Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. So what's Dubay's excuse for why he refuses to debate any of his challengers?
    5
  2. Maqua, photographs are not size accurate. The objects in them will grow and shrink depending on what lens you use, with wide angle lenses like Apollo used making background objects smaller than they actually are. By the way, the moon is actually tiny compared to the amount of space it takes up in the sky. The Earth would mathematically appear slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length to the naked eye, just saying. It would not fill the sky, your doubt is based on a lie. Just remember, the world you find at the bottom of that rabbit hole is just a dream, it's not real.
    5
  3. Said Flat Earther parades around going "Yeah, he totally ran away from me", then blacklists anybody that goes "I'll take you on instead" because the only reason he accepted the challenge was because he knew that Neil wouldn't.
    5
  4. Tyson is one man. Why does Dubay hide in his channel, refusing to debate ANYBODY and deleting comments and banning people when he and his cronies get caught lying? If Youtube didn't allow channel owners to delete comments and ban people, Eric Dubay would have shit his pants so much he'd no longer be potty trained.
    5
  5. Did you know that it's been proven that basketballs are flat? If you zoom in on them close enough, the curvature disappears.
    4
  6. If you posted a link, it probably got marked as spam. Youtube's system is screwy like that and has been ultra buggy since about April.
    4
  7. You know that stock plot where the loser gets people to go to an event by promising that X important person will be there without actually asking them first? That, except that Neil got annoyed and told him to fuck off. Meanwhile, Eric Dubay gets challenged on a regular basis. He never debates anybody and routinely blocks and bans people that challenge him because he's absolutely terrified of losing his perfect record of "By Default".
    4
  8. About the "truth's protective layers"> That's exactly what it is.
    3
  9. .... have you bothered looking at how much it's supposedly pear-shaped by? It's less than 50 miles. You aren't going to see a deviation of only 1-2% on a photo unless your name is Superman.
    3
  10.  @PMunk  Also, by the way, American Moon is NOT respected. That's the video that got caught being so dishonest that they tried to pass off attributed artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze". And just as a head's up, you should not trust anything Massimo Mazzucco tells you. He's a scam artist. Before getting into Apollo, he made his money shilling fake medicine and got rich off of peoples' deaths.
    3
  11. Eric Dubay doesn't want to debate anybody. Are you man enough to tell your master to accept the recent challenge? 10,000 dollars AND the ability to video tape him deleting a channel. Come on, why is he afraid? Why are YOU afraid to challenge him to it?
    3
  12. Assert without proof Quote bible Call anybody that disagrees a NASA shill Delete comments and ban people that call you out when you're wrong. Those four?
    3
  13. If we made the Earth and a cue ball the same size, the mountains wouldn't amount to much more than the chalk.
    3
  14. You have spoken with God? Really? I hope God agrees with that claim come judgement time, because if you falsely claim to speak for him, you will be damned for eternity.
    3
  15. ​ @davidhale8177  The term "Far East" came into popular usage from Great Britain expanding their empire past India to the far reaches of Asia in the 1800s. It has nothing to do with the shape of the Earth. Far West would be the New World.
    2
  16. So fun fact. If you have an object revolve around another object while spinning, the number of times that it points a specific direction is always either one more or one less than the number of times that point points that the object in the center, depending on whether the rotation and revolution are in the same direction or opposite directions for any n rotations over 1. (1 rotation, same direction, would be tidal locked like the moon) Clockwise/Clockwise or Counterclockwise/Counter clockwise 4 rotations during one revolution will point at the sun 3 times in the time it takes to return to its original position (when the moving object is at 120, 240, and 360 degrees). 10 rotations, 9 points. 100 rotations, 99. CW/CCW or CCW/CW will point 5 times for 4 rotations at 72, 144, 216, 288, and 360 degrees, 11 points for for 10, 101 for 100 etc. You're welcome to count. This means that calculate it by formula without any sort of messy "guessing to make it work." It's awfully convenient that whatever cosmic being set up the Flat Earth was kind enough to follow that same pattern.
    2
  17. I mean.... your leaders include a pervert that drinks his own urine and a man that writes songs of worship for a mass murderer.
    2
  18. "You know that contemporary NASA astronauts have asserted that they cannot transgress the Van Allen Radiation Belt because they can't launch a craft sufficiently shielded to protect human cargo through the Belt against the the planetary amount of radiation, due to the required weight of the necessary shielding." Um, no..... that's a claim asserted by YOU PEOPLE, not anybody that's actually remotely related to NASA's astronauts. You insist the shielding must be lead because you know nothing about how radiation actually works beyond what is told on Saturday morning cartoons. There are multiple types of radiation. Lead is for X and Gamma radiation. The belts are beta radiation. Beta radiation requires LOW-DENSITY, lightweight shielding, because it creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy matter. That same process, where particle radiation is shot as a piece of heavy metal, is how your dentist creates their x-rays in the first place. ---------- Also, by the way, the issue they're having isn't radiation poisoning. It's damage to the on-board computers, because modern machines use a completely different type of hardware technology. Nobody's used magnetic core memory in 50 years.
    2
  19. I'm going to spoil some mystery for you. Kubrick changed the number of the room because the hotel they filmed at requested they use a number they didn't have to avoid losing money if squeamish customers refused to stay in the room.
    2
  20. You do realize that the Nazis were anti-socialist in policy and only took the name and some talking points that to win votes with their fingers crossed right? I'm guessing you believe that Kim Jong Un is a democratically elected president, right? After all, North Korea is a democratic people's republic. It's there in the name so it most be true!
    2
  21.  @squirrel4421  Please. Eric picked one fight he knew wouldn't go through and claimed that as his first, last, and only victory because he's not willing to risk anything but winning by default.
    2
  22. No, he didn't. He's referring to the model simulations that were played alongside the radio chatter as they landed because... you know... there were no cameras outside the ship watching them land it.
    2
  23. Chris, the flag is "flying" because it has a rod through the top of it keeping it erect. It really only actually moves when the astronauts are handling it, otherwise it just hangs there like a shower curtain. Also, the moon is lacking air, not gravity.
    2
  24.  @yeysk828shgdy37  Alien, Dubay only agreed because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show up. When ANYBODY ELSE challenges him, he refuses and bans anybody that challenges him on his channel. It's hard to "destroy" anybody when the only type of victory he's willing to attempt is "By default".
    2
  25.  @ninjacrypt5795  Ninja.... First of all, claiming that "many" rocks were proven fake is a blatant lie. It was ONE rock and the "fake rock" wasn't even NASA's. It was a completely unrelated rock that was ASSUMED to be moon rock purely based on when it was received (despite being a year before the moon landings were given out) and then donated without being appraised. The astronauts were given a payload allotment to bring whatever (reasonable) personal possessions they wanted. Aldrin brought a communion set. Armstrong brought boy scout memorabilia or flags or something dignified (I don't remember what it was). The golf equipment was from that personal payload. It was not in place of anything so don't pretend that it was. You can't receive radio from China without a satellite in part because there's a billion tons of rock called "the curvature of the Earth" in the way. The golf cart extends the range you can move away from the ship and allows you to transport equipment and samples over distance. Anybody that doesn't think this is beneficial has their head up their ass. We see stars from the Earth AT NIGHT. The Apollo missions happened during the DAY and the lunar daytime is two weeks long. Photographs of the stars use long exposure times of several seconds long that, if you tried to use them in sunlight, would render everything in the foreground overexposed and unusable because brightly it photographs use exposure times of less than 1/100th of a second. Your precious "truther" cult leaders are well-aware of this, but continue to pretend this is an issue because lying is much easier. By the way, Apollo 16 took ultraviolet photographs using a telescope. They were determined to have come from the moon. The hoaxers will never, ever tell you about that.
    2
  26. I mean... they already knew about the "deadly radiation stopping it". They would have known six months in advance during Apollo 8.
    2
  27. You know, from what I've heard, Tyson "chickened out" because Rogan tried to schedule him without his permission. Meanwhile, Eric not only refuses to debate ANYBODY that will actually show, but also deletes comments and bans people that dare criticize and challenge him because how dare "critical thinkers" not be brainless obedient sheep. That's speaking at the volume of a hurricane.
    2
  28.  @Mr.TomMoon  For fuck's sake. Rockets do not push on things. Tom, there is a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum where the total momentum of a system (mass * velocity) remains constant unless an outside force alters it. This is for all parts of that system combined This means that as rocket loses mass, it will gain speed relative to how much mass it loses and what speed and direction it lost in. They work by mass manipulation, NOT by pushing on shit. This is why rocket engines are shaped like hourglasses: because there's another principle of fluid mechanics called "choked flow" that causes gasses and liquids to speed up when they travel through a narrow opening.
    2
  29.  @Mr.TomMoon  ..... so are you saying that vacuums have the ability to nullify one of the fundamental laws of physics?
    2
  30. First public color TV broadcast was a recording of the famous opera Carmen in 1953, 16 years before the moon landings.
