Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Vaccine risk reduction" video.

  1. Rab J, I’ve seen your nonsense everywhere bro. Why? Who’s paying you? Or are you just wasting your time?
    8
  2. Sounds like normal side effects to me.
    6
  3. Elaine Lucero, Less than 40% are vaccinated in the US so far, and they’re already opening up. They’re conducting a dangerous experiment. Over 65% were vaccinated in Seychelles, and they opened up too early and their cases have skyrocketed. My guess is that you’re going to be glad you’re vaccinated after the latest Indian variants have become established.
    6
  4. Michael P, What? YouTube doesn’t allow external links? Really? Hmmm... What’s this? Conclusions Vaccination of nonhuman primates with mRNA-1273 induced robust SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity, rapid protection in the upper and lower airways, and no pathologic changes in the lung. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32722908/
    5
  5. TORY BLUE, ROTFLMAO!!! I believe you are 100% correct.
    3
  6. stike 3, You believe that incompetent quacks like Mike Yeadon should continue to be working with science?
    3
  7. Lola, The Pfizer vaccines is 95% effective at preventing Covid, and 89.4% effective at preventing spread of the virus and 99.9% effective at keeping you out of the hospital. This is real world results. In other words, facts. So when you claim that the vaccinated are getting reinfected, what are you talking about?
    3
  8. Col Johnson, You believes the world, including Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and J&J prefer to buy vaccines from China and Russia rather than use Ivermectin? Seriously? Why? How does that benefit these companies? Even if Ivermectin works, it is not 100%. People will still need to get vaccinated. Everyone isn’t going to keep taking Ivermectin forever.
    3
  9. Dave Lewis, I see you lack the ability to understand facts.
    2
  10. TORY BLUE, Good advice...
    2
  11. Phil Odowd, Allergies are easily dealt with using medications. So even if you were to experience anaphylactic shock, they will be able to treat you. The real danger with anaphylaxis is when it’s unexpectedness you don’t have access to proper medical care.
    2
  12. Sunset, Start taking Vitamin D. It’s required for a healthy immune system. I suspect that an unhealthy immune system might be more likely to over react to the vaccine, or do something wrong. My second dose of Moderna gave me a fever of 102F and a slight for one day. I’ve been taking Vitamin D since long before the pandemic started.
    2
  13. Janet Airlines, My second dose of Moderna gave me a 102F fever. A friend recommended I call a hospital. Uhhh, .... 102F is NOT a big deal. A fever is not a problem until it goes above 104F. Some people are psssies, and call an ambulance for everything. Maybe these chickensh!Ts have never had a fever before. Or maybe they believe everything they notice might be a blood clot.
    2
  14. Dana V., Well, he owned shares of one of the companies that developed a vaccine for a virus that’s causing a global pandemic, right? And people are now expecting this technology to cure cancer. Obviously their stock went up.
    2
  15. Csab, The vaccines are safe and effective, so why not push them? They’ll save many lives.
    2
  16. tom gong, Huh? Centralized database? What for and why are you concerned?
    2
  17. Dave Lewis, They’re giving Nobel prizes to quacks now? Is that what you’re saying?
    1
  18. Rab J, You’re incredibly confused bro. It seems you don’t even understand what a PCR test does.
    1
  19. Rab J, You’re the one who’s confused bro.
    1
  20. Rab J, I’m calling you confused bro.
    1
  21. Renee D, All the mRNA is eliminated from your body within 24 to 36 hours. And your immune system completely eliminates the spike proteins within a week.
    1
  22. WHATEVER GOES FOR ME, So many people, and it seems you’re one of them, don’t understand what “95% effective” means.
    1
  23. Alikatty1, Seems like you also don’t understand what “95% effective” means. There seems to be so many people who don’t understand percentages.
    1
  24. Col Johnson, Well, Covid won’t require more than 2 doses, so it won’t be every year. So I guess “my government” failed.
    1
  25. Chloe M, Regarding animal trials, what’s this? Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates Conclusions Vaccination of nonhuman primates with mRNA-1273 induced robust SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity, rapid protection in the upper and lower airways, and no pathologic changes in the lung. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.)
    1
  26. carzyscenctist, If their goal is mass depopulation, why mess with vaccines? Why not poison our drinking water?
    1
  27. blackjack reward, ADE is a myth. It has never been demonstrated outside of a lab. Geert is a quack.
    1
  28. Michael John, If Ivermectin was 100% effective then EUA for the vaccines would not be possible. But Ivermectin is not 100% effective. One flawed study showed that it’s 83% effective for 1 month after two doses 3 days apart.
    1
  29. Col Johnson, So you believe Ivermectin is 100% effective?
    1
  30. Col Johnson, So you don’t want to answer the question?
    1
  31. Davide Shaina, They’re lying about a third dose.
    1
  32. YellowSquare Music, Like this right? “Fact check: No evidence that a 2-year-old died after getting Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine” https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/05/09/fact-check-no-evidence-2-year-old-died-covid-vaccine/4971367001/
    1
  33. Ese Callum, So you’re saying that the lockdowns worked?
    1
  34. Ese Callum, But the evidence you posted make it look like the lockdowns have been a huge success.
    1
  35. Ese Callum, What would the numbers be if we had no masks or lockdowns?
    1
  36. Chris H, What’s “convalescent plasma”? And why is it so important to you that the Red Cross won’t accept convalescent plasma from people who have been vaccinated? What point are you trying to make?
    1
  37. Chris H, If the vaccine is 95% effective at keeping you from getting sick, over 99.9% effective at keeping you out of the hospital, and 88.4% effective at preventing the virus from spreading to others, why do you care how or why? Why is how or why so important to you when the fact is, it works.
    1
  38. stike 3, I calculated the numbers myself bro. From the raw data. I know exactly where they come from and what they mean. Unlike you, I understand math. You’re confused bro. What you do is read sh!t and then memorize everything that agrees with your beliefs without understanding it. It’s called “confirmation bias” you should look it up. Also, look up Dunning Kruger while you’re at it. And maybe try to learn some math too if you have the capacity. I also know exactly what convalescent plasma is. What I don’t understand is why you believe it’s such a big deal that they want convalescent plasma from people who have been naturally infected. That’s completely irrelevant. What’s relevant is that obtaining immunity naturally is a lot more dangerous than obtaining immunity from the vaccine. The vaccines are very safe and effective, and you’re incredibly confused. Would you happen to be mentally handicapped?
    1
  39. Chris H, Well liar? Let’s see that screen shot?
    1
  40. Chris H, Still waiting bro. What’s taking you so long?
    1
  41. Chris H, Evidence you liar. I’m waiting for evidence. Evidence that you can’t provide because it doesn’t exist because you’re a liar.
    1
  42. Chris H, Yup. Still waiting for your evidence bro.
    1
  43. Chris H, What do you believe you’re accomplishing by playing dumb bro?
    1
  44. Chris H, Ok. I guess you’re not paying dumb. You actually ARE dumb!
    1
  45. That doesn’t matter though, because even with 1% reported to VAERS, they can spot patterns and investigate further. That’s why try paused the J&J vaccine administrations when there were only 6 cases of blood clots, then they investigated and found 28 cases. You need to understand what VAERS is for and how to use it properly.
    1