Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Dennis Prager Testifies at Arizona State Legislature on ASU Censorship | Speeches and Events" video.

  1. It seems to be a meeting of a committee, or a subcommittee. That is a smaller room, not a legislative assembly room.
    1
  2.  @SlimThrull  Broadcast TV, cable, public broadcasting, print media (other than books) YouTube and other social media and Internet sites, and academic curricula are chock full of leftist propaganda. We couldn't avoid hearing it no matter how hard we tried. But Prager's a censor if he doesn't let leftists filibuster his 5 minute videos on top of that near monopoly? Your premise is as absurd as it is hypocritical. You might have had a point if leftists needed Prager's sponsorship to get on YouTube. He's a content producer not a forum. You are demanding FORCED SPEECH, and calling the refusal "censorship". When he offers leftists time on his radio show where he has time to spare and develop an argument, he is extending to them a courtesy which they don't and wouldn't reciprocate. His radio show is not taxpayer subsidized like many of the leftist controlled venues that shut him out, with slander thrown in for good measure. Conservative media doesn't have to provide leftists "equal time" on conservative venues. All the access conservatives have to an audience doesn't nearly constitute "equal time" or "equal access". We'll start worrying about leftists getting equal time on conservative built venues when conservatives get equal time on leftist venues, federal regulated bandwidth, or even taxpayer funded fora. "He does the same thing that he proclaims the left does." Obviously not. You deliberately chose an unequal standard for its inequality.
    1
  3.  @taylorc2542  "I'd to see Pragers commitment to free speech." You saw it. He supports free speech for Nazis, for white supremacists, for Holocaust deniers and anti-Zionists. What more would you like to see? Nobody is censoring your filthy slander, least of all Dennis Prager. You object to the fact that he refutes you. That is not censorship. That is HIS freedom of speech!
    1