    2
  31. That would depend on what you fuel is. Not all substances produce visible flame or smoke when they burn. Indy car racing has had problems with invisible pit fires because alcohol fires are pretty much impossible to see in sunlight.
    2
  32. Then why do the conspiracy theorists need to keep lying about their evidence? Surely your critical thought should be able to work that out.
    2
  33.  @daryllect6659 No, you're lying about YOUR evidence that it was fake. Bart Sibrel got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that disproved him David Percy cropped details out of photographs and lied about his playback speeds when showing the "slow motion" - which accidentally got proven by Jarrah White being a dumbass and recording himself unable to do fifth grade math. The "Coke bottle lady" forgot when fabricating her story that Australia is ~12 hours off from the UK she really lives in and tried to lie about "staying up late" to watch something at 11 AM in her time zone. "Photographic Expert" Jack White invented his own anomalies using creative cropping and deliberately placed his comparison marks on top of details he wanted to hide. One your "scientists", I can't remember the name of, faked his radiation and heat studies proofs by deliberately misrepresenting the conditions he was testing against. American Moon tried to pass off attributed composite artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze" in full knowledge they were created decades later. Etc etc etc etc etc Go on, "Critical Thinker". Explain.
    2
  34.  @daryllect6659  ...... I'm talking about the "proof that it was faked". Or did the other hoaxers not tell you that every single one of your leaders is a proven fraud? Cropped and altered photos, artwork passed off as originals, videos edited to skip over disproving details, lying about the speed you "correct" the "slow motion" to, faked experiments, scientists and researchers that don't exist....... Surely you have an explanation for that, right? I tried to post several of them, but the comment got eaten again.
    2
  35. The flag has a rod through the top of it. It's hanging like a shower curtain.
    2
  36. Siiiigh. Flat Earthers really don't get it, do you? Down is not the bottom of the ball. Down is the CENTER of the ball.
    2
  37. No, it wasn't. The real reason that the room number was changed is because the hotel they filmed at didn't want real numbers used because they were afraid of losing business if squeamish customers refused to stay in the room.
    2
  38.  @andresbetancourt8561  Question. Are Flat Earthers and conspiracy theorists all high school dropouts? Your spelling is atrocious and none of you ever seem to use paragraphs. ------------ "Water wld never be calm. " You've never ordered a drink on an airplane without ice, have you? Amazing how it sits almost perfectly calm and doesn't instantly slosh out of the cup at 500 miles per hour. By the way, the spinning is about 1000 mph, not 65000 -------- "Guess my hand must be bigger lol" Of course it is. After all, the size that objects appear in relation to one another is how big they are! It looks like it is, so it must be. Or.... would you prefer to admit that you were lying when you said that appearing the same size meant they were? ------------- "Why wldnt buzz Aldridge or Neil Armstrong say we landed on the moon?" Because the man that asked them to swear, Bart Sibrel, is a convicted criminal that harassed them to the point that the police had to be called for stalking and trespassing. Why do you people lie pretend that three of the other astronauts (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean) didn't swear on your Bible or make excuses to why they don't count? Pretty obvious that you're the real satanists. -------------- You do realize that the farther an object is away from you, the less its position changes as you move right? Meaning that you would need to move an astronomically far distance to change the position of an object that is trillions of miles away, right? And that the model you are arguing against straight-up says the other stars are moving in roughly the same speed and direction that we are, so will stay in position with each other like soldiers marching in formation, right? So why do you people pretend that the movement is supposedly random? --------- "We landed in the moon and go to Mars but we can't hover over the north pole?" .... yes, because a satellite in orbit requires it to continuously move forward to counteract gravity pulling it down otherwise it will come back to the ground. To quote it like the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, it's essentially throwing yourself at the ground and missing. Geosynchronous orbit creates the illusion of it hovering by having the speed it's moving match the earth's rotation. You can't do that over the poles. Satellites work on science and math, not making shit up and declaring it to be the divine truth that must never be questioned because God Says So. ---------- "And where the fuck did they get that number??" First of all, it's not a trillion miles so the answer is "You pulled it out of your ass" Second, do you know "parallax" is? And not just the Marvel character? It's the measurable difference in size, position, and angle of an object as you move. You can take two or more locations you know the distance between and measure the change in an object to tell how far away it is. By the way, parallax bends your "true model" over a table like a rich man's maid. If the sun, moon, and stars were only a few thousand miles or less, it'd be very obvious because the star circles would be squashed into ovals as you move South and the moon would show more than 90 degrees of rotation between England and the Falkland Islands. Do they look like they're close? Fuck no, they don't. ----------- "Where are the stars in that infamous moon landing. We can see stars from earth but there not there in moon pic?" ..... because the Apollo footage is DAYTIME, you dolt. Cameras have a setting that controls how much light you let in. The proper settings to avoid all of your brightly lit foreground objects in direct sunlight being overexposed is typically about 1/100th of a second or less, while stars are filmed with long exposure shots of several seconds. That's why most pictures of city skylines or the moon at night, from Earth, typically don't have stars in them either. Hint hint. --------- "And you believe that? All I can say to you sheep is bah bah bah bah." Says the person who thinks they're so smart yet lies about the numbers and hasn't an original thought in their head. ========= Edit: My bad, Parallax is DC, not Marvel.
    2
  39. Because he's not a scientist of geology?
    2
  40.  @FDupp-og1mi  .... why would it crush you? Furthermore, you do realize that gravity's formula explicitly exerts greater force on heavier objects and less force on smaller ones because the mass of the two objects is multiplied together right? News flash: Electrostatic Force works the same way. It's the exact same formula with mass replaced with charge and a different constant. Also, you realize that buoyancy works by the air being pulled down too and pushing the lighter materials out of the way, right? That's why objects don't float when the fluid is weightless or in freefall. I guess they're falling too because they're more dense than a medium they're not even adjacent too? I wonder how that works....
    2
  41.  @FDupp-og1mi  I would assume it has to do with the amount of water, with it only affecting a very small amount and that adding up over a very large area. What causes the high tide to be directly under the moon and directly opposite it on your fake Flat Earth? Is it "It just does" or "Shut up and stop asking questions brainwashed sheeple?"
    2
  42. There's a second hatch in the nose of the ship where it connects to the LEM.
    2
  43. ​ @dubrulphilippe3815  Religion, the Bible, and the Church would never, ever lie to you either.
    2
  44. You know what's pretty pathetic? Dubay only agreed to debate because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show. When anybody else challenges him, he immediately blacklists anybody that calls him out for being wrong and refuses all takers. Go on, go crawl back to him and ask him directly why he doesn't debate and why he won't take McToon's challenge. Ten thousand dollars to sit on a plane AND the opportunity to publicly delete the channel and he still goes screaming from the room when it's brought up. I wonder why.... So much brown nosing of a man that shits his pants when challenged that I'm not entirely sure that Flat Earthers aren't just perverts with a scat fetish.
    2
  45. Eric Dubay doesn't debate anybody. He challenged Neil solely because he knew Neil would refuse, and refuses to tarnish his perfect record of "By Default". He's so afraid of having to actually defend his position that he actively bans people the criticize his videos. That's why his comment section is nothing but ass kissing.
    2
  46.  @jibteenuc9836  Care to point me to a single debate he's actually done? He's been challenged quite a few times. He was also challenged last year to get on a plane with one of the debunkers and fly one of the flights he claims doesn't exist. 10,000 dollars set aside in a legally binding contract and the chance to film himself deleting the debunker's youtube account. He shat his pants and ran away. Go to his comment section and call him out on something. The bigger the lie, the better. Go debunk his Apollo claims, or ask him why his "lighthouses visible too far" provides no actual proof that the lighthouses are actually visible at those distances, or the fact that he keeps using Bart Sibrel's work ten years after Bart got caught faking evidence and the same "stars moving above the Flat Earth" animation even though he knows damn well that the southern stars do NOT move like that. Go call him out directly to his face about the fact that his buddies in Level tried to openly scam the audience with their "you can't see the light source from the darkness" demonstration - where the camera is in darkness because the rim of the flashlight is between the camera and the bulb, blocking the light. If he actually responds, keep at it. Let me know how long your comment stays there. You won't, because no Flat Earther would dare bite their master's hand.
    2
  47. .... um, traffic lights can tell whether there's cars or not. They can have infrared detectors or pressure plates, though many particularly in cities are simply set to timers. If you have a problem with it, go write a letter to your city council for being cheapskates. That ain't NASA's problem.
    2
  48. You mean when he said that they didn't go back because of money?
    2
  49. .... but radiation doesn't cook things like that. It causes nerve death and blood vessel hemorrhaging and you waste away from dehydration as you vomit and shit out all your fluids. The Chicken of the Sea isn't chicken. It's tuna, that's why this post smells so fishy.
    2
  50.  @Trig-mm4rt  Go on, little boy. Go ask your precious Eric why he refuses to debate anybody. Keep hounding him until he gives a good answer. We'll see how long it takes you to ban you.
