Comments by "John Woodrow" (@johnwoodrow8769) on "Daniel Andrews ‘aggressive suppression strategy’ will be contested" video.

Would someone why supports or even understands how an 'aggressive suppression strategy' is a solution would you please like to explain it. Here's the problems to address.... (1) If you do succeed in reducing the number of daily cases (truly the number of people who have been in contact with the virus) then all you are doing is lengthening the time that the virus remains a problem until a level of herd immunity is developed in the broad community. You may be 'flattening the curve' but your not reducing the 'area under the curve'. All your doing is pushing it out. (2) The only way around problem 1 is a reliance that a safe and effective will be developed at some time in the future, and sufficient people will take it to achieve heard immunity. (3) Problem with point 2. No vaccine for any corona virus has EVER been found, and many experts believe this will remain the case. Anyone care to explain the logic behind an 'aggressive suppression strategy'???? I fail to see it.
1