  21. 374
  22. 358
  23. 357
  24. 352
  25. 351
  26. 346
  27. 339
  28. 336
  29. 331
  30. 326
  31. 325
  32. 311
  33. 309
  34. 305
  35. 303
  36. 292
  37. 291
  38. 290
  39. 286
  40. 278
  41. 273
  42. 272
  43. 261
  44. 260
  45. 255
  46. 255
  47. 254
  48. 254
  49. 250
  50. 231
  51. 224
  52. 217
  53. 211
  54. 195
  55. 191
  56. 189
  57. 188
  58. 183
  59. 174
  60. 173
  61. 172
  62. 168
  63. 160
  64. 156
  65. 151
  66. 150
  67. 148
  68. 147
  69. 146
  70. 145
  71. 143
  72. 140
  73. 140
  74. 139
  75. 138
  76. 136
  77. 133
  78. 133
  79. 131
  80. 128
  81. 127
  82. 127
  83. 124
  84. 118
  85. 118
  86. 118
  87. 118
  88. 118
  89. 117
  90. 115
  91. 113
  92. 112
  93. 112
  94. 112
  95. 111
  96. 110
  97. 108
  98. 108
  99. 107
  100. 106
  101. 104
  102. 103
  103. 101
  104. 100
  105. 99
  106. 99
  107. 98
  108. 98
  109. 98
  110. 96
  111. 95
  112. 95
  113. 93
  114. 92
  115. 91
  116. 89
  117. 89
  118. 87
  119. 87
  120. 87
  121. 85
  122. 83
  123. 83
  124. 82
  125. 82
  126. 80
  127. 79
  128. 78
  129. 78
  130. 77
  131. 77
  132. 74
  133. 74
  134. 74
  135. 73
  136. 73
  137. 72
  138. 71
  139. 70
  140. 69
  141. 68
  142. 68
  143. 67
  144. 67
  145. 67
  146. 65
  147. 63
  148. 62
  149. 60
  150. 60
  151. 60
  152. 59
  153. 58
  154. 58
  155. 57
  156. 57
  157. 55
  158. 55
  159. 55
  160. 55
  161. 55
  162. 54
  163. 54
  164. 53
  165. 52
  166. 52
  167. 52
  168. 52
  169. 52
  170. 50
  171. 50
  172. 49
  173. 49
  174. 49
  175. 48
  176. 48
  177. 47
  178. 47
  179. 47
  180. 47
  181. 47
  182. 46
  183. 45
  184. 45
  185. 45
  186. 45
  187. 45
  188. 44
  189. 43
  190. 42
  191. 41
  192. 40
  193. 40
  194. 40
  195. 39
  196. 39
  197. 39
  198. 38
  199. 38
  200. 37
  201. 36
  202. 36
  203. 36
  204. 36
  205. 35
  206. 35
  207. 35
  208. 34
  209. 34
  210. 33
  211. 33
  212. 33
  213. 33
  214. 32
  215. 32
  216. 31
  217. 31
  218. 30
  219. 30
  220. 30
  221. 29
  222. 29
  223. 29
  224. 29
  225. 28
  226. 28
  227. 28
  228. 27
  229. 27
  230. 27
  231. 27
  232. 27
  233. 27
  234. 26
  235. 26
  236. 26
  237. 26
  238. 26
  239. 26
  240. 26
  241. 25
  242. 25
  243. 25
  244. 25
  245. 24
  246. 24
  247. 24
  248. 24
  249. 23
  250. 23
  251. 23
  252. 23
  253. 23
  254. 23
  255. 22
  256. 22
  257. 22
  258. 22
  259. 22
  260. 22
  261. 22
  262. 22
  263. 22
  264. 22
  265. 22
  266. 22
  267. 22
  268. 21
  269. 21
  270. 21
  271. 21
  272. 21
  273. 21
  274. 20
  275. 20
  276. 20
  277. 20
  278. 20
  279. 20
  280. 19
  281. 19
  282. 19
  283. 19
  284. 19
  285. 19
  286. 19
  287. 18
  288. 18
  289. 18
  290. 18
  291. 18
  292. 18
  293. 18
  294. 18
  295. 18
  296. 17
  297. 17
  298. 17
  299. 17
  300. 17
  301. 17
  302. 17
  303. 17
  304. 17
  305. 17
  306. 17
  307. 17
  308. 16
  309. 16
  310. 16
  311. 16
  312. 16
  313. 16
  314. 16
  315. 16
  316. 16
  317. 16
  318. 16
  319. 16
  320. 16
  321. 15
  322. 15
  323. 15
  324. 15
  325. 15
  326. 15
  327. 15
  328. 15
  329. 15
  330. 15
  331. 15
  332. 15
  333. 14
  334. 14
  335. 14
  336. 14
  337. 14
  338. 14
  339. 14
  340. 13
  341. 13
  342. 13
  343. 13
  344. 13
  345. 13
  346. 13
  347. 13
  348. 13
  349. 13
  350. 13
  351. 13
  352. 12
  353. 12
  354. 12
  355. 12
  356. 12
  357. 12
  358. 12
  359. 12
  360. 12
  361. 12
  362. 12
  363. 12
  364. 12
  365. 12
  366. 12
  367. 12
  368. 12
  369. 12
  370. 12
  371. 12
  372. 12
  373. 12
  374. 11
  375. 11
  376. 11
  377. 11
  378.  @gabeo9474  …. But the employee IS the one who will pay the price of safety, NOT the store owner. If this guy was locked behind a cage or something, then coming out to attack would not be the same thing. . In this case, he had LITERALLY 2 seconds to take action. Had he only shoved or punched, let’s say and the guy ducked or was not otherwise incapacitated. Then, he strikes back while the other guy comes from behind in less than 3 seconds. He now has 2 guys on him and the guy in back smashes his head or pulls his own weapon…. he is now dead . So, in the span of LITERALLY 5 seconds, he goes from just hitting this guy to being dead or seriously wounded. It is INCREDIBLY easy to sit back from the comfort of our desk, with two weeks to consider 1000 options, zero risk and with full knowledge of everything that has happened since and say “woudla shoulda coulda”. . It sucks that this guy had to make that choice, but he had only 2 seconds to take ALL of the possible scenarios into account, his previous life experiences and act. We can say… “it was only $150 of stuff that wasn’t even his”, but it IS his life that could easily be taken, if the one guy ducks a punch and the other joins from behind. . The legalities will get worked out, but speaking strictly from a moral perspective…. I have no issue whatever with his actions. . EDIT: Let's say, he stood back and LET them take stuff. What if they smell fear and BOTH attack him suddenly from each side? He now has 2 guys on him and he is in REAL trouble. He tried to do the right thing and allowed them the freedom to get away with theft, but what if that proved not to be enough? What if the wanted to get greedy and go for the cash register?
    11
  379. 11
  380. 11
  381. 11
  382. 11
  383. 11
  384. 10
  385. 10
  386. 10
  387. 10
  388. 10
  389. 10
  390. 10
  391. 10
  392. 10
  393. 10
  394. 10
  395.  @TheHigherVoltage  ... There are two sexes... male / female .. FULL STOP! There are a fraction of percent of intersex, but the numbers are so low, they are not considered another sex, for the purposes of every day discussion. . So, if a man has effeminate features, skinny, small Adams apple, high voice then he is a female? No.. he is not. If a female is strong and has a deep voice... she is male? No... she is not! We cannot have objective standards of conduct, when we have a subjective determination of a person's sex. There is a reason we have separate bathrooms, showers, gym's locker rooms and spaces that are SPECIFICALLY separated for females. Do not attempt to gas light me here, as I am not buying it. Sexual preferences have ZERO to do with being male or female, this is a psychological condition that drives that person to attraction of same sex. That is not a put down or to say they need to be institutionalized or even therapy, only that it is not the "normal", as per the laws of nature. We cannot change ALL the rules of societal interaction, based on how someone "feels". This is how we get men in female prisons that only want to grape the female population that is TRAPPED within the walls of a prison. . If you are a male, you were born with a male brain, regardless of whom you are attracted. Females the same thing. I could not care less how many species are claimed to engage in same sex attraction / behavior, it STILL does not make that person a male in female body or verse visa. . As an adult, I could not care one iota about whom you or ANYONE is attracted or engages in relations, so long as that other person is consenting and of legal age. A bit of a different discussion when two late teens, but there STILL may be legal implications, but neither here nor their. . I could not care less what surgery, hormones or furry outfits anyone wants to wear, but I have a MASSIVE issue, when anyone is grooming children of less than legal adult age. Now, there is a place for some discussion when in early teens, but this is primarily the parents / guardians domain and / or some in public / private schools, so long as parents have a say or the ability to opt their child out. . I am not buying your subjective determination of objective reality.. sorry, not sorry.
    10
  396. 10
  397. 10
  398. 10
  399. 9
  400. 9
  401. 9
  402. 9
  403. 9
  404. 9
  405. 9
  406. 9
  407. 9
  408. 9
  409. 9
  410. 9
  411. 9
  412. 9
  413. 9
  414. 9
  415. 9
  416. 9
  417. ​ @godzillamegatron3590  ... Guess what... that is how the overwhelming amount of people feel. If it weren't for the Regressives and WOKE outrage mob viewing LITERALLY everything through the lens of skin color, ethnicity, sexual identity and racism, we would not have anywhere NEAR the extreme polarization we have today. It is the Regressives and leftists who are injecting racism into everything they see another do or say. It is quite simply impossible to meet the demands of an ideologically driven cult as we see in the Twitter Outrage Mob. What the outrage mob calls "racism" is 99% of the time called "accountability" to those of us they seek to demonize daily on social media.  . So long as the outrage mob is setting the ever-changing rules and regulations in which the ENTIRE WORLD is being bullied into trying to follow, we will have an ever growing division between the leftist cult and normal society. That normal society has existed, matured and adapted to a basic set of rules for some 10K years based on BIOLOGY of the human species, but suddenly, Gen Z has decided that IT knows better about the human condition, after 20 something years on this earth. Nobody wants to be judged on such a level and never ending consistency as is done by the morality police the rest of us call The Twitter Outrage Mob. . Please spare us with your moral superiority of how YOU were taught racism and discrimination is wrong and how society must learn from YOUR example, because the rest of us are just seeking to oppress PoC. PS> Are you going to address the questions I asked of you in an earlier comment?
    9
  418. 9
  419. 9
  420. 9
  421. 9
  422. 9
  423. 9
  424. 9
  425. 9
  426. 9
  427. 9
  428. 8
  429. 8
  430. 8
  431. 8
  432. 8
  433. 8
  434. 8
  435. 8
  436. 8
  437. 8
  438. 8
  439. 8
  440. 8
  441. 8
  442. 8
  443. 8
  444. 8
  445. ​ @swannydabs620  ... I would probably do the same thing, but we must look at this from BOTH perspectives: a: If Ahmaud was NOT guilty of anything and no idea why two guys would get out of trucks and confront him with a gun, it would be reasonable to think that these guys were NOT reasonable and therefore take the first opportunity to take them by surprise. I don't know if I would have done that, but either way, Ahmaud felt that was the thing to do. b: If Ahmaud WAS guilty of stealing stuff and had committed a crime, based on his criminal history, he knows that getting arrested would be a very bad thing. I don't know anything about details of his history with police, but if was very violent, as I think Sean mentioned in this video, than can we be surprised that he would go for a gun, given EITHER of the two above scenarios? . I don't know how privy those who stopped him were on the legal history of Ahmaud, but not likely they knew much. Again, hindsight is 20/20, but citizens arrest is ALWAYS going to be a fine-line thing for those doing the arrest legally, but there is just no telling how the person is going to react. Since you are not a cop, this person has no reason to think you would be accountable to anyone for your actions, as police have to follow the law or your case might be thrown out or something. I don't know if audio of their interaction was recorded on that video, but for all Ahmaud knew, these two were just a couple looking to be hero's. . Based on all of the incredibly insane level of leftists self-victimization, we also have to recognize that Ahmaud may feel that America IS full of racists looking to lynch PoC, so reacted as such. Now, you and I know that is all a TOTAL CROCK OF SHEET, but if Ahmaud fell victim, no pun intended, to this line of thinking, than society has taught him to believe that a white guy with a gun is certain death!  . One thing is for certain, had this IDENTICAL scenario happened, say 10 years ago, I think that Ahmaud would have held still until cops arrived. Since Regressives have taken power and the State, Joseph Goebbles Propaganda Media Machine, big tech, all of academia, BLM, Antifa and the Twitter mob have had the last 6 years to beat the drum on "systemic racism", this has most definitely had a profound effect and very well led Ahmaud to make a decision, he may not have made, in say 2012!
    8
  446. 8
  447. 8
  448. 8
  449. 8
  450. 8
  451. 8
  452. 8
  453. ​ @AGJ117  ... What in the hells ya'll talkin' 'bout? Since you brought it up, exactly where did ANYONE in this thread talk trash about rap artists? Who in this thread said the agree or disagree with Cardie B. For that matter, what makes Cardie B. imminently right or wrong an any particular issue? Even if me or anyone here did talk trash about Cardie B., does that mean she is to be completely discounted for any and EVERYTHING she may say from now into the future? Why would agreeing or disagreeing have anything to do with Naz or Meghan? Are these people somehow psychologically connected, so as to share the identical thoughts on all subjects? Did anyone in this thread speak of Cardie B. and the "gay/ho agenda" as you call it? Who said we hate / like / indifferent to ANY of those you mentioned? Who said that we think none of them are worth listening to on any given subject? You don't know any of us, you probably aren't aware that I got into rap / hip hop back in '89 and have well over 300 CD's of everyone from Public Enemy, KRS-ONE, NWA, Geto Boys, Ice-T, Last Poets and roughly 50 others. So.... you stereotype much? . Maybe you should check yourself, before you wreck yo self! (werd)... lol EDIT: I happen to think that Cardie B. pointed out some SERIOUS hypocrisy of Joy Reid, who I happen to think is stupid-azz nazty leftist biotch who was CRUSHED a couple months back by exposing her idiocy regarding what CRT actually is! I don't follow Cardie B. in any way shape or form, but in this particular instance... she was SPOT FUCKING ON!
    8
  454. 8
  455. 8
  456. 8
  457. 8
  458. 8
  459. 8
  460. 8
  461. 8
  462. 7
  463. 7
  464. 7
  465. 7
  466. 7
  467. 7
  468. 7
  469. 7
  470. 7
  471. 7
  472. 7
  473. 7
  474. 7
  475. 7
  476. 7
  477. 7
  478. 7
  479. 7
  480. 7
  481. 7
  482. 7
  483. 7
  484. ​ @rubecork7102  Amen! The difficulty most have, is oft times a condition of social media and the anonymity it provides. We have become "separated" from each other by ones and zeros and many years from now, studies will bare out the results of social media on society and it WON'T be pretty :( For reasons that ultimately lead back to he values with which someone was raised, far, far, far too many find it acceptable to be a complete arse when it comes to expressing a difference of opinion. Such discourse will cause a visceral response in nearly all cases and then a reply in kind. Since outrage has proven to get more "clicks", we have platforms like Twitter, IG and others that essentially promote such discourse. Because of how fast information is exchanged, the limitation of characters to express that information and, most importantly, the lack of discipline readers have to digest the info and FOLLOW UP WITH SOME ACTUAL RESEARCH to varify authenticity of the comment, we resort to horrible discourse. . I don't have an answer for anyone but myself. I do my best to not only confirm what I read, but often read the ENTIRE comment 2 or 3 times, to help curb some visceral response the initial reading may have generated. I VERY often find that a second reading, shows that I missed a nuance or detail that completely changes my initial reaction. I cannot say how many times doing this has saved me from writing a very strong, but still respectful, disagreement with someone and would have been completely wrong! I have at times written something poorly and another has asked for clarification, because they took my meaning in a way which I did not intend. This has happened more than once over the years and I am always thankful to that person for giving me the opportunity to clarify. . I have also had a "rocky" start with a replying to a comment and both of us continually reaching for common ground. To look past what we thought was ignorance, bias or whatever to find that we both learned something from each other and ended up having a really great exchange. We both hung in there and gave benefit of doubt to one another and became interweb besties :) I have also found, that I tend to write quite long replies, as it is the details that give context and express nuance and is very difficult to get into 280 characters.
    7
  485. 7
  486. 7
  487. 7
  488. 7
  489. 7
  490. 7
  491. 7
  492. 7
  493. 7
  494. 7
  495. 7
  496. 6
  497. 6
  498. 6
  499. 6
  500. 6
  501. 6
  502. 6
  503. 6
  504. 6
  505. 6
  506. 6
  507. 6
  508. 6
  509. 6
  510. 6
  511. 6
  512. 6
  513. 6
  514. 6
  515. 6
  516. 6
  517. ​ @godzillamegatron3590  ... what? Biology drives nearly all of our actions as humans, but we continually try to "over-ride" that biology with the whims of societal mandates on all kinds of things. Take gender, for a perfect example! There are EXACTLY 2 genders that exist in human beings. That is fact and cannot be disputed, by any uniformly recognized metric. Now, there are inter-sex people, who have physical attributes that conform to both male and female anatomy, but they are very rare. That does not mean we should not treat them as humans, of course we should. However, we have a society today that is trying to claim that "gender" and "biological sex" are different and no such argument can be made, without the never-ending revolving door of leftist word games that are designed SPECIFICALLY to trip up others when in discussion / debate. . There are most certainly different races of people, as evidenced by skin color, shape of the eyes and what-not, but that we are ALL human and biology is universal between ALL of them. Sure, there are societal variations of cultural preferences for music, food and a billion other things, but THAT is what makes the human experience so beautiful. We have a MEGA sheet-ton of various religious and spiritual values and beliefs, but this really only becomes an issue when one is attempting to force THEIR values / beliefs upon one another person not interested in adopting all or some of them. There are those that go out of their way and seek out others for which to apply such pressure to change, but these are very few, as the overwhelmingly VAST amount of people just want to live their lives and be left alone by such demands of others. . For some 10K years, humans have lived by this code, both written and un-written and the wars we have seen, are often caused by one society seeking another to conform to ITS will, ways or values. This lead to countries, states and nations, as groups of like minded people tend to flock together and has served the world pretty well, overall. I am glad to year you say you are proud of the USA, as I am, but there are many who would not dare say such a thing. It is most ironic, that those who would condemn the USA for being "racist" or "homophobic", are able to openly do so BECAUSE they are in USA and afforded The Constitution and Bill of Rights affording them the GUARANTEED right to express that hatred or condemnation of this country.  . I support the rights of those who wish to make such condemnation, but it brings me never ending frustration to see that they are seeking to destroy the VERY THING that has afforded them the voice to speak out and say as much! For the record, I have no problem with you, nor your views. While I will push back on what I disagree, I will not be disrespectful, unless another brings it down to such a level. I am a 1a absolutist and I want to hear what EVERYONE has to say or what they think, REGARDLESS of how politically correct, evil or hatred they may spew. For the light of day is the best disinfectant and when voices are silenced, they do not go away, they simply go underground. Others who have the SAME, let's say anti-social voices, WILL find them and create an information bubble of ALL like minds. This is when we have a MASSIVE problem, as those voices will often grow to resent those who have outcast them, mainstream society, and far too often lash out in acts of terror. . I am getting off track here, but I would like you to consider more of the questions on my list. I think there was about 6 or 7, but I find you interesting to converse, so would like to hear your thoughts :) Peace, GodzillX... lol ;) PS> Been giving all the names of people to which I reply in this thread, the "X" treatement :P
    6
  518. 6
  519. 6
  520. 6
  521. 6
  522. 6
  523. 6
  524. 6
  525. 6
  526. 6
  527. 6
  528. 6
  529. 6
  530. 6
  531. 6
  532. 6
  533.  @TheHigherVoltage  ... There is nothing wrong with gay rights that WERE necessary, as LGB's and even T's are protected under The Constitution. The problem is that humans are a binary species and it is not natural to engage in homosexuality. This is a clinical term and am not disparaging the lifestyle, only that we have had approx. 117 billion people born to this earth, and 100% of them, with ZERO exceptions was born of a female that had egg fertilized by a male. Since same sex people cannot pro-create, it is outside of the "natural" order of life. That does not mean they deserve anything less than 100% protections from The Constitution, but that this way of living runs counter to natural law and opened the door for going further in that direction. So long as it was confined to adults, more power to them. The problem we have NOW, is what was predicted by those in the '80's. . Whether by Christians, GOP, conservatives or ANYONE, once the door was opened, the line just keeps moving. At that time, the LGB's said that they would NEVER, EVER go after children and I think they were completely sincere. However, we did not have the T's in ANYWHERE near the stratosphere, as we do now and it is the trans activist cult who is pushing for children to be included in sexualized behaviors that are WAY, WAY beyond their ability to grasp (and should not be anyway!) . It is not rights of the LGB's or even T's, of which we are concerned... it is the C's (children) who have ZERO place in any of this!
    6
  534. 6
  535. 6
  536. 6
  537. 6
  538. 6
  539. 6
  540. 6
  541. 6
  542. 6
  543. 6
  544. 6
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 5
  557. 5
  558. 5
  559. 5
  560. 5
  561. 5
  562. 5
  563. 5
  564. 5
  565. 5
  566. 5
  567.  @Goulash45  .. My moral compass is just fine, thank you. . You continue to say “small amount of merchandise”, as if they have a right to just walk in and take it. Let’s say he totally complies and sits there and lets them steal. How long can these two be expected to stop “shopping”? . Is it reasonable they will just grab, what $50 worth of stuff and then just leave? How long before they realize he is not going to resist and they keep “shopping”? Why not…? He is not going to resist, why not go for a bigger payday and hit that register? . Is he supposed to say..”oh, excuse me…. I will just allow you to step past me and get to the register”. Do you really think that is realistic? Do you think these two might feel like he needs to be taken out of the equation? . Suppose one makes a move for the register and this guy is pressed into a situation in which he is face to face and the guy behind clocks him with something? If he is not resisting, it is completely reasonable to assume they will get more aggressive. . Does the schoolyard bully just have his fill of harassing someone, or does he get emboldened by the weak prey and step up his abuse? On top of ALL this….. the entire situation happened in the matter of a single moment. One minute he is finishing his cup of coffee in the back room and the next he has two guys with ski masks jumping his counter. . Simply amazes me how you can sit back and judge this guy, when you have no GD idea what it it is like or if one or both of them will get the SAME fight response he had and attack with a weapon of his own. . What if this was your wife, husband or child and saw two guys jumping the counter? What would you do…. Oh, don’t tell me, let me guess. You would hop on the phone, call your lawyer and have all of the laws explained, so you would have the legally measured response. . Ya, see how that works out for your family member who very well could be needing emergency surgery or a coroner,
    5
  568.  @gabeo9474  …. I understand your point. . Again…. We are judging this TWO WEEKS LATER and having never been in the situation he found himself with zero warning. He walks out from the back room and has to process a multitude of scenarios, that you and I see from a camera behind it all. . I understand that the law will see this from a dry and unbiased point of view, but he now has adrenalyn (sp?) and watching 2 guys on either side of him with NO idea how they will respond, if one guy is only punched or grabbed. Those of us watching the video have none of the fears or considerations he MUST decide in that moment. . The law may screw him for some minutia of breakdown after having examined all of this data months later with a TON of info he could not possibly have known, much less the calm and reasonable time in which to process all those scenarios in real time on that night. . Yes…. The law will see this differently, but regardless of what happens legally, had he acted with less aggressive force, the ENTIRE scene would be completely different. Maybe that guy would have ran away and prompted the other to do the same thing and this story would be nothing more than a closing segment on the local news. . However, had he been less aggressive and they ganged up on him…. he could have easily been stuck in the head from behind and dead. Wanna take a guess of what you and I would be talking about right now? . We would be saying he should have used the knife on that guy and he would still be alive! . We don’t get such chances in life and this guy would have been just another victim who tried to give a break to a … “person who is just down on their luck through no fault of their own”
    5
  569. 5
  570. 5
  571. 5
  572. 5
  573. 5
  574. 5
  575. 5
  576. 5
  577. 5
  578. 5
  579. 5
  580. 5
  581. 5
  582. 5
  583. 5
  584. 5
  585. ​ @TheHigherVoltage  ... RE: What is the strawman... : Here are your quotes quoting me: Firstly, I want to say that I appreciate your engaging with me. As I said, 100% respond one of two ways, but I cannot say that any longer 🐱I may be able to say 99.95%, but cannot say 100% any longer 😸I am saying this in a silly way, but you do have my respect for making your case. Whether I agree with it or not, humans can NEVER resolve any differences of opinion, when one or both sides refuse to debate, discuss and find some common ground in which to move forward: .... on to my replies: So...by "everyday discussions", you really mean, but the subjective wishes of people who refuse to admit there is more than just 'male' and 'female'. My reply to the above (not so much a strawman, but rather... "So you're saying" ALA Cathy Newman): Do not project upon me what it is you think I mean. If you are unsure or it does not make sense... ask for clarification. The term "everyday discussions" was not used to dismiss anyone or their opinions. It was to used as a replacement for colloquially, but was drawing a blank on that word at the moment. There are anomalies in nature all the time. There are 4 leaf clovers, sometimes we see two-headed snakes or birth defects that leave a person with Down syndrome or body part deformed for some reason. To use intersex as a 3rd sex / gender, so as to BLOW UP the the binary of humans, and the entirety of the animal kingdom, is a leap I will not take. For the record, at no point did I say or do I feel, that 4 leaf clovers, two-headed snakes, those born with Down syndrome, missing / deformed body parts... OR, those who are born intersex, are to be discounted, eliminated or reduced to zero worth. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I am not buying your subjective determination of objective reality.. sorry, not sorry." The irony. You want to argue that millions of people around the world, who are born either with both or neither sex organs, shouldn't be in the definition of objective reality My reply to the above (my reply to the above and this IS a strawman): This is taking a twisted and least generous interpretation of what I said, more importantly...what I meant, as to be offensive. My response immediately above, pretty much covers this as well. The number of intersex people that exist has zero bearing upon their value as humans. I sure as hell did not say, suggest, imply or respond flippantly, as to their inclusion of the population. My point, which I made clear, but you speciously dissected as a removal of my consideration, is where I take issue with you. . The numbers of itersex persons born is 0.02%–0.05%, as per WIKI check right now. I am not arguing these numbers are definitive or that there are those who argue more or less, only that these fall directly in line with my statement of "... fraction of a percent", in my previous comment. Regardless of how many people this happens to be in the world, we cannot use THOSE numbers as leverage to say there is no binary in humans. Intersex is a birth defect. Something went wrong in the development within the incalculable number of variables, circumstances and absolutely INSANE melding of a female egg and male insemination. My dad's second wife has a daughter who has had two children, while living on the streets and addicted to meth. The fathers, only one of which is known, were JUST as messed up. Yet.. the son is 18 yo and daughter is 6 yo and by all accounts, they are none the worse off, in terms of development, due to both parents F'd up chemical poison that was flowing through her body, as she cycled and the sperm his body created WITH such poison in his body. . Was not seeking to get side tracked with family, but rather illustrate how with ALL that can go wrong, the human DNA ability to work within the bounds of such horror as to fertilize and create that tiny human under a bloodstream of both flowing with chemicals, is AMAZING. However, as mentioned, there are indeed MANY who are born with various anomalies, but no matter how many people it happens to be... they were "meant" to XX or XY with perfectly functional reproductive organs, but something went wrong. They are no less valuable as humans, animals or plants, but we cannot take THAT percentage of outcomes to say that 99%+ are not the norm. . I can get VERY wordy in my comments, but kept as short as could, while saying what needed to be said. Peace, THV :)
    5
  586. 5
  587. 5
  588. 5
  589. 5
  590. 5
  591. 5
  592. 5
  593. 5
  594. 5
  595. 5
  596. 5
  597. 5
  598. 5
  599. 4
  600. 4
  601. 4
  602. 4
  603. 4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. ​ Neo One  ... As Sean mentioned in this video, there are a number of reasons: 1. She is pretty. We can all say how sad it is that we put such a priority of physical appearance to raise her level of importance, but need only look anyone who is used to advertise a product. We are particularly driven by the sight of a pretty person, but most specifically women 2. Lots of video and particularly that of joy: The media LOVES to have new video, as it $ell$ the news to juxtapose many happy "full of life" images, against the idea she has very likely been killed. The media, and by extension, its audience is particularly drawn to this narrative and speaks pretty sadly about both. 3. He returns home alone: Not only that, but he immediately lawyers up, does not say word and later disappears completely. 4. The police made some mistakes: While it can be seen as hindsight to say "she would still be alive, if the police had made arrests and brought them into custody, after being pulled over on the highway", I have heard at least a few legal people say they should have been detained. She would likely be alive, had this been the case, but is easy to say all that now. 5. She was a blogger and documenting here trip: She had posted all of the videos we have seen on social media, so there were many who had a vested interest in what had happened to her. There were LOTS of people talking about it, calling the police with tips and keeping the investigation going, so that helped. . There are a few other small reasons, but if ALL circumstances were the same and she was considered unattractive, by the standards we hold TV and movie stars, let's say... it would not have gotten this much attention.