    2
  51. .... by calling NASA and having them broadcast the call over their radio broadcasts. This is no different than calling up your radio station to request a song on the air.
    2
  52.  @deanbolam9630  I mean... the landline doesn't have to reach any farther than Texas, a routine call. They're just connecting the call to the radio comms, a trivial task that can be achieved with a switchboard with one or two buttons. The only difference is that NASA's radio dishes are much larger than those you listen to music on.
    2
  53. But you'll just claim Monkeygate was fake too.
    2
  54. News flash buddy: Eric only challenged him because he knew he'd say no. He refuses to debate literally anybody else because he's not willing to risk his perfect record of "By Default." Go on, little sheep. Explain why your masters "who know what they're talking about" have to rely on blacklisting people that challenge them and muting people mid-debate. Explain why your "truth" movement has more pants pissing that a diaper fetishist's porn folder.
    2
  55. So.... just making sure, but you know that that the Apollo EVA happened at 11 AM in Western Australia, right? 11 AM is 4AM in England, by the way, where her interview David Percy lives. Obvious actress is obvious.
    2
  56. Ah yes, the one where the director went crawling to NASA to have them help make a movie calling themselves liars, with plot holes large enough to drive a train through.
    2
  57. Yes and?
    2
  58. Head's up, we know that Bart's "trick" is fake. Bart was caught red-handed editing his footage to remove shots where you could see the Earth small and outside as the astronauts moved between windows. That "bright blue" is just glare.
    2
  59. Why are we caring what Bart says? He was proven to be a fraud and caught red-handed manipulating his evidence more than ten years ago.
    2
  60. Because religion tries to make it illegal not to.
    2
  61. An unmanned camera attached to the ship.
    2
  62. They transmitted it back via radio, which was rerecorded onto a television-capable format on Earth.
    2
  63. Dust doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance it will drop back at the same rate that everything else does.
    1
  64.  @DreaminBig  Um.... yes more. Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars to land two people for a few days half a dozen times. And you people complain that we aren't mining that shit and building colonies and bases. Also.... if you don't think people are going to be bitching about the amount spent on Ukraine louder than a Dragonforce concert in a hurricane come next election, please voluntarily cancel your voter registration. If voting required an IQ test, you would fail it.
    1
  65.  @DreaminBig  ... and your evidence for this is.....? Oh right, you don't have any, but they must be because grr government bad evil. They'll have to get in line. Your "truth" movement's cackling like a hyena in the deposit line.
    1
  66. Well for starters, Bart got caught lying through his teeth. I'm guessing the hoaxers didn't tell that he edited his "faking the distance" video to skip over and mute parts of the original that blatantly disproved him. This includes shots of them filming the Earth without any sort of trick only a few seconds after clips he used.
    1
  67. Um..... that fake interview's still on the internet. Even if you can't find it on Youtube, it'll definitely be on Dailymotion. Just making sure though, you do realize that we know who the actor playing Kubrick is right? And that the interview cannot possibly be real because it has references to events that happened after Kubrick's death right?
    1
  68. Why would NASA care that much about saving face when the shame of getting caught, and they will be caught with 100% certainty because Russia already knows the factors that make it "impossible", would be much, much worse. NASA straight up told other presidents to go sit on a cactus when they made demands they couldn't make.
    1
  69. ..... because the ground isn't flat? They're not on a cue ball. There's hills and rises everywhere.
    1
  70. Christianity has a long history of stealing names from other mythologies and using them as other names for their demons and devils because the church is more dishonest than the government. That's why Hell is called "Hell" - because there's a goddess in Norse mythology named "Hel" who rules over one of their afterlives. Note that Hel is dishonorable place to go, not torture for sinners. It's where people that die of old age and disease go, as opposed to those that die in battle. You know, where Christians would prefer to go as opposed to the fields of eternal battle.
    1
  71.  @mj77777  You spent centuries cooking up fake crimes to persecute Jews for "killing Jesus" then passed laws forcing them them into professions that you found sinful so that you could continue persecuting them for your own stereotypes. Yes, that actually happened. You publicly tortured them for entertainment. You excommunicated and murdered people for daring to challenge your power You care so little about your own god that changed his birthday so that you could steal pagan holidays. And for what? A "Savior" that claimed that only people that followed him would be saved, then deliberately chose not to send a prophet to Asia, or the Americas, or the Pacific for over a thousand years, dooming many, many good people for not believing in a god they've never heard of. All are welcome to try for Heaven. Except you, young Indian child. You're going to be born into a non-Christian family then die a child because I say so and burn in hell with nothing you can do to stop it. Oh, and how many centuries have you been lying about the rapture coming soon. It won't be in your lifetime, or your child's or your grandchild's because it's never coming. Jesus lied to the disciples that he was going to return before they died, then walked out like a father "buying cigarettes".
    1
  72.  @mj77777  I did what now? I edited my original comment to fix spelling and grammar because I forgot "one of" and other minor changes. That was last night; I haven't edited it since. Youtube's been deleting random comments for about a year now.
    1
  73. "Christ is the only one who was physically risen from the dead! " What about Lazarus? Are you claiming that Jesus did not raise a man from the dead as the gospels claim? Are you claiming that the Book of John is lying? Is there any proof that those "miracles" actually occurred other than "Because the Bible says so"? Also, you do realize "curing the blind/deaf/lame" is something that frauds commonly do right? The blind person is a shill that is working with the "healer" and only pretending to be cured of an ailment they don't have to scam people into thinking their cures actually work. They pull that very trick in original Pete's Dragon.
    1
  74. Some of them have just been amoral assholes that will work for whoever pays their bills.
    1
  75. He said that the footage of them landing was a simulation. Which it was. They showed simulations with models to accompany the radio chatter because there was no camera outside to watch the ship land.
    1
  76. ..... do you honestly believe that 4000x zoom would see small objects on an object 240,000 miles away?
    1
  77. In all likelihood, we'll never actually meet another alien race before we go extinct. Anything we find out there is going to be ruins of a civilization that we missed by millions of years.
    1
  78. .... because it's not a perfect circle. Every bay and peninsula and gulf will increase the length of the shoreline. See also the coastline paradox. By the way, the circumference of a circle is 2pi*radius. If Antarctica were the bounding edge, it would have a shoreline much longer than 30,000 km.
    1
  79. How the space race actually went: US: "Hey Russia!" USSR: "What?" US: "That's a nice pile of trophies you're sitting on like a dragon." USSR: "We're beating the pants off you!" US: "SO uh..... how's the N-1 going?" USSR: "N-1?" US: "Yeah, your heavy rocket that's supposed to get you to the moon. We're halfway done with ours" USSR: "What? Since when?" US: "We've been working on this for like... four years" USSR: "............ SHIT" And then the USSR cut corners to make up their lost time, and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up their own scientists every time they tried to launch it.
    1
  80.  @truckerfromreno  And your fellow "truth seekers" failed to prove it in an open and honest way. If the moon landings were actually fake, there's zero reason whatsoever why you'd need to stoop to cropping details out of photographs, inventing your own "anomalies", creating fake scientists to write your articles, dishonestly and deliberately quote mining, and all of the other shit you've done for the last twenty years But that's okay. It's a good thing to lie as long as those lies oppose the big bad evil government. If you can't break it, fake it.
    1
  81. The issue isn't that it's not flying far enough. It's that you're overestimating how far it'd fly on Earth. People are saying it should fly "higher" for shuffles and sprays that wouldn't even reach six inches on Earth. There's a scene where the astronauts are digging a hole and the dust goes flying over their heads with scoops that don't even reach their knees, and at one point the astronaut shuffles their feet about one inch and the dust sprays ten feet sideways.
    1
  82. You realize he's referring to the pre-EVA show, right? There was no camera filming the ship's landing, so they did demonstrations with models to accompany the radio chatter. They're uploaded onto Youtube and you can clearly see "Animation" or some equivalent flash across the screen in bold white letters as it happens. There's not one person over the age of five on this planet except for you people pretending that those were supposed to be real.
    1
  83. NASA lost the BACKUP copy they made. They still have the original recording, but went looking for the other ones to see if it was better. The rock in the Netherlands has nothing to do with NASA. The family that donated it simply assumed it was a moon rock based on when it was received (a year before any of the moon rocks were actually handed out, by the way), and didn't get it appraised.
    1
  84. Pat.... you really don't get what's going on, do you? The money is a trap. Do not take it. Who the fuck is stupid enough to let a man they know hates them film them swearing on the Bible for money???? It won't convince a single person and it will 100% be presented in a way to make you look corrupt. Neil Armstrong was also not Christian, just FYI, and the man that "asked" him to swear had previously been arrested for stalking and trespassing against him.
