Comments by "C Ch" (@C.Church) on "MEN IN DRESSES Now Have Extra Rights! - Ella Whelan (4K) | heretics. 55" video.

  1. It was supposed to be equal opportunity. It got warped into "having it all" by all the gurus looking to make the bucks back in the 70s and 80s.
    5
  2. ​ @DieFlabbergast She can't already have an opinion based on what blameshifters have been doing already? How is that LOGICAL?
    4
  3. It might help if mn finally admitted some vulnerabilities and worked with wmn for common sense humanistic measures instead of all this us vs them stuff. We are not really from separate planets despite the metaphor.
    3
  4. ​ @denireynolds9599 I replied a very fair rebuttal but it's missing. But to the quick: Your post is very unfair to humans of the XX chromosomes who don't share your temperament or dreams. To expect us who don't to be poor? Dude!
    3
  5.  @denireynolds9599  Not every woman has or wants kids and a husband. Some husbands want to stay home. The gust is about equality in opportunity. Strict gender roles is what got us into this mess. It wasn't feminism. Strict roles is what forced everyone to fight for their rights.
    3
  6. ​kalig.49 Women didn't want access to your spaces. How gross. Women just wanted access to shared spaces men took for themselves. And I see Marcias reply. Yes, you can't take all the office work into your private clubs, wheel and deal, then claim "if only women could actually keep up maybe they would be promoted.😂" How ducked up.
    3
  7. Yes this.
    3
  8. Name an example. Be sure it isn't about public access and ability to complete work.
    2
  9. No. Largely male resistance to everything justice oriented change caused all the woke stuff today. Stop the blameshifting and being nice to men so as not to hurt their feefees. Their cronyism invited a replacement crony system. Period.
    2
  10. Another cart before the horse reply. It was boys getting disproportionately superior future-independent building attention yet the mn at the time refused to admit it. So the new methods took them at their word, but you want to blame anyone else?
    2
  11. That is the cart before the horse. Everything hangs off the cronyism that was in place before, necessitating fights about everything. Solutions tacked on after wars are not as good as those developed in peace.
    2
  12.  @stargirl-9000  What confounds me are men will admit in this trans issue "Yep they're men. That's why they're behaving so depraved and agressive 😂" Then turn right back around moving the goalposts to how unfair for women to pick a bear over them in the woods.
    2
  13.  @denireynolds9599  OK fair enough. But there are mothers who can and want to work and the dad wishes to stay home. We need to keep working on improving men's mental health, and stop focusing on forcing women back into holes so men can retain mental struggles. Men can be classically macho if they want and tolerate his brothers in humanity who thrive better in homeworld work. Or sometimes they wear dresses and need to wee in the gents. We have to stop listening to the false rhetoric that women have ruined society and men are the ones who had their spaces invaded which is false.
    2
  14. No. Godly malehatred of women did.
    2
  15.  @mickdavies5647  Stay on topic. You clearly understood. Womankind has been under sustained attack for milennia. It's why fmnsm exists.
    2
  16. I agree. Even men benefitted from it. It was the machosystem of hate we had in place already that even necessitated feminism. So take that, Marky.
    2
  17. "Guys" is your victim story? Can I have that one? 🙄 I was saying guys as a little girl in the 70s. Good grief, boy.
    1
  18. By the way equality isn't communist Russia where everyone MUST be divided up exactly. It's about opportunity and freedom to choose. Are you concerned with the other demographics not represented in your warehouse? Why not? God, I wish we could swap traumas.
    1
  19. So... daycare.
    1
  20. Also how do you take turns when you have jobs? We'll wait.
    1
  21.  @pathacker4963  I've worked both. The all woman was endurable with minimal eye rolling about each other. But in the Army, Every. Single. Unit. In. Almost. Eight. Years. the men constantly bished about one another. At least at that time, the army units would have "bish sessions" at the platoon level to settle hard feelings and simmering frustrations we dealt with during the day... every day. I would have to sit there in my personal time to watch these boys point fingers, argue, name call, and just plain BISH. Me wishing I could go home.
