General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Kevin Skinner
JRE Clips
comments

Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Joe Rogan on the Moon Landing Conspiracy" video.

Maqua, photographs are not size accurate. The objects in them will grow and shrink depending on what lens you use, with wide angle lenses like Apollo used making background objects smaller than they actually are. By the way, the moon is actually tiny compared to the amount of space it takes up in the sky. The Earth would mathematically appear slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length to the naked eye, just saying. It would not fill the sky, your doubt is based on a lie. Just remember, the world you find at the bottom of that rabbit hole is just a dream, it's not real.
5
About the "truth's protective layers"> That's exactly what it is.
3
@PMunk Also, by the way, American Moon is NOT respected. That's the video that got caught being so dishonest that they tried to pass off attributed artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze". And just as a head's up, you should not trust anything Massimo Mazzucco tells you. He's a scam artist. Before getting into Apollo, he made his money shilling fake medicine and got rich off of peoples' deaths.
3
"You know that contemporary NASA astronauts have asserted that they cannot transgress the Van Allen Radiation Belt because they can't launch a craft sufficiently shielded to protect human cargo through the Belt against the the planetary amount of radiation, due to the required weight of the necessary shielding." Um, no..... that's a claim asserted by YOU PEOPLE, not anybody that's actually remotely related to NASA's astronauts. You insist the shielding must be lead because you know nothing about how radiation actually works beyond what is told on Saturday morning cartoons. There are multiple types of radiation. Lead is for X and Gamma radiation. The belts are beta radiation. Beta radiation requires LOW-DENSITY, lightweight shielding, because it creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy matter. That same process, where particle radiation is shot as a piece of heavy metal, is how your dentist creates their x-rays in the first place. ---------- Also, by the way, the issue they're having isn't radiation poisoning. It's damage to the on-board computers, because modern machines use a completely different type of hardware technology. Nobody's used magnetic core memory in 50 years.
2
You do realize that the Nazis were anti-socialist in policy and only took the name and some talking points that to win votes with their fingers crossed right? I'm guessing you believe that Kim Jong Un is a democratically elected president, right? After all, North Korea is a democratic people's republic. It's there in the name so it most be true!
2
First public color TV broadcast was a recording of the famous opera Carmen in 1953, 16 years before the moon landings.
2
The flag has a rod through the top of it. It's hanging like a shower curtain.
2
There's a second hatch in the nose of the ship where it connects to the LEM.
2
.... um, traffic lights can tell whether there's cars or not. They can have infrared detectors or pressure plates, though many particularly in cities are simply set to timers. If you have a problem with it, go write a letter to your city council for being cheapskates. That ain't NASA's problem.
2
You mean when he said that they didn't go back because of money?
2
.... by calling NASA and having them broadcast the call over their radio broadcasts. This is no different than calling up your radio station to request a song on the air.
2
@deanbolam9630 I mean... the landline doesn't have to reach any farther than Texas, a routine call. They're just connecting the call to the radio comms, a trivial task that can be achieved with a switchboard with one or two buttons. The only difference is that NASA's radio dishes are much larger than those you listen to music on.
2
Ah yes, the one where the director went crawling to NASA to have them help make a movie calling themselves liars, with plot holes large enough to drive a train through.
2
They transmitted it back via radio, which was rerecorded onto a television-capable format on Earth.
2
Dust doesn't float in a vacuum. Without air resistance it will drop back at the same rate that everything else does.
1
@DreaminBig Um.... yes more. Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars to land two people for a few days half a dozen times. And you people complain that we aren't mining that shit and building colonies and bases. Also.... if you don't think people are going to be bitching about the amount spent on Ukraine louder than a Dragonforce concert in a hurricane come next election, please voluntarily cancel your voter registration. If voting required an IQ test, you would fail it.
1
@DreaminBig ... and your evidence for this is.....? Oh right, you don't have any, but they must be because grr government bad evil. They'll have to get in line. Your "truth" movement's cackling like a hyena in the deposit line.
1
Um..... that fake interview's still on the internet. Even if you can't find it on Youtube, it'll definitely be on Dailymotion. Just making sure though, you do realize that we know who the actor playing Kubrick is right? And that the interview cannot possibly be real because it has references to events that happened after Kubrick's death right?
1
..... because the ground isn't flat? They're not on a cue ball. There's hills and rises everywhere.