    1
  85. Anybody that tells you that radiation requires "thick as fuck" metal shouldn't be listened to. No space organization would ever use thick as fuck metal. There are multiple types of radiation - something your puppet masters are well aware of- and the type inside the Van Allen Belts (beta radiation) CREATES secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals, meaning it would only intensify it inside the ship. This process is called "bremstrahlung" and it's how your hospital makes their x-rays in the first place Also, the first of the Apollo astronauts to die, Jack Swigert, died of a malignant facial cancer that spread to his marrow a few years later so you clearly haven't done jack shit for research
    1
  86.  @rhebelrhouser2813  ..... you do realize that there's nothing between 400 and the moon right except a quarter million miles of empty void right? Nobody's going to cross that distance until they go back because you're spending more money on larger rockets to cross a "deadly" barrier for NO REASON otherwise. Also, that's an editing error in the documentary. The audio doesn't match the original either. In the raw footage, those two are about only 7 minutes apart in the same scene. Your fellow hoaxers aren't honest enough to tell you that. So, explain why you lied. Why did you lie and claim that no astronauts died of cancer when Swigert did in 1982? It was pretty big news because Swigert ran for congress and died before he took office.
    1
  87.  @rhebelrhouser2813  No offense, but why didn't you check? That should have been the first thing you did. Because it's EXPENSIVE and ultimately not worth the cost, and actually building bases requires a whole additional level of technology and whole lot more money than just visiting for a few days half a dozen times. Do you know why we stopped and came back? Because Apollo is in inefficient piece of garbage starting the massive elephant in the room that it's a SINGLE USE rocket. This means you are trying to set up and maintain bases with a rocket you need to build a new one of every single launch. That's why the Space Shuttle was built: to develop technology to make space flight cheaper, starting with making reusable spacecraft. It ultimately FAILED to make it much cheaper. Also, what exactly are you proposing to observe and why are robots not a more sound investment given that machines can stay up there for years longer than a human can because they don't need food, air, or water? There's nothing to actively observe on the moon, no life, no weather, no volcanic activity, nothing, and it's too far away to really be a good observation point for the Earth. Satellites would show much greater detail.
    1
  88. No, it came from rejection of science due to hatred of authority and biblical worship
    1
  89. ..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
    1
  90.  @reneesantiago6496  Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary. Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart. Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you. Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that. Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
    1
  91. Faking it and getting caught would be even more catastrophic, and there's about a 100% chance that the Russians would sniff them out. They already know about the "impossible to cross" radiation belts. You cannot bluff while holding marked cards. Best case scenerio, Russia blackmails them. Worst case, Russia decides to be an ass and announce the fakery publicly. The reality is: we didn't go back because Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) and the politicians in charge didn't want to pay to continue it. Especially since Apollo-era technology is too overpriced for what it should do and is single use and requires you to build a new rocket every single launch, so it's not sustainable as an ongoing thing. ---------------- By the way, actors on wires are never supposed to cross paths. This is because if one actor walks around the other, their two wire sets will wrap together like the stripes on a candy cane and they will become tangled. --------------- Also, fun fact, not only have those videos of "people on set" been proven to be fake, one of them was produced by one of the debunkers under a second account to see how many people he could scam. Even after he released the video of himself he spliced to make it, people still thought it was real.
    1
  92. Apollo cost about 130 billion dollars adjusted for inflation.
    1
  93.  @Queenmebonnie  ..... because it cost hundreds of billions of dollars to do so, so without the Cold War excuse, nobody really wants to pay the price tag. I expect when they do return, it won't be five seconds before you people crawl out of your holes with "It's fake because uh.... uh.... the lighting's wrong and the astronaut's fart is too high-pitched!"
    1
  94.  @Queenmebonnie  ... we literally have a political party in this country that does nothing but screech like harpies if money gets spent on anything but the military. By research, I assume you mean "watching conspiracy videos on youtube" with a glassy-eyed stare oblivious to the fact that your "truth" movement has been caught lying about and forging evidence many, many times.
    1
  95. Ralph, do you just believe everything you read on the internet? First of all, Armstrong was NOT CHRISTIAN and the person who 'asked' him to swear had previously been ARRESTED for stalking and trespassing against him. Considering that Sibrel acted like a massive douchebag towards him and the other astronauts, why should he swear? If you treated me like that, I'd have told him to take his bible and shove it up his ass. By the way, three of the other astronauts swore (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean). You people lie and claim they didn't or make excuses as to why they didn't count. -------------- You're really gullible if you believe the "confession". The name of the mission was only create AFTER IT HAPPENED and didn't exist at the time. LBJ's whereabouts are known for the days it supposedly happened. The list of guests includes completely unrelated people for fucking Roswell UFO bullshit. And the "fire where he lost everything" appears to have been happened a year and a half AFTER the "confession" was supposedly filmed according to a GoFundMe put out by his friends/family. But but but but it must be true! A video on the internet says it was and a channel that had to shut off their comments because they got caught faking evidence would never, ever lie!
    1
  96.  @ralphhenderson7270  Awwww, the little baby twuther thinks he's so smart because he blindly believes whatever the hoax leaders spoonfeed him. Go on, little baby twuther. Explain why I'm wrong. You can't, can you? Are you going to actually counter me, or are you just going to pee your pants and throw a dirty diaper tantrum like you people always do?
    1
  97. They should be glad it wasn't Hitchcock accused of it. He was absolutely a massive troll.
    1
  98. Have you watched the footage? The astronauts don't respond to him for at least 4 seconds each time, longer than the time it takes radio waves to travel to the moon and back.
    1
  99.  @someguy-g4r  No, it's about a second and a half one way.
    1
  100. .... by calling NASA and having them relay the call over radio, a technology that radio stations had been using since the 1930s.
    1
  101. ..... you mean an expensive project that would cost hundreds of billions of dollars of investment which serves little practical purpose at the current time because we are not at the stage of technological development where leaving Earth to go to Mars is feasible.
    1
  102. And we should believe Enoch...... why? Especially since it's NOT part of the Bible and was rejected by both the jews that originally wrote it AND the church elders? Justin - pray that you are correct, because heretics don't go to heaven.
    1
  103.  @justinalexander2061  And you have NO EVIDENCE AT ALL of your immoavable pillars beyond "the bible says so". By that merit, I might as well believe that the Earth rests in the boughs of Yggdrasil because that's very clearly the case when you read the old Norse mythology. Without evidence, your stories are just stories. Incidentally, if the Earth is resting on pillars, why does the Book of Job claim that it "hangs from nothing?" That would imply that it's floating, because nobody claims that an object is resting on something is hanging. "Lucifer's space agenies" want you to know the Truth. God wants you to be a dumb sheep that asks no questions, simply accepts what you're told, and bahs when the preacher says baah.
    1
  104.  @justinalexander2061  And Eric's a fucking fraud that has been debunked many, many times and has to resort to censorship to keep his channel free of the truth. Go ask him why his 200 proofs contains "proofs" from people who got caught fabricating evidence. Go ask him why his con artist friends openly fake "proof" and "demonstrations" directly in front of the camera in Level. Go ask him why he continues to use the same model of the "stars circling above the Flat Earth", a DELIBERATE LIE because he ALREADY KNOWS that the Southern stars do not move like that. Go ask him why he has to continually delete comments and ban people that dare speak the TRUTH when they call him out for not only being wrong, but deliberately and consistently lying. You won't, because you know that you'll be banned instantly if you dare speak against Jesus Dubay.
    1
  105. Remember pizzagate? Guy stormed the place armed after reading online conspiracy theories looking for "trafficked children int the basement". Not only were there no abused children, there was no basement. It was completely bogus. The conspiracy theorists immediately labeled him a government plant rather than take responsibility.
    1
  106.  @squirrel4421  Sure he would. And that's why he spends all day with diaper rash from shitting his pants every time somebody challenges him. Then tell your master to go accept McToon's challenge. 10,000 dollars and the opportunity to delete his channels. You won't, because you're too busy brown nosing.
    1
  107.  @gabrielbryant892  First of all, Armstrong's not even Christian. Harassing somebody for not swearing on the holy book of a religion they don't belong to is rather disrespectful. If I shoved a Koran in your face and demanded that you swear before Allah, would you do it? A lot of Christians wouldn't. Also, there's a line in the Bible that many Christians believe makes it a sin to swear on the Bible. That's why the courts allow you to affirm. Second, they refused AFTER Bart lied to them, insulted them, called them hundreds of miles out of their way by pretending to be somebody else and gate crashed events tehy were at and harassed them to the point that Armstrong had to call the police because he had resorted to stalking and trespassing. If somebody treated me like he treated them, I wouldn't swear to what I had for breakfast. Three of them DID swear: Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean. That's almost half of the ones that were asked. Your side pretends they didn't or makes excuses as to why they don't count. Lying about the oaths people actually made. Guess you're the one that deserves damnation huh?
    1
  108. The only "fake moon rock" was a piece of petrified wood that was donated from a private collection by idiots that didn't have it appraised first. NASA never had anything to do with it.
