Comments by "Tim Bucks" (@TimBitts649) on "Bret Weinstein Shares the One Question About COVID No One Is Asking | ROUNDTABLE | Rubin Report" video.

  1. 9
  2. These two guys are heroes. Both very smart, with lots of common sense so the ordinary guy like me, looks up to them. Find the flaw in my logic: In tests now, over 99% of people have antibodies for covid. Either they got it or got the vaccine, or both. Why did 99% of people end up with antibodies, because not everyone got the vaccine? My guess is this means that when people are exposed to low levels of covid, it's small enough an exposure, the body can handle it. Like if you were on a train and a lady 3 rows back who had covid, if she sneezed, the air would disperse the virus, so when it got to you, then you would get a much lower dose of the virus. And your body could handle a low dose. So you don't get sick, but can fight off the virus, especially if you are young. So what if viral load is the key factor, not the virus itself? What if, all we needed to do to defeat the virus, was to tell everyone over 65 to take a year off, stay away from people? What if we told medical doctors: for people under 65, if you think they are medically compromised, you can write a note saying they get a year off? And what if we told people: Keep windows and lots of ventilation open, take some Vitamin D, go for a walk daily, buy a fan and keep it plugged in, we want to thin out the virus. Why? For why? To speed up the virus. You'll get it in the end, no stopping it. But your body can more easily handle a low viral load. Then what? Then the death rate, the rate of disease would have been much lower. And Big Pharma would have earned less money. And more people would have survived, lived to a ripe old age. And we would have not spent the past few years, running around like a brainless chicken, with it's head cut off. 🔪🐔🏃🏃‍♂🏃‍♀😜🤯🧠
    1