Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Boston gain of function virus" video.

  1.  @Vatsyayana87 , Yup.
    2
  2.  @glynnsmith4560 , Dyslexia is an imaginary excuse. These people just never learned to spell.
    2
  3. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  4. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  5. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  6. @Google Reviews, Nope. In the experiment that they conducted the Wuhan strain of the virus killed 100% of the genetically engineered lab mice, and the hybrid virus that they created only killed 80%. It was less lethal than the original strain.
    1
  7.  @sharonrichards1627 , Russia is doing a wonderful job killing their population.
    1
  8. @Google Reviews, I know that I’m right. Instead of reading the news, you can read the study. Exactly what they did, how they did it, what the results were, and why they did it is in there. The problem is all these more ons on the Internet don’t know how to read anything more than scary headlines. They have the attention span of a 3 year old and they lack the capacity to understand science. And then they watch people like this guy who outright lies to them for money. Google pays him a portion of the ad revenue that his video generate and if he doesn’t tell these dum basses what they want to hear, they’ll stop watching him. I started watching him when the pandemic started, and for a long time he was good. I stopped watching him as soon as he started lying. I know he’s lying on purpose too, because for the first year of the pandemic he wasn’t. At least Dr. Been goes through and shows the study and tries to explain it to these ignore and more ons, but they lack the capacity to understand him. You can see it in their comments.
    1
  9. @Google Reviews, You’re confused. Covid was not engineered or created in a lab. That’s complete nonsense.
    1
  10. @Google Reviews, There is no patent on the Covid virus from 2013 either. That too is complete nonsense.
    1
  11. @Google Reviews, You have packed so much bull chit in your last comment that it’s not worth responding to it. It’s obvious that you’ve been brainwashed by a bunch of ignore ant trash.
    1
  12.  @jackiepowell7513 , No. He was not vaccinated.
    1
  13.  @WithScienceAsMySheperd , The original virus killed 100% of the mice. The one they created in the experiment killed 80%.
    1
  14.  @paiger6058 , So now you’re spreading anti flu vaccine bull chit too?
    1
  15.  @goofygranny1020 , Putin is doing an incredible job depopulating Russia. He’s been threatening to depopulate the rest of the world too.
    1
  16.  @shirleytruett7319  <—— Liar…
    1
  17. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  18. He lied in the first minute. The original Wuhan virus killed 100% of the infected mice while the hybrid virus killed 80%. The hybrid virus that they created is less lethal, not more.
    1
  19.  @deborahwesselman845 , Yeah. He probably lost his license.
    1
  20. You’re wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  21. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  22. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  23. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  24.  @jackiepowell7513 , Please learn English. Your comment makes no sense.
    1
  25.  @kayleneeuell7592 , But stew pid people like ignore ant antivaxxers need to be controlled like the children that they are until they have a sufficient mental capacity to make proper decisions on their own.
    1
  26.  @kayleneeuell7592 , In other words, stew pid people should not have the freedom to do whatever they want because they’ll do stew pid things.
    1
  27. He’s wrong in the first 5 seconds of the video. Instead of killing 100% of the mice the new virus killed 80%. It was less lethal in these mice than the original Wuhan variant.
    1
  28.  @marvinboggs  <—— Doesn’t understand what this experiment did, or showed, and has no clue that Dr. Campbell is lying.
    1