    1
  109. ...... but most people are predicting that Russia will march across Europe if Trump wins, not loses. As it stands, Russia's tied up in Ukraine right now. It's almost 100% assured that Trump's solution to 'end the war' is going to be to stop supporting Ukraine and force them to surrender, and he's already threatened to pull us out of NATO and leave Europe to rot. After that, China probably walks into Taiwan, because they know that invading under Harris will start WW3, but invading under Trump will earn them nothing but self-congratulatory tweets about how amazing he is for preventing war by letting them have it, because that's what he did with Syria.
    1
  110.  @jeremyfondo4320  "Where do you think the 2trillion rumbsfeld couldnt find went" You mean the one that was occasionally reported on for about two years before 9/11? Or did your precious "truthers" forget to mention that. The money didn't go anywhere. The government's RECORDS were lost because their accounting transactions were stored on 10-15 year old pre-Windows computers whose hardware was failing because they were from the stone age and they didn't have universally compatible software to transfer the data between, I'm sure your "truth" movement told you all about that.... oh wait, no they shut everything up and pretended it was stolen.
    1
  111. There is not a single substance on Earth that will not break if you hit it hard enough.
    1
  112. Gravity affects the crystalline structure that form when the rock cools so it'll have a different physical structure. There's also no atmosphere, meaning there's very little oxidation of the minerals.
    1
  113. We've already seen it. It was slapped on the dissection table fifteen years ago and the results were not pretty. I'm guessing that they didn't tell you that Bart got caught red-handed lying through his teeth on his so-called "faking the distance" video to the point of skipping over shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  114. This seems like a tall tale that dwarfs the Empire State Building because anybody with common sense realizes that A. this is how you run out of workers and B. this is how your rocket BLOWS UP when people start being careless or cutting corners in the name of time.
    1
  115. Russia blew their lead. They were so scared of the Americans catching up to them almost immediately that they funneled all of their efforts to staying "first at everything" to the complete detriment of the long-term goal and at the sacrifice of safety. By the time they actually got working on the N-1, the Americans had been working on the Saturn V for almost four years. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage with a fatal design flaw that caused it to blow up on launch. By the way, Sergei Korolev, the man responsible for their early successes, died of a botched surgery in 1966, leaving their rocket program in the hands of somebody not as competent.
    1
  116. So, do you believe that China has psychic spies? Better get your tin foil hat. (also, they're talking about Star Trek)
    1
  117. Flat Earthers deliberately don't mention that perspective causes parallel lines appear to converge as they move away from you.
    1
  118. Well, low gravity's basically impossible without CGI that didn't exist for decades afterwards. Slow motion and wires have tells that don't match the Apollo footage and aren't suitable for three hour long shots. A Hollywood effect only lasts a few seconds.
    1
  119. Objects FREEZE in the thermosphere. The gas may be hot, but it's also so dilute that convection basically doesn't work. There's simply not enough gas touching you at any one time to transfer heat faster than every other point on your surface loses heat via infrared radiation. Rockets do not push on things. They achieve thrust by taking their own mass and accelerating it really fast, causing the rest of the ship's mass to accelerate in the opposite direction at a rate to compensate as per a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum which states the total momentum of a system (mass x velocity for all parts added together) remains constant unless an outside force changes it. A rocket spewing its mass into space, but not altering velocity, violates that law. You can see faint radial lines in the dust if you look closely. Also, dust clouds don't form in a vacuum. Without air resistance, every single grain will be blasted outwards away from the ship at high velocity, not linger in the air around it until the ship lands. If the lack of a crater is a mistake, why do both Armstrong and Aldrin directly call it out?
    1
  120. Eric Dubay only accepted a debate with Joe because he knew Joe wouldn't show up and so scheduled it without his permission. He won't dare risk his perfect record of "By Default" If he were actually forced to debate somebody, he'd leave with more soiled pants than a babyfur convention.
    1
  121. The camera's crappy because it was broadcast to Earht using the communications equipment on the ship, meaning they limitations on what they could transmit. The later missions spent additional time setting up additional equipment to allow them to have better signals. The lunar module attached to the exterior of the command module. The rover was stored in an equipment bay on the lower half of the lunar module, and you can watch them unload it on the Apollo 15 broadcast. Going to let you in on a secret. The hoaxers lied about and exaggerated about the Van Allen Belts for twenty years including making up fake "facts" about them that shows that they have no clue what they're doing. Even if the belts did actually count as hard proof and actually would stop them, it's basically white noise because they cried wolf and now people have stopped listening.
    1
  122.  @casoarcano830  Why are you so arrogant as to think we haven't? We've all watched his garbage. It's as dishonest as every other conspiracy theorist. You do realize why his comment section is 100% supportive comments, right? Because anybody that calls him out when he lies or tries to debate him is immediately banned
    1
  123.  @casoarcano830  Um... yeah, because anti-semetic content is a violation of Youtube's Terms of Service, that legal document he signed when he joined this website. Gee, i wonder if the reason his account keeps getting suspended is because he writes songs glorifying Fuhrer Adolf. Go on, go to Dubay. Ask him why he continues using Bart Sibrel's work ten years after Bart got caught red-handed faking evidence. Go ask him why his "lighthouses are visible too far away" video contains nothing but tourist pictures and no evidence whatosever that they're visible from the distance he claims. Go ask him why his 200 proofs contains claims that have never actually been tested in the modern day. Go ask him why his cronies on Level tried to outright scam the audience by showing "the light source can't be seen from the dark" - with the rim of the flashlight between the camera and the bulb. You won't. You won't dare say a word against him because you'll be immediately booted if you don't kiss his ass. There's more pants-wetting in Flat Earth than a babyfur convention.
    1
  124.  @casoarcano830  So.... did you ask Dubay those questions yet? Or did you coward out?
    1
  125.  @casoarcano830  "It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to your enemies. It takes a great deal more to stand up to your friends" - Albus Dumbledore. You, sir, do not have an ounce of courage in you. Just another scat fetish pervert brown nosing a man that shits his pants every time he's challenged.
    1
  126.  @casoarcano830  No. You aren't. You are more terrified than a child crying for their mother. You want to claim you have courage? Then PROVE IT Go to Eric's channel. Click on Level. Confront your master to his fucking face about the fact that his video contains sleight of hand scams that rely on his viewers being too stupid to realize that light doesn't pass through solid opaque objects. You won't. You are so brainwashed you can't even conceive that you're being lied to, and would sooner cut your own arm off then confront your cult about their lies.
    1
  127. Then stop calling the piece of the paper you sign for the government to tell who gets your stuff and how much taxes you pay "marriage".
    1
  128. Go tell Dubay to actually accept the challenges he gets. I'd love to see him debate, wouldn't you? Oh right, you won't, because you know that if you speak up against your master, you'll immediately get banned.
    1
  129. But necrophilia and beastiality aren't between consenting adults.
    1
  130. He flat-out says he doesn't know where they are exactly. Have you considered that he might not know or remember that much about them? It's been 40 years and he doesn't exactly need to know the science behind them to fly a ship in a mostly straight line through them. That's not his problem to solve.
    1
  131. Your altimeter measures altitude through air pressure. It has no clue how far you are from the ground. A plane cannot physically fly higher by accident. If it tries to "fly out into space due to the curvature," it'll sink back down to the given pressure as the air becomes thinner and fails to support its weight.
    1
  132. That is literally what Trump tried to do in 2020, and what people believe with 100% certainty that Trump will do if he's elected and the Democrats win in 2028. He's also going to refuse to accept a loss this year if he loses, and the next Jan 6 will probably be a bloodbath.
    1
  133. .... the Soviet Union? The organization that has motive to miss on purpose because it is to their benefit to have the Americans distrust their own government?
    1
  134. You do realize that Bart got caught lying about his evidence a long time ago, right? His "faking the distance' video is literally cut to chop out shots of them filming without his fake trick.
    1
  135. ​ @brotherpaulv  Would you rather I post a video of my cat? Would that make me credible? I mean, since the only video you have is a 9 year old video of plane pictures, you seem to have a lot of time, so why are you so afraid of the truth?
    1
  136.  @brotherpaulv  ..... you haven't watched the full footage, have you? Bart cut out about a a two minute section of the footage where NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts confirm they are moving away from the window, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The only person claiming they were against the window when the lights come on is Bart himself. He also uses footage less than 15 seconds from another clip where the astronauts zoom the camera out and you can see it sitting a foot from the square window before moving across the cabin to one of the triangular ones.
    1
  137. Your lead Flat Earthers are notorious for deleting comments and banning people because they are routinely called out for being wrong or lying..... Censored to protect means kept secret to profit.
    1
  138. Um.... the top temperature on the moon is only about 250F. Most metals melt between 1000-3000F. Nobody's going to build anything out of mercury.
