General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Kevin Skinner
JRE Clips
comments

Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Joe Rogan - Neil deGrasse Tyson on Eric Dubay u0026 Flat Earth" video.

So what's Dubay's excuse for why he refuses to debate any of his challengers?
5
Said Flat Earther parades around going "Yeah, he totally ran away from me", then blacklists anybody that goes "I'll take you on instead" because the only reason he accepted the challenge was because he knew that Neil wouldn't.
5
Tyson is one man. Why does Dubay hide in his channel, refusing to debate ANYBODY and deleting comments and banning people when he and his cronies get caught lying? If Youtube didn't allow channel owners to delete comments and ban people, Eric Dubay would have shit his pants so much he'd no longer be potty trained.
5
Did you know that it's been proven that basketballs are flat? If you zoom in on them close enough, the curvature disappears.
4
If you posted a link, it probably got marked as spam. Youtube's system is screwy like that and has been ultra buggy since about April.
4
You know that stock plot where the loser gets people to go to an event by promising that X important person will be there without actually asking them first? That, except that Neil got annoyed and told him to fuck off. Meanwhile, Eric Dubay gets challenged on a regular basis. He never debates anybody and routinely blocks and bans people that challenge him because he's absolutely terrified of losing his perfect record of "By Default".
4
.... have you bothered looking at how much it's supposedly pear-shaped by? It's less than 50 miles. You aren't going to see a deviation of only 1-2% on a photo unless your name is Superman.
3
Eric Dubay doesn't want to debate anybody. Are you man enough to tell your master to accept the recent challenge? 10,000 dollars AND the ability to video tape him deleting a channel. Come on, why is he afraid? Why are YOU afraid to challenge him to it?
3
Assert without proof Quote bible Call anybody that disagrees a NASA shill Delete comments and ban people that call you out when you're wrong. Those four?
3
If we made the Earth and a cue ball the same size, the mountains wouldn't amount to much more than the chalk.
3
You have spoken with God? Really? I hope God agrees with that claim come judgement time, because if you falsely claim to speak for him, you will be damned for eternity.
3
@davidhale8177 The term "Far East" came into popular usage from Great Britain expanding their empire past India to the far reaches of Asia in the 1800s. It has nothing to do with the shape of the Earth. Far West would be the New World.
2
So fun fact. If you have an object revolve around another object while spinning, the number of times that it points a specific direction is always either one more or one less than the number of times that point points that the object in the center, depending on whether the rotation and revolution are in the same direction or opposite directions for any n rotations over 1. (1 rotation, same direction, would be tidal locked like the moon) Clockwise/Clockwise or Counterclockwise/Counter clockwise 4 rotations during one revolution will point at the sun 3 times in the time it takes to return to its original position (when the moving object is at 120, 240, and 360 degrees). 10 rotations, 9 points. 100 rotations, 99. CW/CCW or CCW/CW will point 5 times for 4 rotations at 72, 144, 216, 288, and 360 degrees, 11 points for for 10, 101 for 100 etc. You're welcome to count. This means that calculate it by formula without any sort of messy "guessing to make it work." It's awfully convenient that whatever cosmic being set up the Flat Earth was kind enough to follow that same pattern.
2
I mean.... your leaders include a pervert that drinks his own urine and a man that writes songs of worship for a mass murderer.
2
@squirrel4421 Please. Eric picked one fight he knew wouldn't go through and claimed that as his first, last, and only victory because he's not willing to risk anything but winning by default.
2
@yeysk828shgdy37 Alien, Dubay only agreed because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show up. When ANYBODY ELSE challenges him, he refuses and bans anybody that challenges him on his channel. It's hard to "destroy" anybody when the only type of victory he's willing to attempt is "By default".
2
You know, from what I've heard, Tyson "chickened out" because Rogan tried to schedule him without his permission. Meanwhile, Eric not only refuses to debate ANYBODY that will actually show, but also deletes comments and bans people that dare criticize and challenge him because how dare "critical thinkers" not be brainless obedient sheep. That's speaking at the volume of a hurricane.
2
@Mr.TomMoon For fuck's sake. Rockets do not push on things. Tom, there is a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum where the total momentum of a system (mass * velocity) remains constant unless an outside force alters it. This is for all parts of that system combined This means that as rocket loses mass, it will gain speed relative to how much mass it loses and what speed and direction it lost in. They work by mass manipulation, NOT by pushing on shit. This is why rocket engines are shaped like hourglasses: because there's another principle of fluid mechanics called "choked flow" that causes gasses and liquids to speed up when they travel through a narrow opening.
2
@Mr.TomMoon ..... so are you saying that vacuums have the ability to nullify one of the fundamental laws of physics?
2
Siiiigh. Flat Earthers really don't get it, do you? Down is not the bottom of the ball. Down is the CENTER of the ball.
2
Because he's not a scientist of geology?
2
@FDupp-og1mi .... why would it crush you? Furthermore, you do realize that gravity's formula explicitly exerts greater force on heavier objects and less force on smaller ones because the mass of the two objects is multiplied together right? News flash: Electrostatic Force works the same way. It's the exact same formula with mass replaced with charge and a different constant. Also, you realize that buoyancy works by the air being pulled down too and pushing the lighter materials out of the way, right? That's why objects don't float when the fluid is weightless or in freefall. I guess they're falling too because they're more dense than a medium they're not even adjacent too? I wonder how that works....
