General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Rita Gameiro
Good Times Bad Times
comments

Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Good Times Bad Times" channel.

Some are rethinking purchases cause they're afraid of future sanctions. Also, tukyie is having the best possible sale of their drone tech. Lastly this is providing public support for military spending and countries like the example poland and south korea are signing huge deals - money and tech is moving. It's not just nato and there was this ukrainian oficial saying they'll guive their thankyous to some countries that for now they can't name for security reasons, so this will also have future show cases of things we aren't being informed about but will be advertised when the war ends. It's not a thing of "the west" that's russian propaganda.
105
It's play both sides, robb as much as u can... Well known tactic.
26
 @HassanalBolkiahSoyjak countries with highest divorce rates: maldives, russia, china etc etc - 😂
16
@TheNefastor good point. Just keep in mind some of us are small and couldn't cope with an atack like that.
11
@sircatangry5864 demography suggests that russian population in general is shrinking due to less kids and lost of old folk (like pretty much the whole of europe and asia such as japan and south korea). How do u include this in the idea of more ethnic russians and less brashirs?
9
Europe has mines closed for the eventuality of need. Also, there are gas and oil deposits (way more common than u think) just way more expensive to drill. On the other hand ukraine has 1% of easy cheap drillable gas of all known gas reserves in the world. Also the pipeline and infrastructure is already there only needs to be diverted. It's one bad winter for europe but not the end of europe.
7
In trade and economics it is cause it's just a nearby market and so it's profitable. Even during cold war argelia was soviet leaning but traded with europe.
7
India is changing fast.
6
U just need to look into france imports to see it isn't so, it's more french companies than france itself, and those french companies aren't french based nor pay taxed in france for the most part. I would go as far to say that france became corporation corrupt as none of this benefits france or french people, or people from the sahel.
5
@shrinkrapz ucrain is massive in europe. European countries are usually small. I think that's what the guy means.
4
That's basicly every company who isn't properly inspected anywhere in the world. It's just more visible in certain places in africa.
4
@palithaassalaarachchi1497 like most people of the world, algeria citizens aren't a monolith and their voting doesn't say much. It's the same as when usa people get angry for having a trump or a biden (most don't like either) but they don't have a choice of a better 3rd party that would suit their views better. Making presumptions about argelians and generalizing them is the basis for a xenophobic view of the world. In conclusion, I don't know nor do u.
4
@Joeyknows924 interesting, have I written about imigration? No, cause this coment section aproaches foreign policy of a specific country, it actually doesn't consider citizens or their migrations.
4
@BrokeBillionare cold war was exactly that - countries leaders negociating between 2 factions to see who was willing to give more. This situation isn't new, it just has new "players" in the field. As oposed to 2 main blocks, it's 4 🤷‍♀️
4
 @BonsuBigWhale tell me u don't know russian history and present day politics without... 😂
4
Bingo! But shhh 🙈🙉🙊 the "murica bad" is so much more fashionable! 😂😂
3
@hughmungus2760 there is already signs of that, like the story of kenya where a barber shop was for asians only and kenyans were blocked from going there. Or the exploitation of black children to sell racist digital cards in china. Or the kenyan workers who were locked down inside a factory meanwhile the asians where free to enter and leave. It isn't as simplified as a narrative. Remember an apartheid state can be introduced slowly.
3
@keithbajema2358 not very hard: no money no influence no power. It doesn't look good economically on the near future and things change fast when people have to make the economic decision. At least that's what history shows.
3
@mpireoutdoors5274 the lack of investment of a big portion of the population and instill political culture and public ethics - aka the almost zero financing of black comunities that were the majority of the population. This makes a country more prone to a culture of corruption post apartheid - and voilá present time problems. It isn't even nuanced - bad investment leads to bad outcomes, basic economy 101. See, not that hard, doesn't even have to be more than superficial analisis (as the one I just did). Also, deviding people by skin shade makes a future society more prone to do exactly that and vote exactly that way and hence less capable of critically think said vote. Racist or discriminatory policies have a way longer consequences than just the few years or decades they are enacted. And that ends up having an economic social toll payed by everyone.
3
@DrMrPersonGuy explain please, I can't understand how war of anexation and colonialism are related.
3
 @Prororo the problem was already there. Corruption can go as far as ancient sumeria (that we know of on record). No exclusivity anywhere in the world.
3
@selmasousa7484 a country is a political construction not a cultural one - ur point besides ignorant is also mute.