1
Christianity has a long history of stealing names from other mythologies and using them as other names for their demons and devils because the church is more dishonest than the government. That's why Hell is called "Hell" - because there's a goddess in Norse mythology named "Hel" who rules over one of their afterlives. Note that Hel is dishonorable place to go, not torture for sinners. It's where people that die of old age and disease go, as opposed to those that die in battle. You know, where Christians would prefer to go as opposed to the fields of eternal battle.
1
@mj77777 You spent centuries cooking up fake crimes to persecute Jews for "killing Jesus" then passed laws forcing them them into professions that you found sinful so that you could continue persecuting them for your own stereotypes. Yes, that actually happened. You publicly tortured them for entertainment. You excommunicated and murdered people for daring to challenge your power You care so little about your own god that changed his birthday so that you could steal pagan holidays. And for what? A "Savior" that claimed that only people that followed him would be saved, then deliberately chose not to send a prophet to Asia, or the Americas, or the Pacific for over a thousand years, dooming many, many good people for not believing in a god they've never heard of. All are welcome to try for Heaven. Except you, young Indian child. You're going to be born into a non-Christian family then die a child because I say so and burn in hell with nothing you can do to stop it. Oh, and how many centuries have you been lying about the rapture coming soon. It won't be in your lifetime, or your child's or your grandchild's because it's never coming. Jesus lied to the disciples that he was going to return before they died, then walked out like a father "buying cigarettes".
1
@mj77777 I did what now? I edited my original comment to fix spelling and grammar because I forgot "one of" and other minor changes. That was last night; I haven't edited it since. Youtube's been deleting random comments for about a year now.
1
Some of them have just been amoral assholes that will work for whoever pays their bills.
1
He said that the footage of them landing was a simulation. Which it was. They showed simulations with models to accompany the radio chatter because there was no camera outside to watch the ship land.
1
..... do you honestly believe that 4000x zoom would see small objects on an object 240,000 miles away?
1
In all likelihood, we'll never actually meet another alien race before we go extinct. Anything we find out there is going to be ruins of a civilization that we missed by millions of years.
1
The issue isn't that it's not flying far enough. It's that you're overestimating how far it'd fly on Earth. People are saying it should fly "higher" for shuffles and sprays that wouldn't even reach six inches on Earth. There's a scene where the astronauts are digging a hole and the dust goes flying over their heads with scoops that don't even reach their knees, and at one point the astronaut shuffles their feet about one inch and the dust sprays ten feet sideways.
1
You realize he's referring to the pre-EVA show, right? There was no camera filming the ship's landing, so they did demonstrations with models to accompany the radio chatter. They're uploaded onto Youtube and you can clearly see "Animation" or some equivalent flash across the screen in bold white letters as it happens. There's not one person over the age of five on this planet except for you people pretending that those were supposed to be real.
1
NASA lost the BACKUP copy they made. They still have the original recording, but went looking for the other ones to see if it was better. The rock in the Netherlands has nothing to do with NASA. The family that donated it simply assumed it was a moon rock based on when it was received (a year before any of the moon rocks were actually handed out, by the way), and didn't get it appraised.
1
Pat.... you really don't get what's going on, do you? The money is a trap. Do not take it. Who the fuck is stupid enough to let a man they know hates them film them swearing on the Bible for money???? It won't convince a single person and it will 100% be presented in a way to make you look corrupt. Neil Armstrong was also not Christian, just FYI, and the man that "asked" him to swear had previously been arrested for stalking and trespassing against him.
1
..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
1
@reneesantiago6496 Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary. Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart. Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you. Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that. Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
1
Faking it and getting caught would be even more catastrophic, and there's about a 100% chance that the Russians would sniff them out. They already know about the "impossible to cross" radiation belts. You cannot bluff while holding marked cards. Best case scenerio, Russia blackmails them. Worst case, Russia decides to be an ass and announce the fakery publicly. The reality is: we didn't go back because Apollo cost over 130 billion dollars (adjusted for inflation) and the politicians in charge didn't want to pay to continue it. Especially since Apollo-era technology is too overpriced for what it should do and is single use and requires you to build a new rocket every single launch, so it's not sustainable as an ongoing thing. ---------------- By the way, actors on wires are never supposed to cross paths. This is because if one actor walks around the other, their two wire sets will wrap together like the stripes on a candy cane and they will become tangled. --------------- Also, fun fact, not only have those videos of "people on set" been proven to be fake, one of them was produced by one of the debunkers under a second account to see how many people he could scam. Even after he released the video of himself he spliced to make it, people still thought it was real.