2
@FDupp-og1mi I would assume it has to do with the amount of water, with it only affecting a very small amount and that adding up over a very large area. What causes the high tide to be directly under the moon and directly opposite it on your fake Flat Earth? Is it "It just does" or "Shut up and stop asking questions brainwashed sheeple?"
2
 @dubrulphilippe3815 Religion, the Bible, and the Church would never, ever lie to you either.
2
You know what's pretty pathetic? Dubay only agreed to debate because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show. When anybody else challenges him, he immediately blacklists anybody that calls him out for being wrong and refuses all takers. Go on, go crawl back to him and ask him directly why he doesn't debate and why he won't take McToon's challenge. Ten thousand dollars to sit on a plane AND the opportunity to publicly delete the channel and he still goes screaming from the room when it's brought up. I wonder why.... So much brown nosing of a man that shits his pants when challenged that I'm not entirely sure that Flat Earthers aren't just perverts with a scat fetish.
2
Eric Dubay doesn't debate anybody. He challenged Neil solely because he knew Neil would refuse, and refuses to tarnish his perfect record of "By Default". He's so afraid of having to actually defend his position that he actively bans people the criticize his videos. That's why his comment section is nothing but ass kissing.
2
@jibteenuc9836 Care to point me to a single debate he's actually done? He's been challenged quite a few times. He was also challenged last year to get on a plane with one of the debunkers and fly one of the flights he claims doesn't exist. 10,000 dollars set aside in a legally binding contract and the chance to film himself deleting the debunker's youtube account. He shat his pants and ran away. Go to his comment section and call him out on something. The bigger the lie, the better. Go debunk his Apollo claims, or ask him why his "lighthouses visible too far" provides no actual proof that the lighthouses are actually visible at those distances, or the fact that he keeps using Bart Sibrel's work ten years after Bart got caught faking evidence and the same "stars moving above the Flat Earth" animation even though he knows damn well that the southern stars do NOT move like that. Go call him out directly to his face about the fact that his buddies in Level tried to openly scam the audience with their "you can't see the light source from the darkness" demonstration - where the camera is in darkness because the rim of the flashlight is between the camera and the bulb, blocking the light. If he actually responds, keep at it. Let me know how long your comment stays there. You won't, because no Flat Earther would dare bite their master's hand.
2
@Trig-mm4rt Go on, little boy. Go ask your precious Eric why he refuses to debate anybody. Keep hounding him until he gives a good answer. We'll see how long it takes you to ban you.
2
News flash buddy: Eric only challenged him because he knew he'd say no. He refuses to debate literally anybody else because he's not willing to risk his perfect record of "By Default." Go on, little sheep. Explain why your masters "who know what they're talking about" have to rely on blacklisting people that challenge them and muting people mid-debate. Explain why your "truth" movement has more pants pissing that a diaper fetishist's porn folder.
2
Yes and?
2
Because religion tries to make it illegal not to.
2
.... because it's not a perfect circle. Every bay and peninsula and gulf will increase the length of the shoreline. See also the coastline paradox. By the way, the circumference of a circle is 2pi*radius. If Antarctica were the bounding edge, it would have a shoreline much longer than 30,000 km.
1
No, it came from rejection of science due to hatred of authority and biblical worship
1
@squirrel4421 Sure he would. And that's why he spends all day with diaper rash from shitting his pants every time somebody challenges him. Then tell your master to go accept McToon's challenge. 10,000 dollars and the opportunity to delete his channels. You won't, because you're too busy brown nosing.
1
@jeremyfondo4320 "Where do you think the 2trillion rumbsfeld couldnt find went" You mean the one that was occasionally reported on for about two years before 9/11? Or did your precious "truthers" forget to mention that. The money didn't go anywhere. The government's RECORDS were lost because their accounting transactions were stored on 10-15 year old pre-Windows computers whose hardware was failing because they were from the stone age and they didn't have universally compatible software to transfer the data between, I'm sure your "truth" movement told you all about that.... oh wait, no they shut everything up and pretended it was stolen.
1
Eric Dubay only accepted a debate with Joe because he knew Joe wouldn't show up and so scheduled it without his permission. He won't dare risk his perfect record of "By Default" If he were actually forced to debate somebody, he'd leave with more soiled pants than a babyfur convention.
1
@casoarcano830 Why are you so arrogant as to think we haven't? We've all watched his garbage. It's as dishonest as every other conspiracy theorist. You do realize why his comment section is 100% supportive comments, right? Because anybody that calls him out when he lies or tries to debate him is immediately banned
1
@casoarcano830 Um... yeah, because anti-semetic content is a violation of Youtube's Terms of Service, that legal document he signed when he joined this website. Gee, i wonder if the reason his account keeps getting suspended is because he writes songs glorifying Fuhrer Adolf. Go on, go to Dubay. Ask him why he continues using Bart Sibrel's work ten years after Bart got caught red-handed faking evidence. Go ask him why his "lighthouses are visible too far away" video contains nothing but tourist pictures and no evidence whatosever that they're visible from the distance he claims. Go ask him why his 200 proofs contains claims that have never actually been tested in the modern day. Go ask him why his cronies on Level tried to outright scam the audience by showing "the light source can't be seen from the dark" - with the rim of the flashlight between the camera and the bulb. You won't. You won't dare say a word against him because you'll be immediately booted if you don't kiss his ass. There's more pants-wetting in Flat Earth than a babyfur convention.
