Comments by "WALTERBROADDUS" (@WALTERBROADDUS) on "USS Seawolf (S-197) - Guide 321" video.

  1.  @rutabagasteu remind me about a hunting accident story I saw the other day. A hunter somebody's family husky. Guy said he thought it was a coyote.
    9
  2.  @khaelamensha3624  Same principle. BUCK FEVER.🦌 They were more amped o e a sub hunt, than checking if it was Friendly.
    2
  3.  @bkjeong4302  How about the Enterprise Air group at Pearl Harbor? 🤔
    2
  4.  @AdmRose  yes. I believe it was?
    1
  5.  @murrayscott9546  Hmmmmm, why not?🤔
    1
  6.  @jamessimms415  USS Wahoo massacre...
    1
  7. There's no one person to blame. The whole affair is just due to circumstances and policy.
    1
  8.  @michaelkovacic2608  that question is impossible to answer. There are way too many variables in your alternate universe.
    1
  9.  @vikkimcdonough6153  Well.... that sounds good in theory. Just where exactly?
    1
  10.  @johnwolf2829  who's going to do all this repairing work in Singapore? After the slaughter of the population, I don't think you're going to find too many people amped up to be working in a shipyard there?
    1
  11.  @kemarisite  well if they don't explode when you hit a ship, why should they explode at all?
    1
  12.  @johnwolf2829  doesn't it mean taking valuable ship workers already busy in Japan?
    1
  13.  @johnwolf2829  Well....they had a chance to make that calculation. And chose different. 🤷🏽‍♂️
    1
  14.  @johnwolf2829  I think we answered that question? Which is why it wasn't done.
    1
  15.  @johnwolf2829  on the contrary, you're just expressing negative feelings because you did not get positive validation for your idea.
    1
  16.  @AdelineLowry  adding armor as you suggest, takes away for their valuable attributes. Namely speed and maneuverability. Armor is deadweight. The prime attribute of Destroyers and other vessels is speed maneuverability. Add protection, you are going to sacrifice those or weapons as a trade-off.
    1