Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "FACT CHECK: Former Russian Space Chief Repeats False Moon Landing Conspiracy Theory | VOANews" video.

@spaceted3977 It couldn't have gotten to the moon even without radiation. It's too heavy.
5
....... The camera watching Armstrong get off was attached to the ship. The technology to covert between phone call and radio broadcast was 30 years old and had been used in civilian radio stations since the 1930s. Interacting with the gravity? Like the part where they start deliberately kicking the dust around to test its properties and it goes 20 feet? Or the scene where they're digging a hole and the one astronaut is casually throwing the dust over his head with scoops that don't reach this knees? And then the one astronaut shuffles his foot and a one-inch shift causes the dust to go flying off the screen at least ten feet? Or the scene where the astronaut trips over one of the experiments and breaks it, then picks it up and throws it off into the distance? Or the bag toss where a casual flick sends it 20 feet up? Or the pendulums, which have a period based solely on length and gravity, NOT mass? Or the slow falls and effortless three foot jumps when getting out of and into the ship?
3
Resolution is based on the ratio of distance to the object to its size, not just the distance. All of those distant galaxies are freaking massive.
2