    4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. 4
  611. 4
  612. 4
  613. 4
  614. 4
  615. 4
  616. 4
  617. 4
  618.  @TheJustice35  ... RE: @Brad Miles that's a nice way to say the government.... : While this comment not directed toward myself, specifically... I will throw in my $.02 :) . I really wish people would stop the following: conflating, straw-manning and intentionally misinterpreting someone, seemingly in order to "score points" or "win" a discussion. I cannot speak for all, but I engage in these discussions, in order to understand not only WHAT another person thinks, but WHY they think it. Sometimes I change peoples minds and sometimes I just seek to give them more to think about, but intellectual honesty and understanding is my PRIMARY goal. . The feds have FUNDAMENTAL requirement to follow Constitutional law. Written into that Constitution is to ensure that people have the right to "Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness". Since this is foundational law, it supercedes state laws that would othewise restrict those "natural rights". The "medical procedure" you are referring to as a right, is in DIRECT opposition to the rights of another. Therefore, under the Constitution, one person cannot be granted a right that eliminates another's fundamental or "natural" rights. . There are exceptions to every rule and one of them relates to capital punishment. This comes back to a person(s) malicious taking of another persons rights and is in all cases that I am aware, the taking of a life. Whether one agrees with Capitol Punishment or not, this is a penalty for violation of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness". . It is not only a serous leap, but one in bad faith, to equate the concern of taking the life of the unborn, to supporting mask mandates or vaccines. One can argue, and I would make such an argument, that forcing a mask or vaccine DOES violate the principle of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness". This is an entirely different topic, but another that I am deeply passionate about. We'll leave that for another time :)
    4
  619. ​ @jdmac157  ... First: OK, just watched the entire Bernard Goetz interview from LINK above. Second: I have ZERO training / schooling as psychiatrist in any way, shape or form, so the following is 100% my take on what was shown in that video and the little that I recall from when it occured -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING is the only way I can describe how Bernard spoke on what led up to and including the events of that day. He was brutally honest and did not hide or shy away from anything and laid bare his very soul to be judged by anyone who were to see that recording. I was especially impressed with the jury members that were interviewed and specifically how Ms. Serpe very intellectually broke down her interpretation of Bernard speaking to the Cabey. I thought she understood and found words to describe how many of us respond or think in the past-tense and find a way to relay those details to another, as if they happened in real time during an event. It is extremely clear to me that Bernard was VERY, VERY traumatized from his being mugged 3 years earlier and was not known to me until the last couple days. . Bernard had literally years to think about the events of that 1st mugging and slowly built up the determination to avoid such treatment in the future. However, I cannot say he was "looking for trouble", but was able to recognize it when he was exposed to it. When he described in great detail talking with these 4 and how they positioned themselves to be on each side of him, there is NO PERSON ON PLANET EARTH who would not see that as a threat. I don't care if it was 4 priests with Bibles, it would still make someone weary of being surrounded or movement prohibited. His description of verbal exchanges, motions and such by all involved, were very detailed and probably rehearsed in the days prior to turning himself in to police. . What was equally fascinating, if not disturbing, is those that were pushing a racial angle. There was absolutely nothing in what Bernard said at any point, to suggest any kind of racial bias or factor in any way. One of those interviewed mentioned this specifically and pointed out how nearly impossible it would be to hide racial motivation by someone so distressed as Bernard was, during this video. It just goes to show that there are always some who will always play the race card and is 10 fold in current society. Just as Bernard took exception, so did I with the off-camera psychologist, I suppose she was, asking..."Why these 4 people". Clearly, such a question was designed to initiate some kind of uncontrolled response to manipulate Bernard into saying something racist or that he was looking to take someone out. Bernard answered her question with much more control than I think I would have, as I would have fallen into her trap. It was also particularly frustrating to hear the prosecuting attorney saying that anyone who is NOT a racist, cannot possibly have not found him guilty. Essentially, impugning the jury as idiots or just plain stupid, as to not see that he over reacted to a group of people on the subway. . Bernard Goetz was about as honest, open and forthcoming as anyone I have ever seen regarding any event. In the end, the one conclusion I was unable to escape was that Bernard was VERY clearly a much different man after that 1st assault and played out ways he would respond differently, should something similar happen again. The psychology he used and broke down to very fine detail, shows that his response to this attack was much more thought out than I believe most people would consider, should they find themselves in the same situation.  . It is not possible to know what would have happened, if he had just given them $5.00, but in my opinion, he was 100% justified in making the first move, so to speak, in defense of his life. What was also telling was the pending cases and current jail time for a couple defendants who testified at the trial. These were career criminals who were no stranger to doing bad things to random people, so they got what such people nearly always get... dying by the sword in which they lived. . Peace to you, John Daniel :)
    4
  620. 4
  621. 4
  622. 4
  623. 4
  624. 4
  625. 4
  626. 4
  627. 4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. 4
  640. 4
  641. 4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646.  @outofcompliance1639  ... I sorta WANT a massive influx of trans into ALL women's sports. Think of it this way, for every time a trans (biological male) <---- God, how insane is it that this actually requires clarification!!!!!?????, enters a "female" area, the culmination will eventually drive those who are indifferent to finally give a sheet. Right now, the gymnastics teams are not worried about it, because of the inherent flexibility of females over males. What if the equivalent to "Rubber Man" declared himself to be trans and started dominating on the parallel bars with like tripple-flips or routinely common quad back-blips on the mat? . The longer this goes on, the more I fear by the time trans DO infiltrate all of these other female spaces, there will have been too much precedent set and too many new records made to untie it all. Those trans competitors will have an absolute right to dispute having their records nullified or trophy's taken away, as they played by the rules. It is not the trans fault the rules allow them to compete against females, it is NCAA and other leagues who let them in! While the women didn't have the "ballz" to say NO, when they had the chance and the feminists were busy bitching about "the patriarchy", that patriarchy slid in right under there noses and DESTROYED female only sports and spaces. . This whole GD'd thing is disgusting and women have ZERO people to blame, but themselves! EDIT: After having proof-read my comment, I failed to say how pathetic and weak these trans are to ONLY be competitive in the females arena. How sad is it to be a man that can only gain success by competing against women?
    4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. ​ @bluepinkman4488  ... Sadly, we are both correct :( For the life of me, I fail to grasp how someone gets to the point, or rather "lives" to the point at which this seemed like the smart play. Not only to catastrophically over-react to an very common incorrect order at a fast-food place, but then to brandish a weapon, rather than just ask to have it corrected. On top of that, he sits outside and waits for them to fix his order, when a complete IDIOT knows that the cops are on the way. . There is really only one explanation I can think of here... death by cop and go out in a blaze of glory! Clearly this guy had some very serious mental issues going on, as he chooses to have both of his very young children there to see it all go down. One has to hate life to such a degree, as to be indifferent to his children likely watch their father die in a brutal way. . I think it likely we will hear about mental / psychological / legal issues this guy had in the coming days /weeks. To top it off, the mother of his children was interviewed and she had given him custody for a period of time and then extended it further. Where the hell was she when all this was going on? Why would she not only have children with this PoS, but then decide that they were better off with him than her? Nobody can tell me, that this guy did not show some SERIOUS signs of mental problems long before any of this event. This whole thing is just sad for all involved, but mostly the kids. They did not ask for these two for parents, but now they might end up being raised by grandma or the state, because the mom failed them as well. . Just what these kids need... being raised by someone other than thier parents :(
    3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. ​ @Bradley_Lute  ... I don't care if Lia is a "committed" trans or an impostor / poser. Lia's body is THAT OF A MALE and therefore, has a massive advantage over those with whom competing. I have ZERO issues with any adult deciding to do ANYTHING with their body, for any reason, so long as it does not endanger other bodies. Say, set themselves on fire within a crowded building or drive 100 MPH through a down town street. A person can take all of the testosterone or estrogen he / she wants, provided that person is the age of consent... 18. I will not nor would not harass, bully, threaten or in any way attempt to cause any harm whatever to such person and would gladly share a beer and talk about whatever the hell we wanted to for any reason. . My problem is NOT with Lia being tans, it is being a biological male competing against biological females and destroying girls dreams, because Lia cannot cut it on the men's team. I would be 100% willing to bet that Lia would be able to compete on a male swim team. No doubt, there would be some who would oppose it, but would NOT be for having an unfair advantage over the others, as Lia most CERTAINLY does in female swim teams. Lia is absolutely mopping the field in female swim competitions and was WAY, WAY, WAY below such position in the male swim team. . Now, you tell me honestly... does this sound like it is fair to the female swim team? Seriously, please make the argument that this is fair to these girls? Now, that said, there is NO QUESTION that Lia is in a very difficult position, assuming that this there is not deception and is, let's say "authentic" trans. No question that this sucks for Lia, in such a case. However, Lia is FORCING girls that have just as much right to compete OUT of the running, simply by virtue of competing in their events. There is no good answer for the authentic trans who want to compete, but Lia's right to swim should NOT trump the girls right to have fair and honest competition between themselves.
    3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743.  @MorteWulfe  ... Looks like I misspelled it... lol :) My comment has nothing to do with whether Sean is right or wrong... it has to do with people who base their opinion on ANOTHER'S opinion. This guy didn't go look at Sean's video himself, he looked at Vaush's video, which stripped ALL of the context out of Sean's reasoning and, and then proceeded to be critical of Sean saying he doesn't know what he is talking about. WTF? If this person wants to know what Sean ACTUALLY said and understand WHY he said it, he needs to look at the un-edited original video. Now, if he has a bone to pick with Sean at that point... fine. I may or may not agree with his conclusion, but at least he would have been intellectually honest arriving at it. . When this is the manner in which one derives what Sean is believed to have said, it is no wonder communication with an ideologue is impossible. Based on how he views conservatives, it is no wonder why we are demonized to a never ending degree. Ideologues live within an information bubble, and rather than seek out what is true or correct, they look for whatever supports the existing confirmation bias. That is what I was is wrong with this guys critique :) . As to your critique of me... Like Sean, I also feel that there MUST be some sort of means to help reduce recidivism rates and goes beyond straight jail / prison time. That said, when the leftist continues to "catch and release", as they have been doing a LOT over the last few years and never hold people accountable for criminal activity, there WILL be a higher rate of crime, because there is no punishment as a deterrant. If people don't get in trouble for doing crimes... they WILL continue to do more and will escalate to more dangerous ones.
    3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. ​ @gastronomist  ... he he :) OK, makes sense now. I did not make the connection to Daily Wire... lol Ya, I won't make excuses for someone complaining, but it is exceedingly difficult to be a conservative in media these days and not point out all of the ills thrust upon our nation by the leftists. With all of the values and ideals under full-assault by the SJW's, the Dem's and mainstream mediocre, I sometimes feel like guy in a carnival game in which I am on one side of the room and there are 15 people on the other all throwing baseballs at my head! Spending all this energy trying to get out of the way and unable to go on the offensive to actually stop the madness. . I am not in media, but I am a libertarian / conservative and everything I hold dear is under attack right now and I am nearly powerless to do anything about it. I have become mod of Unsafe Space and has given me an outlet to speak to a live chat audience and been reaching out to build that audience further. There are an INSANE amount of people who are pushing back against an INSANELY few amount of people currently rampaging our cities. Of course, the Marxist scholastic institutions are the ones who indoctrinated them with hatred of all those things I hold dear, but that is in many ways the much bigger issue than the violence in our streets. . I am not at all downplaying that violence, but unless we get rid of those that have been indoctrinating our youth, the cycle will continue on or just repeat itself in the future :(
    3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. ​ @AGJ117  ... My point in saying I have rap / hip hop CD's, was merely to point out that you are stereotyping everyone in this thread as haters and completely tribal in their thinking. I can see with the comment above, you have continued with the exact same thinking and still without any evidence to support your argument. I say again, where / when did ANYONE in this thread express in even the slightest way that did we "trash newer artists" or would be down on her had she said.."we should all get the vaccine" and exactly what in the hell does that have to do with the price of tea in China? . As for praising or condemning Cardie B. over her stance on vaccine, you have absolutely ZERO clue how any of us feels about the vaccine, as you are the ONLY one to even mention it! This thread began with my expression of how leftists deny evidence of guilt or hypocrisy that is right in front of their face. Cardie B. pointed out a perfect example of which I have mentioned myself many times over the last year plus. Joy Reid released a Tweet, back when Trump was president condemning the entire process of a vaccine and those who would oversee its development and approve of its use for humans. THEN.... not 1 year later, Joy is talking about how death is near complete certainty if one does NOT take that VERY SAME vaccine she railed against a year earlier. . Now, I will not argue that this vaccine was rushed, due to overwhelming fear of death and mainstream media plays a HUGE role in why people feel this way. However, by all accounts, this vaccine is very effective and does not seem to have any side effects that cannot be expected to be found in any vaccine. There are always going to be some adverse reactions, but it is reasonable to assume there may be less of them had the vaccine gone through the more rigorous testing that most do prior to widespread release. . Each of your comments above have been complete leaps of how you think each of us in this thread feels, but is without any comment or evidence to support it. This is not a court of law, but for gosh sakes, you are assuming we are nothing more than tribal automatons who just spout the party line. I realize that there are some that do exactly that, but anyone who would do so, is an ideologue. So far, you Ag, are the ONLY one here who may fall into this camp. I cannot speak for anyone else in this thread, but I am not tribal in my support for the GOP. I am best described as a moderate conservative, but mostly libertarian in my political affiliation. That is because I happen to align with basic principles of the GOP and most certainly break from them when my principles conflict with the "party line". I have a LOT more to say on that subject, but I am taking us off topic here and do apologize for it :) . Look, you have no doubt seen people critical of Cardie B. and probably many are ONLY aware of "WAP" and those more controversial songs / statements / appearances she has made. OK... let's say that is true, it is YOU who have come into this thread and exposed yourself as EXACTLY what you are purporting the rest of us to be... tribal! How I feel about "all things Cardie B." is 100% irrelevant to how I see THIS particular act. It is quite rare that a darling of the left actually criticizes another on the left, as the fear of cancellation / ostracizing is ever present. We have seen leftists* and Joy Reid is most certainly such a person, who have completely turned on their own for the crime of "wrong think" and Dave Rubin is a textbook example of exactly that. He was cancelled a couple years ago, because he dared have Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson as interview guests and has been 100% ostracized by left-leaning media ever since. There are ZERO left-leaning media that will have an interview or take a statement from him directly. . NOTE: I am using the description of "leftist" to describe an ideologue and is NOT to be confused with one who I say is on the "left" or "left-leaning". A leftist, in the context of which I am using it, describes one who follows the doctrine of Marxist / post-modern ideology. There are most certainly such people out there and the preponderance of those who are outspoken occupy the current Democratic party. This is not just a stereotype, it is observable fact and Joy Reid's Tweet that Cardie B. responded to, is a perfect example of a leftist. Joy Reid DESPISES Trump, so she had to condemn the vaccine of which he was president when it first went into development. However, now that Biden is in office, that EXACT vaccine is expressed as a literal life-saving cure that only the most ignorant among us would deny its use. This, my friend was Joy Reid playing virtue signaling how evil she thinks Trump to be, simply because she wanted to virtue signal her allegiance to leftist ideologues.
    3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. ​ ThePorcupineCondition  ... Seems you and I define "worst President of all time" in very different ways. Seems to me it was Trump, who banned CRT and one of the first things Biden did, was overturn it. Trump wanted to stop international flights from China to US on Jan. 9th, 2020 to get control of Covid spread to US soil and he was called xenophobic and racist (anti-Asian) for his trouble. 1 month later, Pelosi was standing in a MASSIVE crowd of Chinatown, San Francisco, saying... "come on down and celebrate" . Of course, there were no mask mandates at the time, because the first official Covid death in US was not until March 2nd or 3rd, two weeks later. By April, the Democrats were ALL saying that they were trying to get Trump to act on Covid in the first 2 weeks of Jan. 2020. Take a look at the timeline above which is IRREFUTABLE and tell me how the Democrats are re-writing history and the mainstream media just lets it slide. Exactly how many wars were started by Trump when he was in office...? Oh, i'll tell you.... EXACTLY ZERO! How was the economy going while Trump was President.... best in like 40 years. Who was the very first president to enter office and be pro gay marriage.... Trump was. . Which President went to G7 and got his ass chewed out by the Prime Minister of France while cowering like a fucking mouse and gave away the store to Putin? Which President cannot complete more than 1 sentence, without a "clarification" being issued by the White House? Which President has undeniable and EXTREMELY clear case of cognitive decline, yet is covered glowingly by the mainstream media? Which President commended respect from foreign leaders and got multiple peace agreements from Islamic nations with Israel? Yes, I understand they are always fragile, but none the less Trump got them talking and heading in the right direction! Which President was willing to talk about possible alternate Covid treatments, that were immediately shut down by Democrats, that had positive scientific and proven results? Which President tried desperately to get governors, mayors and city officials of states being DESTROYED by BLM protests to accept federal ground assistance, only to get rejected out of hand. Exactly what did Biden have to say about the hundreds, upon hundreds of millions of dollars damage, excess of 34 people murdered and multiple cities being terrorized by BLM and Antifa...? Nothing... he didn't say a God Damned thing to condemn it! Not ONE SINGLE Democrat would denounce the terrorism that went on for 9 full months and CONTINUES in Portland? All of those same people are still in The House and still not saying anything about it. If Biden was worth a shit, he would be on governors & mayors arse every damned day pushing them to prosecute those arrested during the "mostly peaceful protests", instead of punishing the police, letting all of the offenders go only to rejoin the terrorism and destroy everything in sight. Biden is a COMPLETE FUCKING DISGRACE and will prove to be the commander in chief while America is being pushed closer and closer toward a socialist state. This country is headed directly toward a civil war and will be recorded as having happened during Biden's watch! . I could go on and on and on and on, but you get the point. I am not saying Trump was the nicest guy or even that he was not a bit of a schmuck. I am saying that being President of the United States requires a mind for business. Trump not only proved he had a great mind for business, but Biden has proved he has no mind at all!
    3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. ​ @hllymchll  ... a VERY fine recording indeed, Ms. Michelle :) . Just a few weeks back I played some PF demo's including the original mix of WYWH. It was brilliant to hear the origins of how the song was perceived prior to getting the producers and engineers involved. While it is really great, it lacks the looooooooong fading out after that 4th Gilmore note that builds the intro. That fading sustain that builds that incredible anticipation of the next set of notes. When I was very young, born in '64, I did not get into PF at the time. I was into Van Halen, Rush, April Wine, Black Sabbath and many other groups, but for all the talk of PF, I just never gave them a chance in HS days :( However, when I finally got around to really listening to them, I quickly learned what all the fuss was about for all those years :) I am now a HUGE Floyd fan and am still in awe with every listen I afford to their music. . One record I highly recommend, if you have not already gotten into it, is Roger Waters Amused To Death . It is an absolutely BRILLIANT piece of music and maybe picks up where The Final Cut left off, but certainly some of its inspiration. I recommend sitting quietly in a completely dark room and relax for a few minutes, maybe a dog or cat sleeping on your lap :) and then begin the CD. I have always described it as the "perfect meal" of a recording. A small salad, little bowl of soup, the entree and a wonderful glass of red wine then a nice satisfying desert before a finishing cup of coffee (not a coffee drinker myself, but many like to close a good meal that way... lol). Just like with PF material, there is just sooooo much going on and will take many, many listens before you really get your soul around the complete message of what that record is saying. BTW.... Jeff Beck plays guitar on that record, so certainly worth a listen for that reason alone ;)
    2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924.  @unnamedminus  .. Problem was, that you look at the "redaction" squares all over the place, there was no way that it could be more than 1 or 2 characters. While it is not saying it was DW, it was very clear to anyone who realizes how many players in the conservative game, that it was DW. I don't have a problem with SC taking issue and wanting a lot of stuff changed, but was how he went about it and particularly the timeline of events. This deal was dead for over 2 months and SC decides to rake his friends over the coal, when he could have just done a segment on his show just discussing how "some" of his contracts were worded. No, he was deliberately taking aim at DW, even if he did not say so by name. The fundamental issue is that 50% of LWC is tied to 6.5M on YT and he has been on the edge of perm. ban for years. Sooner or later, he WILL be banned, but he IS making money here. He is not monotized, but his MC has grown due to YT and he does his ads as well as exposure. He is worth more more money than proposal, but a) that was a starting point and b) he cannot expect to have guaranteed money, when he WILL lose YT entirely literally any day. He does not even have to do anything wrong, they will make something up, as they normally do. That is not SC's fault, nor DW's fault, but since 6.5M eyeballs are on THIS platform, when it is lost, DW would be on the hook for 50% smaller audience and 100% of the commitment to SC. This all sucks, but so long as YT is the big player, DW has to assume that they will perm delete him at any point. . Anyone who would take on SC is going to have the same concern, so nobody is going to give him the deal he wants. He needs to go to Rumble for less money but total security and then continue with MC bonus access.
