Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. .... by calling NASA and having them broadcast the call over their radio broadcasts. This is no different than calling up your radio station to request a song on the air.
    2
  2.  @deanbolam9630  I mean... the landline doesn't have to reach any farther than Texas, a routine call. They're just connecting the call to the radio comms, a trivial task that can be achieved with a switchboard with one or two buttons. The only difference is that NASA's radio dishes are much larger than those you listen to music on.
    2
  3. But you'll just claim Monkeygate was fake too.
    2
  4. News flash buddy: Eric only challenged him because he knew he'd say no. He refuses to debate literally anybody else because he's not willing to risk his perfect record of "By Default." Go on, little sheep. Explain why your masters "who know what they're talking about" have to rely on blacklisting people that challenge them and muting people mid-debate. Explain why your "truth" movement has more pants pissing that a diaper fetishist's porn folder.
    2
  5. So.... just making sure, but you know that that the Apollo EVA happened at 11 AM in Western Australia, right? 11 AM is 4AM in England, by the way, where her interview David Percy lives. Obvious actress is obvious.
    2
  6. Ah yes, the one where the director went crawling to NASA to have them help make a movie calling themselves liars, with plot holes large enough to drive a train through.
    2
  7. Yes and?
    2
  8. Head's up, we know that Bart's "trick" is fake. Bart was caught red-handed editing his footage to remove shots where you could see the Earth small and outside as the astronauts moved between windows. That "bright blue" is just glare.
    2
  9. Why are we caring what Bart says? He was proven to be a fraud and caught red-handed manipulating his evidence more than ten years ago.
    2
  10. Because religion tries to make it illegal not to.
    2
  11. An unmanned camera attached to the ship.
    2
  12. They transmitted it back via radio, which was rerecorded onto a television-capable format on Earth.
    2
  13. Dust doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance it will drop back at the same rate that everything else does.
    1
  14.  @DreaminBig  Um.... yes more. Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars to land two people for a few days half a dozen times. And you people complain that we aren't mining that shit and building colonies and bases. Also.... if you don't think people are going to be bitching about the amount spent on Ukraine louder than a Dragonforce concert in a hurricane come next election, please voluntarily cancel your voter registration. If voting required an IQ test, you would fail it.
    1
  15.  @DreaminBig  ... and your evidence for this is.....? Oh right, you don't have any, but they must be because grr government bad evil. They'll have to get in line. Your "truth" movement's cackling like a hyena in the deposit line.
    1
  16. Well for starters, Bart got caught lying through his teeth. I'm guessing the hoaxers didn't tell that he edited his "faking the distance" video to skip over and mute parts of the original that blatantly disproved him. This includes shots of them filming the Earth without any sort of trick only a few seconds after clips he used.
    1
  17. Um..... that fake interview's still on the internet. Even if you can't find it on Youtube, it'll definitely be on Dailymotion. Just making sure though, you do realize that we know who the actor playing Kubrick is right? And that the interview cannot possibly be real because it has references to events that happened after Kubrick's death right?
    1
  18. Why would NASA care that much about saving face when the shame of getting caught, and they will be caught with 100% certainty because Russia already knows the factors that make it "impossible", would be much, much worse. NASA straight up told other presidents to go sit on a cactus when they made demands they couldn't make.
    1
  19. ..... because the ground isn't flat? They're not on a cue ball. There's hills and rises everywhere.
    1
  20. Christianity has a long history of stealing names from other mythologies and using them as other names for their demons and devils because the church is more dishonest than the government. That's why Hell is called "Hell" - because there's a goddess in Norse mythology named "Hel" who rules over one of their afterlives. Note that Hel is dishonorable place to go, not torture for sinners. It's where people that die of old age and disease go, as opposed to those that die in battle. You know, where Christians would prefer to go as opposed to the fields of eternal battle.
    1
  21.  @mj77777  You spent centuries cooking up fake crimes to persecute Jews for "killing Jesus" then passed laws forcing them them into professions that you found sinful so that you could continue persecuting them for your own stereotypes. Yes, that actually happened. You publicly tortured them for entertainment. You excommunicated and murdered people for daring to challenge your power You care so little about your own god that changed his birthday so that you could steal pagan holidays. And for what? A "Savior" that claimed that only people that followed him would be saved, then deliberately chose not to send a prophet to Asia, or the Americas, or the Pacific for over a thousand years, dooming many, many good people for not believing in a god they've never heard of. All are welcome to try for Heaven. Except you, young Indian child. You're going to be born into a non-Christian family then die a child because I say so and burn in hell with nothing you can do to stop it. Oh, and how many centuries have you been lying about the rapture coming soon. It won't be in your lifetime, or your child's or your grandchild's because it's never coming. Jesus lied to the disciples that he was going to return before they died, then walked out like a father "buying cigarettes".