3
Countries were poor people don't have much to do in their free time, tend to have higher reproduction. Countries were a strong middle class arises with many options of entertainment for free time tend to reproduce nominally. As soon as a society gets used to small families, it's hard to backtrack to numerous families. This is my 2 cents ofcourse.
3
 @thomasjgallagher924 and that's the worrying part isn't it? After all this the tab and responsibility will fall for the same countries.
3
And that's a very good reason for israel not invade, it's obvious.
3
That's a fair point and an important additional information. My countries census are also wrong, we count less because of covid (people got stranded outside the territory and didn't answer it). Also, politicians made sure to be less so they would count less people in need of help in pandemic and in the near future with the econonic crisis.
3
@teddykayy there are those who desire and work for said disruption and increse of tensions. All this isn't by chance. There are more conflicts / wars that ur not grouping with both of those.
3
It will only increse the goods prices (consumer will be the ultimate payer) cause security on trade routes will just be more expensive, but still cheaper than those same goods locally produced.
3
@thomasjgallagher924 yes, exactly. A people, country etc are only at geopardy if they are fragile. In the example u gave, it's the lack of political vision (voluntary or not) that lead to such situation.
2
 @texenna impossible, crimea isn't key for russian security.
2
If u cook the numbers u can make it look like that meanwhile the reality being another. My country was preparing to do that (dishonest government) but it was caught up in time and the prime went to have a meeting in a room with a tiny litle bared window. When u have the authority cooking numbers is easy, problem is making the reality mirror the numbers.
2
 @mohammedahmed1109 that statement is ignorant, sudanese golden time was under christian rulers. Colonialism of sudan was made by egipcian Muslim rulers.
2
There are energy alternatives, germany just didn't listen.
2
Same here.
2
Not comparable: europe is suffering but it has acess to world financing and make the blunt barable.
2
@Ramirez83786 no one wants that.
2
People failed economics class. Also, laiziness makes u a bad researcher. Between the financial iliteracy and the confort of taking claims in media at face value people are easily fooled.
2
@palithaassalaarachchi1497 flawed democracy* and algeria is a people's republic and it's seen in their 2019 protests that they want a political reform. Usa has a whole lot of people criticizing electoral colege and the dual-partisanship - both ade desinfranshized by their respective regimes, usa less due to its individualistic economic/ political culture and high level of free speach (it isn't absolute free speach there is still nominal censorship), meanwhile argelia individuals are crushed by somewhat state-capitalism (it isn't fully so) and censorship (partly cultural, partly political). All in all, both generally hate the leadership they are offered.
2
It's so weird that all countries do that but are excused, meanwhile eu does it and it's vilified for playing ball. Tell me how many african countries voted in UN for the recognition of taiwan? It goes like this: the ones menacing to vote yes had less chinese investment so the vast majority of them got the message and though only about themselves! Meanwhile their own recent history had teached the value of sovereignty but who cares about the tibetans or the turquics when thinking about their own countries getting that juicy chinese investment. I have more examples ofcourse this is just 1 of that selfishness...
2
Lack of literacy and critical thinking hinders any democratic efforts.
2
@maxjeanfrancois400 brazilians are a product of mixing with the natives and not just the migration waves. Albeit brazil has its own racist and social issues it never went as far as a jimmy crow and thus mixing was more a norm than an exception. This is because the portuguese lacked population (beginning of sea route discoveries pt had about 1.5 to 2 m estimate total pop) and the king favoring marriages and mixing with locals wherever colonization efforts were being made.
2
@BonsuBigWhale it can absolutely be the story anywhere in the world. No place is special or naturally protected against stupid policy and ideologies. Al shabab is a bad ideology and it is bourn right inside west africa. And this is just one example. It can happen anywhere where there are fragile comunities or corrupt populist governments. Saying otherwise is either intelectual dishonest or ignorant.
2
@marcelo55869 it's way more colonial mentality to pre think that africa needs collaboration for the development of its people - than it is to unemotional think of it as market for buy and sell stuff. Before the scramble for africa- the reason to aproach africa was the anti-slavery war waged by UK. Before that it was just trade. Which one is more colonialist - to go into africa and tell them how to develop or to go just as a trading partner? Africa isn't a special continent and africans aren't more special than anywhere else - and what u demand from public in general is a COLONISLIST atitude in itself.
2
South africa is a horrible example, most of its problems and challenges can be traced to apartheid long term consequences. As for a good example it's botswana cause the influence was on botswana terms and not on some shady company or foreign government.
2
hum I'm skeptic about that statement - too simplistic.