    2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. ​ @GhostOfBillCooper  .... OK. I saw your video LINK, thank you :) . This does indeed differ from my understanding from other research I have done (a local report from LA News outlet and Sean's video here. which was edited for YouTube age restriction). It is clear from this video, which I have not seen before just now, he does throw, what can only be reasonably assumed to be the gun. . That said, I have to also must consider several other factors: . 1. We are seeing a different angle than officers. I am not saying the cops could not see what we did, but there is a lot to process in that 3 seconds. . 2. The police KNOW they are chasing a suspect that is armed and into an area, in which he is cornered. Since he did not just drop his weapon, it is only reasonable he is seeking cover and shoot at them. Now, if he did not know these were cops, and I they did give commands, per witnesses other than his friend, but did not realize these were cops, than the only reasonable consideration, is that he WAS going to shoot back from behind the cars. . 3. When the cops are chasing him, they are specifically watching his right hand, because they can see the weapon in it. When he turns to the left to throw weapon, it is at THAT EXACT moment, the reasonable consideration is that he will CONTINUE to rotate around to the left and shoot back at them. . I get that they likely SAW the gun go flying out of his hand, but what the eye sees, cannot be processed in that literal "blink of an eye" amount of time. In other words, 2 nano seconds AFTER the officer shot him with that fatal wound, he was able to process that gun being thrown over the car. . It takes a literal fraction of a second to continue rotating and shoot back, so the INSTANT he began to swing his arm around his body... the cop shoots. We also need to consider adrenaline is flowing HARD and they are also keeping an eye on BOTH suspects, because it is not unreasonable to figure they are both armed. We see the other guy hold his hands up, but again... AFTER his friend is shot and on the ground. . It is interesting, that Sean said that the gun WAS still in his hand, no ambiguity at all on that point, but is what Sean found in his research. We could assume the cops lied, but they both have body cam and video, while not perfect, exposes a lot of things. They may or may not have known about the roof camera we were seeing here, but probably did not. . This video is also pixilated, so maybe the a gun is visible and something else was thrown. This would be EXTREMELY unlikely he had switched the gun we SAW with drugs or something, but it is also EXTREMELY unlikely he would toss the gun and not just drop the gun and throw hands in the air. If he thought they were NOT cops, he would NEVER toss his gun, because they could not possibly be anything but VERY bad intentions, as they are chasing him with guns of their own. . He was running into a corner he could not really escape, so in the amount of time the cops had, was very reasonable to think he was going to continue to rotate and shoot at them. . Thank you for the LINK, as it does give me slight pause, but we can ALWAYS look back and say "woulda, shoulda, coulda" from both sides. At the end of the day, this was a convicted felon who KNEW that serious prison time would result if he was to surrender with a weapon. . I think he realized the officer was too close to gain cover from car, so threw weapon, but was too late to stop the chain of events. . PS> Why did the friend not tell that reporter that Roberts threw the gun to him and was going to surrender. Something doesn't add up here.
    2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. ​ @miraann3997  .. RE: You can still empathize... : The only way to get to the root of the problem, is afford the opportunity for one to get out of it... capitalism does this. I am not going to argue that life is "fair" or that every person has the same difficulty or ease at exercising those opportunities, but that is how life works. There is ZERO reason why the poorest person in America, cannot become the richest person in the world, say for a few things that cannot be controlled by society.  . Basic raw talent, the internal drive to succeed and discipline to follow the rules that societies have set down for millennia. Whether it be Herschel Walker playing football, Bach creating music or Bill Gates writing computer code. There was most definitely support for each along the way, but without basic raw drive / talent for these things, they would never in a million years get to where they arrived and no amount of effort can create that raw drive or intrinsic talent. We have seen extremely poor kids from the worst parts of town, become Mike Tyson, for example, and make millions, upon millions of dollars, but only to piss it away, because raw talent and hard work are not enough... one has to have that discipline as well.  . For without it, all of the hard work, talent and even a massive amount of support structure cannot save them from ending up like countless musicians and actors that ended up dying of OD :( Poverty is NOT the reason people don't make the most of themselves, it is merely a hurdle to those who have :)
    2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. @Don ... so you left one echo chamber, but did you enter another...? Both are a problem, because honest dialog cannot exist in a vacuum. While both are bad, it is the left that controls all of the major mediums in which information is disseminated (Google, YouTube, Twitter, FB, IG, TikTock) and the echo chamber of the left is forced upon the rest of us. I have been censored probably 100 times for saying things that are 100% protected by 1a, but defy the leftist cult of ideology. Since the Overton window has moved to the VERY far left, those who are moderate or even center-left are considered alt-right. Sadly, the endless screams of the leftists claiming the growing number of alt-right extremists is growing are actually correct. Not because of anything I say or even defend, but because not only the definition of "alt-right" now includes those who are centrist, but because of things like "those who identify as a woman, are allowed to enter a female space". We have males who identify as female entering women's sporting events and winning the overwhelming amount of competitions. Walking around in ladies dressing & locker rooms displaying the full male anatomy, because they "identify" as a woman and the law has been manipulated to allow it. If anyone thinks that this is not going to lead to a CATASTROPHIC backlash and MAJOR amount of people who will unfairly become VERY anti-gay and homophobic, they are deluding themselves. This is sad, because it is NOT the LGBTQ community who are arguing for this, it is the leftist activist and they DO NOT speak for about 98% of that community. . I have been called a right-wing extremist on many occasions, because anyone to the right of Nancy Pelosi is considered right-wing. Me, for example, am a very moderate libertarian / conservative, who is just fine with gay marriage and becoming trans AFTER the age of 18. I am about as free-speech absolutist as anyone would ever meet and so long as what you do does not infringe on my rights, I could not care less what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home. Now, don't take that on the street or teach it in classrooms and I am gonna want parents to be involved with the curriculum. I believe slavery and Jim Crow laws should be taught in schools, am 100,000,000,000% against ANY Marxist interpretation of CRT or identity based hierarchy indoctrination of victim hood status in our public schools. Now, if such information, not indoctrination, is made available, but NOT REQUIRED, in post high school education, I am 100% fine with that. . While I am as anti communism, socialism, Marxism as ANYONE you will ever meet, I absolutely want people to understand what these ideologies are about. They should learn the theory behind them, as well as the ramifications of those societies who have lived under such ideologies. . Sowwy... got a little side-tracked there... lol :)
    2
  997. 2
  998. ​@Don ... it is not "communists" that we fear, it is communism! It is the implementation of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" that is the true enemy of us all. While this may sound like a good idea, it is the state enforcement of one person to support another without consent. Since there is always going to be a VERY high percentage of people, myself among them, who will not abide by such tyranny, there is ALWAYS a catastrophic loss of life in such societies. The state has ZERO choice but to separate those who would not willingly participate in a communist system and those people ALWAYS end up dead. This serves 2 functions and both are necessary to enable it to work.  . The first is the state cannot and will not accept things like free speech and citizens who own guns. This is why Nazi Germany became a fascist state, as you cannot control a public that has the means to fight back with deadly weapons. The second issue is the number of people who fit into each of the "ability" or "needs" category". Easiest way to understand is a small group, which is really the ONLY way communism can work and with the agreement of all those involved. Say 10 people decide all by themselves to live as a communist society and you have 1 each of the following: 1 farmer, 1 car mechanic, 1 teacher, 1 electrician, 1 plumber, 1 engineer, 1 doctor, 1 house builder, 1 banker and 1 tailor. If each person is willing to live under "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs", it works pretty well. . Now, imagine that society of, oh... I don't know, 330+M people, for example! If you have a ratio of 25% car mechanics to 35% engineers, their cannot be such an imbalanced ratio, so some of those engineers MUST provide other services to the community or must be eliminated. There will ALWAYS be a percentage that will refuse to be a farmer or house builder and another percentage who cannot make the transition, due to lack of skills or whatever. The state must FORCE compliance or remove those in each category from the equation. . This is why the gulag was created and why people "mysteriously" vanish one day, never to be heard from again in a communist state. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EDIT: I have since read many additional comments by you in this thread, I had NOT read until this comment was created. While I did not apply serious consideration to each and every other comment by you, nor reply by others, it would appear that you either play the same word games or have FALLEN for the word games by Marxists. Regardless of which is more accurate, it seems clear that you are OK or support this admin and Marxism as a rule. This makes you incompatible with the values upon which this nation was founded and will find yourself at serious odds with the overwhelming number of people in this country who will ABSOLUTELY not stand for a Marxist or communist utopia. I would urge you to read up on the history of communism and what it does to the societies in which it is practiced forced upon a nations people!
    2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. ​ @susansmith493  ... It doesn't matter to me who invented what, where, when or how... only that this issue will not go away without a fight. It is most unfortunate, but if women and girls are not willing to fight for what is rightfully theirs, others will not endlessly fight on their behalf and they will be cheated out of opportunities, because they allowed it to happen. I have not dog in this fight. I don't have a daughter who spent the last 5+ years of her pre-high school life going to swim competitions and dreaming of a professional career or Olympics one day. I am not invested here, so I am not going to go to swim meets and protest, so these girls, their parents, coaches and local governing bodies have to deal with this. . What is most sad to me, is that we have all seen the many angry feminists who are willing to bash men for "toxic masculinity" and "the Patriarchy", but will not do a damned thing to condemn men in women's locker, dressing and bathrooms. Now we have males in direct competition with women and girls driving them out of the positions they have worked to achieve for sometimes many years, because they are too GD'd weak to put in the work to succeed in men's sports. While I DESPISE feminist ideology with a passion, it is truly pathetic they have NOTHING to say about HS girls hearts getting broken because of males who don't have the balls to compete against other men but do ONLY to against them! . I am not barking at you, Susan... I am just frustrated as hell to see this BS happening and those who are most hurt by it, do little more than write anonymous comments on blogs or hidden face interviews on the handful of news outlets that will report on it. If these girls and women are willing to play the game by rigged rules, they deserve EXACTLY what they get!
    2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. ​ @kurarisusa  ... OMG, just a day or so ago, this thread crossed my mind. This thread has generated more response than anything else I had ever said on YT by light years. There are now 251 replies and I had followed each and every one and probably responsible for 35 of its comments. As for your comment here... yes, absolutely! The leftist feels he / she possesses the moral high ground and since some words are considered "violent", responding with actual violence is a 100% acceptable response. This is why BLM and SJW's indoctrinated in the idiotology feel completely justified in attacking and sometimes killing anyone from a small child (remember the two teens that knocked the MAGA hat off of that 6 yo's head, probably 2+ years ago?) Or, just this past week when the Amazon delivery driver attacked the elderly woman, because of her white privilege? . Of course, I haven't even mentioned the 9 months of rampaging attacks on literally ANYONE in eyesight that left 34 people dead, hundreds of millions of dollars damage and who knows how many businesses destroyed. This whole thing sickens me... just sickens me :( Now we are finally getting real push back on the evils of CRT and those who were asleep all this time thinking that Orange Man was the real menace, are beginning to see that this admin, along with the Progressive party are the true evil of our day. . If you are curious to see how much denial the SJW faces, open the replies to this comment, beginning from the very first one. Most who replied were engaged and on the side of being human, but there are a few that are just those lost souls and, like you just said... believe in the cult. Logic, common sense, reason and facts just have no place in response to what they think, because they possess the moral high ground!
    2
  1057. 2
  1058. ​ @goober69er  I would argue that while the radical or alt-right certainly exists, they are denounced by, well... everybody, so they make no headway into anything mainstream. No doubt they have meetings and secret "we don't talk about Fight Club" websites and some are very likely part of Antifa, as they both have similar aims. However, the radical, extreme or alt-left, is most definitely protected by media. They will claim they are not, but only because they either don't refer to Antifa at all or lump them in with...uhem, "peaceful" protesters. . The very last thing Antifa are is neither peaceful nor protesting... they are terrorists, pure and simple. They are 100% fascist, so how they are falling under the radar of the left as anti-fascist is a fucking joke. Yes... the proud boys absolutely get unfairly targeted, because the Dem's and media edit video to ONLY show how the Proud Boys responded to violence perpetuated upon them by Antifa. Add to that leftist prosecutors, judges, mayors and other city officials and we see members getting 10 year prison sentences for giving a beat down, while Antifa VERY regularly swings bike locks and heavy weapons at civilians they run down, set vehicles and property on fire and absolutely terrorize ANYONE who gets in their path. That includes little old ladies and men in walkers just trying to cross the street. . Imagine for a split second if we saw someone NOT protected under the wings of Democrats or mainstream mediocre was to do what we saw Antifa do to that elderly couple in Canada last year. The media would have had that video lead on EVERY newscast for weeks on end and the Demoncrats would have launched a full-scale investigation into "the extreme alt-right terrorizing our citizens". But since it was most clearly Antifa... they don't say a God damned thing and those that follow ONLY such media for their news, have no idea that it even happened at all. . Those on the libertarian / conservative side absolutely showed that video, but what does big tech, YT and Google do...? shadow ban such channels and websites, then turns to their buddies Patreon to claim "violation of terms" BS and takes away MASSIVE amounts of income to those creators. Now, they have to fight for their lives to even get a job, so they sure as hell aren't going to spend their resources making sure others see such videos of Antifa terrorism. . Over the last couple days, Patreon is beginning to reap what they have sewn and there are MANY, MANY left leaning and leftist creators who's income are now under direct threat, as Patreon may be forced to close over litigation costs. . We will see where this all goes, but even with the GOP being useless as tits on a boar hog, those on the "right" side of history are beginning to break through :)
    2
  1059. ​ @Player_Review  ... another well spoken reply here... The Kitty digs it! :) Yes... we have not spoken of the VERY likely influence and direct action by those countries who would see American burn. A present though, such discussions in open dialog fall subject to "conspiracy theories by the alt-right". Sadly, this is just one more example of how insanely organized (and incredibly lucky) the left is and has obviously been planning ALL of this for many, many, MANY years. Much of that cannot be attributed as luck, because the Dem's have mainstream mediocre on their side and they are as evil as a millennia is long :( . With all of the "Russiagate" then "Eukrainegate" and "Trump is a Puppet of China" bullshit, it has become impossible for conservatives to indicate a very likely scenario of foreign interference in our Nation. This is like that movie when the bad guy just keeps forwarding his nefarious plans for world conquest and every time the protagonist is always just that one step behind and he gets away with it ... AGAIN! >:( . Thank you for your kind words of ego stoking :) No, my mom is not radicalized, per say, but has an INSANE case of TDS. I keep chipping away, but at some point her protective mechanism kicks in and she becomes inconsolable and begins actually physically shaking with distress (not exaggerating here!). I love my mother and will continue to gently chip away around the edges and my brother and I will finally get through to her. I fear that it is gonna take that "bus" event to break though though. . On your closing line (that is two users in a row with good ones - see @Adam just above). Yes, I have heard that line and like all stereotypes, there is always a bit of truth in them. There most certainly is a connection between the liberal ideals of youth and the conservative values of the more... seasoned... lol . While I have always been somewhat conservative, I too was focused on that "idealism" of youth. But, just like most everyone who lives outside of an information bubble, I have come to understand that the idealism of youth is not shared by all and most certainly not by some VERY powerful countries whom occupy this earth and would like to see America fall.
    2
  1060. ​ @Player_Review  [looks frantically for option to "red heart" this comment] :) . Everything was very well said and I must admit, I was a bit defeatist yesterday :( Was the culmination of several things, but I was pretty pissed about the state of things. We are literally watching everything in which I believe about this nation under attack. One half of that nation is seemingly either not paying attention or they are entirely deceived by mainstream media and my own mother falls into that camp. She knows it is ugly, but she thinks this is all about how racist we are as a nation and has NO IDEA of the socialist plans the leftists have for America. . I do deride the partisanship, but I wish I was able to be more equal in holding blame to both the GOP and Dem's. We both know that what the Dem's are not directly doing themselves, they either completely agree with BLM, Antifa and the SJW's or they are too weak to speak out against their own party. We can see that such fears are not unfounded, as one only need look at ANY Democrat that goes on CNN, MSNBC or is editor of the NYT's to see the shit-storm of attack for speaking up. I Pray that a Democrat of HUGE influence finally says that enough is enough and grabs the The House by the proverbial neck and shakes some sense in to it. Unfortunately, ALL of those with such power and influence are  100% committed to Orange Man Bad and has completely blinded them to any sense of moral obligation to America and the values it was founded upon. . Speaking up is what MUST be done by the moderate Dem's, as the Demoncrats in The House instantly dismiss ANY criticism coming from the right. Of course, they see the Alt-right as a person who is 1 degree to the center of Nancy Pelosi! I keep waiting for the event of such an egregious nature that even BLM or Antifa stop and examine their actions. To this point, no such line has been crossed. . I feel that there will be the destruction of some monument or an explosion that kills a bus load of children or something SO INCREDIBLY horrifying, that even the mainstream media will say this is enough. The catalyst that catapults us BACK from the catalyst that launched this whole thing. Sadly, I feel it will take that bus full of children all captured on video of the body parts of 5 yo kids flying through the air and the mother screaming over the dead body of her child. That image similar to girl in the Kent State photo that just viscerally reaches EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THIS WORLD and freezes us all in our tracks. . The visceral response we all had watching George Floyd being killed at the hands of police, but as a wake up call to stop this fucking madness :(
    2
  1061. ​ @mollyfrommichigan5966  sadly... there will ALWAYS be such attitudes :( That does not mean we need to just accept that Uncle Bob is a bigot, but we have 330+ million people in this nation and bigotry / racism is bred... NOT BORN! While certainly there are those who develop such attitudes via experiences they have, most of them have such bigotry learned from parents. . What we see so blatantly now, is parents recording video of 3 yo children struggling to hold up a "F*** THE POLICE" cardboard sign then being coached to repeat that phrase to the adoration of his parents and friends. I am not saying that some white parents don't do the exact same thing with "F*** THE N******", but there are two VERY distinct differences between them. First... this is broadcast on mainstream social media and seen by millions upon millions of people in the matter of 24 hours. That number of "clicks" is very attractive for a VERY large number of people and they are gaining what they believe to be social currency. . The second issue is acceptance. Had such a video as that young white child been broadcast on the news just 10 years ago or today, the OVERWHELMING vast majority of those who saw it would be up in arms and be disgusted by such behavior from parents. Today.... that little black child is openly celebrated by WAY, WAY, WAY too many people and is nothing short of child abuse... PERIOD! Imagine setting your child up for such failure? Send him / her out into the world believing that it is NOT POSSIBLE to get ahead, as whitie is always around the next corner to put you down and the police literally HUNT BLACK PEOPLE FOR SPORT! . Not only is this a complete and absolute fucking lie, it is perpetuated by the Dem's, mainstream media and the SJW's currently on a rampage in many parts of this country.
    2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. ​ @ywiitter1177  .. you speak for the overwhelming VAST majority of not only people in the United States, but most of the world. There are certain groups of people who absolutely DO kill gays just for "being" and we both know who they are. Sadly, the SJW cult has redefined some VERY visceral terms for their own evil purposes and those definitions have become "mainstreamed" in to societies vernacular. . EDIT: The term "racist" has been re-defined as "power + privilege" by the SJW and is the foundation in which they wield it. However, the accepted definition of racism is STILL held by EVERYONE else. So when the SJW says "so 'n so is a racist", those not following all of this closely, apply the ACTUAL label of racist to the accused. Unless they research the details of WHY that person was accused of this, they take it as face value and are quick to disassociate. This is how the SJW takes what can be a minuscule disagreement over something and EASILY manipulate an individual, business, corporation or entire group of people cough whites cough to be seen as racists. . They have taken over our scholastic institutions and even the long held belief that Miriam-Webster is the go-to for a definition that is unknown to someone. Since racist has become the term du jour, for anyone that opposes even the most minor, inconsequential item with in the SJW cult of ideology, we now have what they would describe as 300 million white supremacists in America that deny a trans persons right to exist and must be "cancelled" from life itself.
    2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. ​ @sthubbins4038  .. Slippery slope is no fallacy! Remember, it was "10 days to 2 weeks to slow the spread". THEN... government thought it a good idea to shut down businesses to "slow the spread". Fast forward to now and we have the president MANDATING vaccines to protect the vaccinated.We have entire cities that are being forced to check your papers in order to enter the establishment. We have Australia who has build and will continue to build "quarantine camps" to protect the rest of us. At what point do you not see that living in fear is now a way for power hungry politicians to govern our lives? . If you want to wear a mask... fine. If someone wants to wear 2 masks and get vaccinated twice a week... fine. If another wants to lock themselves away or live in a hamster ball to feel "safe"... so be it! Life IS about weighing risk vs. reward and freedom. The problem with your analogy is that we keep moving that line farther and farther and once we have gone too far for EVERYONE, it is far too late to do anything about it. Your line may be right here at mandates, but those on the more extreme will push that line even farther, because you gave into the current line. . There is NO END IN SIGHT for this. The vax is as accessible and cheap as it can be, yet about 40% of the population is not vaccinated. This is about power and control... nothing more! If it were NOT and were actually about being safe, then Biden admin would not be asking FB to remove "Covid misinformation" according to the ONE AND ONLY GOD of all things Covid related.... CDC. Let the information come to light, let it be debated, let people be HEARD and discuss this as was what America was founded upon.
    2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. In general response to all of the above: The GOP, Conservatives or political right wing, whatever one wishes to call them, are not dealing with the Democrats or political left that we have known for the last 250 years. They are dealing with socialists & Marxists that have NO ties to the accepted traditional value system this nation was founded upon. Through ALL of the previous presidents and political ideas, there was a fundamental belief in the following 4 things. 1. The Constitution 2. The Bill of Rights 3. The Declaration of Independence 4. The Ten Commandments While not ALL of the text within these documents was 100% adopted by all, they were accepted as the basic guidelines as to not only live our lives, but govern the country. Today, we have Marxists and not only are NONE of those documents recognized as a moral or legal guide, but they are IN THE WAY! A socialist "utopia" cannot possibly exist, so long as those documents are respected, so the leftist is seeking to destroy EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM! The "Democratic" party, mainstream media, big tech, academia K~12, college & university professors do not feel any moral obligation to these documents and feel as though their ideology is morally superior to anything ANY of those documents has to say. . The Marxists have changed the rules of EVERYTHING this country and its people were founded upon. So long as those who oppose the leftists continue to ALLOW them to not only re-write the rules, but outright make them up as they go along, we will continue to lose ground to ideological zealots. The leftists have 3 generations of indoctrinated minions and they have infiltrated every part of society. Those of us who were NOT indoctrinated are not outnumbered by those who were, but they have seized control of the means of disseminating information. Information is power and so long as those who control that information STAY in those positions, we will all lose everything. . Small example of how far we have regressed. Yesterday, I wrote a comment saying "it has become controversial to say there is only [number two] genders". That comment was immediately deleted by minions of YouTube, who were notified via algorithm. After 3 copy / paste of that same comment with minor changes, I finally changed it so it read "too genders" and it was no longer getting deleted. Imagine the delusion one has to ascribe to view the idea of too genders as heresy of doctrine. This is not only what we have come to, but the leftist will continue to push such idiocy until we are driven to a full-on civil war.
    2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. ​ @tessareynolds8377  .. Thank you for your kind words and right backacha! :) Do you actually think that the "blue states" would accept that "red states" have all of the farm land...? or have all of the oil...? Have some natural gas resources that THEY also need? Sane Democrats, as well as Leftists drive cars... eat vegetable and need natural gas to heat their homes. Do you honestly feel that we could negotiate these resources when one "side" owns them all. . Just take a look at Israel and ask how Jerusalem has worked out for them! Sure, they have it all neatly tucked away in their country and willing to allow people to visit, but how does this differ from "separate but equal" we heard from Jim Crow...? not much :( We also have a little thing called "supply and demand". Imagine if the CEO of "Middle American Beef Supply" was once living in a home in Cominfornia, but then forced to move out, because it was to become a "blue state"? . I have to wonder if Mr. CEO would be just as willing to cut a nice deal on that 20K cows for his former state governor Gavin Grewsom.... I wonder? HELL F'ING NO! He would be spiteful, vengeful and raise the price 10x over to punish them for driving him out of his home. Now, imagine this absolutely will happen on BOTH sides of the equation. . I could go on and on with examples and while I agree with your sentiment as a nice one, it is just not possible to implement. I wish it were, but Americans could not avoid the catastrophic events of 1861, with well under 35M people and that number has now risen to literally almost 10x that amount. I don't like contemplating this any more than you or anyone else, but while separation is a nice term... "peaceful" is a relative term! . Peace, Tessa... I like the way you think :)
    2
  1157. ​ @tessareynolds8377  ... While I still hate you for keeping DeSantis all to yourself, I do agree with all that you have said.... say just one thing ;) You mention the "division of assets" and this would literally prove impossible. Beyond the fact that such precious assets are spread all over this country, BOTH "sides" would not only be unwilling to give them up to the other, those of us who are sane, would be willing to find a compromise of some kind (trade, neutral ground or whatever), while the Marxists would absolutely not! . What we have seen time and time again, is the Regrissive Marxists WILL NOT negotiate anything with those whom they consider, in the words of Killary... "deplorables" . They simply WILL not sit down at a table and talk about such things with us lower species. This position would be hardened 1K fold, should it actually come to such a state, even if 95% of Americans were demanding it be done. It would be as if the Taliban sat down at a table and conceded that women were to have full rights and privileges as men... this is just something they will NEVER do, regardless of what you offer in exchange. . Let's say that we were to magically reach some sort of agreement and some neutral party would step in and be the "go-between" for negotiation and also travel between the divided locations and transact the business of trade. Do you honestly think for one nano, that the Regressives would tolerate the lowly existence of a neighboring area chock full of disgusting, wretched and down right EVIL conservatives...? No, they will not! Once all that was settled, they would come after the people in those areas, because the Marxist cult of leftist ideology is an offensive species and would just not be able to reconcile our existence among the same earth as such a morally superior species as themselves. . However, it would never come to that point, because by the time tensions got THAT high, full "civil unrest" will ABSOLUTELY have broken out on a mass scale. EXAMPLE: I live in Comifornia and I would be forced to move, should such a division be make. What of the literally millions of others who would be required to give up their entire existence in the house their great, great, great, great grandfather built? Or give up the land that has been in their family for hundreds of years? No, the Regressive would OUTRIGHT demand that such evil minds, as the one I have, be cast out from their land. This would have to be figured out for, I would guess very conservatively... 100M people who live across this country. How would it be possible to find a peaceful solution to driving such people away from their homes... neighborhoods they grew up in... or friends they have known all their lives? . I realize you did not expect nor desire a response of this length and I am most certainly NOT chastising you or picking on you in even the slightest of ways :) I just know that we tried to separate once before and we saw what happened. The country was MUCH less populated at the time and 75% of the country was never on the front lines of any such conflict. We would have ALL 50 states vying for who gets what, who gets to stay, who is forced (whether required or just "requested") to leave and who is acceptable to remain. No, the Regressives would step up their in-fighting and would then demand that those who are not worthy of being in the more virtuous peoples domain, be cast out, as they leftist has proven to eat its own, just as they devour all that does not comply to the cult. . No... this could never happen and not just for the reasons stated, but there will be many, many other reasons that will arise that have not been mentioned here or even fallen under consideration by either of us :( I feel the only way out is through! I have literally zero doubt that we WILL see our Fort Sumpter moment at some point. Besides, the Civil War was causing division for several decades and we are only coming up on about 7 years not. That is NOT to down-play how horrendous all this has been, but in terms of escalating tensions, we are probably 50% of the way from actually getting to that point, as it relates to the entire populous that willing to stand their ground. . I understand that separation makes the most sense, but we must ask ourselves... how often to Regressives accept fact, logic or common sense?