    1
  22.  @mj77777  I did what now? I edited my original comment to fix spelling and grammar because I forgot "one of" and other minor changes. That was last night; I haven't edited it since. Youtube's been deleting random comments for about a year now.
    1
  23. "Christ is the only one who was physically risen from the dead! " What about Lazarus? Are you claiming that Jesus did not raise a man from the dead as the gospels claim? Are you claiming that the Book of John is lying? Is there any proof that those "miracles" actually occurred other than "Because the Bible says so"? Also, you do realize "curing the blind/deaf/lame" is something that frauds commonly do right? The blind person is a shill that is working with the "healer" and only pretending to be cured of an ailment they don't have to scam people into thinking their cures actually work. They pull that very trick in original Pete's Dragon.
    1
  24. Some of them have just been amoral assholes that will work for whoever pays their bills.
    1
  25. He said that the footage of them landing was a simulation. Which it was. They showed simulations with models to accompany the radio chatter because there was no camera outside to watch the ship land.
    1
  26. ..... do you honestly believe that 4000x zoom would see small objects on an object 240,000 miles away?
    1
  27. In all likelihood, we'll never actually meet another alien race before we go extinct. Anything we find out there is going to be ruins of a civilization that we missed by millions of years.
    1
  28. .... because it's not a perfect circle. Every bay and peninsula and gulf will increase the length of the shoreline. See also the coastline paradox. By the way, the circumference of a circle is 2pi*radius. If Antarctica were the bounding edge, it would have a shoreline much longer than 30,000 km.
    1
  29. How the space race actually went: US: "Hey Russia!" USSR: "What?" US: "That's a nice pile of trophies you're sitting on like a dragon." USSR: "We're beating the pants off you!" US: "SO uh..... how's the N-1 going?" USSR: "N-1?" US: "Yeah, your heavy rocket that's supposed to get you to the moon. We're halfway done with ours" USSR: "What? Since when?" US: "We've been working on this for like... four years" USSR: "............ SHIT" And then the USSR cut corners to make up their lost time, and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up their own scientists every time they tried to launch it.
    1
  30.  @truckerfromreno  And your fellow "truth seekers" failed to prove it in an open and honest way. If the moon landings were actually fake, there's zero reason whatsoever why you'd need to stoop to cropping details out of photographs, inventing your own "anomalies", creating fake scientists to write your articles, dishonestly and deliberately quote mining, and all of the other shit you've done for the last twenty years But that's okay. It's a good thing to lie as long as those lies oppose the big bad evil government. If you can't break it, fake it.
    1
  31. The issue isn't that it's not flying far enough. It's that you're overestimating how far it'd fly on Earth. People are saying it should fly "higher" for shuffles and sprays that wouldn't even reach six inches on Earth. There's a scene where the astronauts are digging a hole and the dust goes flying over their heads with scoops that don't even reach their knees, and at one point the astronaut shuffles their feet about one inch and the dust sprays ten feet sideways.
    1
  32. You realize he's referring to the pre-EVA show, right? There was no camera filming the ship's landing, so they did demonstrations with models to accompany the radio chatter. They're uploaded onto Youtube and you can clearly see "Animation" or some equivalent flash across the screen in bold white letters as it happens. There's not one person over the age of five on this planet except for you people pretending that those were supposed to be real.
    1
  33. NASA lost the BACKUP copy they made. They still have the original recording, but went looking for the other ones to see if it was better. The rock in the Netherlands has nothing to do with NASA. The family that donated it simply assumed it was a moon rock based on when it was received (a year before any of the moon rocks were actually handed out, by the way), and didn't get it appraised.
    1
  34. Pat.... you really don't get what's going on, do you? The money is a trap. Do not take it. Who the fuck is stupid enough to let a man they know hates them film them swearing on the Bible for money???? It won't convince a single person and it will 100% be presented in a way to make you look corrupt. Neil Armstrong was also not Christian, just FYI, and the man that "asked" him to swear had previously been arrested for stalking and trespassing against him.
    1
  35. Anybody that tells you that radiation requires "thick as fuck" metal shouldn't be listened to. No space organization would ever use thick as fuck metal. There are multiple types of radiation - something your puppet masters are well aware of- and the type inside the Van Allen Belts (beta radiation) CREATES secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals, meaning it would only intensify it inside the ship. This process is called "bremstrahlung" and it's how your hospital makes their x-rays in the first place Also, the first of the Apollo astronauts to die, Jack Swigert, died of a malignant facial cancer that spread to his marrow a few years later so you clearly haven't done jack shit for research
    1
  36.  @rhebelrhouser2813  ..... you do realize that there's nothing between 400 and the moon right except a quarter million miles of empty void right? Nobody's going to cross that distance until they go back because you're spending more money on larger rockets to cross a "deadly" barrier for NO REASON otherwise. Also, that's an editing error in the documentary. The audio doesn't match the original either. In the raw footage, those two are about only 7 minutes apart in the same scene. Your fellow hoaxers aren't honest enough to tell you that. So, explain why you lied. Why did you lie and claim that no astronauts died of cancer when Swigert did in 1982? It was pretty big news because Swigert ran for congress and died before he took office.