1
Apollo cost about 130 billion dollars adjusted for inflation.
1
@Queenmebonnie ..... because it cost hundreds of billions of dollars to do so, so without the Cold War excuse, nobody really wants to pay the price tag. I expect when they do return, it won't be five seconds before you people crawl out of your holes with "It's fake because uh.... uh.... the lighting's wrong and the astronaut's fart is too high-pitched!"
1
@Queenmebonnie ... we literally have a political party in this country that does nothing but screech like harpies if money gets spent on anything but the military. By research, I assume you mean "watching conspiracy videos on youtube" with a glassy-eyed stare oblivious to the fact that your "truth" movement has been caught lying about and forging evidence many, many times.
1
Ralph, do you just believe everything you read on the internet? First of all, Armstrong was NOT CHRISTIAN and the person who 'asked' him to swear had previously been ARRESTED for stalking and trespassing against him. Considering that Sibrel acted like a massive douchebag towards him and the other astronauts, why should he swear? If you treated me like that, I'd have told him to take his bible and shove it up his ass. By the way, three of the other astronauts swore (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean). You people lie and claim they didn't or make excuses as to why they didn't count. -------------- You're really gullible if you believe the "confession". The name of the mission was only create AFTER IT HAPPENED and didn't exist at the time. LBJ's whereabouts are known for the days it supposedly happened. The list of guests includes completely unrelated people for fucking Roswell UFO bullshit. And the "fire where he lost everything" appears to have been happened a year and a half AFTER the "confession" was supposedly filmed according to a GoFundMe put out by his friends/family. But but but but it must be true! A video on the internet says it was and a channel that had to shut off their comments because they got caught faking evidence would never, ever lie!
1
@ralphhenderson7270 Awwww, the little baby twuther thinks he's so smart because he blindly believes whatever the hoax leaders spoonfeed him. Go on, little baby twuther. Explain why I'm wrong. You can't, can you? Are you going to actually counter me, or are you just going to pee your pants and throw a dirty diaper tantrum like you people always do?
1
.... by calling NASA and having them relay the call over radio, a technology that radio stations had been using since the 1930s.
1
..... you mean an expensive project that would cost hundreds of billions of dollars of investment which serves little practical purpose at the current time because we are not at the stage of technological development where leaving Earth to go to Mars is feasible.
1
And we should believe Enoch...... why? Especially since it's NOT part of the Bible and was rejected by both the jews that originally wrote it AND the church elders? Justin - pray that you are correct, because heretics don't go to heaven.
1
@justinalexander2061 And you have NO EVIDENCE AT ALL of your immoavable pillars beyond "the bible says so". By that merit, I might as well believe that the Earth rests in the boughs of Yggdrasil because that's very clearly the case when you read the old Norse mythology. Without evidence, your stories are just stories. Incidentally, if the Earth is resting on pillars, why does the Book of Job claim that it "hangs from nothing?" That would imply that it's floating, because nobody claims that an object is resting on something is hanging. "Lucifer's space agenies" want you to know the Truth. God wants you to be a dumb sheep that asks no questions, simply accepts what you're told, and bahs when the preacher says baah.
1
@justinalexander2061 And Eric's a fucking fraud that has been debunked many, many times and has to resort to censorship to keep his channel free of the truth. Go ask him why his 200 proofs contains "proofs" from people who got caught fabricating evidence. Go ask him why his con artist friends openly fake "proof" and "demonstrations" directly in front of the camera in Level. Go ask him why he continues to use the same model of the "stars circling above the Flat Earth", a DELIBERATE LIE because he ALREADY KNOWS that the Southern stars do not move like that. Go ask him why he has to continually delete comments and ban people that dare speak the TRUTH when they call him out for not only being wrong, but deliberately and consistently lying. You won't, because you know that you'll be banned instantly if you dare speak against Jesus Dubay.
1
There is not a single substance on Earth that will not break if you hit it hard enough.
1
This seems like a tall tale that dwarfs the Empire State Building because anybody with common sense realizes that A. this is how you run out of workers and B. this is how your rocket BLOWS UP when people start being careless or cutting corners in the name of time.
1
Well, low gravity's basically impossible without CGI that didn't exist for decades afterwards. Slow motion and wires have tells that don't match the Apollo footage and aren't suitable for three hour long shots. A Hollywood effect only lasts a few seconds.