    2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174.  @totorosghost  ... I get all that and why I freely admit I have not watched TYT to any real degree. However, NONE of that changes the credit I have afforded her. I made it exceptionally clear, that it does not erase anything she has done, only that she HAS seen some of the error of her ways. Accepting that error has in ZERO ways, righted any wrongs, only that I will welcome ANY human on the face of this planet, to move ANY degree toward a sensible position on ANY issue that necessitates it for a cohesive society. . I am not sure why you continue to read more into my opinion than I have made extremely clear on many occasions, within this thread. Your last comment, is very much in line with what I have been saying from the start. If she had one 1B horrendous lies, that does NOT erase any of the truths. It does not excuse them nor does it afford her my forgiveness for them. She has a VERY large platform and has taken owner ship for some of those things she has advocated for all along. . Do you think it would have been better had she NEVER been willing to speak to Ben Shapiro, NEVER had recommended (it seemed very sincere) this channel, had NEVER began calling out the liberal policies that she voted for are failing? If you answer a "NO" to even 1% of ANY of those questions, than you and I are in agreement. . I am not seeking a "gotcha" or "I told you so" moment, I am just standing behind what you have already gave a tiny bit of credit for doing. Now, maybe my credit is slightly higher, and that is an accurate way to describe it, than yours... but that is where we are. I also said that she cannot "unsee" what she has acknowledged were failed policies that she supported. This means, she will exercise more scrutiny going forward, because she has now accepted the consequences of that which she voted for in the past. Will she suddenly decide that she likes to be called a birthing person or person who menstruates? Will she suddenly decide that no bail for multiple time felons is a good thing, after calling them out...? It is "possible", but the likelihood is lower than a snakes belly. . Time will tell....
    2
  1175.  @totorosghost  .... Thank you and I agree. While I have never watched her show, only seen reactions to it (98% of those by Sean). I have seen a HUGE amount of segments, that include a lot of context, so I feel what I have seen is a good representation of each, though the totality of those dishonest segments, should never be ignored. My bias is certainly very strong against the show in general, but Cenk more than any one else. He is the undisputed👑of the straw man and is not possible to be as ignorant as he would need to be, in order to honestly believe a HUGE amount of what he says (being understated with my words, for reasons we both understand). You are correct, in that it is very little, within the context of all that she has supported over the years. I do hope she continues to allow what she is far more willing to recognize, to influence here world view going forward. Only time will tell and maybe I am unrealistically optimistic, but her sitting down with pub. en. #1, Ben Shaprio twice, is enough to end someone in her positions career. . In the end, I don't think any of this will matter much, as society is so incredibly fractured, I am not convinced we will escape collapse. Canada, UK and USA are in a race, though I think Canada will be the 1st to completely stop working into chaos. We are soo far along this path, we are gonna need to see such a thing happen, in order to hopefully get the wake up call necessary. I am an optimist, but very pessimistic about what I see. Best to you as well, Toto and want to say I appreciate the push back, you and others have offered. I see them all as balancing the scales, so as to keep my bias in check and that is something I always strive to do.
    2
  1176. 2
  1177. ​ @totorosghost  ... I have at least 3 comments that were removed and none of which came within 500 miles of any ToS lines. At least one of them was in simple agreement with another, so it was removed. The take in my OP was as you stated in the middle of your reply here, though I just afforded a higher degree of respect. That respect does not travel beyond what you said, but I stand behind it, for what it is. I have done additional clarification in more than a few replies within this thread, so I would ask that you expand it, so as to better understand my position. Ana was willing to directly promote this channel on her platform and that is no small thing. This channel has been exceptionally critical of her platform on many occasions and those who are steadfastly in agreement with her for all this time, have heard it. I am not expecting a mass changing of minds, but she has earned their support, so it is a chipping away at the positions they hold. This is a good thing, just as it is for ANY person who hears a challenge to their long held belief / position on anything. . She has a LOT more of their respect, due to her long held political opinions, so this is a positive move. It does not undo or make up for anything, but it is a step in a more sensible direction. I don't see her ever going GOP, but society needs the left to re-adopt positions in which we have all agreed for millennia. I don't see how anyone can un-see what she has, so this is a good thing. On your closing line, I 100% agree and time will tell. Peace, Toto
    2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196.  @tsdobbi  .. You are right, the GOP will not flood the black community with resources... they will just be a HELL of a lot better at getting the hell out of their lives and allow them the opportunities they have. I never said that blacks were gonna jump ship to GOP, but blacks are far more conservative than most realize already. Sadly, it is those who are younger support the Democratic party, who does nothing but pander to how they will "save them" from conservatives, while not saying a damned thing about the rotten culture they embrace that keeps them exactly where they are in society. . The problem with black neighborhoods is 100% the responsibility of black fathers who don't raise their children and THAT is due in no small part, because Democrats require Welfare mothers NOT have a father in the home. I get the idea of not paying 2 parent homes, but I'd rather see us not pay a GD'd dime to any of them, so they have incentive to clean up their act. . What we have today, cannot be solved by politicians. We have a catastrophic divide, brought to us by Marxist indoctrination, because parents have absolutely failed their children for the last 3 generations. They were too busy "having it all" with a vacation home for the Winter / Summer months and allowed their children to be raised by nannies, babysitters, daycare and the worst of the worst.... the public school system. EDIT: and the internet! . There are many things wrong today and 100% of them could be well on the way to being mended, if there were common values that we shared. The Democrats have allowed the Marxist cult to take over their party, so there is JUST as big a divide with the Dem's, but the only difference being, is that the moderates won't say anything, for fear of getting cancelled. The GOP are fairly divided, but we only know it, because they say so!
    1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. ​ @billybatson7852  ... Clearly there is a market for WOKE, but it is WAY, WAY smaller than these CEO's believe it is. The problem becomes when these companies saturate they ideology, as Disney has, OR invest money / resources / backing for something like Cuties, as N*****x did. . I would say that most people would not even make a big fuss over positive LGBTQ programming, if it were to just stick with portraying a positive message and / or light. The issue comes when there is promotion of such values toward children, by creating an ever increasing representation of it in their programming, such as Disney freely admits to doing. . Look, we continuously hear the Democrats and particularly Regressives and the WOKE crowd, claiming there must not only be "tolerance", but acceptance and respect for LGBTQ. Tolerance is a two-way street and the trans-activist is EXCEEDINGLY aggressive in forcing their pro-LGBTQ agenda down everyone's throats. It has SERIOUSLY crossed a line in the sand, when we see a bunch of public educators releasing video of them directly defying parents wishes and promoting ANY human sexuality in K~3rd. . Secondly is the demand for respect and I have news for anyone who is reading this, not only is respect earned, but there are some who are just not going to be on board with LGBTQ regardless of circumstance. Those mentioned above are just going to have to be "tolerant" of them, because some oft them will NEVER be moved on this issue... period. . I am 57 and live 30 miles from San Francisco. So I saw the rise of AIDS and press for many gay rights, as the news was so local, that it got lots of coverage. While gay people rightfully wanted to reduce discrimination, be legally recognized as partners for insurance coverage and things like hospital family visitation and gay marriage, being chief among them. That was a long road, but while there were many activists, they were nowhere NEAR as aggressive as the LGBTQ activists today. . By "aggressive", I am referring to what happens when the Twitter Outrage Mob decides that a person is a trans-phobe or wont respect their demand for proper pronouns and seeks to, and is often successful, in removing them from social media / employment. Just look at the children in legal trouble the other day for not using "They / Them" to address a girl in their school. This is pure insanity and is turning WAY more people against the trans-activists cause than they will ever gain. . EDIT: When the gay community was pressing for gay marriage and such, there WERE those who said that one day, they would come for the children. While this was NOT the case back in the 80's, it opened the door for the trans-activist today and they FREELY ADMIT, they are coming for the children. One must consider ALL of this, if to understand why so many are opposed to the LGBTQ forcing its message / ideology / lifestyle choice at every turn.
    1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. ​ @joriankell1983  ... It ultimately comes down to environment. Those that do such things as this, "know" better... but simply don't care. I am not a religious person, in even the slightest way, but when a society is raised upon the belief that there is NO "higher power" or over-arching moral code in which to live one's life... that person is left to his / her own conscious. When that conscious does not see inherent value in others or their property, this is the result. Sean had a video earlier today, in which the 3 armed guards were at the gas station and these kids not only stole items, but just needlessly destroyed property. They went out of their way to slash tires, break windows and tear down displays. They have NO moral code that is recognized by general society, so they have no internalized "red flag" that stops them from acting on such impulse.  . Of course, this is compounded by Democrat policies that are ever making excuses for those that commit such crimes, because they apply a "victim's hierarchy". Should this person fall under the umbrella of a "victim", the leftist response is ...."oh, that Jimmy is only lashing out, because of systemic racism. If we punish him, it will only make the systemic trauma worse". Here we are.... watching BLM and Antifa terrorists rampage across the country killing, destroying and violating everything in sight and when they attack someone who defends himself, Kyle Rittenhouse is prime example, but there are MANY others.... they get exactly what they deserve. However, the leftist must now turn ALL of the consideration of accountability and especially punishment, to any and all who do not fall under that victims hierarchy. . What makes this even crazier, is that if the gas station owner, DOES fall under that victims hierarchy, but does have a code recognized by society, but since he is holding little Jimmy accountable.... HE is now the one who should be punished. I am 58 and never in all of my days have I seen ANYTHING like we are seeing, in terms of excuses for not only bad, but ABHORRENT behavior. Those who do what we see here, need to learn a VERY, VERY harsh lesson in life, but society has apparently not suffered sufficiently enough to make that happen. . I highly doubt we will make it out of this decade without complete collapse and total breakdown of society that requires a brand new start. That is PRECISELY what the WEF wants to see!
    1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329.  @sleepykitty8918  ….Yup 😺 More frequent then I would like, I get comments or feedback that I am not pissed enough or pressing hard enough back, so am disrespected, as if I “am playing into the lefts hands” or “just a sheep who will just continue to comply, until we lose everything”. . These people know nothing about me, only that I don’t fight back in the same way they do. Mid 2020, I got a notice of jury duty. I contacted the clerk and told her I was fine with jury duty, this is being honest, but I would not wear a mask, under any circumstances. She gave me a reprieve, for 6 mo. because she thought requirement would be over by then. . Fast forward 6 mo. and still required. I again reiterated my stance and she said, too bad, you have to wear a mask. I told her I would show up at the courthouse, but when the people at the door demand I mask, I would refuse and they were going to have to arrest me. I went on to say, that if I was to be required to wear a mask ANYWHERE they take me, I would continue to refuse. . I fold her this was 100% non-negotiable under 100% of circumstances and if anyone attempted to force me to wear a mask, they would literally have to incapacitate me via stun or gun. If so, when I awoke, I would rip the mask off and it would start all over again. I was not kidding, but I was not rude or a dick about it, just that this was, and remains, a hill I will absolutely and literally die on. . She finally sent my “request” to the judge, along with this string of about 5 emails laying out all of the above. He refused to contact me, so along came the evening when I was to call in after 5:00 PM and confirm if needed the following day. . I was excused 😺
    1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367.  @TheJustice35  ... RE: You're fundamentally flawed.... : I too appreciate your good faith as well :) . No, my argument is not that you MUST abide by my principles, it is that we need to not be forced to live by EITHER yours or mine. This is why a federally enforced legalization of what many believe to be murder or homicide, is so divisive. By shifting the burden to the states, it allows the best compromise possible, because there is literally ZERO hope of consensus on this issue. . As it stands currently, the feds are forcing those that see conception as the beginning of human life, and I fall into this camp, to allow only ONE of the two people involved in creation of that life, to have SOLE discretion on how to handle it. The idea that the female is IMMENSELY more impacted than the male, is not lost on me, but it took two to tango, and currently he has ZERO to say about this. . To bring this full circle, and I am still awaiting an answer from another on THESE specific questions, but I will throw them to you: SCENARIO 1: Woman gets pregnant and decides to carry to term. Does the father have a LEGAL obligation to support that child... YES, he absolutely does.. PERIOD! SCENARIO 2: Same circumstances, but she wants to abort. He offers to cover 100% of ALL financial expenses and she is allowed to sign a release of any / all obligations for the end of time, as he will care for the child forever. She was a willing participant and KNEW the risks and became pregnant. The law as currently written still gives her 100% control over a mutually agreed upon risk, if you want to call it that. She could NOT have become pregnant, were it not for the voluntary act of her being with him, yet, she is the sole decision maker to the fate of that being they created. . Again... I am NOT dismissing the role she needs to play, but what of being responsible for actions? He must support if she keeps by her decision and he must stand by if she opts to flush it. There are many ways to greatly reduce the chance of pregnancy, but short of surgical intervention... NONE are guaranteed. . By kicking this back to the states, we don't by federal point of a gun FORCE one way or the other. In THIS respect... I am pro-choice :)
    1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. @Googlag Inmate #666 ... OMG... Perfect example right now! I left the page and YT had deleted my comment due to a word below --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This still leaves it up to a group or political body to determine WHAT is deemed acceptable speech. Clearly, you and I can come up with 20 or so words that are pretty much considered offensive or should not be said in mixed company. . Example: We might agree that saying "that girl is a *hore" is considered explicit. OK, what if I say..."That girl is a garden tool"? I just said the same thing, only used better language. That might make it past the "advisory" sticker, but do we want kids to say "garden tool" to describe a girl that is, ummm.... "experienced" ..lol. . This ALWAYS comes down to who decides what is / is not offensive. So, the breast thing we can do, is put a sticker for the 7 naughty words and expect that parents WILL BE parenting their kids. There is no doubt, kids will be exposed to it by their friends and such, but that has ALWAYS been the nature of adolescence. . Teach your kids a good moral center, teach them right from wrong, take the time to TRULY explain important topics when they come up and they will be just fine :) . This comment being deleted is a textbook example of YouTube taking on the role of "protecting its users". However, need only look at the context of what I said and COMPLETELY changes what I was actually saying. I have MASSIVE issues with YT censoring with such a broad brush, but happens to me all the time in discussions like this :)
    1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. ​ @natem1982  ... RE: There's really not any good solutions : I need to break this down a bit, so will go line by line :) I don't want to straw man you, but I am having a bit of trouble following you here. Please clarify where needed :) 1. The problem with just "letting it unfold" is that we must then accept whatever they cult decides to do and just live with the consequences. No, this is no way to live and makes one a sheep within a flock of wolves. I am not suggesting that we create chaos in order to fight chaos, but I sure as hell am not going to sit back and let the cards fall where they may and hope that Jesus saves me. I am in ZERO way religious, and don't seek to disrespect your faith, but is it your belief that Jesus will protect you from the hell the leftist wants to rein down on us all? . 2. I agree... and speaks to what I said in my last reply to you. Do not become the evil you fight, but that does NOT mean you should not fight. Fighting is not only physical confrontation, but a broad term for pushing back in whatever way one can, that avoids the pitfalls of becoming that evil. I will absolutely NOT sit back and just watch the leftist take from me, should they make such a direct move. I cannot control who ingests the Joseph Goebbels Propaganda Media Machine and takes it as gospel, but I am out here every single day, doing what I can to push back against the cult. I will not pretend it is easy or that I am making huge strides, but I will not just allow the chips to fall where they may. Those chips may end up where they go with or without my resistance, but I could not live with myself, should I sit back and hope for the best. . 3. Not sure where cancelling came in here, but I am as nearly a free speech absolutist, as it appears you are. I have never sought to cancel anyone, but I will most certainly be happy when one who DOES seek to cancel others, dies by their own sword. I have ZERO issues with people that fall victim to the censorship they once approved be used against others. You make interesting point that I have made myself, in regards to censorship. There are two fundamental questions, when it comes to censorship. The first is WHO decides what is deemed "in-appropriate" speech. Beyond fire in a crowded theatre, when there is no such fire.. calls for violence against another and such. The second is WHO decides WHO decides? The leftist cult is all about censorship, because they are currently in power, but they fail to grasp the clear and EXTREMELY obvious pitfalls of their current ways. There will come a time when the Regressives are no longer in power, hopefully in the next two election cycles, but I digress... , and the "who" that gets to decide what is acceptable will change. I am willing to bet they would be none to pleased, when a conservative appoints a new panel of arbiters of censorship! . 4. As for violence... I am not a fan. I don't wish to be violent and will do what I can to avoid it. However.... I will NEVER rule out the need for violence, when all else fails. There comes a time when violence is ABSOLUTELY the answer and if that time comes, I will know it and act accordingly. . Peace, Nado :) EDIT: I Have just re-read my comment here and I may need to clarify my thoughts on censorship. Simply put, I believe censorship to be evil! I want to hear what Hitler had to say, Ted Bundy and as much as Biden The Tyrantasourous Hex disgusts me, I would never seek to shut him up from whatever he has to say.
    1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416.  @deadzoneternity  ... RE: The reason I think people... : Ya, it was a bit hard to read. You were rambling a little... lol :) I really like your line of ..."it should be a procedure that isn't allowed, but with exceptions to allow it". This speaks to the camp of "Safe, legal and rare" which is something ONLY the most hardcore pro-life would say is not enough. . I think that it is foolish for anyone, you and I included, to think that abortion will ever be universally seen as evil, because it is not easy to judge oneself that harshly. I also think that, because the Western World values tilt VERY strongly toward the preservation / saving of human lives, the pro-choice crowd is just not going to be sold on a zygote or "clump of cells" being a human life. Some can be persuaded, as I myself was pro-choice most of my life. This was because I never really gave it the deep consideration it really deserves and saw it as a "woman's right". . At the end of the day, I would like to see as many laws written for the State level, rather than federal. The Constitution, it's amendments and The Bill of Rights, are the ONLY things that should be concerned with and the rest left to states. This will / would no doubt lead to some states going pretty far off-script, but would greatly reduce these impossibly polarizing issues, because if we hated something so much... we could move. Sure, that is inconvenient, but the alternative is federal over-reach which is EXACTLY what happened with Roe vs. Wade. . I support ANY legislation, aside from those mentioned just above, that falls out of the hands of fed and into the states! . Peace, TSM
    1
  1417. 1
  1418.  @deadzoneternity  .... RE: The idea that you or any individual... : Either you have misspoke in your first few words or have not been paying attention to what I have / been saying.... I happen to think it is the former :) . I understand many of the reasons I hear one say they are pro-choice, I just happen to think the overwhelming number of them are excuses for lack of responsibility OR the false belief that men simply want to control women because patriarchy BS. . Your middle paragraph is spot on and I am in 100% agreement and have said as much, if not in THIS thread, but one or two others on the same subject of other videos :) . Little lol on your last paragraph, as it seems you completely misunderstood the meaning of 1 & 2. I was not listing them as in number or importance or even in ORDER of importance, as they could have been in either order. They are simply 2 things that MUST be understood, before a pro-choice person can understand probably 98% of pro-life people's motivations. . I think that you just read my response(s) too quickly, and I'm not applying malice to you in this regard, then wrote this reply. No harm no foul and as I always say, I appreciate those that make arguments or critique mine in good faith and you have done so :) Peace, TSM! . PS> I do appreciate your separation of paragraphs. Not only easier to digest changes of topic, but just easier to read in general. I have seen comments that surpass my own in length, but are one single paragraph and often lack proper punctuation so that much harder to understand... lol
    1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. ​ @checkyoursixgaming ... Am I OK with cops killing children? You actually ask that question? You and I disagree on some EXTREMELY fine nuances of this situation and your go-to is that I approve of cops killing children? WTF! Why don't you sit down with Cathy Newman on Channel 4 and play the "so you are saying" game with her, because I wont. . I am not a lawyer, I am just giving you a VERY reasonable interpretation of how a hell of a lot of people see this situation (without breaking down the fine points of state laws). It doesn't make one bit of difference of how you or I interpret the law here or what we think is morally acceptable. We both know that if the prosecutor has a stick up his arse to file charges, he will do exactly that. Maybe he doesn't believe he has a snowballs chance in hell of conviction, but he is just virtue signaling anyway and The Constitution and Bill of Rights are the ultimate victims here, so let's keep our eye on the ball. . Regarding your last sentence and even if it will be thrown out of court... here they are in a heap of trouble because they (she) unnecessarily pointed a weapon at people. Even if they are 100% exonerated from any legal wrong doing, my opinion that they could have handled this differently will not change. If there was someone pointing a gun at THEM, my opinion would flip 180 degrees, but from all that I have seen and heard, this was not the case. You and I can kick this back and forth all day, but it is the McCloskey's who must fight for their freedom and deal with all of this crap directly. As we both know, if the prosecutor can get JUST enough leftists to agree to a trial, it only takes a few more on the jury to get a conviction. Even if the gov. pardons them, they would still have VERY likely avoided ALL OF THIS had the weapons been pointed at the ground an finger off the trigger.... whether it there actions are in line with Mo. law or not.
    1
  1442. 1
  1443.  @checkyoursixgaming  OMG... I wish people would just read what I said very clearly above. It MAKES NO DIFFERENCE that the weapon was a prop.... I was assumed to be real, so a "threat" is legitimately perceived. I am 100 BILLION % fine with that, but her lack of trigger discipline is the ONLY strength the prosecutor actually has here. We KNOW it is crap that they are in any legal trouble, but welcome to 2020 and leftist politicians running so much of our country. . Nobody physically approached the McCloskey's personal space, so they should have kept the weapons pointed down and OFF the trigger. I am not saying the crowd did not have harmful intent, they absolutely did. If they did NOT have weapons, there is ZERO doubt in my mind they would have rushed the house and at the very least caused damage, but likely burned it to the ground. Had the McCloskey's kept the weapons pointed AWAY from these people, there would be nobody siding with the prosecutor here. I don't blame them for pointing the weapon, but THAT is the issue that has them in hot water here. If the gun is facing down, it can be raised in a split second to fire IF NECESSARY. Pointing a gun all around at people creates the optics that SUPPORT the prosecutor pressing charges, as the media will sell it that way. We all know that in the end, it will fall apart, for several reasons. A huge swath of this country is blinded by leftist news and they are out there believing the lies because the images are manipulated to fit the narrative we ALL know they want to sell. That is sad, but it is reality :( . The McCloskey's would have been 100% just as protected if they kept the guns pointed down and off the trigger. Whether that is what any of us would have done is unknown, but a trained soldier in the military would NOT have waved a weapon at people as she did and that is being used as the excuse to press for prosecution. I don't agree they should be doing that, but I have no say in Mo. law.