2
@TheSharadwaador both - but none relate to the statement "trickle down economy" and "Americans propping a world system that no longer caters to them" - 2 statements that I'm skeptic about. As there is no relations to ur question it seems easy to assume ur engaging in deflection.
2
😂 It's the other way around. Colonialism can be done by buying off the rulling class, and it's actually historically the method used.
2
@Ganjor420 not all companies. There is a niche in the intern market who actually produced companies with good social and environmental aims. An example is ecosia, go check them out. It's actually the proof u don't need the medeling of a government to do good. On the other hand, companies whose base is ressource exploitation are prone to the worst crimes against humanity and enviroment. And, don't forget that a lot of "green activists" are actually political actors whose aim is societal colapse and power grab - and not a change for better more ethical company practices.
2
@shafuimcoming5151 population size has no bearing in culture or divorce RATES, so mute point. Russia isn't secular, u just need to hear statements by govern oficials plus the new cathedral in state grounds with political propaganda purposes (military service etc), russia is orthodox. China is comunist and has an active anti-theist policy, so not secular at all. Don't know where u get ur ideas but 🤣 ur hilarious!
2
@TrassseB there is no such thing as race, it's a political invention. As for all those 140 million they should decide for themselves not us specially because people get married and have families between these identity groups (albeit some dont publicize it).
1
About europe it already happened, it's called roman empire.
1
 @XOPOIIIO ur confusing nation with country.
1
@lucapieralisi mirrowing is actually a high level of trolling, congrats.
1
It is "under new management" The question is: will it benefit africans on the long run?
1
 @Omer1996E.C second worst* Slavery being the 1st as it robbed the continent of a) work based economy and b) human creative capital Slavery is older than colonialism by europeans.
1
@supahotjoe6493 that's actually a great summary. Thanks.
1
@lucapieralisi again, not my point, my criticism was u refering to some other institution when u meant criticism of yale. So far, u question what I personally consider or don't of the institution (notice I haven't stated an opinion) meanwhile that was never the subject. Also, if u can't comprehend my english than I live quite well with that, it doesn't bother me at all and, really, don't even understand why would it. Finally, ur style of writing insinuates a high dosage of passive agressiveness, it doesn't fare well with heart health I heard. (it's extremely frustrating to explain the same thing again and again, hope this time u'll get it).
1
@lucapieralisi again u mentioned other media reports when the presented view is from yale. I am writing in english as it is one of my languages. Are u prejudging by my name that my english is inferior? If so, this is going to be so much fun 😂
1
The report is from Yale not the media u mentioned but an university. Also, u make a blunder of a number of countries that coincidentally russia was also involved. Finally the if my neighbour raped its legal for me to rape logic has been answered a million times. If ur a propaganda bot u need to ask the higher ups better copy paste material
1
China has this huge solar farm and its not grid conected. Some things are so weird 🤷‍♀️
1
@Ganjor420 and the core problem isn't capitalism, that's a mith. Soviet union wasn't capitalist but a whole lake disapeared, people suffered and died inhumanely etc. Pol pot wasn't capitalist, viet congs aren't capitalists, north korea isn't capitalist, cuba and venezuela aren't capitalists. So - pretending comunism will work this time around is just changing a semi-poison for a full on poison.
1
@Ganjor420 if they stoped producing cars, ambulances would stop and a lot of people would die. Criticizing the whole sistem without a sound alternative (the one existing is comunism and abolishment of private property - which as previously explained causes the same issues in the end) is just another formula that comes from political indoctrination of the masses. Notice that environmentalists leaning left never take the time to criticize the ecological and humanitarian crisis provoked by comunist dictatorships. Either we want to change the political sistem or we want to make a better world, more humane and environmentally friendly - the 2 don't go together albeit publicized as such. I don't fall for that fable due to being enough (albeit should be more) informed. Again, there is a niche in the intern market where profits and end goal is a better society and I just gave u one example with ecosia.
1
Isolationism and protectionism has been tried. It lead to the philosophies that lead to world wars and racism. It also produced insted of a poor class, an exploited class. But sure, let's try again, it will surely work this time 😂😂😂
1
 @Komeshokakunanwene one of which is english which is the world lengua franca.
1
@montanasoftware5954 portugal: a very old quarrel with russia but not oficial nor admited (until now).
1
@@awesomeguy2689no one got couped - myanmar enters the chat 😂 As for the chinese formula - its a polish version of the portuguese one who in fact latter on had monopoly power to vast african territories. U think colonialism is done only 1 way of the scramble for africa? 😂 It's like the same numbers u can cook an egg my dude.
