Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Fox Business" channel.

  1. That's the way it's supposed to work with utilities. You don't pay your contracted amount, your service shuts down.
    23
  2.  @Grant-wn4ep  Border spending is not the problem. De facto open border POLICIES are the problem. We don't need a well funded open border. This was explained in this clip, so there is no point in doubling down on the refuted narrative. "In vain is the net spread in sight of the bird".
    11
  3. The notion that we should treat violence against women as different than violence against men is CHIVALROUS. I know that 3rd wave feminism disagrees, but 3rd wave feminism is WRONG. 3rd wave feminism exists as a parasite on chivalry and cannot live when chivalry dies.
    4
  4. You're leaving out the arm bar he layed on her.
    4
  5. "Government shouldn't be giving money to any Companies" Can't quite go along with that. I'm a conservative and all for fiscal restraint, but contracting corporations is the most efficient way to do anything practical. Government may be doing too much, but trying to do it in house will waste 10 times as much. Government shouldn't be bailing out failed corporations, or doing corporate welfare, but contracting out work is not bad in and of itself.
    3
  6.  @jeremyburgess6536  There is no contradiction between wanting to preserve American culture and institutions and not being a racist.
    3
  7.  @boslyporshy6553  Let them be petty with their OWN money.
    3
  8. Yea, the blackmailee needs to know he's being blackmailed for the thing to work. And it also "encourages the others" as the saying goes.
    3
  9. You grab the journalist's mike when it is time for him to pass it on to somebody else. He should by that time have relinquished it.
    3
  10.  @IcerinAlaska49  I've been laid off many times. It never made me resent management.
    2
  11.  @charliebrown5611  "The GOP Senate helped write it." Some RINOs helped it. If Senator Cruz had voted for it or tried to sell it, that would be a rebuke to "Thank you, Senator Cruz." The bill failed in the SENATE. Do you really think that most of those voting against it were DEMOCRATS?
    2
  12.  @Joeperfectt  Why would you assume @senfing votes Democrat?
    2
  13.  @SkiBlueWater  "I know who the members of DOGE are" Who are they?
    2
  14.  @eniselmenic5056  "He didn't even read their emails" Most didn't send them.
    2
  15.  @valeriemoon3686  You are conflating valuing American culture with racism. This is just politically tendentious slander. The first does not imply the second.
    2
  16. If you have a position on this issue, nobody can figure it out from this. Cruz is holding the line and you're busting his chops for it. The laws are in place to close the border. "Immigration reform" has always been a code word for amnesty, which encourages more illegal immigration.
    2
  17.  @sammadison4792  Not even close. Dems have played patty cake with anti-Semites before (Farakhan, Sharpton), but now they are starting to elect them to congress, and they can't even muster the will to condemn them when they vent their hate.
    2
  18. It is is 70 years too late to attack NK FOR NO REASON. They have not signed a peace treaty from the Korean war. NK has busied itself throughout its existence being to its worst ability nothing more than one continuous reason. It is morally positive that this should have a downside. There may be a better solution than a military one, that would be fine. But it is utterly false and vile to claim that the regime has not earned oblivion many times over.