    1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as [moderate+liberals] [allowed+wholesale+takeover] by [Marxist+Crats+socialists] those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+hor+rent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [horse+kinda] party, but chief among them is the outright [de+monization] of those ideas that would challenge their position as ["right+wing+extreme+ists"] (this would be anyone who is 1 degree [politically+right+former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who [very+self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an [EXTREME+influence+incredible+control+flow+information]. . We MUST have liberal ideas [working+with+conservative] ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable [discourse+"values"], is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what [Western+World+built], is a [runaway+train+brake-lever+broken+headed+sharp+bend+tracks], just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only [shove+idea+"values"+down+throat]. I fear by [time+recognize] that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too [late+stop+train]. I happen to think [already+too+late], it just depends on how many [train+cars+fall+end+bridge+canyon]. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  1464. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as [moderate+liberals] [allowed+wholesale+takeover] by [Marxist+Crats+socialists] those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+hor+rent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [horse+kinda] party, but chief among them is the outright [de+monization] of those ideas that would challenge their position as ["right+wing+extreme+ists"] (this would be anyone who is 1 degree [politically+right+former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who [very+self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an [EXTREME+influence+incredible+control+flow+information]. . We MUST have liberal ideas [working+with+conservative] ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable [discourse+"values"], is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what [Western+World+built], is a [runaway+train+brake-lever+broken+headed+sharp+bend+tracks], just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only [shove+idea+"values"+down+throat]. I fear by [time+recognize] that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too [late+stop+train]. I happen to think [already+too+late], it just depends on how many [train+cars+fall+end+bridge+canyon]. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  1465. @RawOlympia ... The "left" left us all, as the moderate liberals allowed a wholesale takeover by [Marxist+Crats] and socialists those who would [remove+West+ground], in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY [ab+horrent] issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the [donkey] party, but chief among them is the outright demonization of those ideas that would challenge their position as "right-wing extremists" (this would be anyone who is 1 degree politically right of [former+speaker+house]). This level of [pure+narcissism] has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who are very [self+righteous], but this is a whole new level and by those who have an EXTREME influence and incredible control over the flow of information. . We MUST have liberal ideas to work in concert with conservative ones, but the degree of [male+volent+self+appointed+arbiters] of what is and is not acceptable discourse and "values", is very literally [tearing+society+apart]. The wholesale [abandoned+values] upon what the Western World was built, is a runaway train with the brake-lever broken off and headed directly for a sharp bend in the tracks, just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those of us who are [not+insane], are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only to shove their idea of "values" down everyone's throat. I fear by the time we recognize that [standard+rules+discourse] are [not+possible], it will be too late to stop that train. I happen to think that it is already too late, it just depends on how many of those train cars go off the end of that bridge into the canyon below. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  1466. 1
  1467. ​ @RawOlympia  ... The "left" left us all, as the moderate liberals allowed a wholesale takeover by MarxistCrats and socialists those who would raise the West to the ground, in the hopes that utopia will simply spring up out of the earth like a flower. There are MANY abhorrent issues with the ideology that has now taken deep root with in the Democratic party, but chief among them is the outright demonization of those ideas that would challenge their position as "right-wing extremists" (this would be anyone who is 1 degree politically right of Nancy Pelosi). This level of pure narcissism has never before been seen on this scale in the Western world. There have and always will be those who are very self-righteous, but this is a whole new level and by those who have an EXTREME influence and incredible control over the flow of information. . We MUST have liberal ideas to work in concert with conservative ones, but the degree of malevolent self-appointed arbiters of what is and is not acceptable discourse and "values", is very literally tearing society apart. The wholesale abandonment of all the values upon what the Western World was built, is a runaway train with the brake-lever broken off and headed directly for a sharp bend in the tracks, just as it is about to traverse a bridge over the Grand Canyon. . Those of us who are still sane, are trying to reach across to those who have no interest in good faith address of issues, only to shove their idea of "values" down everyone's throat. I fear by the time we recognize that playing by the standard rules of discourse are quite literally not possible, it will be too late to stop that train. I happen to think that it is already too late, it just depends on how many of those train cars go off the end of that bridge into the canyon below. . Yes... I am very [dark+grey+pilled] these days, as we cannot [resist] so many problems on this many fronts
    1
  1468.  @nickkoyle3599  ... I have never watched any of Dore's work. I have seen bits and pieces, mostly reactions, so I don't have any legit opinion, other than what I have heard from those who do watch him. My understanding, is that he is not far left on all topics and willing to have a good faith conversation... as per what I have heard. Never watched any TYT, but seen a TON of reaction videos, so my bias is quite skewed against the channel. That said, most of what I have seen is from Sean here and while he is certainly biased against them, he will always give credit where due and is not one to utterly strip context from a Cenk rant and straw man him. Cenk is king of the straw man, as I have seen him say the most awful things about white people, conservatives and in complete context. . We all have our biases and I am certainly no exception. My issue comes from where TYT is formatted as a "News" outlet, so when they, and Cenk is the king of this, remove very necessary details or context from an event and then built an ENTIRE segment / rant upon that false premise... the entire argument is complete trash. All news outlets, including Fox, AON, Rebel and all the rest, have and DO inject bias and frame in a way that caters to an audience that can create a "bubble". However, the right-leaning media, is ever on the defense, as we see monumental bias to the point of lies, by omission, as well as other issues. Quick example is the [convent+kids+native+man] a number of years back. I can point to more recent, but this was especially bad, as several got their arses sued off over it. The news outlets [we both know who they are], had the entire video exchange, yet maliciously edited it to appear as though this young man was mocking or [bothering] the native man, when this was 100% the opposite of events. He was said to have had a [fruit-punch+able+face] on national broadcast news, to the point where his family got [removal+threats]. These outlets HAD the entire video, but wanted to make this boy look bad, because [dark+pink+baseball+hat] wearing. . I can come up with dozens more and particularly about Cheeto Man. Kinda went off rails there, sorry. I am fine with some bias, but the malicious editing, putting different parts of a speech, as if they were said together or leaving out ..."except the white supremacists and neo's, as they should be condemned completely" and others. TYT deliberately lies to its audience, under the guys of news.
    1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. ​ @learningtocrash4030  ... I hear what you are saying, but we CANNOT allow ourselves to believe that you or I should be the arbiters of what is and is not acceptable speech. Yes... We can see ALL over big tech, that conservatives are most certainly and openly demonized by leftists, while they do ZERO to curb or punish it in any way. However, we CANNOT become that which we are fighting! I am fully aware of the evils that are perpetuated by leftists, but I have and WILL CONTINUE to be civil in the face of it, so long as it is confined to issues of dialog. To that end, this is where I draw the line! . To this very day, I have worn a Covid mask twice... EXACTLY TWO TIMES! Once to vote Trump last year and again to vote Larry Elder and oust Grewsom. I obviously live in Comifornia, so BOTH were wasted votes, beyond any possible "manipulation" that absolutely DID occur (careful with words as some WILL get comments deleted by algorithm). I am not vaxxed nor will I EVER be and is not because I am anti-vax. I have not taken a vaccine for literally 40+ years and that last one was for tetanus, as I was cut by a VERY rusty nail at work. All indications are that the vax IS helping to save lives and lessen the strain on health system. I understand the jury is still out on things, but debating Covid is another way to get comments deleted). . I will continue to believe in 1a, as I am as nearly an absolutist as ANYONE you will ever meet, when it comes to free speech. Even if that speech is allowed to tell ME I have no right to it, because "my speech" is that of a conservative... and moderate one at that!
    1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. ​ @kariahl8845  ... Good morning, Kariah :) We also must recognize that the initial 2 crimes were likely NOT served to full term and release was a condition of accepting the harsher punishment, should they be caught offending again. At some point, we MUST hold people accountable and very often that accountability is harsher than would be otherwise, because they were given a second, and in these cases... a 3rd chance. To be clear... I am NOT defending the punishment of soda can guy's punishment. I doubt that YOU have any such criminal history to be concerned with 3 strikes, so why would that be? Well, because you have not engaged in the behavior that leads to those strikes, just as I have, along with the overwhelming vast majority of people. On that note, I would also look to the state that declares failure to pay for an item of less than $10.00 is considered a felony. By any metric, there is most certainly an issue there and it was peoples error to write such a statue into state law. . 3 strikes laws were not born out of whim or to just randomly punish people for instances like the case you cited. No, they were created as a response to many criminals who CONTINUE to victimize people time and time and time again, so the victimized got fed up. I understand that they are not always adjudicated in the manner in which they were intended, but the perpetrator CONTINUED to pursue crime at the expense of society. The case you cited, not withstanding, we can BOTH go back and forth with examples of how the people were seemingly over punished for a crime, as those who were given too many chances, by all objective measures (the DD I mentioned earlier as an example). I am not going to sit here and defend what happened to the soda can guy, because it does not sound like justice. However, 3 strikes was ONLY created after horrible continued abuses by career criminals, even if THIS particular one was unjust. . I suppose the best way to address such things as 3 strikes is a panel of judges who's job it is to consider specific situations in which 3 strikes law is specifically charged. I think this would be a fantastic way to avoid abuses, but there is one single problem. 3 strikes laws were a direct response to campaigns of victims and families pleading the cases of their HORRIBLE experience with criminals that repeatedly got released, only to kill or murder their mother, father, sister or brother :( Those exact same heart-strings you feel for the soda can guy are just not as powerful as a grieving mother in front of 20 microphones, tears running down her face, eyes bloodshot from crying holding a picture of her 5 yo boy who was ruthlessly killed by a multiple felon released on parole who promised to clean up his act. . BOTH of these are injustices, but how we proceed to fix them is the key. Due to many, many reasons, those who commit crimes are released from prison. Some have served their time and "appear" to be rehabbed, based on the panel that decides such matters, while others are released because of over crowding or maybe a procedural thing, like Bill Cosby was. In the end, we are human and there will ALWAYS be someone who rightly or wrongly got screwed over. . I certainly don't have all the answers, any more than you do. However, personal responsibility is at the heart of 100% of those we have spoken of in this thread and includes JJ. We, as a nation, must decide if imprisonment is designed for punishment, rehabilitation or both. Sadly, there are some, and I would say that JJ falls into this category, who will NEVER be "rehabilitated" and there is just no way to determine that, based solely on his earliest criminal conviction. Unless we as a society are willing to invest many times the amount of resources into rehabilitation facilities that can spend the time necessary in an attempt to undo the damage that leads to repeat offending, we will always have the soda can guy who was over-punished and 8 time DD who was released only to commit a 9th time. . society has a difficult time in accepting the amount of resources that go into addressing criminal behaviors, when the majority of us will never see that system, outside of a speeding or parking ticket. Just like ALL things, it comes down to money far too often. Paying ever higher and higher taxes to help those who perpetuate crimes against us all, don't get much sympathy and that is a powerful incentive to those who support harsh punishments.
    1
  1573. ​ @kariahl8845  ... As I mentioned earlier, we can ALWAYS take individual cases and hold them up as a good or bad example of 3 strikes. There are going to be just as many that were fairly administered, in a sense we would have agreement, as those that were not. Specifically in the case of the person who failed to put the correct amount of money, I am not familiar, but that is also a petty crime and not a felony that led to a 3rd strike and therefore life in prison. If it DID, than I would need more information, as I would be willing to bet there is more to the story, even if you are not aware. I am not seeking to be an apologist for any type of failure upon the criminal justice system, but you and I both understand there is always more to a story than gets reported. We need only look at the exceedingly left-leaning media which painted The Covington Kids as white supremacists, very simply because some were wearing MAGA hats. The mainstream media is ALWAYS going to seek the heart-strings point of view to paint a picture of unfair treatment in the justice system, as that is what they do. Just look at the case of JJ right here and how many have very high profile platforms and flat out lying about this case. Again, we can go tit for tat forever. There was a case in my home town, where a drunk driver on a motor cycle blew a stop sign and struck a man walking his daughter in a crosswalk. She was killed, he lost a leg and was hospitalized for many months. The driver....? he already had something like 8 felony convictions for driving under influence and proceeded to covertly flip the bird to the victims family when he was in court. . Just like the example you gave that appears to be a miscarriage of justice, so is this one. He was given WAY too many chances and continued to piss them away. Just like virtually EVERY criminal that has been convicted several times, it is not realistic to assume these are the ONLY times he she committed such a crime and got caught 100% of the times he perpetrated one. I get that you are not for capital punishment, as you are certainly not alone. This topic is might be 2nd in controversial, to that of Rowe vs Wade. . I think that you and I have gone about as far as we can with this and we just disagree on a few points. While these may or may not be about lives being unfairly taken, they are points that will NEVER be rendered "acceptable" to both sides of the opinion on capital punishment. I will add one more thing, that I forgot to include in earlier comments. Just because a person has a bias, does NOT mean he / she is is automatically going to be driven to error because of it and therefore incapable of being objective. While you may be more inclined to spot the times punishment was incorrect or in humane, as you put it. I am more inclined to point out where the system failed, by giving a person too many chances and left one or more victims on a long list, that should NEVER have been victimized at all, for a system that failed in the opposite direction. . Peace, Kariah L. I think we had a good exchange here and while I don't think either of us changed our position, I think it fair to say we gave each other something more to consider when forming our own position, at least I hope so :). This conversation is EXACTLY why this nation will forever be divided, as to how we deal with those who enter the criminal justice system. It is most certainly difficult to get out of a revolving door, we must remember that before one seems trapped within that door, he / she had plenty of chances to avoid it, likely many years earlier via programs specifically designed to support 1st time offenders. Some will get trapped easier than others, but we are a forgiving nation. However, seeing the injustice perpetuated upon THIS family, by way of possible release in lieu of death sentence or even life in prison for JJ, is every bit as unfair as the guy and the soda can :)
    1
  1574. ​ @kariahl8845  ... Your right! After I wrote 100%, I took a little pause, but I believe I covered those anomalies a bit later in my comment. However, the judge determines bias is true, but a judge has bias of his / her own, so this STILL falls back to the people who operate the system. Based on this criteria, it can never be possible to have a "fair" (literally impartial) trial, therefore would be grounds for a mis-trial 100% of the time... see where I am going with this? The idea being is that both attorneys have the ability to challenge the judge on a particular ruling he or she makes during the trial and that is a check and balance thing, as written on that "paper". Of course, BOTH attorney's have a bias, as well as the jury members and we can go on and on. The system understands there is bias, but since it cannot be removed from the equation, there are ways to address an issue when bias is believed to be influencing the proceedings and there is literally no other way we can do this. . Both attorneys even have such power to ask the judge to recuse him / herself and there are other procedures that can get other judges involved to determine bias, if the issue is pressed hard enough. Yes, there are most certainly rulings that enable the ability for others to abuse, but again.... this is absolutely unavoidable and there are procedures in place for an attorney to call out bias, mistrial or other when it is believed to have occurred. Sometimes this is not noticed or picked up until well after the trial has concluded. . As for mandatory minimums, yes.... that would seem to be a "hard line" as dictated by legislation or laws passed by citizens. However, no matter HOW definitive that law or legislation, there is going to be extenuating circumstances in nearly 100% of those cases. That is why a judge has to do exactly that... judge. It then becomes the attorneys job to decide if that judgement was fair or shows a perceived bias. . As for underpaying for a soda, seems like you may be getting at the 3rd strike laws? If so, we have to consider that a person has already had 2 felony convictions, so when he steals a piece of pizza, which was one highly publicized case, he goes to prison for life or whatever the mandatory sentence is for that crime in that state. Such a sentence is NOT because he stole a piece of pizza, it is because he used a knife and has gotten two chances already and failed to live up to the agreement he made when released from that second conviction. I get that it sucks going to prison for stealing a slice of pizza, but that is NOT the actual reason he is going away again. . If I am understanding you correctly, you feel that the judge should have called for a mis-trial, once it became known that the jurist lied... am I correct? If so, than this again falls back to bias, procedure failure or whatever legal reason and is but one of the way in which the system works to correct human "errors", let's call them. I am not a lawyer, nor was I involved in that trial, obviously, but IMO, the judge seems to have violated Chauvin's rights and hence the appeal that has been make is all but guaranteed to include that action within the document filed by his attorney. . In conclusion here... I do get that no matter HOW hard we try, no matter HOW many procedures we have and no matter HOW much we want to get it right, there are just too many people involved. 100% of them, through action or inaction due to personal bias, has the possibility to have a direct impact on the outcome of a trial. Since we cannot possibly remove all of those from the equation, we also have done our best to not put the death penalty on a perfect citizen in EVERY single societal valued way, until that one day commits the most horrific crime imaginable. When this happens, such a case is always tried as a mentally deficient person, maybe a minor, and we don't sentence capital punishment on such people.  . So, we have to make a decision. Either we do the best we can as a people, and admittedly we certainly fail at times, and permit capital punishment in states that allow it OR lock them away until the end of time. We have to weigh these options as they BOTH come with a very high price. One in living with the execution of a person who may be found innocent at a later date, although exceedingly rare, it has happened. Or two... lock them away and pay a monetary price in building more prisons and taxpayer support until the end of their life. Or three... discuss rehabilitation and all three have drawbacks that can have a VERY difficult outcome with which we as a society must reconcile.
    1
  1575. ​ @kariahl8845  ... I apologize :( I did not mean to suggest that you did, but I can see how I wrote my comment, it might have suggested that :)  . As for the actual "system" being at fault, I would 100% disagree, as it is the people who mess things up. If ALL arrests were handled in a completely objective manner and to the letter of how it is written on that paper, we would have exceedingly few complaints about it at all. As far as I can tell, this case was textbook per that "paper", but only got screwed up now because of activists getting activated.Of course, we humans are NEVER 100% objective and there in lies the rub! . I am sure if we looked at all legal proceedings of all cases ever tried, we would find things that fell through the cracks, so to speak. There are literally infinite variables that can happen and there is NO system of any kind that can account for them all in every way possible. This is why we have a lengthy appeals process, court appointed lawyers and such, because we sometimes see long after the trial, that someone has a few too many and spilled the beans to someone and perjured him / her self. It is for this reason that I am not in favor of immediate execution, if a verdict of capital punishment is given. . Again, we can always find cases that were seemingly failed by the system, but we can look at every one and find where someone intentionally or otherwise, failed procedure in some way. Bill Cosby is a perfect example. While he admitted to drugging one woman, he had a deal with the then prosecutor that it would not be charged, in order to plea to other things. This is EXCEEDINGLY common in the system, but it was a replacement prosecutor who used that protected admission to imprison Cosby. While all of us may agree that he is among the worst of the worst, when it comes to how he treated many women, it was absolutely the correct thing to do, by letting him out of prison. It is the prosecutor and not Cosby who royally F'd up here, as far as his release from prison is concerned. . Derek Chauvin has filed an appeal and is likely due to the images we have all seen of one jury member who was well aware of BLM and even had a t-shirt in that photo, yet claimed non-bias when he was being selected for jury duty. While this does not exonerate Chauvin's behavior, there was VERY clear misconduct by a jury member and he is the one who should be blamed, if Chauvin gets a new trial. If BLM rampages through America again, I will blame them for what they do as well. There are many issues about that particular case that were not handled well, but in the court of public opinion, rightly or wrongly, a MASSIVE amount of earths population witnessed what they believe to be the murder of George Floyd. . Hopefully, this governor will get the message from objective observers and see that commuting his sentence would be a slap in the face, not only for justice, but for the family of the victim :(
    1
  1576. ​ Mark Harris  ... I would approach it in the identical way. While all of these things were 100% true at the time of his murder, it takes a certain amount of time for ALL of it to not only be digested by the legal parties, but accepted as well. Once a trial has ended, the losing party examines it all and looks for things that may have been illegal or mishandled in some way and we need to allow time for that to happen. We HAVE seen cases, Thin Blue Line being an example, of when someone was wrongly convicted and may have been put to death. Such events MUST give us pause, if we are to be a morally grounded society that is based upon tenants of the Ten Commandments. . What we see here is that the system worked as it should, in the sense of exercising appeals and making sure we don't get a person recanting testimony and the like. What happened in THIS case, as with many.... activists! They, HollyMarx in this particular case, have VASTLY more influence on society than they aught to and for unconscious reasons, people will hear a very famous actress make a claim of racism or something and the idea catches fire among media and then society. There is literally ZERO reason why Denzel Washington should have any more credibility than you, me or any random stranger on the street.... but they do :(  . Once a large contingent of very influential people get involved, we all pop our heads out the window to see what all the fuss is about. When we have social and mainstream media willing to outright LIE, either by playing semantics, obfuscating or omission, people find it difficult to dismiss, because it is done with not only great conviction, but on video. Such communication is a POWERFUL thing and its influence should never be underestimated.
    1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618.  @ryans1623  On part one of your question…. context is everything. . What if this person is inside your home with your wfe and kids present? In the BLINK of an eye, that person could change up tactics and suddenly has a knife at one of their necks, or one person makes a move that distracts and the other uses that distraction to smash you or one of your family over the head? . This can ALL go horrendously sideways in that much time, so we cannot simply Monday Morning quarterback this stuff. The INSTANT one guy reaches over to steal something from 3 feet away, the second guy immediatelly hops the counter and is in his private space. One moment they have his full attention, so he grabs a knife, then……. BAM, suddenly they have intentionally or otherwise used a 2 on 1 ploy to take advantage of their physical position AND that his attention is now separated by a 90 degree head swivel to determine their next moves. . This is UNQUESTIONABLY a threat! We can argue the degree of that threat, but we not only have the 100% safety, calm, cool and collected view from a stationary camera behind all this, but with FULL knowledge of everything that has YET to happen and several weeks later. In the LITERAL span of 1 second, those two dramatically escalated their tactics to manipulate his attention and steal from behind his counter. This is a threat to his person and YES his property. property they were willing to press his ability to address, based on two guys and situated on each side of his position. . This IS a threat on several levels and the clerk is not prossessing all of these actions in reall time, as he is dealing with adrenalyn, fear and a sudden coordinated “assault” on his personal space and yes…. his property. I make no distinction as to the value of property they are taking, because this is indescriminate stealing on their part and they have every incentive to take as much as they can get away with. . In that instant, he is not PROCESSING this guy dashing for the door. He “sees” it, but is simultaneous to the second guy jumping the counter, in a clear escallation of their 2 on 1 advantage. While we all like to consider the knife as major over reaction, his eyes are immediatelly on the guy who hopped the counter and we are able to see and process the other making a dash for the door. . Sure, we can EASILY say he was no longer a threat of any kind, but the clerk cannot see and digest that in the living moment of all this. We can see the guy just standing there, but in that flash, he simply sees a guy who is now on his side of the counter and his fight or flight instinct has instataneously maxed out and he makes his move. . We will see where the law takes all of this, but there is NOTHING that can go back in time, put ourselves in the clerks head and expect us to act with perfect degree of force or subdue the guy with perfect precision a take down move. We have the benefit of TONS of criteria that was still unfolding at the time, so this could have all gone horribly sideways, from his perspective. We MUST consider his use of force was deemed reasonable, based on what he knew, when he knew it and the nature of 2 on 1 guys in ski masks who have exactly ZERO concern for his right to property OR any fear or distress any of that may cause. . .They are there to steal and 100% reasonable to think they will continue to escallate their advantage as long as it suits their position.
    1
  1619.  @maddoggibson1  ….. If you have not read my last handful of comments on this thread, I ask that you do, because I had a HUGE part of this story wrong. . I had initially thought BOTH guys were behind the counter at the same time and therefore saw him as surrounded and was 100% on board with clerks actions. Was only very late in this thread, I realized this was not the case and reversed my take completely. . With more reflection still, I am at least on the fence. One second the guy on his right leaned over and stole something and was at that point, the OTHER guy jumpred counter. In the fraction of a second, he was being “violated”, as his store was under direct assault, for lack of maybe a better word and on EACH side of his position. . .it was at that instant, he lunged for the guy and stabbed him. I will not argue that being stabbed was in any way not horrible, but this guy has a lot to think about in a very short period of time and we are sitting back several weeks later saying what WE would have done. We dont have is adrenalyn, his sense of 2 on 1 or feeling that at any second, the other guy may bet ballzy. . We see all of this from a detached perspective and had he ONLY punched or pushed, maybe the second guy or someone watching door outside gets involved. Had he not incapacitated that guy, could have been 2 on 1 and he is in big trouble.. . Is it fair he used a knife when we know now the robber did not have a weapon…? No. However, it was THEY who chose to violate this guy and his store. The F with playing fair, when they were counting on the 2 on 1 advantage to distract clerk. . We can see the guy run out of the store the moment clerk goes on attack, but the clerk is NOT processing this at all. He immediately went after the other guy and took him out of the equation. Was it harsh…? Yes, but we are seeing ALL of this from a MASSIVELY different perspective and am about 75% in the clerks corner on this. . As for crime in general, this is a societal thing. Whether gun or knife, the person who is committing the crime WILL create a reaction by his action and people are not predictable. That guy did not count on nearly dying, just as the clerk did not wake up thinking. “I think I will use a knife and stab a robber in the neck at work today". I just don't think it is "reasonable" for everyone to expect the clerk to be "reasonable" when dealing with unreasonable people who went in to his store with the explicit intent of stealing his property and while being distracted by the two of them. . These guys instigated this ENTIRE thing and I am not saying YOU say the following, but I am just not willing to completely condemn this clerk, because he had literally 2 seconds to act and when adrenalyn, fear and anger boil over, one is not really in a conscious state of mind any longer, one is reacting to eliminate a threat completely, not make legal or "reasoned" considerations as to what may happen, because he does not have the benefit of what WE know now. . Had he stood back or just complied, odds are they would have been emboldened and gone for the register. Maybe not, but he could not possibly know the future and I have very little issue with him making sure he did not play beta male and just hope for the best. . 😺
    1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623.  @Goulash45  …. Had ALLelse been the same and there were only a SINGLE guy…. you and I would be in agreement. . However… there was TWO guys and that changes the equation. Had he stabbed a lone person, I would be in full agreement that it would be WAY over the top. In such a case, it would have been reasonable to punch or tackle the SINGLE guy and a knife would have been 100% unjustified. . The problem is the second guy. If he just sits there, why not go for the register? Why not just keep getting more bold... what is to stop them, when he is cowering in the corner? These are two guys in ski masks brazenly stealing from this guy and that IS threatening behavior. It is a threat to his pride, it is a threat to his job responsibility and indeed a physical threat when they are on each side of his position committing robbery! . Tell me, Jon…. what would YOU have done? I already know, you would sitand there like a beta and let the steal from your store. Now…. what if you stood there complying and then they decided to go for the register? Why shouldn ‘t they be expected to do that? You aren’t resisting…. you pose no threat, so they are now emboldened and you are inbetween them and the cash? . As soon as those two make a move for you, there is very slim chance to avoid serious injury. One from the front and the other coming at you from the back. This was not one on one in an open parking lot, this was TWO on one, with your back GUARANTEED to be toward one of them! You try to jump the counter, they grab your arm or leg and trip you up and fall on your face on the other side. They jump over, while you are trying to get up and kick you in the head! Your moment of shock and awe is long gone and now you are getting your head kicked in by two adrenalin charged robbers! . What do YOU do, when you waited for them to get bored and leave…. but decide to score some cash?
