Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

@arthas640 that's cause of the enactment of forbidding loans with interests uppon muslims which left the jews and christians in a position of exception cause it was a religious law. That and the fact same religious law demanded that all asset to be divided upon death (no big companies inherited by only 1 inheritor) - that was the general economic state post-ottoman empire.
1
@ObIitus a country is a political construct, so are borders. A country is an international recognized government and borders. So... 🤷‍♀️ Ur spining it emotionally.
1
@ObIitus that would be ur personal definition. If the international comunity doesn't recognize than it isn't a country, case in point, the basques, the tupiquinin uncontacted tribes, the sentenalese, and so forth. The fact u insist on ur personal preception tells me ur emotionally invested in changing the definition of what a country is which is hilarious.
1
@ObIitus it is. Both sides claim the whole of china. The devision is remnants of chinese civil war that happened on the middle of the 2nd world war. That is basic comon knowlege. China ccp also claims a big chunk of mongolia, almost half of russia, a small portion of afghanistan etc. Afghanistan doesn't recognize pak/ afghan border, etc etc. But u went specifically to taiwan under a false narrative, shows ur trying to sell lies.
1
@ObIitus and china is a great example, do the tibeten define their country? No, they don't, cause internationally they aren't defined as occupied. Do the uighurs define their country? No, they don't cause internationally they aren't seen as occupied. The list goes on, cause china proper (ethnically) is just the south eastern most part of the country where han majority live. 😂 The only thing taiwan doesn't recognize is the ccp, which I agree with, I also don't recognize a government based off a book by a german authour in the middle of asea, I see it as colonial (my perception, internationally ccp is recognized).
1
@ObIitus 1. Ur being intelectual dishonest by stating that I'm twisting. Very unethical. 2. No such thing as true or false, a territory belongs to whichever political institution it belongs to by international recognition. It is what it is, no emotion, just is.
1
@ObIitus lol, cause u say so. Way to go a accept u were wrong. 👍
1
Isis funded itself by exchanging oil for arms in the black market via turkiye. No oil - no money - no isis. But sure the n1 oil power house most definatelly would waste money and effort for oil on the other side of the world, a raw material who isn't that uncommon 😂
1
In transnistria was more the rus federation spending there, more so than in most rus fed places to keep influence in the common man. With no investment and u'll see transnistrians migrating to places where there is hobs and opportunity and coming back to transnistria with a different idea. No one is interesting in maintaining a past that's gonna make u go hungry.
1
Whatever they said oficially doesn't mean it was the actual war strategy position, politicians lie. And in war the oficial statements might be part of psique games.
1
 @rustv8598 us wouldn't send troops. It would however control and close the border while ending most/all trade with mexico. Now u know.
1
@alik5972 lol no, I had the pleasure of knowing (internet) a bunch of turks who can't stand erdo.
1
Actually UK is the reason europe ended united. Unless u are a hitler apologist, aka, a nazi. If so, carry on, we know u exist.
1
@williamwoznack5312 geography isn't on poland side. Also, europeans tend to do that v one another, not a poland exclusive. Probably remnants from when europe countries were constantly at war with each other.
1
 @bcfuerst actually no, but they are close to that objective.
1
 @RabbitShirak history shows that it isn't the size but the quality of the army.
1
@Jugement nope, history shows quality (strategy, tech, luck, etc) are the common denominator of military advantage 100% of the time. As for the usage of capital letters, it's on purpose. I only capitalize beginning of sentences or people's names, and the I in english - everything else I don't. It's my personal style of writing, in the latin alphabet ofcourse. Small seemingly outnumbered armies have won time and time again against giant empire due to this. Quantity isn't a good measure in military, it's actually a nightmare in management and logistics. U should read about it, u'll find very interesting battles with giant armies retreating.
1
@Jugement only smart strategist are able to do "gambles" which goes into the list of "quality" not "quantity". Ad-hominem - yup, ur so superior 😂
1
@Jugement thanku for conceiving u feel superior to complete strangers - pls don't fail art school. Also, gamble is exactly playing odds (be it small or large), and no, I don't think u grasp that u ate ur own foot with this one. Lack of humbleness (aka feeling superior) isn't a trait that goes with inteligence. Bye.
1
@Jugement u don't even grasp what bye means. Yes, ur right, I am so wrong, pls leave me alone oh superior being. (can't argue with stupid - for other readers) 🤦‍♀️
1
@АлексейПешков-г8ь not really. Nothing surpasses a well trained profesional army. Whole empires where built on this permisse.
1
@АлексейПешков-г8ь ww2 there wasn't much of profesional armies. Both allies, soviets and axis had conscripts. So 🤷‍♀️ don't know what ur talking about really!
1
@u2beuser714 pro regime is a monority in iran, that's a known fact, from that group is where regime chooses police, military etc. It isn't rocket science, when there is no money to pay off ur stay in power and ur a sect of a sect, that's the outcome.
1
@pitts64lb 100% american interest. No world trade, no dollar usage, no dollar usage, no use of dollar as foreign currency, dollar devaluates and usa purchace power goes down the drain, no purchace power - no strong pentagon and thus no usa security in international trade. Very simple really, it's all conected, usa major power is it protects everyone and is entangled with everyone in biz.
1