1
@BrokeBillionare it's so heartbreaking to see a potencial to an all out crazy war. But it's there and no one is paying true atention to avoid it.
1
@BrokeBillionare I see more as war as a product of inovation and feeding the greedy to inovate in a distruction cicle that humans seem to be adicted to. It's quite depressing.
1
Lead refined gas - the extent energy lobby is willing to go. But it surely produces a generation of indoctrinated useful idiots every time!!!
1
@montanasoftware5954 as I stated they don't need. We r small, if I want I meet the president in person but there is no need all parties (except for the comunist) have already that idea. None of them would even dare to think otherwise as it would make the money guys mad.
1
No need, the political/ economic class in my country has a long issue with russia more so than the average citizen. Also, most of our energy imports don't come from there and we can handle the winter (its mild and we aren't rich so we are used to extra sweaters to save up money).
1
@karlalan3806 ur writing as if the soviets weren't invested in warfare in africa, or china. Angola civil war wasn't started by america or europe - it was between a pro-soviet socialist and a pro-china socialist (I'm oversimplified). Zimbabwe was a soviet influence product etc. Cold war did a number in africa, making usa/ europe and soviets/ china guilty. Let's not pretend one party wasn't dancing cause that's propaganda.
1
 @mysterioanonymous3206 some contemporary europeans do carry the political guilt, it's just a way of being well informed.
1
@AbuilyasalAryanee that's the core of it, they are extremely expensive due to the corrupt leaders that demand military investment, bribes etc etc. That makes a cheap become expensive in a heart beat.
1
@t.n.h.ptheneohumanpatterna8334 algeria is politically stable, it's population generally literate etc - it has stable economic growth. If u go to its arms race v morocco u'll see where public money was spent insted of citizens well being. Also, algeria has huge diplomatic influence both in europe and africa.
1
@waitwhat1320 nope, all those respect private property rights at least in spirit. Very diferent albeit being propagandized as if it was the same in the last 2 decades, mainly by political actors who really want power without competition, aka authoritarians and totalitarians of all political flavours.
1
What drugs are u on? 😂
1
 @marcelo55869 u forgot well keep 90% of the profits and give u a stable enough to eat but no more of 10% - 😂
1
They published this propaganda calling for migration to russia in spain because of winter weather: not only the winter is mild in comparisson to russia but spain doesn't import gas from russia (algeria is way closer). It has become a sort of meme in iberia as a lot of people have been saving up money by turning the heating of cause the last decade hasn't been financially easy.
1
@hughmungus2760 already happening hence why south sudan can't develop, their raw mats sale profits stay between china and sudan for the most part, leaving a nominal amount to finance south sudanese governm.
1
@BonsuBigWhale too early to tell. In fact, publicizing either way at this early point is just pure propaganda. There are already reports that in some instances whole comunities were atacked and discriminated which pushes said people to the arms of the separatist militias who still exist and act in the sahel.
1
Ur benefit is called a salary. Ur relationship with ur boss ends there. What u want is to have a say on how economic actors operate beyond or role - so did national socialism, comunism and all other bad isms of 20th century. It's the branch manager rulling over the company owner 😂😂😂
1
U mean eu having acess to 1% of all world gas reserves making it able to control gas prices?
1
That can have a bad side effect: some areas are so distant that the disconect might bring some sort of warlords dictatorship and find a fate of constant infighting or undermining the neighbour.
1
Russia acording to their website of the program import substitution can't produce chips. It's their own admission 🤷‍♀️
1
@happyguy2k in what sense?
1
@steirerbua5322 again not my point, now u are strawmaning: I don't defend either nor do I condemn as I haven't guiven a personal opinion (as is tiresome the troll behaviour of deflecting and strawmaning, very much). My point was that eu is vilified meanwhile the tendency is to excuse any other country doing the same. This is the 3rd time that I say the exact same point of double standart that occurs and it's extremely frustrating to exchange pov with such atitude!!!!
1
@nuo.not1033 the translate option isn't present, don't know why 🤷‍♀️
1
@nuo.not1033 china foreign policy might but ccp has no problem to use it for their own benefit. Also chinese foreign policy has its own agreessiveness. Agression doesn't need to be oficial. For example, if a dictator insists on using slavery and china goes into non interfering and still does business, china is complicit to slavery, and thus co-conspirator in agression and a crime against humanity. If china poses as the alternative willing to accept slavery than china foreign policy is no better than the europeans and arabs who bolstered african slave trade before the prohibition of such.
