Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "The Political Motivations to Deny the Bible’s Historical Accuracy | Real Talk" video.

  1. Yes, we talk about evidence, not lack of evidence. That is a strength of our position and a weakness of yours.
    2
  2. Yea, the Jew haters contradict themselves a lot. They say that it is the Jewish religion that prompts Jews to hostility and domination plots toward gentiles and Christians and that Zionism is part of the plot, then when they list subversive Jews in places of power they list atheist Jews whose family has never darkened the door of a synagogue, sometimes for generations, and who are more hostile to Israel than they are. They say the Jews are to be blamed because they killed Christ, then they say modern Jews are not descendants of the Old and New Testament Jews. They deny the historical holocaust by way of trying to improve the image of Nazis, then call for a holocaust. If a holocaust is bad, why are they calling for one? If it is not bad, why do they spend so much energy trying to deny the 20th century European one? Not only are each of their claims unsupported and absurd in isolation, they don't even fit together into a consistent lie.
    2
  3. Well, the Bible is history, and so are scores of discredited theories against it.
    1
  4. Not at all. Faith is trust in God in adversity. Faith is not a basis for belief. Belief is a prerequisite for faith. The Bible only ever invokes faith as steadfastness in adversity. The Bible never invokes faith as a defense against CONTRARY EVIDENCE.
    1
  5.  @MasonRai  Which 2 "myths"?
    1
  6. Atheism of the gaps. Each of your alternate denial claims is shot down one by one by the advance of science and scholarship, but you refuse to notice a pattern. "The truth is not in what we know, but what we don't know." Whatever.
    1