    1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626.  @Schlabbeflicker  …. My position has nothing to do with whether or not this mans actions were legally justifiable. . My contention is that by virtue of both of thes guys having hopped over the counter and literally cornering him with no reasonable way to escape, he at that point, became a “prisoner”. . Had he made a move either way to escape, it is not reasonable to expect no physical confrontation to occur, therefore it is reasonable, that the other guy would have given assistance to the one being confronted. In such a case, his back would be to this person and be EXCEEDINGLY vulnerable to being hit in the head or otherwise seriously injured as a result. . Wa can speculate all day long about what “might”have occurred, but the fact remains, there was a threat to his person, by the mere fact these two were committing a crime and he was trapped inbetween. . We were not there. We do not have HIS frame of mind and the moments he was limited to decide what action to take. We CANNOT say, they were “just going to steal a couple hundred dollars worth of product”. Had this guy complied and just sat there, it is EXCEPTIONALLY likely they would have been emboldened and gone for the register. . At that point, they would HAVE to deal with him, because he was trapped at the register. There is NO way to reasonably expect that with all the adrenylin (sp) and testosterone flowing in that little area, it is impossible NOT to get into a brawl right there. . This guy saw that he was trapped and his best chance to avoid serious injury…..? catch one of them by surprise! If he just threw a punch and had not immediately incapacitated him, then he would fight back and within 2 seconds, the SECOND guy would come in from behind and he would be guaranteed to be cracked in the head with whatever he could find behind the counter. . He may be in serious legal trouble here, but I will ALWAYS support his actions!
    1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. ​ @Jessica Mason .... No question, that if ALL people in society, be them elected to enforce laws or simply enforce the recognized rules of a given society, did the "right thing".... but they do not. The problem in 100% of cases, comes down to the nature of human beings and there is LITERALLY zero systems that can eliminate the 3 issues I mentioned in my previous comment just above yours. So long as we humans are charged with making decisions, we cannot eliminate those that would abuse the privilege in which they were assigned. We can have any number of oversight committees or checks and balances, but for EVERY one of them.... human error, human ignorance and human malice WILL enter into the equation. . It all starts with a society that has legally, morally and tacitly agreed to a certain conduct of behavior and interaction. The moment just one citizen breaks those rules, regardless of how egregiously, those in the society must pass some judgement, punishment or correction to it. The first thing society gave up on was shaming. When society decided that "shame" was no less cruel then bullying, we began our decent off the rails of a polite functioning society. There have always been those who go WELL beyond things that simple shame would address, so we need to take the next step. Well, one in ALL cases, will lead some to take that next level of anti-social behavior. We can trace back probably 98% of serious anti-social behavior, gang killings in this case, to the failure of enforcing simple shame WAY back when it would have done some good. . Obviously, there are those who are just born bad and no amount of shame would have stopped them from the destructive path they were on. Hell, we can look back to the earliest days of Hitler himself, and see how events and how others handled them, influenced what we saw he eventually became. Systems will ALWAYS be abused and there is no way to eliminate it. All we can do, is enforce those things that have time tested as proven to lead to the most cohesive society of the past. . Society has failed itself and when this happens... chaos is the only possible result 😿
    1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... Some things we know to be true: 1. The man shot, was in possession of a legal fire arm. Ergo he was not a convicted felon and for all we know, he had not committed any crimes 2. He was alone in this apartment and door was locked, so not expecting any visitors I will do my best to steel man your argument, as I understand it :) The police enter the door quietly with a key, so as to remain stealth. One officer immediately yells "Police... this is a warrant" (may not be verbatim) and within 1 second, multiple other officers yell the same thing. Very clearly, this is intended to startle any occupants and the idea is that they will caught off-guard and be less likely to reach for a gun or mount some kind of resistance. I get this, and I fully understand how this will make it safer for police, as entering a home in this way is about as risky as it gets for police. Now, the ONLY way I can interpret your position at this point, because it appears that you believe that the INITIAL officer announcing "Police.... this is a warrant" is sufficient for anyone within earshot to not only understand exactly what is happening, but NOT reach for a weapon, if you happen to not be a bad guy. Again.... I am NOT trying to straw man you, but this is how I understand you position to be. . Based on what I have written directly above, and subject to error, this is the only conclusion I can surmise. This guy not only knew it was cops, but understood it was a legal warranted raid upon the apt. he was within, his go-to move was pop out from under the covers, weapon first, and do what....? No reasonable person, particularly one who is 2a and legally carrying, is going to think that police are going to stand down or otherwise NOT react in such a way to protect themselves from being shot, which is the ONLY reasonable consideration the police would have at this point. . My conclusion, based on the above: This guy was asleep or at least relaxed enough to have no idea, that cops were going to enter into his space and begin yelling. When the first "Police... this is a warrant" is yelled, he is obviously not expecting such an outburst, so it takes the average mind a moment to digest the sound, process it and realize... "Oh, this is police and I have not done anything wrong, so I will just put my hands at "twelve and two", so to speak, and calmly comply with the officers. No, in such a state of sleep or rest, that FIRST "Police... this is a warrant" is yelled and just wakes you up.  . How many times in your life has the dog or cat knocked over something loud in the house and wakes you up in the middle of the night? You are suddenly wide awake, as you heard the crash of broken glass on the kitchen floor. Now, how long does it take you to put the sound together with one of your pets making a mess in the kitchen... lol. It takes you probably 3 maybe 4 seconds, until you yell... "Dammit, Fido... get out out of the garbage can!" (remember... this is REAL time 3 or 4 seconds). Now, fast forward to THIS moment, the initial "Police..." wakes you up, within 1 second, you are awake, but certainly not fully alert yet, you hear multiple others just yelling loudly. I would safely bet that 99% of all humans who are not living with the idea cops are going to enter their home, would be unable to process all this within the following 3 more seconds! It would be VERY reasonable to assume you were having your home invaded and you are likely to be in extreme danger immediately. You were JUST sound asleep and within 3 seconds, you think you may die! . If this guy was able to understand ALL of this, in the time allotted, why emerge with a gun when he KNEW there were multiple officers pointing guns directly at him? . I am doing my best to steel-man, so keep this in mind :)
    1
  1654. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... No..... you are assuming this person, or ANY person would have a full grasp of what was happening in the midst of a iteral 9 seconds of chaos. If this was a murderer or a multi-felon with a weapon... I have ZERO... let me say that again.... [size 86 font... ZERO] issue with removing him from this earth. Yes, the first guy DID yell solo, but after about 1 second, all you hear is a bunch of guys rushing in and screaming. If you are asleep or completely relaxed and you hear that first "Police... this is a warrant", you are INSTANTLY overwhelmed by a bunch of guys yelling and 98% of all people are going to be so jarred by the suddeness of it all, won't be able to digest that INITIAL "Police... this is a warrant", before you are facing multiple black clad men swarming you from all sides. If you are NOT the bad guy and you have an actual conscious care for your fellow humans, as the thugs and murderers obviously don't... you are going to be dead before you EVER figure out what the hell is going on. . While the overwhelming is great from the cops perspective and I cannot blame them in the least for wanting such an advantage, when a mistake is made, bad intel or otherwise a person who was NOT the target of the warrant, this is what happens. This guy was legal 2a, and while a bit odd he awakes puling a gun, It is exceedingly unlikely that THIS particur man understood what the hell was happening, before he was shot dead. . Based on what we understand at this moment, and that may change in time, why would he not just comply with police orders? He was not on the warrant and, since legally possessing a weapon, he had NOTHING to fear... right? If it was soo obvious that these were a bunch of cops, it would be guaranteed suicide to pop out from under the blanket packing a gun.  . This is a GUARANTEED way to be shot, so are you suggesting that he KNEW it was police, but as an upstanding legal gun owner, decided he wanted to have a shoot out in the living room? It is beyond obvious, that he had NO IDEA these were cops, because he was not a criminal and had no reason to resist. No, he was supremely startled and his instincts were to exit the blanket with a fire arm to protect himself. . Tell me.. why pull a gun, when it was so obviously cops looking for someone else?
    1
  1655. ​ @PirateNinjaMegaRobot  ... OK, you aren't LISTENING to me here. Let me clarify AGAIN! I am NOT anti-cop NOR am I anti-No Knock warrant. What I am saying is that these type of entries create a very SPECIFIC danger to us all and here is why. The idea of No Knock is to give the police a supreme advantage, as they catch someone by surprise and, hopefully, unable to resist as they otherwise would. While this is FANTASTIC, if this happens to be the murderer, multiple time felon who's home you have entered.. . However, if this is NOT the correct home or happens to be some mistake and this is the home of someone who is NOT a bad guy, but has a weapon, because law abiding 2a and all that. You are asleep or otherwise laxed on the couch...whatever. ALL you hear is a bunch of people yelling what cannot be easily distinguished as "Police.. this is a warrant", because it is a whole bunch of them yelling this. As mentioned my comment above.... line up THIS video at the point when the cops are turning the key. Close your eyes, turn up the sound VERY loud and imagine you are sleeping or chilling in your room. What do you hear..? You hear what could VERY easily be a bunch of gang bangers rushing into your home, because you are taken 100% by surprise. You are not likely going to isolate ONE voice saying "Police... this is a warrant". No, you are going to be disoriented for at LEAST a few seconds, they bust through the bedroom door and you ALREADY have your weapon, because you are fire arm proficient and in your own home. . All you see is a bunch of guys dressed in black pointing guns at you and, because you already had YOUR gun, but not fully aware of what is happening yet, you have it pointed at the door they are entering. Now, you have done NOTHING wrong, but the cops have to assume you are a bad guy, understandably... and you are dead! . I think what would be MUCH better, is to designate ONLY a single person to yell "Police... this is a warrant" several times, with a couple seconds between each mention. Since they are announcing at that point anyway, at least those who are NOT criminals, have a moment to comprehend what is happening. I get that the surprise is what gives cops added safety, but it also creates a much higher degree of risk for average Joe who did NOTHING wrong, but is now dead. . Please tell me if this does not make sense :)
    1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. ​ @isotopesreactor3019 ... N. Korea is not going to concede anything of value to any nation in the world, without doing EVERYTHING possible, to humiliate or degrade every nation that would seek concessions from them. Any worthwhile negotiations with N. Korea are gonna take months of meetings and that leader is going to have to appear to Kim Jong-Un, to grovel and humiliate his / her nation into getting concessions from N. Korea. That nation, just like Cuba, has survived just fine without the help of the West, so he is NOT about to give the West ANYTHING without a long fight to prove we have something he wants. Side note, while all of us can agree, living under the rule of N. Korea is not something any of us would wish upon anyone, a nations leader cannot sit at a podium one day, and espouse the evils of a N. Korean dictatorship one day and then seek a sit down meeting with KJU in the following ones. It is easy to point out the horrors committed by him and how he rules N. Korea, so this is why Trump "played the game" and walked across that bridge without escort into N. Korea. KJU respects that kind of thing and it would / will take a HELL of a lot more than that act alone to get anywhere with N. Korea. . Perhaps you have heard of the Abraham Accords? Ya, I get it... the Arab nations are not going to invite the Jews over for tea, but Trump was able to help make some very serious discussions between Israel and some of these nations and was a great few steps. Now, these would not be like dominoes and see Iran and others suddenly say... "I love you Israel, let's hug". Trump did this while 100% of the Democrats were ACTIVELY undermining his administration at every possible turn. From a general who ACTUALLY contacted China, in order to behind the scenes tell them that Trump was simply making a threat to appease the American people and he is not going to attack. If America does plan a military move, I will let you know. Ya, our own American Chief of staff committed TREASON against his own country, JUST to harm Trump. Go ahead and fight him at every turn. Call him to the mat for every action he wants to take, but FFS, don't LITERALLY sell out your own nation, in order to harm Trump! . Obama had a drone strike and there were Americans killed there as well. One of those times when it really SUCKS to be a POTUS. In 100% of every circumstance in which military actions are taken, the POTUS is not spending weeks in the War Room planning strategy and accounting for every move that leads up to to a call for an action. No... POTUS has and will ALWAYS rely on the various leaders of the military and intelligence to provide the information necessary to make the call and POTUS must decide. I am not excusing Trump, nor am I calling out Obama (I could go on for multiple paragraphs on what he COULD have done, as the 1st black POTUS, but utterly FAILED). What I am saying is that POTUS is certainly responsible for making that call, but there are an INFINITE number of things that can be misinterpreted, wrong or simply change, between the time an order call that drone strike and the time it ACTUALLY strikes it's target. No excuses for Trump or Obama, but every POTUS ever to occupy the Oval is subject to the information given. Since we have multiple examples of Trumps OWN admin turning on him, in order to punish him, is it really surprising that things he was called to do were not proposed in good faith? Trump must own strike, just like Obama must own his! . Leaving allies! Just like 100% of every POTUS ever, he relies on aids and can get things wrong, because guess what... we are human. Though we can also add exactly how many wars did Trump start and how many from the previous, say 4 POTUS'? Some of this is simply luck of the times, but it is also garnering respect by foreign leaders and not being a weak one who leaders can walk all over.... in steps Biden. While the evacuation plan to leave Iraq was formed by the Trump admin, the execution of it was ALL on Biden and his admin. No question, America needs to VASTLY reduce its presence in foreign nations, as this is an ever increasing risk / problem on multiple levels. Biden simply put America and it's allies tail between its legs and ran away. We left several billion $$$ worth of military vehicles, weapons and such behind, which the Taliban is now using to supply itself as well as VERY likely Hamas and others to do what they do. Remember the civilians LITERALLY falling from the sky as they were hanging on to a plane that was leaving the airport? That evacuation was literally treason against America and its allies and is absolutely IGNORED by mainstream leftist media. What Biden authorized was the most most poorly executed exit plan ever performed.... and Biden must own that. We needed to get the hell out of there, but a few hundred soldiers in strategic places could have been an IMMENSE help in assuring we got ALL of our allies and equipment out, evacuated the civilians and allies... THEN we have the military personnel taken out. As it stood, we had absolute CHAOS and a terrorist opted to take the opportunity to blow up a bunch of people while crowded at the airport. . I am not a Trump apologist, but I see things for what they are and I have the EXACT same bias as 100% of everyone who happens to make it to this part of my comment. No doubt, we could all go back and forth about the above and add / take away certain things to improve / worsen those events. My problem with those who I consider having TDS, is the hyperbole. The idea that Trump is simply explained away by accusing him of being the most evil man ever and that he is LITERALLY worse than Hitler, which I have heard once respected people, like Sam Harris, for example, is called hyperbole... and it serves nobody. . I support Trump today, because the state is so INSANELY corrupt and F'd up to such an extreme... desperate times require desperate action. Trump is light-years from the perfect man and as unconventional a POTUS as has been in my lifetime and maybe ever. He has many faults, but the overwhelming vast majority of them, as claimed by the left leaning of our world are simply false. We can look at "Russia, Russia, Russia" and know that it was Hilary Clinton behind the Steel Dossier with the corrupt as F-BI paying informants to lie, in order to spy on American citizens... THIS IS FACT! and is treasonous. I could name multiple Constitutional violations by Biden, but this is not about him... this is about Trump. . I am sure I missed some stuff that I will think of 5 seconds after I hit "post", but that is enough for now. As per ALL of my comments, I invite a good faith discussion with any / all who agree or disagree. I am not perfect, though I am a kitten, so I have studied hoomans to the best of my ability, but if wrong about something... I will own it and ask others to do the same . Now.... you begged and I delivered. I expect a good faith reply, as my PC is now out of ink 😿
    1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735.  @nunote2362  ... I am 59 and as mentioned prior, this has always existed, but was not the "norm" it is today. Obviously, there are parts of the country or inner cities when over the top and need to consider gang's, as these are in overwhelming cases, issues of "terf". . My point still stands. The average person who got in a fight, typically at school over some slight, legit or otherwise, was not a death match. I am not, nor have not said that such things never happened, because this is clearly not true. I can see, over the course of my lifetime, that the instances of fights turning into multiple people on one and often times, people who simply wanted to "get in on a beat-down", join in for a few kicks to the head, when the person was clearly unconscious or far too injured to go on. . This is a special kind of malice that stems from a fundamental lack of respect for human life and is vastly more prevalent in particular demographics. The primary of those, being fatherless homes with no proper male role model to instill those values and "fear" how dad would respond when the school called and said hit child was threatening / bullying another child. We have 3 full generations now, whom have been increasingly more indoctrinated with an "us vs. them" mentality of oppressed / oppressor. . The cannon of values that were the foundation of the West, are not just failed to be taught, but we have sitting Congress members who openly embrace socialism on a large enough scale that should concern us all. All my life there has been some oddball who was a "Socialist Party" member, but we saw this on mass scale, by BLM and Antifa, during the Summer of 2020. Times have changed and these kids seeking death over a disagreement, are a reflection of that change.
    1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745.  @johnulmer6715  ... I don't disagree, but I don't see you armed and storming the White House, do I? We also must recognize that The Forefathers WERE and organized group and the entire continent had a total of less than 300K people. There were no states, only colonies and there was no organized military. There were militia that was comprised of other citizens, so need only get their cooperation and it was the "government" who was organizing it all. It is not soo simple as to rise up today, as it takes a MONUMENTAL amount of citizens to rise in unison. I grant to you that far, far, FAR too many are unwilling to do so, but it is not so simple as that. . We have learned that there is a MASSIVE number of sheep in this America and the Western World. They thought that "2 weeks to flatten the curve" was reasonable, and it actually was. What they did NOT realize, nor did anyone else, that there was a MUCH larger plan at work and took another 6 mo. for that to only BEGIN to become clear. I do think that there is a HUGE number of people who have reached near wits end, but the organization necessary to "reverse" what is happening, to use language that won't trigger my comment to be removed, is infinitely more difficult now than it was when England would have to send SHIPS to sail for America to put down the rebellion. They need only stop them from coming ashore to win that fight. . It is a very different country today and while I freely admit we do not have the balls to do what must be done, apparently... neither do you 🐱
    1
  1746. ​ @johnulmer6715  ... And what would you have me do? I don't disagree that the cult MUST be stopped, but what needs to be done, will take a MASSIVE uprising of those willing to sacrifice everything. . Early in 2020, I received a jury duty notification. I contacted the clerk and told her that I was unwilling to wear a Covid mask, may I reschedule. She gave me an extension, which ended up being 6 mo. I reached out to her again, after that time and reiterated my position. She said you will HAVE to wear a mask, because you will not get another extension. I told her in no uncertain terms, that I would NEVER wear a Covid mask and was non-negotiable and a hill I was willing to die on. . After 5 or 6 emails back and forth of her continuing to apply legal pressure to force compliance with mask mandates, she forwarded all of my communications to a judge. In them, I told her that I would show up at the courthouse for jury duty, should I be required to, but when if those at the door demanded I wear a mask, I would again refuse. In those emails, I said that the cops would have to come to my home, kick down my door and take me by force, for a contempt of court violation, which would be the case, should I NOT appear in the room for jury duty. I said that If I go to jail, I will NOT wear a mask and this remains 100% non-negotiable. . The judge released me, because he / she was not willing to challenge my position and risk the mess I would absolutely make over the BS mask mandates. . Before you tell me I am unwilling to do what it takes to fight back, I would ask that you know more about me, prior to doing so. . Peace, John 🐈
    1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. ​ @tolstoyed  yes and and no. I would agree that being gay is not a decision, but party affiliation is more akin to how one legislatively supports their values. Those values are generally instilled by parents, other family members and close friends as one grows up. There are certainly some changes to those values due to events in one's life, but I would say the most basic values one has are quite universal. . I would add that Conservatives and Democrats have traditionally shared very similar values, but as mentioned above, the difference is best identified by how one feels those values should be expressed or written into legislation. After all, the purpose of government is to write and enforce laws to protect its citizens. Creating / supporting an infrastructure of roads, police, fire stations and the like is something that a conservative would be MUCH more likely to argue is enough than a Democrat which, as I go on, will become more clear. However, this is where the significant differences lie within the Republican and Democratic parties. . I am going to be quite general here, but I could go back and site a huge number of times when the following was found to be true. Let's take "Affirmative Action" as a VERY good example. The idea, in its conception, was a really good one and would argue that the vast majority of GOP would agree with that statement. The difference between Conservatives and Democrats on this point has become VERY clear over the years since it was implemented. There was most certainly a time when a very large portion of America was bigoted against blacks. While there certainly are still some that feel this way (we have 330+ million people here), those numbers have dropped INSANELY since the civil rights laws of the sixties were enacted. However, there comes a time when one must remove the "training wheels" and ride that bike with the risk of falling. . Affirmative Action today, has become a limitation that is HURTING blacks... YES, it is most definitely hurting blacks. When we as a people continue to support or make laws that say to someone "you need my help to make it in this world, so we are not going to remove those training wheels". At what point do those training wheels prohibit the rider of that bike to becoming a contestant in the X-Games? A: as soon as one is able to ride that bike without them! If you don't give somebody the opportunity to fail and protect them with the "security" of training wheels, they will NEVER, EVER, EVER reach their potential, because those training wheels are indeed holding them back. . If I was to continually remind you, that "you need my help because the the world is against you", you create a person who will ultimately rely on that help and come to feel he or she will absolutely fail without it. So, over the many, many years of Affirmative Action, we get excuses from both blacks that have not been as successful as desired and Democrats that will point to those training wheels and say.... "See.... this is why we need to add an additional set of training wheels to offer more help". If you ever want to crush the human spirit, tell that person you will NEVER make it on your own without my help! . This becomes a circular argument and we have the perpetuation of "help" and one cannot be inspired by success and grab opportunities to achieve ones dreams. If ANYONE has continually had a "safety net", at what point does that person feel he or she has been a success and feel a sense of pride in their own accomplishments? After all, what is so impressive about a tight-rope walker crossing a wire 1000 feet off the ground, were it not for the possibility that he or she would ABSOLUTELY die, should even the smallest mistake be made and fall from that wire? . We can all say what an incredible act of balance and concentration, but if there was a safety net below and that tight-rope walker could not possibly be harmed by falling, exactly how much pride will he or she feel to make it to the opposite building and how many of us would be impressed by such success...? pretty much none!
    1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. ​ @Dave Logic Oh my God... are you really going to make that as an argument to say we aren't a free nation? How does it feel to straw-man those of whom you have disagreement and think to yourself... "gotcha"? . Your opening statements about legislative mandates about items we can no longer or must use, are anecdotal evidence of the Constitutional Republic in which we have chosen to live under in this country. Those items are derived from legislation that those in this country either voted for directly or elected the politicians that wrote, created and passed that legislation into law. I am not going to address whether it is or is not a good to have those specific regulations, but in the end, WE as a people are responsible for passing that legislation. Call us stupid for supporting these people, but we decided AS FREE PEOPLE to believe that these changes would be an improvement to our world. If we were lied to by those seeking power or just ignored evidence to the contrary, WE ultimately voted to take those freedoms away. We have speed limits on roads to keep people from doing 55 mph in a school zone.... is that an example of a nation that is not free or is it a common sense law for the safety of children walking to school? Damn it is annoying to dumb down the conversation to address the straw-man argument.... jheez! . As for the 77% of people who voluntarily censor themselves because of cancel culture, those people ARE free... they just fear repercussions of speaking up. Freedom is not "free" and freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. Cancel culture exists because of POS SJW's who are petrified of actually engaging in discussion with those of whom they have disagreement. Cancel culture is a mob of virtual thugs who use intimidation as a means to force compliance and create a fear of practicing our freedoms. They are exactly the same as a gang of thugs that would hold you at gunpoint to steal your wallet, except they do it within the anonymity of the safety from behind a cell-phone! . Having to address your "arguments" is an exercise in the loss of brain cells.