    1
  19. I assume you meant something like "Stop being a warmonger, man, and I know the war never ended." Even that is not a rational reply to my refutation of the concept that NK can be attacked for no reason. It is just name calling and Bulverism. It is irrelevant to the refutation in 2 ways: 1. Refuting your fallacy does not make me a warmonger. 2. If I were a warmonger it would not affect the fact that I refuted your fallacy. The term "warmonger" is only good for irrational and tendentious name calling anyway. It IMPLIES that the target is a person who likes war and will advocate it at every opportunity. In practical terms of how it is used it only really MEANS a person who advocates a war you don't advocate. And if you read my post carefully, I did not even do that. You vastly misrepresented a point of fact in your original post. I corrected your error. That's it. I did not advocate a course of action. From Bulverism by C. S. Lewis: /quote You must show that a man is wrong before you start explaining why he is wrong. The modern method is to assume without discussion that he is wrong and then distract his attention from this (the only real issue) by busily explaining how he became so silly. In the course of the last fifteen years I have found this vice so common that I have had to invent a name for it. I call it "Bulverism". Some day I am going to write the biography of its imaginary inventor, Ezekiel Bulver, whose destiny was determined at the age of five when he heard his mother say to his father — who had been maintaining that two sides of a triangle were together greater than a third — "Oh you say that because you are a man." "At that moment", E. Bulver assures us, "there flashed across my opening mind the great truth that refutation is no necessary part of argument. Assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error, and the world will be at your feet. Attempt to prove that he is wrong or (worse still) try to find out whether he is wrong or right, and the national dynamism of our age will thrust you to the wall." That is how Bulver became one of the makers of the Twentieth Century. ... Suppose I think, after doing my accounts, that I have a large balance at the bank. And suppose you want to find out whether this belief of mine is "wishful thinking." You can never come to any conclusion by examining my psychological condition. Your only chance of finding out is to sit down and work through the sum yourself. When you have checked my figures, then, and then only, will you know whether I have that balance or not. If you find my arithmetic correct, then no amount of vapouring about my psychological condition can be anything but a waste of time. If you find my arithmetic wrong, then it may be relevant to explain psychologically how I came to be so bad at my arithmetic, and the doctrine of the concealed wish will become relevant — but only after you have yourself done the sum and discovered me to be wrong on purely arithmetical grounds. It is the same with all thinking and all systems of thought. If you try to find out which are tainted by speculating about the wishes of the thinkers, you are merely making a fool of yourself. You must first find out on purely logical grounds which of them do, in fact, break down as arguments. Afterwards, if you like, go on and discover the psychological causes of the error. /unquote
    1
  20. +MrZapparin "You actually believe NK is a danger to USA, or that they're seriously going to attack SK, or Japan." NK has never ceased to assert that they are, and that they will, and appears to be vigorously upgrading its ability to, do all of those bad things. ". If NK has nukes, then they are at even odds. " Securing our freedom is not about giving the bad guys a fair chance to screw things up. " if the NKs want to get rid of The Dear Leader, then it's up to them, not us. Who are we to decide on their behalf" [sic] What the people of NK want is unknown, and under the current regime, unknowable. It is not a question of whether they will have their choice taken away from them, but of whether they will begin to have a choice.
    1
  21. +Roderick Moore "nk is trying to protect their land from the central banks that control the us and many other countries what dont you understand" [sic] I don't understand: 1. Why an hypothetical international economic conspiracy would seek to conquer for gain a country which has nothing worth stealing. 2. Whatever happened to the question mark?
    1
  22. +MrZapparin "Also, it a', not 'an', before 'hypothetical' " Quite correct, I think I added the adjective to the sentence after I had already written it, and did not catch the indefinite article. I will leave the error uncorrected so folks will not be confused by your correction. "As for why we need NK, ask yourself this: what would we be fighting against, if we didn't have NK?! The question will lead your way. Take care" The question leads nowhere. History has never afforded a shortage of belligerent aggressors, and the disappearance of NK would not leave us short. You seem to be assuming that peace and harmony are the natural state of affairs and any conflict requires some convoluted conspiracy theory to explain. This is a fundamental misunderstanding not only of history but of human nature.
    1
  23. That there are globalist seeking to replace national sovereignty with global government is not a conspiracy, because it is not a secret. This has nothing to do with the US protecting itself and its allies, which is an assertion of national sovereignty, ours and theirs. Globalists oppose that. If you oppose it as well, you are the tool and dupe of the globalists, not me.
    1
  24.  @rogerwarren803  The bureaucracy is busting a gut to punish Musk for political action and your defense is "It won't work, so no foul"?
    1
  25.  Jacksmithmagahunter  Where is the lie? He CALLED OUT McConnell for this. You only know about Republican collusion in this BECAUSE HE JUST TOLD YOU. If he's lying, you have no source for your attack on Republicans.
    1
  26.  Jacksmithmagahunter  "Born in Canada. Parents immigrated. He isn't a American born citizen. Pure fact." His mother was a US citizen, so he is a "natural born citizen" in the Constitutional sense. He has always been a US citizen from birth and never had Canadian citizenship. Canadian law does not convey citizenship to aliens born in Canada. So the "born in Canada" is fact, the rest is lies. Trump's lies to sabotage Cruz' presidential primary run.
