Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "The 3 great MYTHS of the UKRAINIAN WAR - VisualPolitik EN" video.

It's about the gas biz, an ukraine with a EU trade agreement was a menace to the monopolist rusian gas. Everything else is excuses.
60
@willthecat3861 the war isn't over so no one knows. It looks bad as in europe is now seen as unpopular to buy russian gas, albeit still dependant but in the future probably change for alternatives. From dificulties comes inovation and change (not always for the best). Its always so hard to understand these historical events, specially with all the missinformation and propaganda going around.
5
Even thou I don't really agree with everything I appreciate the information this chanel provides.
3
Slonner ukraine has untaped gas that would feed europe for 20 years which means EU could use that as a stock to dump into the market when prices go high (like usa did with oil during the cold war). This means russia couldn't have control as it had so far over its exports price into europe. Economics of supply and demand, basic knowlege. It not about "I think" or "I feel", it's about IT IS HOW IT Works.
3
U just describe a huge factor in angolan civil war.
2
Some politicians say what to think and do (authoritarian and totalitarian regimes) so 🤷‍♀️ ur point being?
2
@psychologianiestacjonarna6558 the paternalism is really bad manners. Don't know where men get the idea that it's ok to be discusting.
2
@paulmakinson1965 that's conspiracy theory for the gulible. He had so far a legacy of having saved the russian economy post soviet fall and the grim 90's. With ukraine being found to be a competitor in the gas biz, his legacy would be changed into the guy who allowed russian economy dependant upon gas exports (whose main client is europe). With or without war his legacy got screw up the moment geological survey report humoungous shallow gas deposits in ukraine. Nothing to do with empires but about gas biz and european market cause money talks.
2
Russia wants to expand to keep monopoly in gas biz not for any other reason.
1
The idea of ethnicity as a factor of relations is racist as F!
1
Well that's politicians for u, they corrupt events to suit their personal agendas. Believing in sides on the basis of what politicians say is pretty gulible behaviour imho.
1
EU isn't germany. Yes it is bad, yes german is a strong economic leader but EU hasn't reach the federal state for 1 member state have such effect. Actually it affects economy globaly, meaning if geeman falls other economies not in the eu suffer. For example, burundi (the poorest country) has an economy of 15% german exports, and this is 1 in a million examples.
1
With us or against us was in modernity a usa position and in relation to afganistan post 9-11 not a nato position. The one who resorted to an armed conflict (including transforming discontent into separatism and arm it - an old playbook) was russia in this parricular case, their stand against diplomatic solution not nato's (who has been a mediator/influencer but not a decider, decision was ultimately ukraine and russia). In conclusion, it was russia who found itself in a zero sum game: if there is a war there are always 2 loosers the civilian society and whoever looses said war - a very much atitude of zero sum. Either ur against imposed by force colonialism or u consider countries by hierarquy and accept ur own inferiority - can't have it both ways. If ur next going into whataboutism ull be identified as a troll or a bot or a whatever but not a person with sound arguments.
1
@aniemgamaou6591 so have a lot of dictators and a lot of them where proven wrong making ur observation an extremely subjective bias opinion. Just because u claim doesn't make it so, u need sound arguments and I proven ur arguments wrong.
1
The EU has the right of rejecting one and not the other. Ur proposing a forced marriage because the bride can't choose between 2 grooms and has to marry them both. EU is a political and economic alliance and has its own interests not someone else's whore!
1
That's a very healthy way of thinking.
1
@Tom-tg2jl what are u talking about?
1
@zilentangelzero7 defining thought based on ethnical grounds is racist, that's how nazis defined europe. Congrats u think the way hitler did.
1
@yourstruly5706 that's propaganda excuse. If it was about buffer zones than russia would already lashed put when the balcans entered nato as it's the same distance to moscow. Also, the heartland theory is easely disproven.
1
@tj1923 did I say otherwise?
1
@tj1923 no it doesn't. If u infer anything close to that u have reading problems.
1
It can also be seen as a very stupid falling for a trap. Either u are capable of reaching an objective or u are trying to climb a mountain after breaking ur own leg. Most stupid ass invasion!
1