    1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. ​ @InqvisitorMagnvs  ... What in the hell are you talking about? I am not here saying that gay people have not had a very difficult time getting to where the are today, in terms of acceptance. Nor am I making excuses for anyone who treated gays so poorly at any point in history. What I am saying is that we, as humans have evolved over time and the overwhelming majority got over the bigotry and hatred of gay people and we as a nation are much better off for it. Are there still some who don't like gays...? Absofreakinglutely! we have 330+m people in America and you will NEVER see it bigotry, racist, white nationalist, homophobic or xenophobic 100% free as a nation.. EVER. Guess what, people are free to hate gay people all they want, they are just not allowed to physically assault them or discriminate against them, based on being gay. Will some find a way around that and still not hire them for a job or fire them if they discover they are gay..? YES! Some people are just NEVER going to be OK with gay people and that is just not going to change. . What I am getting out of the ​ @InqvisitorMagnvs statement is what I hear from the SJW's as an argument to "cancel" a person or group. Since at one point the GOP were VERY much anti-gay in nearly all ways, so was a massive amount of Democrats, libertarians, communists, socialists and fascists at one point. The SJW will argue that since this is the case, any such "group" who was anti-gay, is forever guilty by association and is therefore irredeemable. Guess what, Trump is the VERY FIRST president to ever enter office and be pro-gay marriage on the day he was inaugurated. That's right... Obama, Clinton and 100% of every president that America has ever had, was ANTI gay marriage when they entered the White House. . The vast majority of people in ALL of the groups I mentioned above, have come to understand what the gay people were saying from the start. They are just like everyone else, they just happen to be romantically attracted to persons of their own sex. One of the often irrational fears we possess as human creatures, is to fear what we don't understand. That fear has historically caused people to respond in ways that seemed rational at the time to most, but many times proved to be wrong as we came to know or understand what it was that we feared so badly. Those who are not gay, including myself, simply cannot understand what it is like to be gay and that "unknown" was enough to instill an irrational fear in far too many people and the gay community payed dearly for it. The acceptance of gay people has come LIGHT YEARS from those early days and some of it was triggered by AIDS, as it was killing people and they were nearly all in the gay community. We don't hear about AIDS much at all anymore, but I remember the fear of not knowing ANYTHING about it, except that those who got it died a very slow and painful death. That fear made it MUCH worse for the gay community, as it created a trigger response of survival in much of America. . This is not a "GOP" thing... a "Democrat" thing or an "any" thing other than a psychological response to an irrational fear of something we just don't really understand as straight people. If you ask evolutionary biologist, they will tell you that such instincts were born of early man who had to hide from animals in caves to avoid being lunch. Those instincts are STILL within us and cause us to respond in ways that later prove to be irrational. In the early days of man, not taking EXTREME caution, could very well cost you your life. The survival instinct is built in our DNA and you can blame our creator for that one. . I am not excusing anyone for perpetuating hate against gay people, just saying that humans are far from perfect, but we have grown as a people. While Ben is a associated with the GOP, he was not in political power looking to deny rights to gay people when Reagan was president. While he is "less tolerant" than many, he is a HELL of a lot more accepting of gays than the vast majority of people 50 years ago.
    1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. ​ @Player_Review  ... There is a lot to unpack there, but will give it a go :) . Yes, the idea of "tolerance" was absolutely omitted from the WOKE handbook, as was discussion, debate, conversation or acceptance of ANY view other than its own. I do see the SJW ideology as not only a cult, but it is absolutely EVIL! The moderate Dem's, and their certainly are, have no spine, because they are afraid to speak up against the outrage mob. Even the very left leaning Nancy Pelosi stood up against the squad initially and said she would NOT attempt impeachment of Trump, as their was ZERO bi-partisan support and such an act would be very divisive for the nation. She was absolutely correct, but caved because she is weak. . Then, Pelosi went serious for impeachment 2 more times while STILL having nothing to stand on, except Orange Man Bad and the Dem's forced a vote. Everybody with a microscopic brain knew it was gonna fail, but they just want a black mark on Trump. This leads us to everything else the Dem's are doing. They have NO strategy for anything, they just want to hurt Trump, so they resort to the most insanely petty BS imaginable and just keep throwing everything, including the kitchen sink up against the wall to see what sticks. Well, nothing has stuck, but that doesn't stop them and THIS leads us into mainstream media. . I would argue that the mainstream media is 100% as evil as the SJW, but in many ways they are even worse. Since they back 100% of ANYTHING the Dem's do or say, it has emboldened them to go for impeachment like 6 times (3 times quite serious) and keep looking for that one thing to "stick" on the wall. We have heard the Dem's call Pres. Trump a racist, white nationalist, xenophobe, bigot, sexist and literally every single negative slur they can think of, yet offer ZERO to substantiate any of it. Well, they may be able to make a case for being a lousy husband or objectify women, but unfortunately, that is all too common with very rich and powerful men... sad, but true. . The thing is, one cannot find evidence of racism and all the rest, because THERE IS NONE! They take EVERYTHING he ever says out of context and lie about everything else. Hell, I could go on for about 200 more paragraphs, but my computer will run out of ink before I get them all down.... lol . The GOP is every bit as weak as the moderate Democrats and Trump is the ONLY thing between BLM, Antifa, the SJW's, the Demoncrats, big tech, all social media and the mainstream mediocre... did I forget anybody? The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence and Ten Commandments are under FULL ASSAULT right now. Trump is the last line of defense before it is all destroyed by the leftist being allowed, even supported by many people in VERY powerful positions. If he loses in November, this country will absolutely go to full gun fighting in the streets civil war. There are what, 200m fire arms owned by American citizens and like 12 quantillion rounds of ammo and the 2a members of this country, WILL take a stand against socialism. Socialism is what the leftist wants and I would rather be dead than live under a socialist America.
    1
  1921. ​ @matthewdavis3014  A. you do understand their are exceptions to every rule, right? B. The definition I am using for "leftist" may differ from yours. The "leftist", often called an SJW and I agree with that assessment, is also sometimes called a progressive. I personally use it as a derogatory term for an EXTREME left-leaning person who is entirely incapable of thinking outside of the cult. The cult says that you can be all for LGBTQ, but if say the following... "A woman is a biological female and a man cannot become a biological female" and you are "denying trans peoples right to exist". That statement is 100% fact, BTW. . If you believe a man CAN become a biological female or argue is NO difference between a male and female, you are a "leftist" as defined above. I have defined it in earlier comments within this thread as well. If you also are friends with a conservative, I have a couple things to add. You are the exception to the rule and you had better not go on Twitter and admit this to your circle of friends. It has been well documented that even commenting on a thread of a conservative, will make you guilty by association and likely get the outrage mob to target you for cancellation. If that sounds harsh, you are damned right it is harsh and I know of plenty of people who were convicted of "wrong think" by the SJW or "leftist" and been assaulted, harassed, had their place of employment bombarded with messages and phone calls saying that person is a racist and lost their jobs. They have been doxed and otherwise been VERY badly financially harmed, because of political disagreement with the SJW. The SJW cult is pure EVIL and it knows only how to destroy and nothing about actually sitting down with opposing points of view and discussing possible compromise or understanding of the nuance or context in a given argument. . However, if you are willing to "openly affiliate" with a conservative and you have multiple pronouns in the bio of your social media accounts, you had better not invite that person to your like minded friends house for dinner... lol . NOTE: Conservative: Not someone who is slightly to the right of Nancy Pelosi, but a moderate conservative, such as Ben Shapiro. Anyone who thinks Ben Shapiro is Alt-right... is most definitely a leftist
    1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. ​ @colmodwyer9352  .. maybe he does, but it is his right to feel that way. Just as it is your right to be for that marriage. The idea of 1a and freedom in general, is to see that ALL rights are observed and protected. Since many, including Ben, believe the fundamental function of marriage is to procreate and two same-sex people cannot possibly do this, he is opposed to it. He does not want gay people to die, be sent to jail or re-education camps to "be straight", he just doesn't agree with gay relationships. As mentioned earlier, I have zero issues with gay relationships or marriage, but I respect his right to disagree with me and I am a Ben Shapiro fan and sub his channel :) . EDIT: I believe that the biggest hurdle here is the word "marriage". Since marriage is spoke of in the bible and in the context of a man and woman, that SPECIFIC word has a vastly spiritual meaning and goes back what, 10K years? The crux of this argument for a HUGE swath of religious persons, is the use of "marriage" in the biding of two same sex persons. One can argue that gays have a right to marriage, but since that word is so integrated into the bible and its teachings, it really cannot be separated. Many see the term "marriage" as a religious bond and hence many are just not going to approve of "gay marriage". . We can fight about this for the next 10K years and ONLY way most churches are gonna be OK with this, is if a word other than "marriage" is used to bind a same sex couple. Call that unfair if you like, but you are pushing against 10K years of those who follow some version of the bible and good luck trying to change their minds.
    1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. ​ @QueenJneeuQ  I guess to this one specific instance, that word would be applicable to some. I, however, wont use that word, because it is to all encompassing a term, IMO. . Every single person reading this has bias or preference in one way or another about something. You may be 100% fine with gay and lesbian, but take issue with someone going through transition surgery. Does that make you a bigot or just having a line of which you no longer approve. To me, I draw the line of "bigot" in terms of how one feels or treats the subject in question. If you were as I described above, but did not "hate" or show anger / malice toward someone who transitioned, but rather just did not approve, would that make you a bigot...? to me it would not. I see bigotry as in malice or hatred in ones heart, not disagreement on how another makes life choices. . Such terms are too broad and is one of my biggest issues with the SJW cult. The thinking, as evidenced by countless attacks on social media, cancellations and absolutely vile assaults of both physical and psychological attacks on someone for disagreement is insane. Earlier in this thread I used the former Democratic Pete Buttigieg as an example of how the "gay community" (SJW's who have decided they speak for LGBTQ people) said he was not "gay enough" to run for president. Imagine that... the first openly gay person to EVER run for the office of president and he was "cancelled". . Was this the act of self-righteous activists who are 100% convinced they know what is best for the "gay community" or bigotry? It was damned sad, that is for sure :(
    1
  1928. ​ @mellowtron214  ... Well, we are getting more into discussing semantics and that can only lead us astray... lol . Yes, we are speaking in "general" terms here. There are most certainly exceptions to EVERYTHING any of us have said in this thread. But, we are all adults and to constantly qualify every single statement with.... "I am generalizing here and don't speak for 100% of all who consider themselves FILL IN THE BLANK politically affiliated" is, or rather should be beneath the level of discourse we are having here. . Yes... I am thankful that the extreme die-hard leftists are a "minority", when it comes to actual numbers. But, when we look out the window or see the events unfolding all over this nation and most specifically, Portland, we can see that minority is on 100% full attack against EVERYTHING upon which this country was built. The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence and The Ten Commandments are under MAJOR ASSAULT and this cannot possibly be denied by ANY person who actually sees what is happening in this nation. . While they are a minority, they have nearly full support of mainstream media, those in academia, Democratic mayors / city leaders and the Democratic party. There are certainly MANY in each of those groups who are VERY MUCH OPPOSED to what BLM, Antifa and others are doing, they are absolutely SILENT! They are silent because they are either spineless or in the vast majority of cases, fear retribution by the outrage mob on Twitter. We saw only last week that the NYT's was planning to run an article exposing the town in which Tucker Carlson lives. We absolutely know that such information will be read by supporters of BLM and Antifa and begin to track down the specifics of where Tucker Carlson lives. They will absolutely and without shadow of a doubt, search public documents of town records and figure out his home address. Antifa and or BLM will without question show up at his house and threaten him and his family, because they disagree with his politics. This is a fear tactic and the leftists have no issue stooping to this level. . While there are a handful of those on the alt-right who would do something similar, they are nowhere near the numbers of those on the left they would be 100% denounced by the GOP. We cannot say this about the Dem's or mainstream media. . Now, you and I are very likely in agreement about nearly all of this and most likely you did not me to say all of the above. However, there are many in this thread who would say that I am "fear mongering" or "an alt-right extremist", but I am neither of these things. I am a libertarian / moderate conservative who 100% believes in the founding principles of the democratic party. From there, we will differ in many ways politically, but I want us ALL to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
    1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. ​ @beesdontlikeit  You are not listening to me :) I have given you a VERY clear definition of whom I am referring and by the definition I am using. There is a clear distinction between "Left" and "leftist". Now, you may not agree with that distinction and it appears that you don't, but that is 100% fine. However, having made that distinction to frame my position, it is a failed argument on your part to conflate the two so as to support your assertion that I am generalizing the left...that is pure BS. . I follow ALL media, but do my best to avoid propaganda. That is EXTREMELY difficult, when one consumes CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and most mainstream media, as they have become left-leaning bias to an absolutely absurd degree. I have no issue with media that has a biased point of view, as it is not possible to avoid bias, as we all have them about varying things. However, when the bias of ANY news organization has become so accepting that it becomes the "facts" of an event, that is when I can no longer follow, because the reporting has no objectivity remaining. . If I had the time or inclination, I could LINK for you a thousand articles of pure garbage passed as "fact" by leftist new organizations (see "leftist" as I define in earlier comment), but I will give to you one that perfectly describes how widespread and bad it gets.... "Covington kids". The media intentionally and will extreme malice, painted those kids, and most specifically, Nick Sandmann as a racist and bigot. . I don't fear a "boogyman" in leftist media, I fear those who believe the trash they sell is true!
    1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. This thread has produced 133 replies and just like the current state of politics has become tribal and lost focus: My OP: . Ben is orthodox Jew. Completely opposed to gay marriage, yet good friends with Dave Ruben who has a husband. The Leftist claim tolerance, but would NEVER befriend a conservative . Let's break this down, shall we?: 1. Ben is an orthodox Jew : This orthodoxy simply put does not accept a person being gay as a sexual relationship is to be between a man & woman 2. Completely opposed to gay marriage : We could pick this apart, but is a simple way to say that Ben has issues with two members of the same sex engaging in sexual conduct. ....Now, regardless of specific language used or semantics I used, it is a simple way to explain that the "human being" Ben Shapiro has some major issues with gay relationships. 3. yet good friends with Dave Ruben who has a husband : What is "good friends"? we all define differently, suffice to say, they are 100% cordial and here Ben is at ....Dave's house having a pleasant conversation about politics and social issues. Those issues are completely intertwined and the conversation takes no issue with Dave being gay ....or Ben having an issue "making a cake" or "going to his wedding". Those are not relevant issues here, as neither Dave nor Ben define their friendship over who they have sexual ....relationships with. Ben has said that he would be happy to have Dave and his husband over to the Shapiro home for dinner, but his religious doctrine precludes him from going to ....a wedding between a same sex couple. I personally define this as "good friends", but describe it however you like. 4. The Leftist claim tolerance : This is where much of this thread has broken down, IMO. The term "leftist" is a common term that is used to describe a politically left leaning person ....who is on the far end of that political spectrum and often referred to as "progressive". The term "progressive" is supposed to be a positive one and meaning forward thinking and ....accepting society as it has become and outside of the "conservative" definition of how that society should be built. The accepted conservative definition of society is built on ....what is derived from the bible. This is a basic reference to the era in which the Ten Commandments were written. 5. _ but would NEVER befriend a conservative_ : The term "leftist" or use "progressive" if you like, is certainly a derogatory term, as "Progressives" continually say they are "inclusive" ....of ALL people. Gay, black, white, trans... you name it. The SJW is using the basic principles of the Democratic or liberal party, but twisting it into what can ONLY be described as .... a cult. The SJW has taken to redefining a shit-ton of words, but let's just focus on "racism". Since I am referring to the SJW in this part of my OP, this is where much of this ....conversation has gone astray, IMO. Racism does NOT mean "power + privilege". This is a complete lie, as it means to judge one based on his / her race and deem that race as ....inferior or superior because of their race. THAT is the basic definition of "racism" and how the world has defined it for 10,000 years. That definition is used by the SJW to define ....nearly every single person who has ANY disagreement with it's ideology and deem that person as "racist". This term is interchanged with "white supremacist" "homophobic" ...."xenophobic" and all other descriptive words that tell the listener, "this person has very narrow views of society and intolerant of one who does not follow the teachings of the ....bible" Simply put, as I am not a religious scholar :) While the SJW keeps using terms of "inclusive", they and those I describe as "leftist", have ZERO tolerance for Ben Shapiro, ....because they just put him into the box of "evil". There is no conversation allowed in the world of and SJW, you either believe 100% of what they say or you are a "racist" and so ....on. The SJW has also deemed Dave Rubin as all of those terms, because he has merely associated with people OUTSIDE of who the SJW deems as acceptable. Acceptable is ....ONLY defined by the SJW and is re-defined continuously based on the moment. The SJW cannot be called "tolerant' as Dave Rubin has been deemed an evil person, because he ....associates with people who are not SJW's. I could pick apart and destroy SJW cult, but since I would offer disagreement to the conversation, "cancellation" is the only answer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Now, what I have done in the above is freaking RIDICULOUS, yet many in this thread have gone WAY beyond what was said or meant with the original post. Ben and Dave have many significant political differences and one very distinct one, that have traditionally precluded a conversation like we see in the above video. However, they are having that conversation, because they can see beyond those differences and work toward a common goal. The SJW or leftist will NEVER discuss anything with either of these men, because they don't "bend the knee" to the whims of SJW cult. That makes the self-proclaimed "inclusive and tolerant" SJW, exactly the opposite. If you DON'T think SJW is a cult, just take a look at the "peaceful" protesters who want to KILL every police officer in this country... no exceptions.. they are all deemed EVEL... period!
    1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. ​ @ottz2506  ... There was probably the consideration of how people will respond to him holding his husbands hand in public, but that is just part and parcel of being gay on this planet. Just because someone takes a long stare or disagrees with the way he lives his life, does NOT mean that he will be treated any less poorly by all. Some will, sure... because we have 330M+ people in this country and not all of them are going to accept a person being anything but straight and go to church every Sunday morning. . Who knows exactly ALL of the reasons Dave moved to the local he chose. Maybe he just likes the area... maybe it is close to a school he likes, because he has talked of bringing a child into his life at some point. Maybe he has some friends that live in the area and this was the perfect residence to not only live, but build the home studio he really wants to continue his podcasts. Whatever the reason, I am not going to break it all down to find some hidden ulterior motive in which to ascribe some hidden agenda or nefarious intent for him choosing to live in this particular part of Florida or attempt to slide under the radar of those who would not approve of his being gay. Besides, why does this have to be a "deep red" or "deep blue" issue? . As I have mentioned in another comment just earlier today, may even be in this thread... I don't recall, those seeking to be around ONLY those who feel specifically as they do in all things, leads directly to an echo chamber and any thinking / rational person on this earth, includes you and I, realize that such a decision can only lead to more division amongst us. Comifornia, and particularly where Dave used to live, is EXCEEDINGLY far left and ruled by emperor Gavin Grewsom, as well as his local mayor, and he and his husband wanted to get the hell away from his authoritarian and hypocrisy of "do as I say, not as I do" BS. . He now lives in FL and under a governor who does not want to control his life, but rather leave it to his own decision. That means, Dave & Dave can continue with a life style they more or less had, prior to the sweep of authoritarian rule not only accepted by far, far, FAR too many people in Comifornia, but actively sought by those who hold the reins of power there. . After having seen a few videos of Dave from FL, I can see that it agrees with him and am as happy as I can be for his new found joy in living. I will not look upon his move and apply some deceit or attempt to lie to those in his subscriber base, it seems as though YOU do, but rather as what was best for him and his husband :) . Peace to you, Ottz :)
    1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. ​ @TheHigherVoltage  ... I really don't know what you are going on about here. I never said there were no gay people or even that being gay is only a matter of choice, I said that it is not the natural order of nature, because nature has but ONE single function.... to reproduce itself. That does not disparage the L's, G's or B's, but to say that no matter how common, it is not a sustainable way to live, because we cannot successfully set out to create LGB's. What we CAN do, is project upon them, and this is called grooming! I am not saying that LGB's set out to groom, but the trans activist cult DOES! We can see this, because of "drag time story hour" and "child friendly drag shows", countless teachers on TikTok showing their pride flags, grade school libraries with a multitude of "Gender Queer" and the like books. Books that have cartoon images depicting VERY explicit acts and images of VERY adult activities. . I don't deny that gays or trans exist. I don't deny that there is some internal drive within them that moves them this direction. What I am saying, is that the OVERWHELMING number of "trans" we seen in the last 10 years or so are in very high numbers, due to social contagion. The trans activist will say... this is because trans is more acceptable today, as there were ALWAYS this many trans, but afraid to come out". Of course, in the very next sentence, they will say..."There is a trans genocide happening due to right wing extremists". . While you have not claimed this here, please tell me... WHERE is the evidence to support such a claim as a "trans genocide" happening? This is because there is NOT! The OVERWHELMING vast majority of trans who are killed are due to several self-inflicted means. They either were outcast for any number of reasons and on the streets sharing needles. They hook up with straight men and eventually the guy figures out he has been fooled, he freaks out and a crime of passion the trans is beaten or killed. I am not arguing that this is OK, only that if you EVER want to find a man at his most vulnerable, it is after an encounter he believes was with a female and turns out to be a guy. This is an EXPLOSIVE combination and nearly all of trans who are killed by straight people, were not done "because they are trans".. they were killed because they made a fool out of a man and he lost his sheet. Not saying that is right and not saying he should not face charges for any criminal activity. I am saying... you sleep with dogs, you wake up with fleas. When men successfully pass and fool a straight guy... he is BEGGING for trouble. . Everything else you said above is completely subjective. It is simply not possible to "measure" the female brain that has merged or otherwise grown within the male body. There are differences in size of the brain, on average and we know from 100K years that men and women "think" differently. However, we cannot plug a machine into a man, ask some questions and a machine print out.... "he has a female brain" or likewise for females. There are a BILLION factors that enter into the equation of how a male / female reacts to stimuli and I have ZERO doubt that more than a small amount is due to the creation of that brain, within the mother. However, if we look back at sociopaths, for example because criminals have been studied for hundreds of years.... the overwhelming number of them had very traumatic childhood events. Raised by an overbearing other or abusive father. . There is no reliable test for "being gay". Whether born, and I would argue that absolutely most are... or how much is a response to that billion factors AFTER that child reaches this earth. As for trans... an EXTREMELY high number of those who identify as trans today are 100% due to social contagion. The sad thing is, that those who are NOT subject to this, I can say Blaire White and Transpa are the most commonly known on social media, I would say... have proven to be the most likely of born with more than simple gender dysphoria, but some degree of alternate-sex brain chemistry at birth. This cannot be measured and I would not discount it as real. I have no issue at all with either and have been subd to Blaire for many years now. . My problem with 100% of this ENTIRE issue, is that children are being groomed for trans, by adults who project this upon them at a young age. Look at Jazz Jennings for the most famous example of our day. Jazz was FORCED to think he was a girl, but an absolutely EVIL mother! I don't know the roll of his father as much, but he was at the VERY LEAST, complicit and therefore guilty of the same evil. Jazz is MISERABLE and now that it has become so clear, he is not used as the high example of trans kids any longer. I have been subd, and currently moderate B-enjam-min -Boy-ce channel (disguising name, as YouTube may delete my comment) and have seen roughly 40~50 detrans and ALL of them say the same thing... they were groomed by society, internet, blogs and many by adults who projected trans upon them. By the time they see a therapist or counselor, they are so thoroughly convince of being trans... they cannot be talked out of it. I have seen many videos, Jeffery YouKnowWho is about as evil as they come, because he ACTIVELY recruits young teens to "talk in private", because "Their parents screwed up" . I could not care less how many gays, lesbians trans in this world, so long as they keep their influence away from OUR CHILDREN! . PS> The trans activist cult are, and I mean this in a VERY literal sense... parasites! The parasite requires a host, because it cannot reproduce and its species will die off without making more of its own kind. The trans activist has NO choice, but to find others to carry on the numbers as THIS is what nature does... continue its existence. Certainly not all trans are activists and if they just want to live their life, Blaire White and Transpa are perfect examples... right on!
    1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. The voting system needs some serious revision: 1. Person casting vote MUST present valid ID and sign as performed with witness on site to varify compliance to these stipulations 2. Set a 24 hour amount of time in which to cast ones vote. There are to be NO time zone considerations. 3. ZERO electronic counting machines that have or contain internet or wireless connection to ANY location outside of the physical placement of that machine 4. NO mail in voting, without a VERY strict chain of custody that is rigorously followed and for ONLY those who are infirmed or incapable of traveling to voting location 5. NO exit polling or release of tallied or counted votes, until AFTER the 24 hour period is over and voting has ended 6. Elimination of Gerrymandering districts as a means to isolate political affiliation 7. ALL votes that were done by other than in-person cast, WILL be opened, hand counted by a truly bi-partisan committee that is certified ONLY after a full counting has been done a second time, in reverse order . This will likely delay the vote count for possibly a few days or longer, but we MUST honor the Constitutional Republic and Electoral College to maintain the vision set forth by the founding fathers. Counting votes is the easiest thing in the world and has been overly complicated to an absolutely ABSURD degree and mostly by the Democratic side of the isle. It is simply impossible to remove 3 things from ANY equation... 1. Human error 2. Human ignorance 3. Human malice No such thing as perfect, but the above will eliminate the overwhelming vast majority of distrust in the process that we ALL have. Until such time that we all have faith in the vote, it is not possible to have a cohesive society that believes in and respects those who were placed in seats of the state.
