General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
John Woodrow
Sky News Australia
comments
Comments by "John Woodrow" (@johnwoodrow8769) on "NY Post has been completely transparent about the ‘provenance’ of Biden scandal story" video.
Is that the same "US Intelligence" that started the Trump Russian collusion scam, or supported the war crime of invading Iraq?
1
I'm surprised by many of the comments that all of this wasn't common knowledge. I was aware of this stuff months ago, always wondered why the US people would vote in someone clearly known to be associated with corruption as President, leaving aside he is clearly senile. FFS, Hunter Biden's business partner at the time Hunter went to 'work' at Burisma knew the arrangement was so dodgy he even went to the trouble of writing a formal letter to the Department of Justice to put on the record he had no involvement in the scam. It was so smelly day 1 he though it wise to cover his arse. But the old man somehow still gets away with saying he had no reason to question what Hunter was doing on the Burisma board. But I suppose I can understand Joe's thinking. After all what is unusual about a Ukraine gas company owned by a mobster employing the son of the US vice President for a massive monthly salary, and he knows nothing about the gas industry. Happens ever day of the week.
1
What's been proven to be false? That Hunter Biden with a resume of zero experience in the oil and gas industry, and had been 'administratively discharged' (meaning kicked out) from the military, was being paid $50,000 a month by Burisma in the Ukraine, a company owned by a person of 'questionable character'. Is that true or false? Or that Hunter Biden's business partner at the time Chris Heinz (stepson of John Kerry) wanted nothing more to do with Hunter Biden when he took the Burisma position due to what he considered his lack of judgement and "concerns about corruption in Ukraine and appearances". Is that true or false? And then if you'd like, please explain just WHY Burisma was employing Hunter Biden and paying him this quite high salary. For his good looks perhaps?
1
I don't even understand why there is a shred of doubt exactly why Hunter Biden was 'employed' by Burisma, a company owned by a virtual gangster, and paid US$50,000 a month. Perhaps anyone who thinks it wasn't solely to get influence and access to his father, should explain just why a company pays someone with zero experience in their industry $600,000 a year.
1