Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "US and China and BA 2" video.

Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
9
@denisepappas4644 , The FLCCC is a scam. The majority of their treatments are ineffective. 50% of those who are infected are asymptomatic and another 30% experience mild symptoms. This has been the case since the pandemic started. The fact that none of you became severely ill is nothing more than luck. Y’all had an 80% chance of experiencing mild to no symptoms regardless of what you did. Pierre Kory is charging $1,200 in consultation fees if you decide to consult with him. The guy is making a fortune off antivaxxers.
3
@bronwynbeistle8317 , If you are not vaccinated, or previously infected and therefore have absolutely no previous immunity when you become infected by Omicron, then Omicron is MORE pathogenic. It causes more severe disease more often in the immunologically naive than any previous variant. It is a significantly more lethal virus. The only reason it is causing less severe disease and fewer hospitalizations is because the majority of the population everywhere is either previously infected, or vaccinated. So yes. Absolutely. The reduction in pathogenicity comes from vaccination.
3
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
3
@Andrew-rc3vh , The chances of being locked down in China appears to be less than the chanced of being dead from Covid in the United States.
3
@denisepappas4644 , The FLCCC is a scam. The majority of their treatments are ineffective. 50% of those who are infected are asymptomatic and another 30% experience mild symptoms. This has been the case since the pandemic started. The fact that none of you became severely ill is nothing more than luck. Y’all had an 80% chance of experiencing mild to no symptoms regardless of what you did. Pierre Kory is charging $1,200 in consultation fees if you decide to consult with him. The guy is making a fortune off antivaxxers.
2
@keithporter3126 , Pfizer makes more money from monoclonals and antivirals than off the vaccines. It’s more profitable for them if you are not vaccinated. Vaccines ≈ $30/dose Antivirals ≈ $700/dose Monoclonals ≈ $1600/dose Use your brain bro. If you know how…
2
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
2
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
2
How SARS-CoV-2 Causes Brain, Kidney, Pancreas, & Heart Damage https://youtu.be/g9Ftwk4loPA
2
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
1
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
1
Omicron is NOT milder unless you have been previously infected or vaccinated. Omicron is NOT “milder” https://youtu.be/92lFo3YMM24
1
@jeffgobert9325 , Good luck bro… Super Antigens and SARS-CoV-2 https://youtu.be/BuMzUIVBw8k
1
Covid causes autoimmune disorders because the virus contains super antigens. Super antigens confuse your immune cells and cause them to start attacking things that it shouldn’t, like YOU. Super Antigens and SARS-CoV-2 https://youtu.be/BuMzUIVBw8k
1
@GlobalAdventurer , Look into getting monoclonal antibodies. They are as effective as the vaccines, and do not require a functioning immune system.
1
@jeffgobert9325 , 2/3 of those who experience severe Covid have 1 comorbidity and the remaining 1/3 do not. Since about 50% of the population has at least 1 comorbidity, the other 50% do not, which means that having a comorbidity only doubles your risk of experiencing severe Covid. On the flip side, having no comorbidities only halves your risk. You got lucky, but your chances were 50% better than someone with a comorbidity.
1
@GlobalAdventurer , You can take monoclonals proactively. They last from 4 to 6 months per treatment. They are the same antibody made by our immune system, but only the most effective one.
1
@carriec.9834 , The IFR is only less than the previous flu season in the vaccinated and the previously infected. In the immunologically naive, who are now quite rare, it is not.
1
@caroltoot7602 , If you’re immune compromised, get monoclonal antibodies. They are currently the most effective treatment. After that comes antivirals.
1
@kevinduran7698 , Nearly everyone in Denmark has either already had Covid, or has been vaccinated. You’re all immune already, so they lifted all the restrictions. Why not? You’re no longer at risk, so the restrictions are now pointless.
1
@jeffgobert9325 , Luck had everything to do with it. Super Antigens and SARS-CoV-2 https://youtu.be/BuMzUIVBw8k
1
@jeffgobert9325 , And what’s the vaccination rate in Canada, and among the unvaccinated, how many have been previously infected? What’s the seroprevalence? In the United Kingdom over 98% of the population has antibodies, and are therefore protected against severe illness.
1
@jeffgobert9325 , What’s the vaccination rate in Canada, and among the unvaccinated, how many have been previously infected? What’s the seroprevalence? In the United Kingdom over 98% of the population has antibodies, and are therefore protected against severe illness.
1
@mayrareyes8135 , When this pandemic started, around 50% of the immunologically naive were asymptomatic upon infection, and around 30% experienced mild symptoms. Only around 10-15% required hospital care. Around 2/3 of those who required hospital care had at least 1 comorbidity, so 1/3 had no comorbidities. Since approximately 50% of the population has 1 comorbidity, those with 1 or more comorbidities are at approximately twice the risk as those with none. Therefore those with at least 1 comorbidity are at around 20% risk, and those with none are at around 10% risk of hospitalization. So, if Omicron is twice as lethal and you have no comorbidities, then your risk of hospitalization, if you were immunologically naive, was around 10%. You therefore had around a 90% chance of experiencing mild to no symptoms. However, how can you be sure you were immunologically naive? How do you know you weren’t already infected and experienced mild to no symptoms? You could have already been among the 80% who gained immunity from previous infection. Were you tested for antibodies or for a T cell response? Most of the world now has immunity either from previous infection, or vaccination. The seroprevalence in the UK is around 98%. The pandemic is pretty much over for the majority of us. The immunologically naive are now extremely rare, and most of the unvaccinated, without getting tested, have no clue whether they are immunologically naive or not. You got lucky, and you are now no longer immunologically naive. However, you have no clue what damage this infection may have done to your body, and what the long term consequences might be. There have been no long term studies, and the short term studies don’t look good. How SARS-CoV-2 Causes Brain, Kidney, Pancreas, & Heart Damage https://youtu.be/g9Ftwk4loPA
1
@mick1581 , What the future holds… Super Antigens and SARS-CoV-2 https://youtu.be/BuMzUIVBw8k
1
@leedza , Dr Campbell also has tunnel vision. He searches for evidence that provides him and his viewers with the confirmation bias that they crave. The data he presents is fine, but he and the majority of his viewers are extremely confused about what it means.
1
@christopherrobinson7541 , In the immunologically naive? Or in the general population? Remember, about 98% of the UK population is estimated to be seropositive. That means they would test positive for antibodies, or in other words, they have some immunity against SARS-CoV-2 that is protecting them from severe disease. If, after including the population that is protected, and considering that the vast majority of the population is protected, Omicron is only 10-20% less severe, that would mean that Omicron must be significantly more severe in the immunologically naive. This is the only way the numbers can work out.
1
@christopherrobinson7541 , I suggest you take a good look at those “recent studies” and see if they only looked at the immunologically naive when determining this number, or if they includes everyone who’s unvaccinated without considering that the majority of them might have been previously exposed and therefore had “natural immunity” protecting them from severe disease.
1
@sammywhite9906 , Obtaining “natural immunity” is risky. And we’re discovering more ever day. How SARS-CoV-2 Causes Brain, Kidney, Pancreas, & Heart Damage https://youtu.be/g9Ftwk4loPA
1