1
Um.... the top temperature on the moon is only about 250F. Most metals melt between 1000-3000F. Nobody's going to build anything out of mercury.
1
If you don't question every lie the "truth seekers" tell you.you're just a sheep following a different shepherd.
1
So how does near-vacuum and atmosphere exist side-by-side on Flat Earth? Under the very same laws that make "globe Earth impossible", the atmosphere should immediately expand and equalize pressure inside the dome, not form a pressure gradient that reaches 1% hundreds or thousands of miles below the "barrier". Strangely, the Flat Earth "free thinkers" refuse to answer this.....
1
@maxconspira2962 It has a gradient that reaches 85% pressure at Denver, a populated city, 50% pressure at about the height of Mt Everest, and 1% at less than 100 miles high. And yet your dome is supposedly somewhere between 100-200 miles high, where they tried to "bomb through it" and 3,000 miles high where the sun is. So.... what's filling the rest of your dome? What's filling the mostly empty space? Why does pressure not equalize inside of it? How does a barrier OUTSIDE of the pressure gradient, on the other side of near-vacuum from the atmosphere, prevent the equalizing INSIDE of it? Why will none of you discuss this? ---------- By the way, the pressure at the deepest part of the ocean is about 16,000 PSI. That's only six miles deep. Your dome is holding back..... how much water exactly? An infinite amount? I'm not sure how God has any time to listen to your prayers when he'd be spending the entirety of his time keeping his dome from cracking like an egg. Or maybe it's just made of some rare unobtainium material that defies mortal knowledge that somehow never breaks under an infinite amount of pressure. ---------- Rockets are not airplanes. They do not push on external objects. They expel their own mass to create thrust through a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system (mass time velocity), remains constant unless an outside force alters it. This means that if you take part of an object's mass and shoot it in one direction, the remaining mass will alter velocity to compensate relative to the direction and speed it was shot so that Ejected Momentum + Remaining Momentum = Original. Note that expelling the mass into space and "not moving because there's nothing to push again" means that you have changed mass and not changed velocity, meaning that the momentum has changed. In other words, YOUR ARGUMENT breaks the law. You want to claim we're "talking physics now" and yet are willingly ignorant of one of most fundamental laws of physics that is literally half of a college freshman midterm. But who cares how many laws of physics YOU break when you can shout God Moves in Mysterious Ways and hand wave away all criticism. ----------- Also, nobody claims that sound travels in space. Transmissions from spacecraft are radio broadcasts, which are electromagnetic radiation like light.
1
.... except you don't, because you understand only enough for "Radiation = Bad" and stop because that gives you the conclusion you want. People with more interest and understanding are fully aware that the hoaxers have spent twenty years making up "six feet of lead claims" out of thin air and twisting every comment because they don't know how radiation actually works and have no interest in learning or being honest about it.
1
Do you think it's because he's not Christian, or because the guy that asked him to swear previously harassed him to the point that Armstrong had to call the police when he resorted to stalking and trespassing?
1
@eternallyg Why should he after being harassed, lied to, and insulted by a man that had previously committed criminal actions against him? Why should he swear? If somebody treated me the way Bart treated him, I'd tell him to take his bible, cover it in porcupine spines, and shove it up his ass. What alternative universe are you from where you think that would help? Bart harassed the astronauts multiple times and three of the other astronauts (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean) DID swear. In fact, after getting them to swear, he didn't stop, trying to goad Mitchell with "I'll hit you so you can sue me" and refused to leave until getting literally booted out the door. You frauds immediately lied and claimed that that didn't count, or flat-out pretended they didn't.
1
That actually is a quote by Wilbur Wright. He was basically telling people at a party that wanted him to give a speech to f-off because he hated public speaking.
1
..... you mean when NASA had double its current budget and it wasn't spread between a dozen lesser projects hogging up all of their funds.
