Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Ballot Harvesting Undermines Election Integrity | Short Clips | PragerU" video.

@ji8044 Can you tell us the part of the Constitution that is violated by voter ID, which used to be universally required and is in every other nation on the Earth? If it was unconstitutional, no state could legally require it.
3
It is accurately depicted as a breakdown in the chain of custody. Such a breakdown undermines the integrity in the manners described. When you consolidate the custody of a group of ballots to an entity without an outside observer or a verifiable chain of custody, that entity effectively controls all the votes in its custody. One person, one vote is an expression of the IDEA of an election. Ballot harvesting is a way to subvert that idea. If you WANT there to be no more or less that one vote per eligible voter, you oppose ballot harvesting, any insecure or large scale routine protocol for mail-in voting, and favor voter ID. There is no valid reason to subvert the long-standing international protocols and standards for verifying election integrity. If you say you want to disable the means to verify integrity, then you are against election integrity. Those who are for making cheating easy are for cheating. Lie about it till your tongue falls out.
2
Theoretically, they're being watched by observers from the other party.
1
The state election rules are specified in the US Constitution as the sole responsibility of the state legislatures. If the opposition party can't get a bill passed, they can't change the law in theory. Leftist state courts have also interjected themselves, but I don't think they have jurisdiction
1
The part of our Republic where we vote is the Democratic part. That's the part under attack. We can never fix it if you won't let us talk about it. This is why we lose. Every time a practical point is raised, some fool starts an impractical argument.
1
@j.christie2594 What's your point? Trying to undermine Jesus? it's spelled ΙΗΣΥS (Yaysoos) in Greek, no "J" required. There's nothing more lame than an ignorant pedant.
1
She never said that THE UNITED STATES IS A DEMOCRACY. She is warning that the voting part - the democratic part - of our republic is under threat. We can't fix it if we're not allowed to talk about it. This is why we lose. Every time a practical need is addressed, some fool diverts us into an argument about political theory.
1
The part of our republic where we vote is the democracy part. That's what the Democrats are attacking. Don't shoot the messenger. She's on our side in this one.
1
How do you verify that? Because you liked the results?
1