Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "The Age of INDIA'S OLDEST BOOK: What They Won't Tell You" video.

@SattickDas2001 Tamil older than sanakrit is a theory spun by AIT ( aryan invasion theorists). Now the same AIT propagandists are into the idea that sanskrit is older than Tamil. So basically it is politcs to divide north and south. I'm a Tamil it is dmk dk groups responsible for this hate against north. Their idea is to break Tamil nadu ahd entire south India from India and attack it with lanka and form a new Christian nation named "Elam".
20
Im from tamil nadu. Here the politcs over saying "sanskrit is recent language" got its root from British rule. From british, the periyar movement took over and continued british's divide and rule work. Then from periyar the dmk and dk political parties continues to uphold this divide and rule politcs abusing sanskrit and insulting hindu dharma. Great Grandfather of this divisive politics = british; grand father = periyar. Sons = dk snd dmk political groups.
3
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg cite me which text number first. There is no caste discrimination anywhere in hindu texts. Shudra is not born by birth. No casts are born by birth. It's like you should gain knowledge and face test and then only you can become a brahmina. Shudra means a person who loses quality in life like a drug addict; a drunkard etc. Even a shudra could become a brahmina eg are vyasar ( low caste became a brahmina) ; alwar tamiz saint ( belonged to all caste groups and became brahminas); valmiki ( born to brahmin parents and became a low caste and from low caste and became a brahmina and wrote ramayana) etc no such caste discrimination.
3
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg varnas arent division based on birth. It is rather called "intellectual grouping" eg military doing work of military; peon doing work of peon; finance minister doing work of finance minister; pm doing work of Pm; doctor doing work of doctor etc it was the dravidian politics by periyar that started this idea of separating north vs south and mislead the Hindus against each other on bases of caste discrimination after the British did by including caste into law.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg that is not caste discrimination.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg eg If a person in his previous life indulge in dark qualities/ sins he will be born in next birth with dark qualities. Previous birth's essence/ taste will be continued in next life. If suppose if man is born into a family indinging in gambling; drugs trafficking; prostitution etc due to his activities in his dark qualities in previous life then that person can strive hard and learn good qualities and art the knowledge in scriptures/ rituals and become a brahmina.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg no.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg varna is not by birth at all. If a person of dark qualites in previous life dies he is born with same dark qualites due to his previous birth karma from let's say feet of God. This person can again mend his qualites in his new life and become a brahmina and there is no force that prevents him to mend his ways and become a brahmina in his new life.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg first quote me the text number of shambuka. Where is it?
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg saying varna is by birth is equal of saying a doctor/ professor/ teacher etc are by bith. Varna is grouping of profession.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg sources of your claim = dmk dk WhatsApp univ? Adi sankara came in 7th century and he revolted against caste discrimination.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg "shambuka episode is in uthra ramayana" Give me text number; chapter number or accept you are WhatsApp university member of hate groups dmk dk missionaries.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg "shambuka" I asked you for text number verse number chapter number but instead you telling "sankara said so; modern day scholar said so etc" these are all appeal to authority which means referring someone who is not here but spreading false info about them. Clearly they did not tell what the dmk dk groups told.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg "so you agree that there was caste discrimination during sankara" I agree because that started only in 6th century ad not before that. Eg of caste discrimination is not a part of hindu philosophy= vasya; alwars ; valmiki ; Krishna ( Krishna was born to obc ) etc etc there are 1000s of more circumstantial evidence you will find while reading the books. Caste discrimination started in 6th century ad but British brought that caste discrimination into law actually made things worst. Today it is very hard to remove caste because of monetary benifit nobody wants to give up which is made it into law by British. But reality = caste discrimination is not a part of hindu philosophy.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg no my point is same as above, caste discrimination is not a part of hindu philosophy at all. *6th century ad there is ottoman attack at madurai meenakshi amman temple.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg caste system got strong under European rule. They only brought into law the British.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg dravida movement is an offshoot of British colonial rule.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg ramayanum and mahabaratham both are strongly backed by literary sources + archeology to add to weight to its historicity. I did not ask for your attestation or any attestation of any dushyant or etc. I asked you to cite me the text number; verse number and chapter number of your false claim on caste discrimination about chembuka, but you havent posted any. First post that and spew your other nonsence later.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg sugar is sour during jaundice and truth is bitter while you are student of dk dmk WhatsApp univ scholars research centres. Now cite me the chapter number; verse number ; text number of your false claim. I do not rely on your dmk scholarly sources to see what it is mentioned, I want the direct text number and not your hearsay stories.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg cite me the chapter number; verse number ; text number of your false claim on caste discrimination from ramayanum. I do not rely on your dmk scholarly sources to see what it is mentioned, I want the direct text number and not your hearsay stories.
2
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg I do not reply without verifying the verse numbers. I just verified it now and I found there is no "caste discrimination" by birth. Those verses from 73 - 75 is talking about people who in previous birth living with dark qualities were born again from feet of God. These people were not forbidden from performing penance like you mentioned.
1
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg verse 73 - The death of brahmin's son : This verse says the brahmin himself was a "Peasant" thus your false concept that caste system is based by birth is overruled. Here the brahmin himself is of low caste then how is he a brahmin? Chapter 73 - The death of brahmin's son: "Having said farewell to shatrughna, the fortunate Rama found satisfaction in ruling his kingdom in equity. Now some time after, "an aged peasant, a Brahmin, bearing his dead child in his arms came to the palace gate, weeping and crying out again and again -....." unquote Now this brahmin himself is a peasant ( over ruling the hate concept of dmk & periyar WhatsApp univ that caste system is based on birth)
1