Comments by "John Woodrow" (@johnwoodrow8769) on "Urgent investigation into AstraZeneca vaccine after Melbourne man develops blood clots" video.

A whole lot of so called 'experts' who were completely dismissing this problem when first raised by Germany a coupe weeks ago must now be feeling VERY stupid. If they don't they should be. Just proves how little you should trust what these so called 'health experts' and MSM claim. And only now the UK is admitting it has had 30 cases of this rare blood clot, and 7 people have died .... when 2 weeks ago they were claiming no experience whatsoever of problems. Clearly the problem in 30 people can't just be related to the past couple weeks and zero before that. The UK was either lying, or was incompetent in monitoring what was actually occurring. Most likely the latter.
3
People should have recognized from nearly Day 1 of the 'pandemic' that the old military expression equally applies ..... "the first causality of war is truth".
3
You're assuming this is the ONLY risk of a vaccine that the 'experts' had told you only up to as little as a few days ago was 'completely' safe. You actually trust them? Has there been anything associated with covid that the 'experts' have told you was honest, accurate, and scientifically valid? I'm struggling to think of much.
2
Sorry to be blunt, silly comparison. Taking 'the pill' has a massive positive benefit to the woman, not wanting to get pregnant, or as I understand it, those who suffer chronic debilitating period pain. An 'unplanned' child can be a devastating outcome, or not being able to work 2 or 3 days every month are major problems to be weighted against the downsides of the pill. On the other hand the covid vaccine has very little, if any, positive for a young healthy person. At most they can expect to be in mild discomfort for a few days if exposed to the virus. No more than the common side effect of actually getting the vaccine. So little benefit for many, to be weighted against a vaccine with the potential, even if small, to kill the recipient.
2
@MrSuperfuzz79 I suggest you go to the German vaccine authority webpage, and actually read their assessment, and reason for suspending the use of the AZ vaccine in anyone under 60 years old. It makes perfect sense, written by people who have more knowledge and experience in this field than probably the total sum of all SkyNews internet portal contributors combined. As people continue to tell us, listen to the science. Not market spin merchants working for big pharms, politicians, MSM, or worse that all of them combined .... doctors who are so incompetent that only place they can find a job is as a bureaucrat in a government public health department.
2
@louisdisbury9759 I hope everything works out well for you. Regards.
2
EVERY medication know to man has some side effects, even common paracetamol. So it wasn't unreasonable to believe anyone saying the vaccine is 'completely' safe was always either ignorant or lying.
2
The only 'bull sh-t' is your comment. The medical experts of Germany flagged this issue about a month ago, and despite significant political pressure, have maintained their position that the AZ vaccine should at this stage not be given to people under 60 years old. The reason is there is little to no benefit in the vaccine for fit healthy people aged 60, yet the possibility of a significant bad outcome in taking the vaccine (including death). That is the reason many countries have now followed Germany's lead.
1
What do you mean "no complaints so far" in Great Britain????? Latest count for the UK was 30 people had developed this rare problem after being vaccinated with AZ, and seven have died. Maybe you spent less time on social media and more researching your facts.
1
@bruceparker6142 Unlikely. Covid itself causes the rare blood clotting in a small number of cases, and this is believed to be due to the bodies antibody response, medical fact. So it only stands to reason that a vaccine, which is only something that fools the body to produce the exact same antibodies, could also produce the exact same outcome.
1
@henriettagibsonii3545 If your talking about the man in Victoria, or any of the other global cases .... they didn't 'get covid'. They got a rare brain blood clot (can't be bothered looking up the long correct name), the same as some people who have had covid. The medical research into the problem in people who have actually had covid, before this vaccine related issue even surfaced, is leaning toward thinking it is not the virus itself that causes the problem. It is the bodies antibody response to the virus. So it is unreasonable to think a vaccine that initiates the exact same antibody response as the actual virus, could result in the exact same bad outcome.
1
@henriettagibsonii3545 It's exactly what you'd expect based on the drug companies very own data. If J&J's vaccine is rated as 73% effective, that means 27 out of every 100 people who receive the vaccine, assuming they hadn't had covid prior to the vaccination, remain susceptible to contracting covid. So lets say 30% of those 27 people do actually catch the virus, that's 9 people who will test positive out of every hundred who were originally vaccinated. So you'd expect something like 9% of people who take the J&J vaccine to test positive to covid after having the vaccine. I don't actually believe the 90+% effectiveness the other manufacturers give their vaccines. Reckon that number came out of the marketing department rather than the scientific department. It's probably about the same as J&J and AZ's.
1
@louimcquire2393 Why would you imagine that???? You comment seems nothing other than a pretty poor attempt to try and discredit legitimate and prudent caution regarding a totally new technology, rushed out without adequate and prudent long-term testing, prior to widespread community adoption. Especially as this new technology offers really nothing to anyone other than those in the high-risk groups (very elderly, serious comorbidities). A vaccine that everyone was told is "completely safe" and is now turning out to not be the case. Learning from vaccine attempts in the past, the industry knows it has to work fast to sell its product before natural immunity no longer makes it required e.g. the Zika virus.
1
@louimcquire2393 I'm most certainly not an 'anti-vaxer'. The largely eradication of whooping cough in young children has been a fantastic achievement. However having said that, there may be legitimate concerns about the age that the mix of children's vaccination are given and all at one time. Risks may be able to be reduced if people inform themselves on those matter, rather than just blindly follow the 'advice' of a health 'professional' who in most cases doesn't know much more than the parent on the specifics. The long term effects of the covid vaccines have yet to be established. Their effectiveness in stopping transmission has yet to be established. Their effectiveness in preventing disease has yet to be really established. Are they really more effective than Influenza vaccinations which offer only 30% protection for one strain, and 50% for the other .... due to the constantly evolving nature influenza virus ...... exactly as the covid virus appears to be doing. But the real bottom line for me is .... the vaccines will make me as sick as covid will (a couple days of headaches, muscle aches, etc) , and offer me no more protection than actually having had covid. So why would I want to rush out and stick this stuff in me. Makes ZERO sense to me.
1
Perhaps not, but you'd need to consult a specialist in that area. The problematic blood clotting is a very rare and very specific form. When this issue first surfaced and so called 'medical experts' started talking about the incidence of any form of blood clotting, they were deliberately tying to throw the uninformed public of the issue.
1