Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Hamas can’t be negotiated with, co-founder’s son says | Cuomo" video.

@socialroi2673 what u describe is a projection of ur own prespective but not reality. Majority of palest don't want a israeli passport, they consider that 1. Israel can't exist (river to the sea), 2. Lack of self-criticism (there would be an automatic civil war as soon as israel stoped existing), 3 their migrants (yes, a portion of palest are migrant descent and not descendants of folks who have been there for milenia as publicized) are legitimate but israel one's are ilegitimate. As u can see, israel wouldn't be normal, it would be a territory without definite borders (a big chunk of palest consider a portion of lebanon, the whole of jordan, a portion of syria and a chunk of egipt to be palestine the country) and extremely violent under civil war and war with neighbours, a very deadly combination. The more u know.
14
@socialroi2673 if it was that black and white, it would be that easy. Palestinians aren't a monolith, and there are about zero polls of what the actually think (culturally censorship is the norm not the exception). Best way to go into analising is the political leadership not ur average palestinians (that would be anedoctal evidence). But 2 can play ur game: there is a conection of the soviets and palest (along other arabs) who atempted a general arab socialist revolution where palest were used as cannon folder, so it isn't secretly support, it's a well known fact that anti-monarchist in jordan and kwait or anti-republicans in lebanon are politically align with factions of plaestinian resistance (notice that countries with a baath dictatorship didn't get palest interferance) and it's also easy to conect the soviets with south africa politics - there's ur cold war conection that goes beyond ur familly. Are u by any chance a soviet friendly socialist? Also, son of hamas can be counted as anedoctal evidence as much as ur familly prespective. I could go on and on and on- cause it isn't black and white but a very stupid conflict full of fake ass narratives and projections and false equivalence. In conclusion, all bad, both wrong etc.
7
@sebastiancalderon3273 nope, in the past u are correct but present time, there would be a civil war and at the same time a war with neighbours. Why? There is the internal fighting and there is the prespective that palestine the country is the same as palestine the territory who encompass a chunck of the neighbours and the whole of jordan (basicly the mandate palestine plus some more). If hamas gets away with this it can also start considering the territory of the ummayads, the empire. That's why these wakos (like isis) are so dangerous beyond their own borders.
1