Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Joe Revisits the Phil Plait Moon Landing Debate w/Penn Jillette" video.

@ninjacrypt5795 Ninja.... First of all, claiming that "many" rocks were proven fake is a blatant lie. It was ONE rock and the "fake rock" wasn't even NASA's. It was a completely unrelated rock that was ASSUMED to be moon rock purely based on when it was received (despite being a year before the moon landings were given out) and then donated without being appraised. The astronauts were given a payload allotment to bring whatever (reasonable) personal possessions they wanted. Aldrin brought a communion set. Armstrong brought boy scout memorabilia or flags or something dignified (I don't remember what it was). The golf equipment was from that personal payload. It was not in place of anything so don't pretend that it was. You can't receive radio from China without a satellite in part because there's a billion tons of rock called "the curvature of the Earth" in the way. The golf cart extends the range you can move away from the ship and allows you to transport equipment and samples over distance. Anybody that doesn't think this is beneficial has their head up their ass. We see stars from the Earth AT NIGHT. The Apollo missions happened during the DAY and the lunar daytime is two weeks long. Photographs of the stars use long exposure times of several seconds long that, if you tried to use them in sunlight, would render everything in the foreground overexposed and unusable because brightly it photographs use exposure times of less than 1/100th of a second. Your precious "truther" cult leaders are well-aware of this, but continue to pretend this is an issue because lying is much easier. By the way, Apollo 16 took ultraviolet photographs using a telescope. They were determined to have come from the moon. The hoaxers will never, ever tell you about that.
2
Then why do the conspiracy theorists need to keep lying about their evidence? Surely your critical thought should be able to work that out.
2
@daryllect6659 No, you're lying about YOUR evidence that it was fake. Bart Sibrel got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that disproved him David Percy cropped details out of photographs and lied about his playback speeds when showing the "slow motion" - which accidentally got proven by Jarrah White being a dumbass and recording himself unable to do fifth grade math. The "Coke bottle lady" forgot when fabricating her story that Australia is ~12 hours off from the UK she really lives in and tried to lie about "staying up late" to watch something at 11 AM in her time zone. "Photographic Expert" Jack White invented his own anomalies using creative cropping and deliberately placed his comparison marks on top of details he wanted to hide. One your "scientists", I can't remember the name of, faked his radiation and heat studies proofs by deliberately misrepresenting the conditions he was testing against. American Moon tried to pass off attributed composite artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze" in full knowledge they were created decades later. Etc etc etc etc etc Go on, "Critical Thinker". Explain.
2
@daryllect6659 ...... I'm talking about the "proof that it was faked". Or did the other hoaxers not tell you that every single one of your leaders is a proven fraud? Cropped and altered photos, artwork passed off as originals, videos edited to skip over disproving details, lying about the speed you "correct" the "slow motion" to, faked experiments, scientists and researchers that don't exist....... Surely you have an explanation for that, right? I tried to post several of them, but the comment got eaten again.
2
.... but radiation doesn't cook things like that. It causes nerve death and blood vessel hemorrhaging and you waste away from dehydration as you vomit and shit out all your fluids. The Chicken of the Sea isn't chicken. It's tuna, that's why this post smells so fishy.
2
But you'll just claim Monkeygate was fake too.
2
So.... just making sure, but you know that that the Apollo EVA happened at 11 AM in Western Australia, right? 11 AM is 4AM in England, by the way, where her interview David Percy lives. Obvious actress is obvious.
2
How the space race actually went: US: "Hey Russia!" USSR: "What?" US: "That's a nice pile of trophies you're sitting on like a dragon." USSR: "We're beating the pants off you!" US: "SO uh..... how's the N-1 going?" USSR: "N-1?" US: "Yeah, your heavy rocket that's supposed to get you to the moon. We're halfway done with ours" USSR: "What? Since when?" US: "We've been working on this for like... four years" USSR: "............ SHIT" And then the USSR cut corners to make up their lost time, and wound up with a piece of shit that blew up their own scientists every time they tried to launch it.
1
@truckerfromreno And your fellow "truth seekers" failed to prove it in an open and honest way. If the moon landings were actually fake, there's zero reason whatsoever why you'd need to stoop to cropping details out of photographs, inventing your own "anomalies", creating fake scientists to write your articles, dishonestly and deliberately quote mining, and all of the other shit you've done for the last twenty years But that's okay. It's a good thing to lie as long as those lies oppose the big bad evil government. If you can't break it, fake it.
1
Russia blew their lead. They were so scared of the Americans catching up to them almost immediately that they funneled all of their efforts to staying "first at everything" to the complete detriment of the long-term goal and at the sacrifice of safety. By the time they actually got working on the N-1, the Americans had been working on the Saturn V for almost four years. They then tried to rush development to compensate and wound up with a piece of garbage with a fatal design flaw that caused it to blow up on launch. By the way, Sergei Korolev, the man responsible for their early successes, died of a botched surgery in 1966, leaving their rocket program in the hands of somebody not as competent.
1
He flat-out says he doesn't know where they are exactly. Have you considered that he might not know or remember that much about them? It's been 40 years and he doesn't exactly need to know the science behind them to fly a ship in a mostly straight line through them. That's not his problem to solve.
1
You do realize that Bart got caught lying about his evidence a long time ago, right? His "faking the distance' video is literally cut to chop out shots of them filming without his fake trick.
1
@brotherpaulv Would you rather I post a video of my cat? Would that make me credible? I mean, since the only video you have is a 9 year old video of plane pictures, you seem to have a lot of time, so why are you so afraid of the truth?
1
@brotherpaulv ..... you haven't watched the full footage, have you? Bart cut out about a a two minute section of the footage where NASA asks them to prepare for interior shots, the astronauts confirm they are moving away from the window, and you can watch the Earth shrink as they do so. The only person claiming they were against the window when the lights come on is Bart himself. He also uses footage less than 15 seconds from another clip where the astronauts zoom the camera out and you can see it sitting a foot from the square window before moving across the cabin to one of the triangular ones.
1
Which video? The one of Stanley Kubrick that we know who the actor playing him is, or the one of the "son of a base worker" that we know is bullshit because it is full of anachronisms?
1
Isn't that the video that got caught trying to pass off credited composite artwork as Apollo photographs?
1
@WeirdScience-ET The point is that she's obviously lying. She didn't "stay up" to watch the landings and it was "gone in the morning". The landings happened in the middle of the day there, a fact she would have known had she actually watched the landings from Australia and actually remembered the event.
1
..... but you'd just claim the Google Moon pictures were fake too.
1
The rover only has a maximum speed of about 8 miles per hour. On Earth, it probably wouldn't be thrown more than a few inches. Also, dust doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance, it will immediately drop to the ground like a ton of bricks. There's a scene with the astronauts digging a hole. I don't remember which mission it's from. The dust goes flying head height easily with scoops that don't even reach their knees and at one point one of the astronauts scuffs his foot sideways about an inch and the dust goes flying off the side of the screen.
1
"Sheeple" was popularized by a con artist that got caught faking his "proof".
1
And yet the "truth seekers" have to constantly lie about their evidence "proving" this. Hmm...
1
@snakeplissken571 How exactly would NASA clean them up? The first thing the geologists will do is put it under a microscope and then see all of your chisel marks. Also, they'll be able to see that it was processed on Earth because exposure to air, water, and snow will cause the minerals to rust. The petrified wood has nothing to do with NASA. It was ASSUMED to be a moon rock based on when he received it - even though it doesn't resemble any of the samples and it was given a year before any of the moon rocks were actually handed out - and his family simply donated it without having it appraised.
1