    1
  22.  @pathacker4963  by the way... Y: "X can't work together. Throw each other under the bus 😂" Also Y: "Of course you're on her side. X always stick together! 😡" Y perception can't be trusted.
    1
  23.  @pathacker4963  Also, Y perception can't be trusted. Half the time they're making fun of X not working together. Then mad that X always stick together.
    1
  24. There is an honest to goodness man here whose trauma is "hi guys" is unisex and only 2% of free women choose to work in his warehouse. Good grief.
    1
  25. And your post is part of why feminism even had to exist. You don't own the world. The world isn't mens space.
    1
  26. Also stop causing the wars so maybe you won't have to fight in them. Where is your personal accountability in that?
    1
  27. No one thinks if it in the same way no one thought about little boys in school when they began focusing on girls and there is one reason why: Men. They constantly boasted they were "naturally superior, not getting extra attention you're just mad😂". So why would anyone think of it?
    1
  28.  @OrwellsHousecat  <-- See this is what passes for "smart" discourse by the crony class.
    1
  29. This is wrong. The system before refused to acknowledge boys got disproportionately more and better future-independence building attention than girls did. The response to this fact was a whole lot of haughty laughter. Mn refused to admit it so the system put into place to help girls took these mn at their word. You can't rewrite this history. It is astonishing how blind so many people are to this. As usual, it's tehwimminz fault. 🙄
    1
  30. ​ @helenromanelli2544 Yep. I agree. This is all related and it is astonishing how compartmentalized people see these obvious issues. Exposes how biased against wmn they are themselves.
    1
  31.  @judyjohnson9610  What is disconcerting to me is mn have had the luxury to figure out their mess on wmn and call it "The world we live in 🤷‍♂️" with waves of this and that brutal problem. But wmn have 4 waves of fmnsm in a short period of time (which none of it exists without 🤷‍♂️) and that's what's under scrutiny but not what caused it.
    1
  32. What in the world? So what was in place before the French Revolution wasn't the same? An imposition? What passes for critical thought by many left, right, or center is astonishingly bad.
    1
  33. That's not feminism.
    1
  34. It absolutely is not. All of this is caused by men and male hatred of women. Feminism doesn't even exist if not for male hatred of women.
    1
  35. That's a conflation of issues. If men were doing bad things in one area of society, therefore why protect fathers rights? That's what you're saying.
    1
  36.  @OrwellsHousecat  Now you're stalking ME.
    1
  37. Renee, that is de Cart before the horse. Malecronyism is the root of all of current ills. If we had a real merit based system rather than the previous crony system (where merit accidentally happened in some areas) none of this would be happening. Cronyism necessitated all the broken systems that had to be tacked in after a long fight.
    1
  38. Yeah a lot of people are starting the stopwatch much too late in the reaction eras rather than in the actual causation eras.
    1
  39. How can you see the problem is men but blame feminism?
    1
  40. Wrong. Mn caused all of this. Affirmative action, Pride month, fminism, Marxism, unrest in the Middle East. All of it originates with mn unwillingness to implement a real merit based system and not the crony systems of upward failing for their friends and attack on everyone else. All of it.
    1
  41. ​​@denireynolds9599 This is a very unfair take. Women are human beings just like men are. This needs to be said?! We all have temperaments that drive us in different directions. Sorry deni, but I don't want to be beholden to menfolk who may (may!) hold it over me, or the alternative of being poor seeking handouts. Dude! Seriously! You can have your family and live at home full time doing the good work of raising kids. That's fine. But other women wanting something different isn't an insult. To say it is is akin to trtran saying "JK is phobic bc she wants women's spaces." Eyeroll. Being pro woman is NOT the same as being anti YOU. None of this would be happening if the system in place was truly merit based and not the crony system where they got to fail upwards, shutting other citizens out. Men who prefer the home life could have done the home daddy thing. It is so obvious to me. Why can't more people see this obvious truth? Y'all got corrupted by the shoulderpadded gurus who was only in it to sell books.