    1
  139. Let's be honest: if this is true, it's probably something that would have pushed the rating from R to "Unrated"
    1
  140. If you don't question every lie the "truth seekers" tell you.you're just a sheep following a different shepherd.
    1
  141. So how does near-vacuum and atmosphere exist side-by-side on Flat Earth? Under the very same laws that make "globe Earth impossible", the atmosphere should immediately expand and equalize pressure inside the dome, not form a pressure gradient that reaches 1% hundreds or thousands of miles below the "barrier". Strangely, the Flat Earth "free thinkers" refuse to answer this.....
    1
  142.  @maxconspira2962  It has a gradient that reaches 85% pressure at Denver, a populated city, 50% pressure at about the height of Mt Everest, and 1% at less than 100 miles high. And yet your dome is supposedly somewhere between 100-200 miles high, where they tried to "bomb through it" and 3,000 miles high where the sun is. So.... what's filling the rest of your dome? What's filling the mostly empty space? Why does pressure not equalize inside of it? How does a barrier OUTSIDE of the pressure gradient, on the other side of near-vacuum from the atmosphere, prevent the equalizing INSIDE of it? Why will none of you discuss this? ---------- By the way, the pressure at the deepest part of the ocean is about 16,000 PSI. That's only six miles deep. Your dome is holding back..... how much water exactly? An infinite amount? I'm not sure how God has any time to listen to your prayers when he'd be spending the entirety of his time keeping his dome from cracking like an egg. Or maybe it's just made of some rare unobtainium material that defies mortal knowledge that somehow never breaks under an infinite amount of pressure. ---------- Rockets are not airplanes. They do not push on external objects. They expel their own mass to create thrust through a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system (mass time velocity), remains constant unless an outside force alters it. This means that if you take part of an object's mass and shoot it in one direction, the remaining mass will alter velocity to compensate relative to the direction and speed it was shot so that Ejected Momentum + Remaining Momentum = Original. Note that expelling the mass into space and "not moving because there's nothing to push again" means that you have changed mass and not changed velocity, meaning that the momentum has changed. In other words, YOUR ARGUMENT breaks the law. You want to claim we're "talking physics now" and yet are willingly ignorant of one of most fundamental laws of physics that is literally half of a college freshman midterm. But who cares how many laws of physics YOU break when you can shout God Moves in Mysterious Ways and hand wave away all criticism. ----------- Also, nobody claims that sound travels in space. Transmissions from spacecraft are radio broadcasts, which are electromagnetic radiation like light.
    1
  143. Von Braun's comment on the size and fuel the rocket needed was from very early in the production, and that was under the condition they try and land the entire ship on the moon like they do in Hollywood B Movies. The fact that they sent the rocket in phases and ditched the mass they no longer needed completely changes that math. Also, rockets don't need to refuel in space. They only spend fuel when changing direction, or leaving orbit, and at all other times they coast without the engine on because there's no friction in space to slow them down.
    1
  144.  @michaelsellers5095  Okay. Drawing the movement of the stars on the Flat Earth map results in a paradox where objects are magically in multiple places at once moving in a manner that should be overlapping but isn't. That doesn't make sense, now does it? And yet your "truth" movement covers it up like a priest hiding a pedophile. Go on, "critical thinker", why is that? You don't have the ability to question anything. You just think that going against the grain makes you smart.
    1
  145. The right will draw their guns if Harris does.
    1
  146. .... except you don't, because you understand only enough for "Radiation = Bad" and stop because that gives you the conclusion you want. People with more interest and understanding are fully aware that the hoaxers have spent twenty years making up "six feet of lead claims" out of thin air and twisting every comment because they don't know how radiation actually works and have no interest in learning or being honest about it.
    1
  147. Do you think it's because he's not Christian, or because the guy that asked him to swear previously harassed him to the point that Armstrong had to call the police when he resorted to stalking and trespassing?
    1
  148.  @eternallyg  Why should he after being harassed, lied to, and insulted by a man that had previously committed criminal actions against him? Why should he swear? If somebody treated me the way Bart treated him, I'd tell him to take his bible, cover it in porcupine spines, and shove it up his ass. What alternative universe are you from where you think that would help? Bart harassed the astronauts multiple times and three of the other astronauts (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean) DID swear. In fact, after getting them to swear, he didn't stop, trying to goad Mitchell with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" and refused to leave until getting literally booted out the door. You frauds immediately lied and claimed that that didn't count, or flat-out pretended they didn't.
    1
  149. Have you... watched the footage? The astronauts respond twice to Nixon, taking 8 and 4 seconds respectively; round trip delay should be less than 3. "No delay" my ass. Also, radio waves travel at the speed of light. It could circle the Earth 7 times a second. A signal to the ISS would take less than a second; the delay's caused by the communications technology feeding a modern signal through a dozen different codex and VoIP and signal converters and shit like that.
    1
  150. Modern computers are many, many times weaker to radiation than 1960s parts. It's one of the side effects of circuit miniaturization.
    1
  151.  @georgemaxim2362  And the hoaxers have exaggerated what the belts would do to high hell. They literally made up fake claims about needing "six feet of lead" to cross - despite being the wrong type of radiation - and we're supposed to trust them? What would happen outside the ozone layer? Probably nothing, at least not very fast. They block ultraviolet radiation, the type that causes sunburns and cancer over YEARS of exposure to unprotected uncovered skin. That's why they have a UV coating on the windows and a visor on the helmet.
    1
  152. You could prove it by a very simple modification to the experiment. Flat Earth can only get the same result with two locations. Just two. It won't match once you have three or more.
    1
  153.  @robyn7165  "we all know when you purchase a globe it always has a disclaimer on it that states “not for educational purposes”" ...... that's because the 10 dollar pieces of trash you buy at Walmart have outdated, inaccurate, or simplified information on them that makes them unsuited to be used for anything more than making your room look pretty because they don't want to pay the royalty licensing to get real updated maps.
    1
  154. You do realize that Tyson "backed out" because they tried to schedule him without his permission right? What excuse does Dubay have? Dubay refuses to attempt any debate he cannot win by default and aggressively blocks comments on his channel calling him out when he lies.
    1
  155. They used the LEM's equipment to broadcast it.
    1
  156. So does he lie less in this one? Just asking, because he's kind of notorious for having been caught red-handed fabricating "evidence".
    1
  157. "According to them the sun is way bigger. Does it look bigger to you?" I have a clear view of a billboard out my bedroom window. From where I'm sitting, it looks smaller than my monitor so it must actually be smaller.... right? ------------ You do realize that neither humans nor mechanical devices can feel speed right? They can only feel changes in speed and changes in direction, and 1000 miles per hour on an object 24,000 miles in circumference would be changing direction about as fast as a carousel pushed by your grandmother in her wheelchair. Sitting on the hour hand of a clock would move much faster. ---------- Satellites can't hover over the north and south pole. They can only hover over the middle, otherwise they can't orbit. .... also, where the fuck are you launching a rocket from where it would go up first? Santa's workshop? How would that even prove anything? Anybody with two working brain cells knows that you'll instantly claim that's CGI even if you can't prove it and anybody that claims otherwise will burn in hell for lying. ----------- By the way, the word "horizon" has nothing whatsoever to do with being flat. It actually means "boundary". The flat meaning for "horizontal" is a bastardized slang that overtook its original meaning of "relating to the horizon." Horizontal does not actually mean flat. It means "(in the direction) of the horizon."
    1
  158.  @MomoBrandt  Monica, the reason that Dubay's channel is 100% positive comments is because he aggressively censors it. Anybody that tries to debate him or anybody that counters his claims is immediately blocked. If you go on and ask him a nice easy slowball like... say.... why he refuses to remove Bart SIbrel's "faking the distance" from his 200 proofs even though Bart got caught red-handed editing his footage to skip over segments that disproved him, you'll be banned just like the rest of the "shills".
    1
  159. That actually is a quote by Wilbur Wright. He was basically telling people at a party that wanted him to give a speech to f-off because he hated public speaking.
    1
  160. ..... have you looked? I found the analysis of those samples in ~10 seconds on Google Scholar
    1
  161. ..... you mean when NASA had double its current budget and it wasn't spread between a dozen lesser projects hogging up all of their funds.
    1
  162.  @jupiterjohnson7191  First of all, what is your people's obsession with computing power? That is NOT the limiting factor and even if it were, you have nothing to prove it beyond incredulity All I hear is cell phones calculators blah blah blah. Not once, not one single time, have I heard anybody even attempt to calculate what was actually NEEDED. I've also never heard a single one of you comment on the existence of NASA's computing bank of mainframes that actually ran the hard calculations, let alone their capabilities. ---------- By the way, do you know what the downside to those super tiny pin needle computer components is? They are many, many times WEAKER, not stronger, against radiation than Apollo-era components, and become more susceptible the smaller you make them. Congratulations, you made the mission harder. Gee I wonder if that's why the Orion video people like to deliberately misrepresent was talking about the belts' ability to damage the electronics.... ------------- News flash buddy. We can't afford those wars either. We are massively in DEBT and our military spending is a cancerous mass that increases by more than NASA's entire budget every single year. And in case you haven't noticed, we have a party in this country called the Republicans that screech like harpies at every single penny increase that's not on the military. Do you know why the Space Shuttle shut down after 30 years in use? Because Congress refused to pay for both that and the plans to return to the moon simultaneously. So.... Apparently NASA told this big secret that only a few people are supposed to have the actual details to Congress - an organization notorious for infighting, faction wars, and personal schemes, and most importantly, whose members change every few years. That makes total sense.
