Comments by "Kalimdor199" (@Kalimdor199Menegroth) on "Origins of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict" video.

  1. 4
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. @tryndaOP Ukraine was also in the Soviet Union. This doesn't change the fact that Ukraine and Russia have bad relations overall. Russia and Azerbaijan have good relations, but on a whole lower level compared to Armenian-Russian relations. I know that Russia has their military base in Armenia proper. But that military base there proves that Russia is more committed to side with Armenia in case of need than with Azerbaijan. Russia ultimately wants to control Armenia, and to keep Azerbaijan from becoming too close with the West. In other words, they don't want Azerbaijan to be a second Georgia. How can they accomplish this? By maintaining the current status-quo in Artsakh. This conflict secures the stranglehold Russia has over Armenia, because Armenia has no one to turn to in case it needs help, but it secures at least the neutrality of Azerbaijan, as they would not want to anger Russia by becoming too close with the West. The 2008 Georgian-Russian war is just an example of what happens when a country part of the Russian sphere of influence becomes too close with the West. Artsakh is just an example though. Russia maintains its grasp over Armenia because of 2 similar breakaway regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. It keeps Ukraine in check because of Crimea and Donbas. It keeps Moldova in check because of Transnistria. Anyway, I do support the end of the conflict, and consider the updated Madrid agreements as rather fair. The Lachin corridor under Armenian control and UNO administration of Artsakh until a referendum for independence or unification with Armenia is conducted sounds rather fair.
    1
  11. 1
  12. 1