    1
  42. Reduced completely, men did.
    1
  43. All of this is rooted in the male crony system of yore, but you're you all are desperately avoiding admitting it.
    1
  44. It has nothing to do with being "single male". Aside from the fact that plenty of single men have impregnated women: People in general shouldn't have to foot that bill. Being male suggests you're outside the equation which isn't rational since every male comes from a female who gave birth.
    1
  45. ​ @OrwellsHousecat I saw you yesterday talking in the same way. Is this all you do?
    1
  46.  @OrwellsHousecat  Seeing someone randomly the next day is stalking? You were dysfunctional towards me yesterday, too.
    1
  47. Yep. They're already being aided and comforted in knowing the conservative brocode covers them over women who were forced to develop feminism in the first place. It's all a vicious cycle.
    1
  48. The entire history of everything broken is because of fear of misandry.
    1
  49. It will never be fixed if we are not allowed to name why this all began. The problem is cronyism. One set of cronies replaced by a new set. Everyone in the system allowed to fail upwards. A true system of merit is what society needs. That will allow those who wish to work to do so with more ease. And those who wish to be stay at home to do the same. Also having more than one baby per person is just selfish.
    1
  50. Exactly. It is astonishing that so many smart people can see someone throw a smoke grenade into a banquethall, but only start the stopwatch at the escape. "Those people escaping ruined that room!" Fmnsm doesn't exist without the onslaught of hatred put onto women for millennia. But yeah sure let's blame fmnsm. These people claim to be smart!
    1
  51.  @OrwellsHousecat  I posted on this so I got a notification. Your reply is dysfunctionals tfortat. OP is discussing an origin and you're arguing the result of the origin like that's a big gotcha.
    1
  52. Feminism: A woman's place is where she chooses.
    1
  53.  @OrwellsHousecat  Forget "do you?" I'm going right to how many lady dolls do you own?
    1
  54.  @mickdavies5647  Women have long been attacked even before femiism. And clearly it is a word if it served its purpose. How about you get logical and stop playing tu quoque?
    1
  55.  @mickdavies5647  Womankind has been under attack long before femimism. It's why there is feminism. And it clearly is a word if you understood it. How about dropping the tu quoque, micky?
    1
  56.  @mickdavies5647  Feminism exists because all of womankind has been under sustained attack for milennia. Stay on topic. Who cares about a mild word you clearly understood?
    1
  57. Can anyone explain why "blameshifters" got Mick's panties in a twist? Good lord the sensitivity in boys. In another thread a guy is up in arms because "Hi guys!" is unisex, HE claims since the 90s... The 90s? Lol? This is why women consistely choose bear.
    1
  58.  @mickdavies5647  So you're only playing games to thwart the topic. This all checks out for your sex.
    1
  59.  @mickdavies5647  So you're only playing games to thwart the topic. That checks out for your kind.
    1
  60.  @mickdavies5647  The misery you must be to women behind closed doors. Such an angry man.
    1
  61. Open letter. Feminism wouldn't exist in the absence of hatred of women in the first place. It is astonishing that small men like Mick would consistently start the stop watch of offense in the modern era (for him 18 May 2024) and blame the reaction to hate rather than look at originating hate. None of this would exist in the absence of the Micks of the world. Affirmative action, feminism, Pride month, not even the Middle East crisis. None of it exists without the original hate which men like Mick deep down understand comes from his group, not from the reaction groups. Blameshifters. There I said it again.
    1
  62. We had a crony system in place in which they refused to let up on other citizens and denied them rights. it forced every group to push harder than reasonable or fair. It was to the point that once some got in they didn't see it as freedom finally; they saw it as a foothold because it kinda was. So they started their own crony ways. If we had merit based systems from the start or implemented at a fair pace all along we wouldn't have these problems. Blaming women is just more crony evils by men and their handmaidens.
    1
  63. I'm unable to reply a proper reply. It may be there in a Newest sort.
    1