    1
  163. You mean when he mismanaged a plague that left hundreds of thousands dead, when he bankrupted the American soybean market with failed tariffs, requiring tens of billions in bailouts, and when he tried to overthrow the government when he lost? Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
    1
  164. You do realize that the "Six feet of lead" is literally made up because idiots like you don't know anything about how radiation works so they can simply make up whatever bullshit they want and you'll beg for more, right? News flash buddy: no space agency would ever shield the belts with lead because they're beta radiation, the type of radiation that creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals.
    1
  165. How do you know Australia is upside down? North being Up and South being Down are human creations. YOU could be the one that's upside down, buddy. How do you feel??
    1
  166. Science is supposed to change as new information is gained. This is to avoid "This is how things are and we will never change" like Religion does.
    1
  167. Man didn't attempt to return the South Pole for 40 years and the deepest part of the ocean for 50 either. Those are fake too right? Right?
    1
  168. You'd immediately claim that the test was rigged and the CIA controlled the AI.
    1
  169. The one that proved that the "truth" movement is a scam when Bart got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of the Earth being filmed without his trick?
    1
  170. The petrified wood was a rock NASA had nothing to do with that was donated without being appraised because humans are morons. Sorry.
    1
  171. @Jib Teenuc  What evidence do you have that they're afraid? Did you confront Dubay about lying yet? How long did it take you to get banned? Or did you run away, again, just like every other "critical thinker" ever? Why do you care how long it takes? You do realize that people have lives outside of you, right Karen?
    1
  172.  @jibteenuc9836  "He could do so to please me, for one (THAT's a great reason)." Why the hell would he care what you think? Your arrogance is out of control, Karen.
    1
  173.  @jibteenuc9836  So did you confront Eric Dubay yet, or did you run away with your pants leaking like all the others?
    1
  174. So then explain why the hoax leaders have to constantly lie about their evidence.
    1
  175. Dubay only challenged Tyson because he knew Tyson would decline. When anybody else challenges him, he soils his pants, runs away, and deletes comments. It would be catastrophic to the Flat Earth scam if Dubay risked his perfect record of "by default" by actually debating somebody.
    1
  176. Planes heat up because of friction against the air. There's no friction in space.
    1
  177. Because that's not how telescopes work. Telescope resolution is not based on how far away an object is. It's how large an object is vs that distance. All of those objects millions of light years away? They're f-ing huge, whereas you're looking for objects only a few feet across.
    1
  178. Which video? The one of Stanley Kubrick that we know who the actor playing him is, or the one of the "son of a base worker" that we know is bullshit because it is full of anachronisms?
    1
  179. Um... the sun is nowhere even close to the position in the sky it would be if it was only a few thousand miles high. This is conveniently ignored.
    1
  180.  @kash5614  "stop pushing one narrative to all our children as FACTS when indeed they're NOT AT ALL." Okay. How old were you when your parents dragged you screaming to church?
    1
  181. Is Jarrah still banning people that bring up the fact that he threw a big tantrum and got his critics accounts deleted by flagging their videos with fake copyright strikes?
    1
  182. .... that's an awfully ironic statement considering that one of your own claims in the other post, the "faking the distance to the moon", was revealed to be a blatant lie ten years ago because the creator got caught red-handed editing his footage to remove sections of it that disproved him, including shots of the footage where you can see them filming without his trick, because people weren't stupid and checked.
    1
  183. Everybody know that you'll call that a hoax too.
    1
  184. .... who the flying f*ck said they landed on a landing strip?
    1
  185. So, I watched the Gemini 8 press conference a few weeks ago. Armstrong acts exactly the same as he did there, three years before it was "faked".
    1
  186.  @Trig-mm4rt  You're not really very smart, are you? Tyson vs Dubay is like that stock plot you see in sitcoms where they get people to show up to an event by promising that X important person will be there without asking them first, except that unlike in TV where they always show for the happy ending, they got told to buzz off. The ONLY reason Dubay agreed to debate NDT is because he knew from the beginning that Tyson would say No. If Tyson had said yes, he would almost certainly have chickened out, just he does with literally anybody else because he is not willing to risk his perfect record of "By Default". There are 7.8 billion people on this planet. Dubay is afraid to debate 7.8 billion minus 1.
    1
  187. Fun fact. NASA helped make the movie. the reason it looks like NASA's equipment is because they borrowed NASA's very own practice mockups.
    1
  188. Isn't that the video that got caught trying to pass off credited composite artwork as Apollo photographs?
    1
  189. History does not use your warped idea of the scientific method. Historical proof does not require repetition. Any form of data verification and observation counts as evidence, whether humans go back or not. Such as Japan creating exact replicas of the Apollo landing backgrounds while converting their terrain maps into 30 models, even though the US would most likely not have been able to sufficiently obtain this information in the 60s and there's no evidence whatsoever that it was photographed by a probe. The reason this is "fake" is because.... er... um...... IT JUST IS SHUT UP SHILL!!!!! I don't see a single one of your fake "scientists" claiming that the 1960 descent to the Challenger Deep, the deepest part of the ocean, was faked or inconclusive because it wasn't repeated for more than 50 years.
    1
  190. The issue they're having with the belts isn't people. It's the fact that modern integrated circuits, which replaced magnetic core memory in the 70s, are many, many times weaker to radiation than the computers used on Apollo.
    1
  191. You are aware that Bart Sibrel's been caught fabricating evidence before right? It's pretty fucking sad that you people believe his fraud "confession" when the actor tries to name his "secret project" after a phrase that wasn't invented until the 1970s, AFTER the landings had already happened.
    1
  192. There is a part in the bible where one of the prophets is walking down the road and a bunch of children make fun of him and tell him to leave because he's bald. That's it, that is literally all they do. Elisha flies in a rage and curses them to death.. Does God try and stop him? Does he lessen the punishment to making the kids bald as a fitting punishment? No, he stands back and assists as his prophet commits murder over nothing more than petty insults for basically no reason and aids him by sending bears to have them horrifically torn apart by bears just because he can. God has no morals. He supports both genocide and slavery. He routinely kills and curses the innocent for the crimes of others. He flat-out orders his soldiers to execute helpless babies while pretending that "The sins of the father are not the sins of the son". He does nothing nothing to stop Lot from trying to sell his daughters to be raped and murdered (which happens with another identical story elsewhere in the bible and the man is STILL treated as being in the right even after the girl gets chopped into pieces) because he views women as property and only cares about HIS angel. If God had morals, Elisha would have been dragged to hell right then and there. But he doesn't because God's about as moral as Kim Jong Un and cares about himself.
    1
  193.  @kalobrogers235  Why would these kids know? How?? There's no television news, no newspapers they can read with his face posted on it. They've never seen him before. Unless they haven't personally seen him, how would they know this man is the prophet and not some random nobody walking down the road? Is this a place that no merchants and no travelers ever come through? That's BS and you know it He doesn't announce himself as such. He doesn't have a banner reading "Prophet coming through"He makes no effort to tell who he is. He just immediately kills kids who for all intents and purposes are insulting a complete stranger. -------------- "God has the right to kill because he made the life" is disgusting and comes across as a tyrant with no morals beyond "Do what I say." If God ordered you to kill a baby because its parents were non-believers, would you do it? Of course you would, because defying God is a worse sin than cold-blooded murder. And don't try and claim he wouldn't, because he does. And that is why trying to claim the God is a "standard of moral" is bullshit. Because there is no standard if God does not practice what he preaches and simply orders people to break it. --------------- I am not, by the way, homosexual. Is making false accusations a thing you commonly do? It's funny how "good Christians" are always the first to turn to lies. You might want to repent for that otherwise you will be joining me.
    1
  194. Head's up, modern computers are WEAKER to radiation than the parts used in the 60s. This is also true of static electricity and I believe EMPs. This is a fundamental flaw in how computing technology works. Okay, so you know how Apollo-era computers are these big bulky things and you know how today's parts are these super tiny, super conductive chips with circuits so small you can't even see them? The smaller you make them, the easier it becomes for even a single spark to do a lot more damage, so all of those integrated chips you take for granted are many, many times more susceptible. This problem has not been solved. It constantly gets WORSE year after year after year, and it's a real pain in the rear because the technology to make better chips progresses much, much faster than the technology to protect it does. It's so difficult and expensive that by the time your specialized hardened parts are finished, they're already obsolete.