1
@casoarcano830 So.... did you ask Dubay those questions yet? Or did you coward out?
1
@casoarcano830 "It takes a great deal of courage to stand up to your enemies. It takes a great deal more to stand up to your friends" - Albus Dumbledore. You, sir, do not have an ounce of courage in you. Just another scat fetish pervert brown nosing a man that shits his pants every time he's challenged.
1
@casoarcano830 No. You aren't. You are more terrified than a child crying for their mother. You want to claim you have courage? Then PROVE IT Go to Eric's channel. Click on Level. Confront your master to his fucking face about the fact that his video contains sleight of hand scams that rely on his viewers being too stupid to realize that light doesn't pass through solid opaque objects. You won't. You are so brainwashed you can't even conceive that you're being lied to, and would sooner cut your own arm off then confront your cult about their lies.
1
Go tell Dubay to actually accept the challenges he gets. I'd love to see him debate, wouldn't you? Oh right, you won't, because you know that if you speak up against your master, you'll immediately get banned.
1
Your altimeter measures altitude through air pressure. It has no clue how far you are from the ground. A plane cannot physically fly higher by accident. If it tries to "fly out into space due to the curvature," it'll sink back down to the given pressure as the air becomes thinner and fails to support its weight.
1
Your lead Flat Earthers are notorious for deleting comments and banning people because they are routinely called out for being wrong or lying..... Censored to protect means kept secret to profit.
1
@michaelsellers5095 Okay. Drawing the movement of the stars on the Flat Earth map results in a paradox where objects are magically in multiple places at once moving in a manner that should be overlapping but isn't. That doesn't make sense, now does it? And yet your "truth" movement covers it up like a priest hiding a pedophile. Go on, "critical thinker", why is that? You don't have the ability to question anything. You just think that going against the grain makes you smart.
1
@robyn7165 "we all know when you purchase a globe it always has a disclaimer on it that states “not for educational purposes”" ...... that's because the 10 dollar pieces of trash you buy at Walmart have outdated, inaccurate, or simplified information on them that makes them unsuited to be used for anything more than making your room look pretty because they don't want to pay the royalty licensing to get real updated maps.
1
You do realize that Tyson "backed out" because they tried to schedule him without his permission right? What excuse does Dubay have? Dubay refuses to attempt any debate he cannot win by default and aggressively blocks comments on his channel calling him out when he lies.
1
@MomoBrandt Monica, the reason that Dubay's channel is 100% positive comments is because he aggressively censors it. Anybody that tries to debate him or anybody that counters his claims is immediately blocked. If you go on and ask him a nice easy slowball like... say.... why he refuses to remove Bart SIbrel's "faking the distance" from his 200 proofs even though Bart got caught red-handed editing his footage to skip over segments that disproved him, you'll be banned just like the rest of the "shills".
1
Science is supposed to change as new information is gained. This is to avoid "This is how things are and we will never change" like Religion does.
1
@Jib Teenuc What evidence do you have that they're afraid? Did you confront Dubay about lying yet? How long did it take you to get banned? Or did you run away, again, just like every other "critical thinker" ever? Why do you care how long it takes? You do realize that people have lives outside of you, right Karen?
1
@jibteenuc9836 "He could do so to please me, for one (THAT's a great reason)." Why the hell would he care what you think? Your arrogance is out of control, Karen.
1
@jibteenuc9836 So did you confront Eric Dubay yet, or did you run away with your pants leaking like all the others?
1
Dubay only challenged Tyson because he knew Tyson would decline. When anybody else challenges him, he soils his pants, runs away, and deletes comments. It would be catastrophic to the Flat Earth scam if Dubay risked his perfect record of "by default" by actually debating somebody.
1
Um... the sun is nowhere even close to the position in the sky it would be if it was only a few thousand miles high. This is conveniently ignored.
1
@kash5614 "stop pushing one narrative to all our children as FACTS when indeed they're NOT AT ALL." Okay. How old were you when your parents dragged you screaming to church?
1
@Trig-mm4rt You're not really very smart, are you? Tyson vs Dubay is like that stock plot you see in sitcoms where they get people to show up to an event by promising that X important person will be there without asking them first, except that unlike in TV where they always show for the happy ending, they got told to buzz off. The ONLY reason Dubay agreed to debate NDT is because he knew from the beginning that Tyson would say No. If Tyson had said yes, he would almost certainly have chickened out, just he does with literally anybody else because he is not willing to risk his perfect record of "By Default". There are 7.8 billion people on this planet. Dubay is afraid to debate 7.8 billion minus 1.
1