    1
  37.  @rhebelrhouser2813  No offense, but why didn't you check? That should have been the first thing you did. Because it's EXPENSIVE and ultimately not worth the cost, and actually building bases requires a whole additional level of technology and whole lot more money than just visiting for a few days half a dozen times. Do you know why we stopped and came back? Because Apollo is in inefficient piece of garbage starting the massive elephant in the room that it's a SINGLE USE rocket. This means you are trying to set up and maintain bases with a rocket you need to build a new one of every single launch. That's why the Space Shuttle was built: to develop technology to make space flight cheaper, starting with making reusable spacecraft. It ultimately FAILED to make it much cheaper. Also, what exactly are you proposing to observe and why are robots not a more sound investment given that machines can stay up there for years longer than a human can because they don't need food, air, or water? There's nothing to actively observe on the moon, no life, no weather, no volcanic activity, nothing, and it's too far away to really be a good observation point for the Earth. Satellites would show much greater detail.
    1
  38. No, it came from rejection of science due to hatred of authority and biblical worship
    1
  39. ..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
    1
  40.  @reneesantiago6496  Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary. Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart. Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you. Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that. Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
    1
  41. Faking it and getting caught would be even more catastrophic, and there's about a 100% chance that the Russians would sniff them out. They already know about the "impossible to cross" radiation belts. You cannot bluff while holding marked cards. Best case scenerio, Russia blackmails them. Worst case, Russia decides to be an ass and announce the fakery publicly. The reality is: we didn't go back because Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) and the politicians in charge didn't want to pay to continue it. Especially since Apollo-era technology is too overpriced for what it should do and is single use and requires you to build a new rocket every single launch, so it's not sustainable as an ongoing thing. ---------------- By the way, actors on wires are never supposed to cross paths. This is because if one actor walks around the other, their two wire sets will wrap together like the stripes on a candy cane and they will become tangled. --------------- Also, fun fact, not only have those videos of "people on set" been proven to be fake, one of them was produced by one of the debunkers under a second account to see how many people he could scam. Even after he released the video of himself he spliced to make it, people still thought it was real.
    1
  42. Apollo cost about 130 billion dollars adjusted for inflation.
    1
  43.  @Queenmebonnie  ..... because it cost hundreds of billions of dollars to do so, so without the Cold War excuse, nobody really wants to pay the price tag. I expect when they do return, it won't be five seconds before you people crawl out of your holes with "It's fake because uh.... uh.... the lighting's wrong and the astronaut's fart is too high-pitched!"
    1
  44.  @Queenmebonnie  ... we literally have a political party in this country that does nothing but screech like harpies if money gets spent on anything but the military. By research, I assume you mean "watching conspiracy videos on youtube" with a glassy-eyed stare oblivious to the fact that your "truth" movement has been caught lying about and forging evidence many, many times.
    1
  45. Ralph, do you just believe everything you read on the internet? First of all, Armstrong was NOT CHRISTIAN and the person who 'asked' him to swear had previously been ARRESTED for stalking and trespassing against him. Considering that Sibrel acted like a massive douchebag towards him and the other astronauts, why should he swear? If you treated me like that, I'd have told him to take his bible and shove it up his ass. By the way, three of the other astronauts swore (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean). You people lie and claim they didn't or make excuses as to why they didn't count. -------------- You're really gullible if you believe the "confession". The name of the mission was only create AFTER IT HAPPENED and didn't exist at the time. LBJ's whereabouts are known for the days it supposedly happened. The list of guests includes completely unrelated people for fucking Roswell UFO bullshit. And the "fire where he lost everything" appears to have been happened a year and a half AFTER the "confession" was supposedly filmed according to a GoFundMe put out by his friends/family. But but but but it must be true! A video on the internet says it was and a channel that had to shut off their comments because they got caught faking evidence would never, ever lie!
    1
  46.  @ralphhenderson7270  Awwww, the little baby twuther thinks he's so smart because he blindly believes whatever the hoax leaders spoonfeed him. Go on, little baby twuther. Explain why I'm wrong. You can't, can you? Are you going to actually counter me, or are you just going to pee your pants and throw a dirty diaper tantrum like you people always do?
    1
  47. They should be glad it wasn't Hitchcock accused of it. He was absolutely a massive troll.
    1
  48. Have you watched the footage? The astronauts don't respond to him for at least 4 seconds each time, longer than the time it takes radio waves to travel to the moon and back.
    1
  49.  @someguy-g4r  No, it's about a second and a half one way.
    1
  50. .... by calling NASA and having them relay the call over radio, a technology that radio stations had been using since the 1930s.
    1