Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "The Coming Far Right Backlash" video.
-
8
-
@-Swamp_Donkey- "Oops, can’t mention Jews, banking, The Balfour Declaration, and WWI and expect your comment not to be removed."
Of course you can. You didn't expect to be removed. Why would the leftist establishment remove your comment? Everything you groypers do or say helps them. The notion that an ethnicity is a conspiracy is absurd. You Jew haters help the socialists because you play into their narrative. The only effective lie the socialists have nowadays is accusing US of being YOU. If you did not exist, they could not win anything. They would have to invent you in order to have anything to say after their policies and ideology have been so totally discredited historically.
In fact, every day in every way groypers support the same things the "cultural Marxists" support, from the centrality of "group identity" through the abolition of the civil rights enumerated in the Constitution (all of them, without exception) through segregation, to the opposition to the ideal/goal of limited government and freedom itself. This is how you know they are false flag leftists-BECAUSE ALL OF THE THINGS THEY ADVOCATE ARE LEFTIST THINGS.
Your man Spencer endorsed Biden/Harris in '20. Nick Fuentes tried to urge Georgia conservatives to stay home and not vote in the runoff elections that handed the Dems the effective majority in the Senate. You are pulling out all the stops to ensure that conservatives lose, you are doing this OPENLY, and you expect us NOT TO NOTICE? That is why you denigrate EVERY EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE VOICE, not just the Jewish ones. Fascist and Marxists (two flavors of socialism) have been playing this game since the 1920s: "If you're not one of us you're one of them". BS. Occasionally they fight each other but most of the time they cooperate against liberty.
We conservatives have some political power and a following. You racists have nothing. You will always have nothing. You will always accomplish nothing as you have accomplished nothing to this day. The only effective checks on the socialist agenda have been accomplished by us, with no help from you, because you are not on the side of freedom.
1
-
@hi-rq1el "Ad0lf H1tler October 27th, 1928"
Hitler wasn't just a murderer, he was a liar. It is true that Hitler when he was a politician seeking office expressed certain pro-Christian statements. But in his private remarks to his officials he made it clear where he really stood as has been revealed by seized Nazi government documents and the notes of an author who planned to publish a collection of Hitler's remarks at the dinner table.
Dr Zoellner and [Catholic Bishop of Munster] Count Galen have tried to make clear to me that Christianity consists in faith in Christ as the son of God. That makes me laugh... No, Christianity is not dependent upon the Apostle's Creed... True Christianity is represented by the party, and the German people are now called by the party and especially the Fuehrer to a real Christianity... the Fuehrer is the herald of a new revelation."
— Hans Kerrl, Nazi Minister for Church Affairs, 1937
During the war Alfred Rosenberg formulated a thirty-point program for the National Reich Church, which included:
The National Reich Church claims exclusive right and control over all Churches.
The National Church is determined to exterminate foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800.
The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible.
The National Church will clear away from its altars all Crucifixes, Bibles, and pictures of Saints.
On the altars there must be nothing but "Mein Kampf" and to the left of the altar a sword.
Prior to the Reichstag vote for the Enabling Act under which Hitler gained legislative powers with which he went on to permanently dismantle the Weimar Republic, Hitler promised the Reichstag on 23 March 1933, that he would not interfere with the rights of the churches. However, with power secured in Germany, Hitler quickly broke this promise. Various historians have written that the goal of the Nazi Kirchenkampf (Church Struggle) entailed not only ideological struggle, but ultimately the eradication of the Churches. However, leading Nazis varied in the importance they attached to the Church Struggle.
William Shirer wrote that "under the leadership of Rosenberg, Bormann and Himmler, who were backed by Hitler, the Nazi regime intended to destroy Christianity in Germany, if it could, and substitute the old paganism of the early tribal Germanic gods and the new paganism of the Nazi extremists." During a speech on 27 October 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt revealed evidence of Hitler's plan to abolish all religions in Germany, declaring:
Your government has in its possession another document, made in Germany by Hitler’s Government… It is a plan to abolish all existing religions—Catholic, Protestant, Mohammedan, Hindu, Buddhist, and Jewish alike. The property of all churches will be seized by the Reich and its puppets. The cross and all other symbols of religion are to be forbidden. The clergy are to be forever liquidated, silenced under penalty of the concentration camps, where even now so many fearless men are being tortured because they have placed God above Hitler.