1
@jupiterjohnson7191 First of all, what is your people's obsession with computing power? That is NOT the limiting factor and even if it were, you have nothing to prove it beyond incredulity All I hear is cell phones calculators blah blah blah. Not once, not one single time, have I heard anybody even attempt to calculate what was actually NEEDED. I've also never heard a single one of you comment on the existence of NASA's computing bank of mainframes that actually ran the hard calculations, let alone their capabilities. ---------- By the way, do you know what the downside to those super tiny pin needle computer components is? They are many, many times WEAKER, not stronger, against radiation than Apollo-era components, and become more susceptible the smaller you make them. Congratulations, you made the mission harder. Gee I wonder if that's why the Orion video people like to deliberately misrepresent was talking about the belts' ability to damage the electronics.... ------------- News flash buddy. We can't afford those wars either. We are massively in DEBT and our military spending is a cancerous mass that increases by more than NASA's entire budget every single year. And in case you haven't noticed, we have a party in this country called the Republicans that screech like harpies at every single penny increase that's not on the military. Do you know why the Space Shuttle shut down after 30 years in use? Because Congress refused to pay for both that and the plans to return to the moon simultaneously. So.... Apparently NASA told this big secret that only a few people are supposed to have the actual details to Congress - an organization notorious for infighting, faction wars, and personal schemes, and most importantly, whose members change every few years. That makes total sense.
1
You do realize that the "Six feet of lead" is literally made up because idiots like you don't know anything about how radiation works so they can simply make up whatever bullshit they want and you'll beg for more, right? News flash buddy: no space agency would ever shield the belts with lead because they're beta radiation, the type of radiation that creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy metals.
1
Man didn't attempt to return the South Pole for 40 years and the deepest part of the ocean for 50 either. Those are fake too right? Right?
1
The one that proved that the "truth" movement is a scam when Bart got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove shots of the Earth being filmed without his trick?
1
Is Jarrah still banning people that bring up the fact that he threw a big tantrum and got his critics accounts deleted by flagging their videos with fake copyright strikes?
1
Everybody know that you'll call that a hoax too.
1
.... who the flying f*ck said they landed on a landing strip?
1
So, I watched the Gemini 8 press conference a few weeks ago. Armstrong acts exactly the same as he did there, three years before it was "faked".
1
History does not use your warped idea of the scientific method. Historical proof does not require repetition. Any form of data verification and observation counts as evidence, whether humans go back or not. Such as Japan creating exact replicas of the Apollo landing backgrounds while converting their terrain maps into 30 models, even though the US would most likely not have been able to sufficiently obtain this information in the 60s and there's no evidence whatsoever that it was photographed by a probe. The reason this is "fake" is because.... er... um...... IT JUST IS SHUT UP SHILL!!!!! I don't see a single one of your fake "scientists" claiming that the 1960 descent to the Challenger Deep, the deepest part of the ocean, was faked or inconclusive because it wasn't repeated for more than 50 years.
1
The issue they're having with the belts isn't people. It's the fact that modern integrated circuits, which replaced magnetic core memory in the 70s, are many, many times weaker to radiation than the computers used on Apollo.
1
You are aware that Bart Sibrel's been caught fabricating evidence before right? It's pretty fucking sad that you people believe his fraud "confession" when the actor tries to name his "secret project" after a phrase that wasn't invented until the 1970s, AFTER the landings had already happened.
1
Head's up, modern computers are WEAKER to radiation than the parts used in the 60s. This is also true of static electricity and I believe EMPs. This is a fundamental flaw in how computing technology works. Okay, so you know how Apollo-era computers are these big bulky things and you know how today's parts are these super tiny, super conductive chips with circuits so small you can't even see them? The smaller you make them, the easier it becomes for even a single spark to do a lot more damage, so all of those integrated chips you take for granted are many, many times more susceptible. This problem has not been solved. It constantly gets WORSE year after year after year, and it's a real pain in the rear because the technology to make better chips progresses much, much faster than the technology to protect it does. It's so difficult and expensive that by the time your specialized hardened parts are finished, they're already obsolete.
1
@justinherbert9146 And once again, it's the same old bullshit from the tired old sheep herd. First of all, you do realize that the Apollo calculations were done on mainframes, right? RIGHT??? The hoaxers told you that the on-board computers were built to process output generated by another computer whose data was transmitted to them, not that they calculated it themselves.... right? Right? No, they didn't, because that would require honesty, a concept as repulsive to "critical thinkers" as garlic to a vampire. Second, nobody gives a shit about your laptop, or watch, or calculator. Boot it up, and tell me how long it takes to fly to the moon. Oh wait, it can't, because no matter how sophisticated it is, without a GIANT ROCKET, it doesn't move six inches. You people bitch and bitch and bitch about how much more computing power your tamagachi has. Not a single one of you sheep has the balls to even attempt to estimate what would be NEEDED.
