Comments by "Rita Gameiro" (@puraLusa) on "Knowledgia" channel.

  1. 😂 Sure thing buddy. Before the europeans arrived they were all love and rainbows hippie style 😂
    13
  2. Im sceptical. Big chance that was sooner but evidence got lost.
    4
  3.  @julybeeb4614  sumerians (that is middle east) left their racism written in stone (literally). But sure, show ur anti-euro feeling and ofcourse evidence of ur ignorance in the web for future generations to know 😂. 👍Perfect way to be remembered for posterity.
    4
  4. It still is used in the same fashion. The practicians just don't notice.
    3
  5. ​ @kennarajora6532 u do know that a lot of catholic festivals in iberia are actually celt (and others, there were more than celts) mixed.
    3
  6. ​ @doo2786 that is not very correct, a lot of conversion was of the goth and sueve kingdoms not necessarily under roman rule.
    2
  7. ​ @kekeke8988 eventually they did. Portugal vs the ottoman plus allies - batle of diu. Research that one, u'll be amazed 😁
    2
  8.  @g-ps  I think I wrote my coment in the wrong coment section 😂. I mean the original coment here is about India, so a completely geographical location. Someone somewhere is still waiting for a response possibly 😂.
    2
  9. It's because of this trade route who used the stars to navigate thru the desert that the portuguese were able to cross the oceans. That's how important it is.
    2
  10.  @julybeeb4614  lmao. The level of ignorance is a good joke.
    2
  11. Ibrian union, basicly some king for both countries.
    1
  12. The only reason the nobles didn't accept the anexation was taxes that were implemented. It's more what if no new taxes. Follow the money and you have the answer of most of european history.
    1
  13.  @brokenbridge6316  I can asure you back than nobles weren't necessarily portuguese, french, etc... They were a mixture of nobles mariages of all countries, there was no patriotism, it was all politics and money, and they weren't moral either. So best way to answer questions about Europe is money.
    1
  14. Good point.
    1
  15. There are plenty of youtube videos about portugal.
    1
  16. Mais uma: os dois paises desistiram de conquistar um ao outro em vários momentos porque tinham os recursos postos na colonização e não dá para tudo ao mesmo tempo. 😂😂😂
    1
  17. ​ @Nutty151 depends on the location, some villages majority are arab and amazigh descent, some hsve zero.
    1
  18. ​ @marusdod3685 so says the portuguese tale
    1
  19.  @marusdod3685  I think peeps in other coments already explain that that too is a mith and that in fact there was the use of chariots and thus wheel. Don't know why people need to use history to justify political position of present day - but u sure seem to be one.
    1
  20.  @marusdod3685  me? 😂 Probably not as I'm not an engeneer. But as a portuguese I think my folk as known for their ability to build boats and sail the seas 😂 Some peeps in the internet are quite able to make an ass of themselves 🤣
    1
  21. ​ @skp8748 the celtic one. The phonicians traded and had settlements prior to the romans. One of the thnigs they traded was tech, aka, scripts and the formula of writing. There are a number of stone inscriptions (not many nominal) who show the celtic languages (plural) and writing scripts. These stones are recent arqueologic finds in some places inhabited by the celts and the old historic narrative that was the romans who spread writing and roads thru europe is being debated among scholars. I'm sure if there was more arqueological research in the african continent same kind of stuff would be found. Colonizers in ab atempt to transform the conquered had the policy of erasing privious cultural and tech or appropriating. We really don't know much about the past, just litle flashes.
    1
  22.  @skp8748  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etruscan_language No - it is greek script - etruscan script- latin script. If u can't use wikipedia, it's ur problem.
    1
  23.  @skp8748  as for celtic languages, this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celtiberian_script Before there was a consensus that celts didn't have a script. But archeological findings show that they did. They just didn't right as much cause it's expensive in time and materials, and celts didn't have either much of the time. 🤷‍♀️ Again, simple use of wikipedia.
    1
  24. ​ @chefar 2nd oldest, egipt being the oldest.
    1
  25. Not even that, the vikings had landed prior to what would be known as the Americas.
    1
  26. 😂😂😂
    1
  27. ​ @frgv4060 lusitanian
    1