    1
  27.  @evanwest4751  "grabbing women by the pussy without permission is okay when it's a republican" What Republican does this without permission, don't say Trump because he said "they'll LET YOU" which is consensual. You are lying about this (again), so nothing you say has credibility.
    1
  28.  @peterjean5403  Sure, Bezos is having to contract launches with SpaceX.
    1
  29. @synco pated What's your point? Do you think it impossible, or even particularly unlikely, for the UN to recognize or favor evil? In this case they have "recognized" terrorists with stated genocidal goals.
    1
  30.  MSB 1997  Actually, when the US government is making a international claim on this level, it usually does. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
    1
  31. @bd z You are pointing out that European powers have a vested interest in avoiding a US/Iranian conflict, that is not the same as demonstrating that Iran is not an enemy of the west, and a growing threat.
    1
  32.  @scottphipps2278  Tell them what? That the regime that followed is not at least as murderous, and an international threat to boot?
    1
  33.  @danielm5161  We are going to prevent nuclear armed terrorists.
    1
  34.  @NangongReng1973  "Where are the natives?" Still here, in all 3 cases.
    1
  35.  @Ghekko-kw3zz  An NGO is not a government contractor, it's a non-profit organization.
    1
  36.  @RealEstateEntrepreneur  Elon Musk is a naturalized citizen of the US.
    1
  37. Superfluous, that is existing law. Biden enforces it, he gets the Ukraine funding.
    1
  38. "Has anyone noticed that Joyless hasn't brought up the fact that Hillary was the one that was using Russian disinformation?" Or that Hillary was in charge of handling "bimbo eruptions", of quashing reports of Bill's sexual misconduct? That's not a victim, that's an ACCESSORY!
    1
  39.  @springerworks002  "Do you not understand that there is more than the uniparty?" Do YOU not? If the establishment weren't threatened by conservative Republicans, it wouldn't be mobilizing the law enforcement apparatus and bureaucracy against them. "There are dozens of political parties." No, in terms of accomplishing change and effecting policy, THERE AREN'T. (Not to mention that the biggest third party - Libertarians - not only aren't conservative, they always tactically sabotage themselves.) If your Republican reps are too leftist, VOTE IN PRIMARIES. But, of course, you don't want freedom to win, you're trying to fool us into throwing away our vote so the leftists win.
    1
  40.  @eniselmenic5056  "he would never pay bots to do that" Why should he bother when he's too busy earning the respect?
    1
  41.  @EdReyda  Dementia and high functioning autism are not the same thing.
    1
  42.  @lisahardy9707  As for the lawsuit she had to pay his court costs. There was no "settlement" as you implied. He paid her hush money before the election.
    1
  43.  @MikaPopp  "examples are lies." Not even his detractors are claiming that. Note he's asking "What part do you object to?" and they can't point to anything.
    1
  44.  @christophergemmell8805  "tesla is down over 50 percent" Yes sabotage will do that. "blowing stuff up" Sabotage does that, too. SpaceX has captured 80% of the launch market because they can launch for half what their competitors can and still make money, because they're still the only launch provider that can reuse rockets. He didn't become the richest man in the world by underperforming as a CEO and engineer.
    1
  45.  @scraigrogers  "People don't devote hundreds of millions of dollars in politics and then devote their time for nothing." Democrats don't. Conservatives and Republicans give more and volunteer more, as documented in the book "Who Really Cares?"
    1
  46. @tilesetter929 "wtf is the deal with shadow banning comments?" Welcome to YouTube, are you new here?
    1
  47.  @macalister8881  "is how he is know by those that think" By those that think they know grammar and sentence structure?
    1
  48.  @danielrobelto1347  "SACRIFICES OUR PEOPLE!!" Are "your people" corrupt bureaucrats?
    1
  49.  @Chewy_GarageBandDad  "let the trolls get to them." Not every response to a troll is an emotional response. Lies need refutation, or everything devolves to "he said, she said".
    1
  50.  @bridgettewood1713  "if I went into Walmart and stoled something I would go to jail!" One would hope, but I'm afraid that depends on which county you stole in.
    1