Comments by "Newbie Prepper" (@newbieprepper8451) on "AOC Shares 'Close Encounter', Rips Apart GOP 'Cowards' During Livestream" video.

i agree, all the democrats that supported or stayed silent over the storming of the capitol during the Kavanaugh hearings SHOULD be arrested and removed from office. as a side question, will Biden and Harris be impeached for sedition or treason for aiding and abbeting seditious forces engaged in attacking a federal courthouse?
2
@dominichutchison1322 sure, i will elaborate more carefully for you since you lack critical thinking skills because of your lack of education. Trump nominated Bet Kavanaugh for a SCOTUS position as is his right and duty. the senate convened to deliberate and vote on the nomination as is their right and duty. lots of people decided to go protest at the capitol and stormed the capitol building, plenty of pictures and video of that exist. and yet the democrats either supported this storming of the capitol or stayed silent and ignored it. so yes, they supported the storming of the capitol and for that they should be removed from office. as to the impeachment and removal of Biden & Harris. a federal courthouse was attacked using explosives by insurectionists looking to overthrow federal authority in that jurisdiction. a federal courthouse is operated by the federal government and an extension of the federal government. Harris & Biden supported and helped raise and distribute funds specifically directed for bail purposes to free inssurectionists against the federal government from custody. the claim that democrats are curently making against Trump that he supported and helped insurectionists is exactly what Harris and Biden did during their campaign. hope thats elaborate enough for you.
2
well, if she wants to act like a nazzi with her lists then she should have some close encounters.
1
@thatonegirl4676 and thats teh best you can do? cant refute the point ive made so you result to petty childish insults.
1
@dominichutchison1322 protesters didnt storm the courthouse in Portland, it was insurectionists and they did use explosives and tried to set the courthouse on fire. on the second case of the Kavanaugh hearings, the definition of insurection as used by the democrats is to attempt to or succeed in stopind government functions, those protesters at the Kavanaugh hearing attempted to stop a government process, defining them as insurectionists. YOU couldnt find any info because you are either willfuly incompetent or purposefully stupid, take your pick but quit lying.
1
@dominichutchison1322 no, i said the storming of the courthouse with explosives took place in portland, its a seperate event from the kavanaugh hearings. but still both are acts of sedition. perhaps you should learn how to read. but lets reitterate. 1. Harris & Biden both supported the seditious attack on the portland courthouse by promoting and helping fund and distribute bail funds to the rioters involved in that attack. 2. the Kavanaugh hearings, being a seperate event, were either supported by and condoned by or completely ignored by every democrat out there. the protesters stormed the senate building during the Kavanaugh hearings in an attempt to stop the hearings from continuing. such an act is defined as sedition by the democrats themselves. since the democrats condoned sedition in the past, either they set the precedent for it repeating and have no ground to stand on to speak against it now or they should all be thrown out of office for supporting it in the past.
1
@dominichutchison1322 google is your friend. a simple search of the portland courthouse riots will point to many articles by national and local news outlets that talk about explosives such as fireworks and other incendiary devices being used against the courthouse, here is one for you now. https://nypost.com/2020/07/28/apparent-molotov-cocktail-explodes-outside-portland-courthouse/
1
@j0j0dartiste21 not overly vague, Google Portland court house riot. If you haven't heard about this on the mainstream news then you must not watch news that much. The riots at the Portland courthouse have been going on since late spring or so, daily. Harris and Biden directly helped fund bail money for the rioters trying to burn that courthouse down during their campaign.
1
@j0j0dartiste21 can you recite the first amendment and explain which part of it allows for violence? last i read it, it talked about peacably assmeble and free speech among other things, it mentioned nothing about violence or using explosives and committing acts of arson, and thats exactly what happened in Portland. the feds stepped in when the city refused to do anything about people trying to burn federal property down, thats not an escalation. but you allow it and defend it so you have no moral high ground to stand on condemning the capitol rioters. by the way, its not "whataboutism, its called an "argument of precedent", if you get an education that covers more than gender studies and underwater basket weaving then you will learn about such things as precedent and argument. the precedent was set with the portland rioters attacking a federal institution which you condone, the precedent was set yet again during the storming of the capitol during the Kavanaugh hearings, which you condoned. so you have no moral ground to be outraged by the storming of the capitol on 1/6. quit making excuses for your bad behavior.
1