    1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. ​ @AGJ117  ... lol... Just shows to go you how much energy I spend following her :) Well, maybe some other comments were as you described, but you were saying those in THIS thread were of that ilk. I have not appointed myself the arbiter of protecting the honor of those in this thread, but you came into it making claims of how essentially awful we are, because of double-standards or what not. What those say in this thread or outside of it, in regards to Cardi B, are of no concern, until you came in talking trash :) . I have a perfect right to support or condemn what Nicki, Cardi B or ANYONE says about anything, without obligation to believe, respect or have opinion on ANYTHING else they may say or do and I am not sure why you care so much. I also don't care if you or anyone else supports or condemns the vaccine. For what it is worth, I have no issue whatever with the vaccine, as it has clearly saved lives and certainly many from going through what can be a mild illness to death! I have chosen not to get the vaccine, because I have not taken a vaccine for ANYTHING in about 45 years. I certainly can be a bit stubborn, so that is obviously part of it... lol, but more so because I am just not one to take medications for occasional headache, Nyquil for occasional insomnia or any other preventative medications / remedies. I don't condemn anyone who does, this is just what I have decided for myself and don't care if you or anyone else approves / condemns it. There are those who have absolutely told me straight up that I am playing with fire, in regards to Covid and my refusal to get vaccine, but this is my life :) . If you have issues with those writing comments on this video, have at it. Just don't come into THIS one dumping vitriol as if we said those things. Kinda like the white knight analogy, because it is kinda funny, but that is not why I pushed back against you. I am one who happens to believe in "intellectual honesty". I am NOT saying you do or don't, but just how I conduct myself and when I get accused or seemingly so, of something I have said or done that is incorrect, I speak up about it. . To be clear, I have no problem with you and you can be critical all you like. Just if you are gonna criticize me... betta bring receipts :) . Peace, AG :)
    1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. ​ @friedchicken4735  .... I agree, except there WILL be problems. I am not a doctor, nor emergency person in any capacity, but there will be a time when certain injuries are going to be more life threatening, if the person hurt is male or female. . If not life threatening, an injury may be more "quality of life" related, depending on male or female. At some point, due to mass casualty situation, plane crash or something, and an emergency respondor will have to make a snap judgement on care for an person. Based on anatomical factors, a person who "appears" to be male or female, may not get immediate enough attention and suffer needlessly as a result. . This is all speculation on my part, but willing to bet this issue HAS come up and a less than ideal call was made in the field. This could be compounded, should an ID be an "X", "non-binary" or say "male", but actually be a pregnant female who "identifies" as male. Imagine the lawsuit that WILL happen, if a woman, who appears to be male, has the ID saying is male, but is only due to mastectomy or something. . This has probably already happened, but it absolutely WILL at some point and creating legal documentation stating the incorrect gender of a person can have some extremely negative consequences. Those consequences will cost the reputation of an emergency responder their job, reputation and maybe a lifetime of guilt for not figuring it out sooner at the time of the emergency. . So long as someone is a legal adult, I have zero issues with transition, but we are introducing complexities that we cannot yet imagine and legal documentation that is biologically wrong, compounds this further :( . PS> Here's a scenario. A responder sees an "X" on ID, but MUST be sure. Is that responder to visually inspect genitalia? Imagine the lawsuit that happens when an "X" person says they were "s*** assaulted" by that responder, because they visually checked or touched them between the legs? This sounds absolutely ridiculous, but this WILL happen at some point and will be a freaking mess of a legal situation. This is all because we want people to "feel" affirmed... SMFH!
    1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. ​ @DrMackSplackem  ... It is trouble for all of us! America was founded upon the idea of discourse and debate, to resolve disagreement. There have been 2 fundamental changes that have taken root of society and they are coming from the political left, but instigated by the Marxist cult. The first is a wholesale abandoning of even the most basic values that act as a glue to hold a society together. The second is the steadfast refusal to engage in good faith discussion / debate to resolve our differences. . There are many examples, but one that is at the heart of a split in the Democrats and GOP is the issue of abortion. There has always been a rift on this issue, but the common "value" we all shared, was "safe, legal and rare". There were some, even many, on the farther right, who have and always will be pro-life in nearly if not all circumstances. Those people have always voiced that opinion, but it has and is still shared by a number of states. While they have always voiced this position, from a federal position, the "safe, legal and rare" model was doable, though far from what they wanted. Now, we have the far left (MarxistCrats) who have quite literally taken over the Democratic party, over the last 8 years or so. These are the counter to those on the far right, who have also abandoned "safe, legal and rare" to adopt... "on demand". While there are certainly fewer numbers of the on-demand supporters than pro-life absolutists, it seems to come from a position of spite for most. . This leads us to the steadfast refusal to engage issue. Why it is the Democratic party has chosen "trans" to be the hill they ABSOLUTELY want to die on, is beyond comprehension. Back in the '80's, I saw this movement and was for gay rights. The LGB's did not want ANY special rights, just basic ones afforded to us all. They wanted legal rights, as a long-term man / woman would have, in the event of hospital visits / decisions and insurance, but the second was marriage. I understand that the term "marriage" is CRITICAL for most on both sides, but since the term "marriage" is well defined in the Bible, there are those on the moderate right who will always oppose that term, being applied to same-sex couples. Again, I understand why the term "marriage" is so attractive / appealing, but imagine how much smoother this would have all gone if some other word was willing to be used. The term "marriage" is so connected to the Bible and those on the right, this will NEVER be a compromise that the GOP will embrace. . I don't want to to any farther off the path, but you get the point. Hotez will NOT discuss / debate his ideas, because he considers his opinion to be morally superior, so to even debate them is to be beneath him! I do get the "debate" aspect of it, as Mehdi Hassan is excellent at debate, but only because he uses an approach that is in EXTREMELY bad faith. He wrote a book titled "How To Win Every Argument". Imagine the self-righteousness of one to think that he / she has the right opinion 100% of the time? Imagine the arrogance of holding an opinion that CANNOT be influenced by any argument or introduction of facts, logic or information. . THAT is the definition of the MarxistCrat and why this is trouble for us all! Those who feel such a way have COMPLETELY taken over the Democratic party and are completely consumed by the idea that the are 100% firmly and totally on "the right side of history". We have seen it countless times when senators are posing questions that expose the extreme cognitive dissonance of leftists and like a broken record, they simply repeat the dogma. . A national divorce will NEVER work, because any agreement that would stand the test of time, requires "good faith". The MarxistCrat who WILL drive the Democrats decisions to the extreme left will not have equal numbers on the extreme right, so compromise would be impossible. The marxistCrat will NOT compromise on anything, so it is simply not possible to negotiate in good faith. . ..... welcome to Hotez who hides behind people like Hassan to protect him from defending his ideas.
    1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. ​ @michaelbarker6460  ... Since this comment is not "@" anyone, I am going to figure it is to me, so will address it. It is a fair question you ask, because 100% of the people who have ever existed on this earth , does indeed have a bias. Yes. if someone says something that is true, it is and will forever be true, so to condemn both Sam and Neil as I have, is not a valid excuse to dismiss them entirely. My concern is the very obvious corruption that has forced Sam, to abandon the core values I had heard him speak about multiple times... free speech and NDT to abandon biology, to appease the WOKE cult. . Sam recognizes that free speech is a most core value, as we cannot debate things, if someone with the ability to control the dissemination of information, has deemed someone as NOT WORTHY of free speech. Both Sam and the overwhelming number of social media and big tech platforms have done precisely that . Twitter DELETED a sitting POTUS account (Trump), due to the internal decisions they made, to "decide" that he is not worthy of free speech. They had determined that since they do not like what he said about "A", he is therefore unworthy to be heard to speak about "B". Several of the mainstream legacy news media (Maddow on MSNBC spoke of this directly) opted NOT to carry Trumps weekly, I think it was, talks with reporters, saying... [paraphrasing] .."if Trump says something of importance, we will carry the press conference". Well, talk about the GD'd frigging arrogance for MSNBC to be the SOLE arbiter of the worthiness that the world should or should not hear, what a sitting POTUS has to say! This is the epitome of hubris, yet this is totally common place and accepted practice of the vast majority of platforms. . Gotten a bit off track, but only to show that some bias are carried to the extreme and they have the ability to KEEP people from hearing them. In the case of Sam and NDT, I have chosen to personally no longer follow anything they have to say, because the corruption of absolutely core principles have been abandoned. I have no power to stop them from sharing that information, nor would I do so had I the means. Neither are wrong about the truth they tell, but since Sam cares about free speech, until it is Trump and NDT only cares about biology, when it no longer is politically expedient to do so... I will have nothing to do with either. . A bit long winded, as well as sidetracked, but I think that answers your question. If not, do chime back in, as I am always willing to have a good faith discussion with anyone about anything 😸
    1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. ​ @iuvalclejan  .. Sorry.... I blurted out the "Conversion Therapy" banner, but failed to make it clear.. my bad 😿 . I figure you already know what Conversion Therapy is, so will get to how it relates to the podcast I was moderating yesterday. The guest was speaking largely about the WPATH files recently released and how the doctors there were discussing things the overwhelming number of us were concerned about, but denied was the case for years. Because the guest of the podcast, was sharing information that is NOT welcome here, it is my assumption, that somebody saw this "in progress" podcast in their recommends, opened it up, was ideologically opposed to what the guest was saying, so reported the podcast to YouTube. . YouTube then applies that banner just below video and above the description for all to see. We are VERY familiar with the "CDC one for Covid", "Jan. 6th insurrection" BS and there are a few others. Never seen a "Conversion Therapy" prior, but had a single sentence that says the following..." The Trevor Project: Conversion therapy refers to a range of dangerous and discredited practices aimed at changing one’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression." . This topic nor these words were ever mentioned on the podcast, yet this banner is a "threat" to the creator he / she is getting close to unacceptable content and seeking to create bias and or fear, in a user who sees the video, as if the content were promoting or recommending it. Truly vile such a thing was done, but such is life as a wrong-thinker on this platform. . Yes. I am aware of multiple means to disguise my words, but of course, none of them are because of threats, cursing or calls for [bad+things+people], but rather just those things we cannot say because protected class feelings. I have been reminded of the "sort" button again and how it is used to DIRECTLY shadow-ban comments and how many of mine I have been able to see, that I was POSITIVE were removed. Of course, the default setting is "Top Comments", when it is "New Comments" that displays those hidden comments. Even within the replies of a thread, comments reappear with this setting. . I now moderate 5 channels, as YouTube has banned me from chat rooms in EVERY ONE, except those I moderate. This drove me to actually ask 2 creators to make me moderator, JUST so I can be seen in chat room. Most others that work initially (open "Participants" 3 dots above chat window) I will be listed for about 10 minutes and... POOF! While I can still see all looks normal, refresh the page, check participants and I am no longer listed. 90% of my regular comments are auto-removed, because I am on the radar. . In addition to blocking my being seen in chat, YouTube ALSO, removes ALL of my chats that have scrolled up off the window, once I have been blocked. So, unless one scrolls up to previous chats and LOOKS for me, they will never even know I was present. I am pretty sure this translates to the chat replay as well, but not sure. I have a Wordpad mapped to my "F4" key, so I back up EVERY comment that comes within 500 miles of wrong-think, in the event I refresh and... POOF! I can encrypt and try again. I have several threads going right now, where the person pressing [you know what thinking] replies to me directly and when I retort... POOF! This makes it appear I am ducking after someone "owned me". . Very frustrating to be here.
    1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. ​ @JohnCarterRocks  ... Again with a simple accusation, but nothing else. Tell me HOW... "Trump just attacked Hispanics by illegally making the conditions harsh for small children and women"? You mean by separating the adult male from the others that may be in a group to determine if this man IS the head of the family? To make sure he is not a mule or kidnapped them to escape a criminal past or maybe drug dealing? You do realize that when a man is arrested for drunk driving and has his family in the car, the police separate them... right? They don't get to be by his side for the process of being jailed an tested... right? . Why don't you ACTUALLY say something of substance, rather than just throwing out an accusation? You say the border has always been secure? You mean like when Biden opened it up 1.5 years ago and allowed thousands of people to live in squalor and dirt under a bridge in Texas? Do you have any IDEA how close we were to a humanitarian crisis there? It would have taken only one child to be playing in a puddle of water that had run off from a stream where feces and urine were exposed. How long before deadly pathogens could have spread throughout that entire population? They were there for It think 2 weeks with no showers or proper sanitary facilities for such a number. Is America just to set up a MASSIVE area in which to allow endless numbers of people to waltz over and come on in? . There is not ONE nation on earth who does not seek to protect its boarders, if they plan on having a secure country. I really enjoy conversing with those whose best response is.."I know you are, but what am I?" . Peace, Christos 🐱 PS> My second favorite thing, is when those who write comments are the very first to give it a 👍
    1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. ​ @Goulash45  ... Dude.. for the love of God.... it was irresponsible to make such a statement. This was not two people talking on the phone. This was not a guy at a party talking to a group of people that had a few too many drinks. This was guy with a huge following of very loyal subs in which he has quite a bit of influence. Just like a Steven Crowder... Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson. The context in which he made that statement was to possibly incite violence, because he has a lot of people who listen to what he has to say and, while it is not be fair, he MUST consider what one of them might do in such an emotionally charged condition. . You can claim he was joking or didn't really mean it or point to a definition or description on the internet... I don't care. I think he got exactly what he deserved, but I will certianly argue, that had this been identical scenario, but was a libertarian or conservative creator and not a leftist... the punishment would have been far more severe, as the channel would likely be removed. . Ethan got at minimum what he deserved. Hopefully, he will be more careful with what he says going forward. . EDIT: Let me clarify here. Even though, I 100% believe that a conservative would have gotten a much harsher penatly for saying this, I am not advocating that Ethan lose his channel over, as that would be an over-reaction. I am a free speech absolutist and is specifically as it relates to 1a. I want to hear what even the most extreme left, right or whatever someone things / believes, as I feel that allowing such ideas to the light of scrutiny would be far more beneficial than booting someone off of a platform, so they go underground to create an echo chamber of others who also may have anti-social opinions or views. .  Can we be done with this now, please?
    1
  2330. 1
  2331. ​ @Goulash45  ... OMG... lol. I was just making a joke because I saw that someone was being called a "contrarian" :) Didn't even know it was me... lol. . I have never, nor would I ever claim to NOT have a bias. Of course... I have a bias, just as you and everyone else does. However, that bias does not make anything I said not factual. . it is certainly a matter of opinion as to how much sarcasm, twinkle in the eye Ethan had when he suggested someone should bomb the building, but that is not the point. One cannot go into an airport an even in the most silly or joking ways, suggest someone should bomb the place. In the same manner, one cannot suggest one "harm" POTUS either. . Ethan said something that should NEVER be joked about when speaking about a CURRENT situation with the amount of intense emotional feeling as was the case when he said it. As mentioned already... he was speaking off the cuff and not caught up in the moment, but it is STILL inciting a violent act. He was talking to many thousands of people at the time and was a very irresponsible thing to say. . Do I think he should go to prison... hell no! Do I think he gave more than .2 nano's of consideration before he said that... hell no! Doesn't matter... he STILL he must be conscious of what he is saying, who is listening and the state of tension that was existing at the time. . I argue my position not from one that is looking to be right or seek a "gotcha" moment (I am not accusing you of saying that I am). I don't even argue from an ideological position, I say what I understand to be facts of an event and apply the most intellectually honest and good faith argument I can to whoever cares to listen. . If I am wrong... I will own it. This is not about what Ethan was thinking when he said this, it is about being responsible for the things he says. THIS was the wrong thing to say... period.
    1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344.  @totorosghost  .... (trying again)..... Seems you continue to read a LOT into at least my comment(s). If you have not already, expand them and see each one of my replies, as I have been not only consistent, but have not gone beyond my OP. Like everyone else in this thread, I have a TON of disagreements, push-back and more, for many positions I have heard / seen her support / praise. . However, while ALL of those things were, are and remain true, she has been willing to not only accept a 180 degree turn on a number of big issues, but she cannot "unsee" what she has been accepting for a while now. She will certainly never be team Cheeto Man nor even a conservative, but as I have asked in one or two previous replies... how often do we see ANYONE so far on the left of so many issues, not go double, triple, quadruple and octuplet down on every single occasion? . She is still and will always lean very heavy to the left and maybe even more than ever on some of them, she has been willing to not just reverse course on some very key issues, but once a person's eyes have been opened to such a degree, she cannot simply close them again. She is allowing at least some of the sane back into her liberal world view, so I am merely recognizing that. . Furthermore, we must also recognize that she is on a MASSIVE platform, that has millions of followers, who despise these change of positions, but some of them WILL give some benefit of the doubt and listen, because she has their ear, regardless of yours, mine and all others in this threads opinion about those positions. She is now embracing fact over feelings in a number of issues those of us on the outside have been ripping our hair out, hoping she and many others would see. . I get that probably most of these changes of position, have come due to being directly effected by them, but that does count as changing position. We can ask.."what took so long" and similar questions, but the point is.... she is not only reversing course on some huge things, but now TELLING that audience of millions just why she is doing so and some of them will be moved, to some degree, as she has. Those people will now begin to think about them and guess what... THEY will talk to others and share those views. Sure, some will be dragged back again or just leave the channel, but she IS getting some of them to look at an opposing opinion and giving it consideration. . This is where I have stood since my OP. I have zero hopes she will begin wearing a dark pink hat with 4 letters embossed upon it, but we NEED sane libs and on at least some of the biggest issues (crime), she is not just moving that direction but to the point where she gave a sincere shout out to Sean's channel. Sean has been one of her harshest critics, yet here she is telling those millions of followers to check him out. . I am repeating myself and like you, I have had an INSANE number of comments removed (my story is worse than most reading this, I can all but guarantee it), so I will back this up to Wordpad, in the event that it is removed, so I can try again with some encryption. Though, my experience as of late is that once a SINGLE comment / reply has been removed, from a video, any further comments, are then auto-deleted for at least 24 hours and often times, permanently. I have a sheet ton of threads in which I cannot reply to strawman, obfuscation, conflation, lies and some extremely bad faith replies to my comments and not one GD'd thing can do about answering to them. What makes it worse, is then that person continues to call me out, for not remaining in the thread, as if I cannot refute his / her "facts". . I know your pain ALL too well, but will keep on trying anyway. Peace, Toto :)
    1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349.  @totorosghost  ... You continue to read a LOT into at least my cooment(s). If you have not already, expand them and see each one of my replies, as I have been not only consistent, but have not gone beyond my OP. Like everyone else in this thread, I have a TON of disagreements, push-back and more, for many positions I have heard / seen her support / praise. . However, while ALL of those things were, are and remain true, she has been willing to not only accept a 180 degree turn on a number of big issues, but she cannot "unsee" what she has been accepting for a while now. She will certainly never be team Cheeto Man nor even a conservative, but as I have asked in one or two previous replies... how often do we see ANYONE so far on the left of so many issues, not go double, triple, quadruple and octuplet down on every single occasion? . She is still and will always lean very heavy to the left and maybe even more than ever on some of them, she has been willing to not just reverse course on some very key issues, but once a person's eyes have been opened to such a degree, she cannot simply close them again. She is allowing at least some of the sane back into her liberal world view, so I am merely recognizing that. . Furthermore, we must also recognize that she is on a MASSIVE platform, that has millions of followers, who despise these change of positions, but some of them WILL give some benefit of the doubt and listen, because she has their ear, regardless of yours, mine and all others in this threads opinion about those positions. She is now embracing fact over feelings in a number of issues those of us on the outside have been ripping our hair out, hoping she and many others would see. . I get that probably most of these changes of position, have come due to being directly effected by them, but that does count as changing position. We can ask.."what took so long" and similar questions, but the point is.... she is not only reversing course on some huge things, but now TELLING that audience of millions just why she is doing so and some of them will be moved, to some degree, as she has. Those people will now begin to think about them and guess what... THEY will talk to others and share those views. Sure, some will be dragged back again or just leave the channel, but she IS getting some of them to look at an opposing opinion and giving it consideration. . This is where I have stood since my OP. I have zero hopes she will begin wearing a dark pink hat with 4 letters embossed upon it, but we NEED sane libs and on at least some of the biggest issues (crime), she is not just moving that direction but to the point where she gave a sincere shout out to Sean's channel. Sean has been one of her harshest critics, yet here she is telling those millions of followers to check him out. . I am repeating myself and like you, I have had an INSANE number of comments removed (my story is worse than most reading this, I can all but guarantee it), so I will back this up to Wordpad, in the event that it is removed, so I can try again with some encryption. Though, my experience as of late is that once a SINGLE comment / reply has been removed, from a video, any further comments, are then auto-deleted for at least 24 hours and often times, permanently. I have a sheet ton of threads in which I cannot reply to strawman, obfuscation, conflation, lies and some extremely bad faith replies to my comments and not one GD'd thing can do about answering to them. What makes it worse, is then that person continues to call me out, for not remaining in the thread, as if I cannot refute his / her "facts". . I know your pain ALL too well, but will keep on trying anyway. Peace, Toto :)
    1
  2350. 1
  2351. ​ @sole__doubt  ... EDIT: I just now found can see a reply that was invisible until AFTER I wrote the following. For context, I will leave this comment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I DID make several points, that I am more than willing to expand upon and provide other reasons why I disagree with your opinion. Your reply..."Im not here to convince im here to convey". Um, you did not convey anything, but your opinion. I offered to expand WHY I hold my position and you are unwilling to do so yourself. Please tell me again who amongst us is not providing an argument? . Please tell me where I said or indicated in ANY way, that "... the more money a channel brings in the better?". What I provided was a very brief description of the things that show DW is NOT about appeasing or on the side of big tech. I can go on and on with many more examples. What you are asking me to do is make my case, so you don't have to do so yourself. This is called failure of presenting your argument in good faith. YOU said that DW works 110% for big tech, therefore, it is incumbent upon YOU to make the case as to why. Seems you are asking me to prove a negative and that is not how a good faith discussion happens. . You are going way out of your way to avoid supporting your claim, so until you do, no good faith discussion can be had. Again... have a nice day, SD 🐈
    1
  2352.  @sole__doubt  ... EDIT: Dammit.. YouTube did not display this comment until AFTER I had posted my last one... GRRR the censorship is frustrating as hell... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I will re-iterate that we should both refrain from staw manning, yet you have now done so multiple times! Yes... it is true that larger channels get away with things smaller ones do not. That is not something I support, just happens to be how things work in general. YouTube has a WHOLE lot more to lose from DW or SC leaving the platform, than say MY channel with its 72 subs and 9 videos. . Please tell me how reality "proves they are in the club" and that I support them for that reason"? Yes, it is also true that once a business or entity becomes larger and larger, they have a greater amount of people to which they need to support, so I will not argue that compromises are and must be made. This is HOW business works and is unavoidable, because with bigger business becomes bigger responsibility to make sure that business survives. However, that does NOT mean that because they make some compromises, that this company should be automatically removed from being considered authentic or genuine. This depends on evaluation of each "compromise" as we see them and making the determination. . DW does make certain concessions in order to remain on YouTube... just as SC or ANY conservative channel. This is because, whether we like it or not... YouTube IS the shark in the pond and we must ALL deal with that shark, in order to swim in it! If you feel that DW makes too many compromises... fine. No doubt they do make some, but the compromises they DON'T make, are the reasons I support them. . Conservatives are in an EXTREMELY vulnerable position, so while I am not in lock-step with any one channel, I support those that fight the WOKE cult. DW has done more to fight the WOKE cult than many have. They do so by supporting JBP, Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro and others. YES... there are those who take issue with DW... fine. They have their reasons, just as you do. . I support DW's efforts to fight the WOKE cult and I will support them, even though they make some compromises that may lose a battle, but continue to fight the war!
    1
  2353. ​ @sole__doubt  ... I get that is your opinion and I both disagree and have expressed why. This does not mean I am lost any more than you are. Why is it that your opinion must be 100% correct and mine is 100% wrong? I accept that as companies / businesses or in this case, social media channels, have to compromise some things in order to survive. Here is the problem, if DW makes NO compromises, they are removed from YouTube and they have precisely ZERO voices on the inside for which to fight the culture war the leftist cult is waging upon us all. As you said, this there is no science to determine what can and cannot be compromised, but we must make that determination for ourselves. What is too big? What if the audience is as 100% committed to fighting the WOKE cult as that channel? What do you think it costs to produce the documentary "What Is A Woman"? Matt was flown across this globe to other countries and many, many interviews. You are aware that taking on such an undertaking takes money... right? Much of DW's content is demonitized, so they must fund their business and the many dozens of people via sponsors. Well, as you and I both know, there is no over abundance of companies willing to pay good money to advertise on conservative channels, because the WOKE cult WILL attack them and a MASSIVE number have folded to the fear of that mob. . The pay wall allows users to get exclusive content for a fee and that fee PAYS for the machine that CREATES all of the content that fights the WOKE cult! If you don't see the value in supporting the channel, that is your option. However, to in any way equate a channel or business as in some way "selling out" (not your exact words, but sums up what you are telling me), because they have an option to charge for special services, tells me you have never run a business or company. Well, I have.... and it takes money to support the machine that makes the commitment to pay for it all. . Go ahead and not like DW, but I won't call you "lost" because you and I disagree 🐱
    1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. ​ @doctorbrown5957  ... I cannot speak to what you have heard The Timinator say on his podcasts, as I not seen but only a very few of them in total. I have been following his daily videos for about 6 years, so have seen him come a LONG way of of that "milk toast fence sitter" position he was on for the first several of those years. I also will not defend anything you have heard him say, but will ad the following for some thought. . I am uniquely on YouTube for ALL my social media life. It is not possible to tell you how many times I have had my comments deleted for "wrong think", as while I am only slightly right of center politically, that pretty much makes me Hitler to those of the farther left persuasion. I was mod for a short time on Unsafe Space (channel on YT) and was under the EVER watchful eye of YouTube minions and its algorithm. I have ALWAYS been able to say what I wanted, but most certainly had to choose my words carefully in most cases and completely re-edit my entire comment on literally hundreds of others. I had learned to copy / paste back up my comment PRIOR to "REPLY" and then refresh page 10 seconds later, to see POOF... I had wrong-thunk again. . All I am trying to say is that while Tim may very well be compromising to some degree, we ALL have to in order to remain on nearly all of the social media platforms. YouTube may or may not be less restrictive than some other platforms, Tim would rather not be removed, for playing the game to at least a small degree. That said, he may have compromised more than I am aware and I am not an apologist for him, but I do certainly give him some pretty good benefit of the doubt, as I have come to see him as quite principled. I don't always agree with those principles, but I don't need him to agree with me, I only need him to call out hypocrisy as he sees it.. whether from the left or right. . Peace, Doc :) PS> Did anyone ever believe that where your're going.. you don't need any roads? :P
    1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1