Comments by "John Woodrow" (@johnwoodrow8769) on "" video.

@SigrunHT No, it gives the Democrats hope. Donald being the next Republican candidate is about the ONLY hope the Democrats have of retaining office. Even if another candidate is finally chosen by the Republicans, the divisive contest to get to that point will be HIGHLY counter-productive. Donald's time has come and gone. This has to be accepted to be able to move forward and regain control of the HOUSE, Senate, and Presidency. It should be a walk in the park to do that with the correct new face, as there is a wealth of talent to choose from.
1
@SigrunHT It's more than just driving the Democrats crazy. It's being unable to get women largely uninterested in politics to vote for him. It's giving the left-wing biased MSM a total 'free kick. It's giving the Deep State a gift from heaven. People seem to be loosing sight of the future goal, and are bogged down in the past and personalities. This is playing right into the hands of the Democrats. The goal should be to select the candidate with the highest chance of winning office, and regaining the House and Senate majority. .... as well as delivering on a future vision as people see it. If people put aside petty squabbles about who done who wrongs etc, the Republicans have a wealth of talent to choose from. That's probably the biggest problem, too many good potential candidates, what a problem to have. On the other hand, the Democrats have NOTHING. Their only chance is a rerun again Donald. Say for example Ron DeSamtis is seem as the future, if this decision is made NOW, and every conservative 100% throws their support behind him (putting aside their own favorite for the greater good) the House and Senate are regained in 2 years, Joe/The Camel becomes a 'lame duck' President, and the Presidency is regained in less than 4 years. Eight years of good conservative rule for certain. The only thing that can derail this idea, is division within the conservative base, and giving the 'establishment' the only possible change they have of clinging to power, Donald Trump. P.S. I like Donald, but the 'goal' is way bigger than just the future ambitions of one person.
1
@SigrunHT Neither Ron DeSantos, Mike Pompeo, or Kristi Noem could be remotely considered 'pushovers'. Anyone of the three could easily win against Kamala Harris and her VP running mate (assuming Joe will be completely in pixie land in 3 years time, just consider the deterioration from 4 years ago). P.S. I know its not nice to poke fun at someone struggling with mental decline, but that person has still enough wit to know its totally wrong to put themselves forward for the most powerful public office in the land.
1
@SigrunHT Yes there is Ted Cruz, Nikki Haley, Mike Pence .... as I said in a previous comment, a wealth of talent, and ALL could easily beat The Kamel. Withing a heartbeat expect someone to comment on the above slamming Mike Pence for disloyalty for not following Donald's rather foolish request regarding the joint setting of Congress to finalize the electoral college votes. And then someone else will jump in slamming Nikki Haley for telling Donald he was an arsehole for publicly criticizing his loyal for 4 years lieutenant Mike Pence for not complying with his stupid ego driven request. The point I'm making is there is a wealth of talent to easily take down the Democrats. The only thing that will prevent this from happening is Republican supporters infighting, trying to eat their own, clinging to the past e.g. "we was robbed", being divided, and allowing support for a personality (Donald) to surpass cold hard headed political judgement. P.S. By the way, I agree with Nikki, Donald was a total areshole for how he treated Mike Pence at the end. Mike deserved better, much better.
1
@SigrunHT Sorry, I forgot to comment on the voter fraud bit. That's another thing the Republicans need to put behind them other than just tighten up State electoral processes where possible. Point being just focus on the future, not on the past (its not going to change so just wasted effort). Against Joe Biden, if Donald was a certain winner for the Republicans he should have come in so far in front that it would have been totally impossible to close than massive gap by cheating. Donald said himself, how embarrassing to loose against the weakest candidate in US history to stand for the Presidency. People didn't elect Donald 4+ years ago, they voted against Hillary. Same deal this time, people didn't elect Joe, they turned out in record numbers to vote against Donald ...... and they will again turn out in record numbers to vote against Joe or The Kamel in 3+ years time .... as long as Republicans get their act together, and unify behind a solid fresh new face. It is theirs to loose.
1
If I was a Democrat party strategist, I'd see Donald being the Republican candidate in 3 and a bit years time as a gift from heaven. It represents about the ONLY chance of the very weak (that's about as diplomatic as I can put it) Democrats retaining office. That the Democrats were actually trying to prevent him from standing again shows they think with their arses, not their brains. People didn't vote for Joe Biden, who would be that stupid. They voted against Donald. Republican supporters, no matter how disappointed they may personally be, must recognize a new face for the party is required to guarantee future success. The quicker than realization is made, the quicker success will come.
1