    1
  195.  @justinherbert9146  And once again, it's the same old bullshit from the tired old sheep herd. First of all, you do realize that the Apollo calculations were done on mainframes, right? RIGHT??? The hoaxers told you that the on-board computers were built to process output generated by another computer whose data was transmitted to them, not that they calculated it themselves.... right? Right? No, they didn't, because that would require honesty, a concept as repulsive to "critical thinkers" as garlic to a vampire. Second, nobody gives a shit about your laptop, or watch, or calculator. Boot it up, and tell me how long it takes to fly to the moon. Oh wait, it can't, because no matter how sophisticated it is, without a GIANT ROCKET, it doesn't move six inches. You people bitch and bitch and bitch about how much more computing power your tamagachi has. Not a single one of you sheep has the balls to even attempt to estimate what would be NEEDED.
    1
  196.  @justinherbert9146  .... you mean a project that went 30 years with more than 10 times the number of flights? Two failures out of about 130 fligths is a 98% success rate, by the way. You really don't have a leg to stand on, do you? All you do is jump from talking point to talking point without an original thought in your head because you can't counter a word I say.
    1
  197.  @justinherbert9146  ... and that was first reported on the Apollo missions, with Apollo 16 and 17 taking special helmets to try and measure it. Your leaders told you about ALFMED right? They didn't try and claim that this was only reported on the space shuttle... right? Oh dear, they lied to you again. Edit: also, it's about 240,000, not 500,000, and most of the area between 400 and 240,000 is nothing but empty void.
    1
  198.  @justinherbert9146  I missed the "and back" while reading hastily. .... how is three million miles without a fatality impressive? STS-61-C, the Space Shuttle Columbia mission directly before the Challenger disaster, flew almost 3 million miles ON ITS OWN. You know, because spacecraft need to keep flying to not come crashing back to Earth. Also, I like how you people deliberately ignore the time the oxygen tank blew up because "almost dead" isn't good enough. I have a great idea! Let's fake an accident! That'll totally help us "deceive the masses" and not shoot ourselves in the foot with a rocket launcher when the outside meddlers start rooting through our stuff during the inevitable investigation. -------------- Jesus fucking Christ. I know parrots with more originality. So, you do realize that dust clouds don't form in a vacuum right? Without air resistance, every single grain of dust will be blown away from the ship and not come back. And considering that that the ship used a pressure sensor to shut off the engine WHILE STILL FLYING, the dust would have to go up into the exhaust to get on top of the legs. Also, you can see radial lines in the dust in many of the photographs directly under the bell indicating wind-based erosion. By the way, you know who the person that discovered the "no crater" was? Neil Armstrong. Within one minute of climbing off the lander, he himself calls out that there's no crater, so apparently NASA already knew it should be there long before you people examined it and thought they'd rather deliberately call attention to their own mistake instead of...you know... grabbing a shovel.
    1
  199.  @justinherbert9146  Sure it was. And that's why your leaders have had to fake their evidence. And at this point you've run out of tired out arguments. Get working on your new ones. We all know when the return happens in 2025, you'll immediately suck up to the first person to tell you that was fake too.
    1
  200.  @WeirdScience-ET  The point is that she's obviously lying. She didn't "stay up" to watch the landings and it was "gone in the morning". The landings happened in the middle of the day there, a fact she would have known had she actually watched the landings from Australia and actually remembered the event.
    1
  201. Russia blew their lead. They wasted so much time, effort, and money on being "first at everything" at shit that didn't matter for the sake of propaganda that they wound up years behind on actually building their heavy rocket, then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage that blew up when they tried to launch it. Fixing this would have required scrapping half of their work, so they shelved it and moved on to other projects because the Americans weren't going to sit around waiting for them to catch up. Only the US, Russia, and China have manned space programs right now. Only three countries, and there's little motive to rush right now. You can only be first once.
    1
  202. ...... dumb question, but where exactly did you get this 20% statistic from? It's completely made up. If you have to lie about your claim, that proves you are wrong.
    1
  203. You're extremely gullible, aren't you? Not only has the channel been caught faking evidence before, it's pretty obvious that his story is bullshit. I mean..... he openly calls his project "Slam Dunk" even though the term was invented AFTER the moon landings.
    1
  204. ..... but you'd just claim the Google Moon pictures were fake too.
    1
  205. HOW do you have a conversation with Bart? He shut off the comments on his channel ten years ago because he got confronted about faking evidence and I doubt he responds to emails.
    1
  206. ..... a max speed of 8 miles per hour is Fast and the Furious? Remind me if I ever make a spy spoof film like Austin Powers to have a slow-speed chase through a school zone. That's a whopping breakneck speed of 15. Also, you do realize that it's really fucking important to test how a vehicle accelerates, breaks, and handles for future missions right? I'm sure that NASA would be absolutely pleased if their brand new lunar transport convoy trucks skid out of control because "lol no traction".
    1
  207. 1. First of all, mission control has no delay because they're the ones recording. Their half is recorded when it's said, not when it reaches to the moon. Second, the only reason there's "no delay" is because the hoaxers deliberately cherry pick instances or use footage from documentaries that altered the audio to shorten it. Sometimes, they just lie and claim there's no delay even when there is and hope you don't actually watch it (like the "no delay" Nixon phone call where the astronauts don't respond for 7 seconds). If you watch the raw footage, there's delays everywhere. 2. Probably radiation-resistant containers. They do exist; you'll just get searched if you try and use one at the airport. 3. I'm not sure what you mean by "without disturbing the ground". They kick up enough dust to make it hazy at the camera's location hundreds of feet away. It just settles really quickly because there's no air resistance to keep the grains aloft.
    1
  208. Just remember that the last three Republican presidencies, Bush Sr, Bush Jr, and Trump, all ended with a recession or ecnomic disaster that the Democrats had to clean up. Economists are already warning that Trump's announced economic plans will cause another one
    1
  209. If I were in a padded bounce house? Absolutely. In a hostile environment where failing to stick the landing and damaging the suit meant instant death....
    1
  210. And the people "proving it was fake" ahve themselves been caught red-handed faking evidence.
    1
  211.  @fatalx916  The Bible is a lie, no matter how many people believe it.
    1
  212. The issue with the belts isn't keeping the human alive. It's the fact that integrated circuits used in modern computers are weaker to radiation than Apollo-era components. It doesn't matter if the humans get radiation poisoning or not if it CRASHES because all its shit stopped working.
    1
  213. Bart got caught muting audio and skipping over parts of it that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
    1
  214.  @8000_k  You didn't do your research did you? The petrified wood did not come from NASA, regardless of what dishonest headlines say. It was ASSUMED to be a moon rock based on when it was received and donated from a private collection without actually having it appraised. It does not resemble any of their other samples in size or appearance, it was presented loose on a piece of cardboard while all of NASA's actual moon rock gifts are sealed in airtight plastic to prevent environmental contamination, and it was received a year before anybody else in the world got one, and they were not given to random ex-politicians. Furthermore, the country this was in only received two rocks, both of which were presented to the royal family and both of which are accounted for, so why do they have THREE? So how is an event that NASA had literally nothing to do with any of their fault or business?
    1
  215. The rover only has a maximum speed of about 8 miles per hour. On Earth, it probably wouldn't be thrown more than a few inches. Also, dust doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance, it will immediately drop to the ground like a ton of bricks. There's a scene with the astronauts digging a hole. I don't remember which mission it's from. The dust goes flying head height easily with scoops that don't even reach their knees and at one point one of the astronauts scuffs his foot sideways about an inch and the dust goes flying off the side of the screen.
    1
  216. .... except that that's a lie. If you actually watch the footage, the "gun" is the reflection off the passenger's hair and is visible for several seconds before the shot. You can also see that he doesn't reach around because his black sleeve does not cover the white of his shirt, as would if you reached over your shoulder Or was he a circus contortionist trick shot?
    1
  217. So do you believe that China has psychic spies?
    1
  218. Because it cost about 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) and nobody really wants to pay for that, not when a robot can do the same job for a fraction of the cost and stay active for years longer than a manned crew can because machines don't need food, air, or water.
    1
  219. "Sheeple" was popularized by a con artist that got caught faking his "proof".
    1
  220. They even generously told each other their flight plans so that they didn't crash into each other on-route.
    1
  221. Um, no. It cost over 130 billion in today's money, and that was with double our current budget at the height of it.
    1
  222. And yet the "truth seekers" have to constantly lie about their evidence "proving" this. Hmm...
    1
  223. 4 minutes in, he gives away that his story is fake, or at the very least, not factually accurate. He calls it "Project Slam Dunk". This is really weird since the term "slam dunk" was coined in the mid-70s, AFTER Apollo had already happened
    1
  224.  @snakeplissken571  How exactly would NASA clean them up? The first thing the geologists will do is put it under a microscope and then see all of your chisel marks. Also, they'll be able to see that it was processed on Earth because exposure to air, water, and snow will cause the minerals to rust. The petrified wood has nothing to do with NASA. It was ASSUMED to be a moon rock based on when he received it - even though it doesn't resemble any of the samples and it was given a year before any of the moon rocks were actually handed out - and his family simply donated it without having it appraised.
    1