Hitler himself possessed radical instincts in relation to the continuing conflict with the Catholic and Protestant Churches in Germany. Though he occasionally spoke of wanting to delay the Church struggle and was prepared to restrain his anti-clericalism out of political considerations, his "own inflammatory comments gave his immediate underlings all the license they needed to turn up the heat in the 'Church Struggle, confident that they were 'working towards the Fuhrer'". According to the Goebbels Diaries, Hitler hated Christianity. In an 8 April 1941 entry, Goebbels wrote "He hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity."
In Bullock's assessment, though raised a Catholic, Hitler "believed neither in God nor in conscience", retained some regard for the organizational power of Catholicism, but had contempt for its central teachings, which he said, if taken to their conclusion, "would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure". (Bullock wrote.)
In Hitler's eyes, Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.
— Extract from Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, by Alan Bullock
Writing for Yad Vashem, the historian Michael Phayer wrote that by the latter 1930s, church officials knew that the long-term aim of Hitler was the "total elimination of Catholicism and of the Christian religion", but that given the prominence of Christianity in Germany, this was necessarily a long-term goal. According to Bullock, Hitler intended to destroy the influence of the Christian churches in Germany after the war. In his memoirs, Hitler's chief architect Albert Speer recalled that when drafting his plans for the "new Berlin", he consulted Protestant and Catholic authorities, but was "curtly informed" by Hitler's private secretary Martin Bormann that churches were not to receive building sites. Kershaw wrote that, in Hitler's scheme for the Germanization of Eastern Europe, he made clear that there would be "no place in this utopia for the Christian Churches'.
Geoffrey Blainey wrote that Hitler and his Fascist ally Mussolini were atheists. "The aggressive spread of atheism in the Soviet Union alarmed many German Christians", wrote Blainey, and with the Nazis becoming the main opponent of Communism in Germany: "[Hitler] himself saw Christianity as a temporary ally, for in his opinion 'one is either a Christian or a German'. To be both was impossible. Nazism itself was a religion, a pagan religion, and Hitler was its high priest... Its high altar [was] Germany itself and the German people, their soil and forests and language and traditions". Nonetheless, a number of early confidants of Hitler detailed the Führer's complete lack of religious belief. One close confidant, Otto Strasser, disclosed in his 1940 book, Hitler and I, that Hitler was a true disbeliever, succinctly stating: Hitler is an atheist.
1
-
1
-
@Octoberfurst "The Democratic party is not left!:"
The biggest thing, of course, is that a whole host of radical new issues have appeared out of the blue. Indoctrinating preadolescent children in dangerous sexual practices that will leave them more vulnerable to exploitation by sexual predators and a lucrative industry of quack elective drugs and procedures which will leave them impotent, frigid, and sterile; and dependent on continual, extra, and expensive medical care just to stay alive. Mainstreaming of censorship and political slander and violence. Mobilization of the "law enforcement" apparatus to suppress political dissent. Corporate and academic departments devoted to sequestration and punishment of political views. Mandatory Orwellian "struggle sessions" indoctrinating and enforcing the party line. Most of these things were not even being advocated quite recently, much less done. In the field of race relations, Democrats are utterly abandoning the ideal of the colorblind society in favor of "positive racism" and segregation:
https://www.newsweek.com/black-students-only-housing-washington-university-1633265
https://housing.wwu.edu/black-affinity-housing
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/american-colleges-segregated-housing-graduation-ceremonies/
But if you want to quantify the drastic leftward shift of the Democrat party, the easiest thing to graph and track is the shift in registered party members' views on issues that have actually existed long enough to be tracked over time. I can remember when free speech was not a partizan issue. Neither was support for Israel. Dems used to be, if anything, more hawkish about immigration control than Republicans. As recently as Obama's first presidential run, the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman (back when we could all agree on what those terms meant) was a plank in the DEMOCRAT party platform. Republicans haven't moved much since the 1980s when the Reagan revolution reversed the simultaneous double-digit inflation and unemployment and "national malaise" (Carter's phrase). The Democrats' leftward movement on a number of the same issues over time is a verifiable and quantifiable fact, as show in the charts and figures in these articles:
"Democrats and their water carriers in the press are like people on a boat that is drifting off to sea, but are convinced that it's the land that's moving, not them."
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/pew-research-center-study-shows-that-democrats-have-shifted-to-the-extreme-left/
https://theweek.com/democrats/1002266/democrats-have-moved-further-left-than-republicans-have-moved-right-statistical
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-democrats-have-shifted-left-over-the-last-30-years/
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/597987-new-polling-confirms-democrats-left-leaning-policies-are-out-of-touch/
1