1
@happyguy2k and russia also colonized a bunch of people from the caucasus till alaska. And it still is actively trying to increse it's territory. So 🤷‍♀️ mirror mirror on the wall...
1
@steirerbua5322 my point exactly, eu does whats best for eu as any other economic or political entity. U give the excuse to one but vilify the other: u expect eu to make decisions against itself to serve others interests and hence why the vilifying
1
@steirerbua5322 that wasn't my point and ur deflection is exactly what I'm talking about.
1
@TrassseB what's with the obcession with skin colour?
1
Actually, there already case studies that show the result: ineficient economies.
1
@MelioraCogito it can also be code word that means I cant say publicly what I am actually doing (yes some use that fact to desguise their private actions, they are zombie pretend in the middle of the real zombies). You actually never know who is who and is intended that way for security reasons.
1
@sheepman1320 a ton in storage doesn't mean a ton in working conditions. Also, tanks don't do well in spring or autumn cause mud. Tik tok the time is against it.
1
@keshi5541 and u know it was externally sabotaged and not internally because.... I know bias, must be someone else, can't be the group I chose to favour 😂
1
Self-reliance is a mith sold by political actors with bad intentions.
1
Europe is known for its welfare and it didn't worked this around either. On the contrary, all european countries have leaches who live off welfare and teach their kids to keep in welfare as opose to look for contributing.
1
Saudi is buying russian oil to keep prices up. But the main factor here is the refining companies (those are at record number profits). Petroleum lobby has a whole history of screwing people. Short memory for the ones who forget the story of lead refining and how it stoped.
1
There are already a bunch of videos about this. There are several deposits in the world of gas and oil. Some easy to access thus cheaper to drill and sell like saudi oil in comparisson to the much more expensive version of uk. There are all kinds of deposits in russia (vast territory) but the easy access ones are being depleted faster (obvious) and ukraine has a bunch of it (about 1% of the total known deposits in the world).
1
@sircatangry5864 ah, sorry for the misinterpretation. Do u happen to know if bashirs have generally bigger families? I am absolutely ignorant of the subject.
1
There is this one tapped converation of a soldier explaining that radio com warned AA unit after being bombed by UAF not before 😂. Taking this into consideration what u propose is very much possible.
1
It's unrelated to western parties interests so it doesn't make it to the news. It's a very good example or proof that western media is (maybe always was) no better than any other propaganda outlet.
1
Since the cold war that the masses are naive to "the other". A good example is the uk pacifists with their anti-nuke position, latter fully known that they were financed by the soviets.
1
@Aurekbeshisk ur almost right, sudanese former dictator was an islamist (self described as one) and he is the one who made these 2 military groups. So, to a certain extent, islamism did have a hand in this.
1
The one that makes the difference is the one used in industry and heating both room temperature and watter. The cooking is minor.
1
 @NEWROCK717 that would be incorrect. There are muslims who practice this and there are ones who don't. Word to research is takfir.
1
@Aurekbeshisk in the case of sudan, these 2 army groups were made by the islamist dictator (so that they would fight each other if one tried to coup- tipical dictator strategy), they united to oust the dictator and then turned against one another. The islamism part was the tool the dictator used to 1. keep sudan inside the pan-arab movement and 2. Justify the subjugation of south sudan and darfur and 3. Meddle in other conflicts such as yemen.
1
When a conflict doesn't have a political party agenda in the west or democratic country, it tends to be ignored by media. Sudan conflicts has many interest groups, none in western political party related, so it's ignored. Key countries: egypt, lybia, uae, china, russia- these are the one's who have a vested interest, and the more conflict, the more sudan is dependant, the more these countries win. It's kind of neo-colonization by means of war. But as it doesn't fit "muah mean west" it doesn't reach the news.
1
@kairon5249 it does and it only got atention (publicity and power) because russia became a menace. Prior to this they weren't in enough numbers to make a diference in the long run, like the rest of the world. It isn't with military might that you counter a bad ideology.
1
@zuthula3847 anonimous is non partisan but follow the so called wester values.
1
@TheNefastor ya, they'll probably still sell some but never as a functioning oficial industry. One of the possible outcomes of this is dark market sells (north korea does it - it's a whole another story). It will be of our interest to pressure governments to keep track of this possibility because no one wants more guerrillas or isis like groups cause in the end the propaganda will be like "its the west who arms them and bla bla bla". That's my fear about this hipe in weapons sales.
1
@TrassseB I understand what u mean but now that it's done it can cause more harm than good, it can make a bad situation worst.
1
@XOPOIIIO no, not really even though most people make that assumption.
1