1
@justinherbert9146 .... you mean a project that went 30 years with more than 10 times the number of flights? Two failures out of about 130 fligths is a 98% success rate, by the way. You really don't have a leg to stand on, do you? All you do is jump from talking point to talking point without an original thought in your head because you can't counter a word I say.
1
@justinherbert9146 ... and that was first reported on the Apollo missions, with Apollo 16 and 17 taking special helmets to try and measure it. Your leaders told you about ALFMED right? They didn't try and claim that this was only reported on the space shuttle... right? Oh dear, they lied to you again. Edit: also, it's about 240,000, not 500,000, and most of the area between 400 and 240,000 is nothing but empty void.
1
@justinherbert9146 I missed the "and back" while reading hastily. .... how is three million miles without a fatality impressive? STS-61-C, the Space Shuttle Columbia mission directly before the Challenger disaster, flew almost 3 million miles ON ITS OWN. You know, because spacecraft need to keep flying to not come crashing back to Earth. Also, I like how you people deliberately ignore the time the oxygen tank blew up because "almost dead" isn't good enough. I have a great idea! Let's fake an accident! That'll totally help us "deceive the masses" and not shoot ourselves in the foot with a rocket launcher when the outside meddlers start rooting through our stuff during the inevitable investigation. -------------- Jesus fucking Christ. I know parrots with more originality. So, you do realize that dust clouds don't form in a vacuum right? Without air resistance, every single grain of dust will be blown away from the ship and not come back. And considering that that the ship used a pressure sensor to shut off the engine WHILE STILL FLYING, the dust would have to go up into the exhaust to get on top of the legs. Also, you can see radial lines in the dust in many of the photographs directly under the bell indicating wind-based erosion. By the way, you know who the person that discovered the "no crater" was? Neil Armstrong. Within one minute of climbing off the lander, he himself calls out that there's no crater, so apparently NASA already knew it should be there long before you people examined it and thought they'd rather deliberately call attention to their own mistake instead of...you know... grabbing a shovel.
1
@justinherbert9146 Sure it was. And that's why your leaders have had to fake their evidence. And at this point you've run out of tired out arguments. Get working on your new ones. We all know when the return happens in 2025, you'll immediately suck up to the first person to tell you that was fake too.
1
...... dumb question, but where exactly did you get this 20% statistic from? It's completely made up. If you have to lie about your claim, that proves you are wrong.
1
You're extremely gullible, aren't you? Not only has the channel been caught faking evidence before, it's pretty obvious that his story is bullshit. I mean..... he openly calls his project "Slam Dunk" even though the term was invented AFTER the moon landings.
1
1. First of all, mission control has no delay because they're the ones recording. Their half is recorded when it's said, not when it reaches to the moon. Second, the only reason there's "no delay" is because the hoaxers deliberately cherry pick instances or use footage from documentaries that altered the audio to shorten it. Sometimes, they just lie and claim there's no delay even when there is and hope you don't actually watch it (like the "no delay" Nixon phone call where the astronauts don't respond for 7 seconds). If you watch the raw footage, there's delays everywhere. 2. Probably radiation-resistant containers. They do exist; you'll just get searched if you try and use one at the airport. 3. I'm not sure what you mean by "without disturbing the ground". They kick up enough dust to make it hazy at the camera's location hundreds of feet away. It just settles really quickly because there's no air resistance to keep the grains aloft.
1
If I were in a padded bounce house? Absolutely. In a hostile environment where failing to stick the landing and damaging the suit meant instant death....
1
And the people "proving it was fake" ahve themselves been caught red-handed faking evidence.
1
Bart got caught muting audio and skipping over parts of it that disproved him, including shots of them filming without his trick.
1
@8000_k You didn't do your research did you? The petrified wood did not come from NASA, regardless of what dishonest headlines say. It was ASSUMED to be a moon rock based on when it was received and donated from a private collection without actually having it appraised. It does not resemble any of their other samples in size or appearance, it was presented loose on a piece of cardboard while all of NASA's actual moon rock gifts are sealed in airtight plastic to prevent environmental contamination, and it was received a year before anybody else in the world got one, and they were not given to random ex-politicians. Furthermore, the country this was in only received two rocks, both of which were presented to the royal family and both of which are accounted for, so why do they have THREE? So how is an event that NASA had literally nothing to do with any of their fault or business?
1
They even generously told each other their flight plans so that they didn't crash into each other on-route.
1
Um, no. It cost over 130 billion in today's money, and that was with double our current budget at the height of it.
1